| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-01-04 | |||
| 16:02:39 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 33 new untriaged bugs (+9 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:43 | bauzas | #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage | |
| 16:02:57 | bauzas | yeah, looks like some new bugs appeared when I was off :) | |
| 16:03:53 | bauzas | looking at some, it seems they can be closed | |
| 16:04:21 | bauzas | but I'll do my homework tomorrow | |
| 16:04:30 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 25 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:04:40 | bauzas | nothing to say about placement, it's winter then | |
| 16:04:42 | bauzas | there* | |
| 16:05:07 | bauzas | any bug to raise in particular, except gate issues ? | |
| 16:06:15 | bauzas | looks not, moving on | |
| 16:06:19 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:06:25 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:06:29 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:06:36 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) | |
| 16:06:51 | bauzas | nothing new on the gate side | |
| 16:07:05 | bauzas | and the placement periodic jobs run fine | |
| 16:07:22 | bauzas | so I guess we can go to the next topic | |
| 16:07:40 | bauzas | unless someone wants to say something | |
| 16:08:31 | bauzas | guess no | |
| 16:08:39 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:08:46 | bauzas | #info Yoga-2 is due Jan 6th | |
| 16:08:53 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-2 | |
| 16:09:33 | artom | That's spec freeze, yeah? | |
| 16:09:39 | bauzas | correct but, | |
| 16:09:47 | bauzas | that was my next question | |
| 16:10:00 | bauzas | do people want to punt the spec freeze until next week ? | |
| 16:10:09 | bauzas | gibi isn't around, melwitt as well | |
| 16:10:39 | bauzas | or, we can just accept some spec approval exceptions if needed | |
| 16:10:43 | sean-k-mooney | i think that makes sense | |
| 16:10:53 | sean-k-mooney | to move it to next week | |
| 16:10:57 | bauzas | lemme look at the number of open specs we have | |
| 16:11:23 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+is:open | |
| 16:11:52 | sean-k-mooney | we have ~10 | |
| 16:12:05 | sean-k-mooney | although i do not expect all of them to be approved this cycle | |
| 16:12:08 | bauzas | looks like we have around 7 specs open for this cycle | |
| 16:12:43 | sean-k-mooney | that sound about right | |
| 16:12:53 | bauzas | we already have 11 accepted specs for this cycle | |
| 16:12:57 | bauzas | #link https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/yoga/approved/ | |
| 16:13:13 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821606 may need a spec unless we agree it shoudl be a specless blueprint or its too late to conisider this cycle | |
| 16:13:34 | bauzas | last cycle, we had 19 accepted specs | |
| 16:13:51 | bauzas | so, yeah, we can accept more open specs | |
| 16:14:01 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: agreed | |
| 16:14:02 | sean-k-mooney | lightbitslabs are lookign to upstream there nova,cinder and os-brick driver | |
| 16:14:17 | sean-k-mooney | but im not sure we will get everthing inline by next week for it to happen this cycle | |
| 16:14:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: at least we need to discuss this blueprint in a new meeting | |
| 16:15:02 | bauzas | and see whether we need a spec or not | |
| 16:15:36 | bauzas | ok, do people have concerns if we punt the spec freeze to Jan 13st ? | |
| 16:15:38 | artom | sean-k-mooney, kinda off-topic, but they better have solid future-rpoof CI | |
| 16:16:16 | sean-k-mooney | they have some downstream ci and said they were workign on a third party ci | |
| 16:16:26 | sean-k-mooney | but ya those are the kind fo thing we woudl need to work out | |
| 16:16:43 | bauzas | this will mean that we will only have 6 weeks between spec freeze and feature freeze, but I don't think it's a problem | |
| 16:16:57 | bauzas | if we accept to punt the spec freeze to next week | |
| 16:17:03 | bauzas | any concerns ? | |
| 16:17:21 | bauzas | 1... | |
| 16:17:23 | bauzas | 2... | |
| 16:17:27 | bauzas | 3... | |
| 16:17:28 | sean-k-mooney | i would suggest punting to next week but plan to not have excptions | |
| 16:17:32 | bauzas | accepted | |
| 16:18:16 | bauzas | #agreed Nova Spec freeze is moved to Jan 13st but after this limit, we won't accept exceptions | |
| 16:18:30 | bauzas | I'll write a ML email about it | |
| 16:18:34 | sean-k-mooney | ++ | |
| 16:18:46 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:18:54 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:19:02 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:19:07 | bauzas | waaah, this link became large | |
| 16:20:06 | gmann | mine are easy one, yoga testing runtime | |
| 16:20:21 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you marked a few os-vif and os-traits changes as priority but they are still open after 3 months, do you want to remove the label ? | |
| 16:20:30 | bauzas | gmann: good point, I'll review it | |
| 16:20:52 | gmann | thx | |
| 16:21:14 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: just looking at them now | |
| 16:21:21 | sean-k-mooney | i think i did that because i wanted other to review | |
| 16:21:27 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: the changes in question are https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/765912 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/765970 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/786999 | |
| 16:22:22 | sean-k-mooney | ill review them again today and see where they are | |
| 16:22:46 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:23:24 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I'm half present this week for good reasons (/me looks at Uggla ;) ) , but please ping me if you want me to review them | |
| 16:23:59 | sean-k-mooney | the os vif one s are train backports the os-traits on need a respin | |
| 16:24:11 | bauzas | oh | |
| 16:24:24 | bauzas | ok, let's skip this and revisit it tomorrow then | |
| 16:24:31 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews, needs a second +2 | |
| 16:24:58 | bauzas | we have two approvals already, thanks gmann and gibi | |
| 16:25:13 | bauzas | gmann had good concerns, will provide a FUP | |
| 16:25:41 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:25:56 | bauzas | elodilles said he won't be around for this meeting | |
| 16:26:12 | bauzas | but I guess the updates are the same from last meeting | |
| 16:26:18 | bauzas | which were | |
| 16:26:19 | bauzas | stable gates are not blocked | |
| 16:26:24 | bauzas | though on some branches (wallaby, victoria?) we need many rechecks to be able to merge patches | |
| 16:27:06 | bauzas | unless someone saw something popping up on the stable gates, I guess we can move on | |
| 16:28:49 | bauzas | finishing up | |
| 16:28:51 | bauzas | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | |
| 16:28:56 | bauzas | Libvirt (lyarwood) | |
| 16:29:14 | bauzas | well, I guess there was no activity during the last weeks | |
| 16:29:31 | lyarwood | Nope nothing | |
| 16:29:41 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:29:41 | lyarwood | and as discussed before the break we need someone else to take this section forward or drop it | |
| 16:29:57 | bauzas | I think someone stepped up :) | |
| 16:30:53 | bauzas | actually, my brain is fucked | |
| 16:30:59 | bauzas | https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-12-07-16.00.log.html#l-162 | |
| 16:31:08 | bauzas | I guess we will demote this gang | |
| 16:32:16 | bauzas | #action bauzas to officially remove the libvirt subteam topic from the nova meeting | |