| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-12-14 | |||
| 16:04:05 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:10 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:25 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:04:31 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) | |
| 16:04:43 | bauzas | crickets for me | |
| 16:04:52 | bauzas | nothing to tell about gate bugs or placement jobs | |
| 16:04:56 | bauzas | both work | |
| 16:05:17 | bauzas | anything to discuss about our gate ? | |
| 16:05:40 | gibi | - | |
| 16:05:43 | bauzas | nice too | |
| 16:05:45 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:05:47 | gibi | I was more preoccupied with the neutron gate this week | |
| 16:05:50 | bauzas | #info Yoga-2 is due Jan 6th | |
| 16:05:56 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-2 | |
| 16:06:00 | bauzas | #info 2nd spec review day happens today on Dec 14th | |
| 16:06:13 | bauzas | so we have like 6 or 7 specs to look at | |
| 16:06:27 | bauzas | we only merged one spec which was a fast reapproval | |
| 16:06:56 | bauzas | some are quite in a good direction but maybe we will have not enough time for merging them *before* yoga-2 | |
| 16:07:25 | gibi | yeah if things are not landing this week then it will be hard | |
| 16:07:34 | gibi | to land them without cores :D | |
| 16:07:43 | bauzas | if people don't disagree, I'll propose an exceptional spec approval deadline exception during our first meeting of 2022 | |
| 16:07:54 | bauzas | exception process* | |
| 16:08:02 | gibi | sure, lets see what we will have open then | |
| 16:08:13 | bauzas | yup | |
| 16:08:28 | bauzas | not a reason to not look at the open specs | |
| 16:08:39 | bauzas | but just saying that one week more shouldn't be a problem | |
| 16:09:09 | sean-k-mooney | yes that shoudl be workable solong as we dont let it drag out too long | |
| 16:09:09 | bauzas | either way, this is what it is | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | anything to discuss about this ? | |
| 16:09:48 | sean-k-mooney | well not all project have a m2 spec freeze | |
| 16:09:59 | sean-k-mooney | so it may be less impactful on others | |
| 16:10:05 | sean-k-mooney | not form me | |
| 16:10:19 | gmann | yeah, its project to project | |
| 16:10:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you're right, this is maybe us who haven't considered it correctly when we thought about Yoga-2 as a spec freeze | |
| 16:10:34 | bauzas | anyway, not a problmem | |
| 16:10:48 | bauzas | we'll see how things go after new year | |
| 16:10:57 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:11:02 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:11:07 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews, needs a second +2 | |
| 16:11:13 | bauzas | thanks gibi btw. | |
| 16:11:29 | gibi | thanks bauzas | |
| 16:11:49 | gmann | I am ok with that, just 1 comment i added to make it clear on non-core adding +1 | |
| 16:11:49 | gibi | the current list of review prio looks OK to me | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas | about the unified limits series, I was confused with what to review but this is fixed | |
| 16:12:00 | gmann | but that is ok to add in followup also, not blocker | |
| 16:12:08 | bauzas | after discussing it with melwitt internally | |
| 16:12:23 | bauzas | gmann: ack, will look | |
| 16:12:48 | bauzas | I really want us to merge the unified limits series, this has been overdue for too long | |
| 16:12:58 | sean-k-mooney | i agree | |
| 16:13:17 | bauzas | so I'll continue to review, but given melwitt's on PTO, I guess the progress would be better after next year | |
| 16:13:18 | sean-k-mooney | unified limist assumign its readay i think would be a big win and release highlight | |
| 16:14:02 | gibi | there is a list of patches on the yoga-python-testing that we need to look at I will add them to priorities | |
| 16:14:13 | bauzas | any series or patches that people would want to highlight to the team for reviews ? | |
| 16:14:14 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: on a related note do we have a nova spec for the chagne in RBAC direction and what that means for nova | |
| 16:14:22 | bauzas | heh, jinxed by gibi | |
| 16:14:27 | bauzas | gibi: patches ? | |
| 16:14:32 | gibi | yep | |
| 16:14:37 | gibi | gmann has a list of them | |
| 16:14:40 | bauzas | gibi: I mean, links ? | |
| 16:15:09 | gmann | yeah, this is list for auditing all policy #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/rbac | |
| 16:15:11 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/819208 | |
| 16:15:15 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/819205 | |
| 16:15:18 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/819203 | |
| 16:15:21 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821636 | |
| 16:15:25 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/819206 | |
| 16:15:30 | gmann | and we can do audit in wiki page in one shot or in code changes also. | |
| 16:15:41 | gmann | gibi: thanks | |
| 16:16:25 | bauzas | gibi: I marked the nova and placement ones with the R-P flag | |
| 16:16:33 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: that was for RBAC one, and we have BP also for that #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-defaults-refresh-2 | |
| 16:16:50 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: we said on a meeting yes for a specless BP approval | |
| 16:16:54 | gmann | yeah | |
| 16:16:56 | bauzas | (for the policy thing) | |
| 16:17:01 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ok | |
| 16:17:16 | sean-k-mooney | normally i think we shoudl treath policy like an api change | |
| 16:17:31 | sean-k-mooney | and use a spec for it but we can proceed without one for now | |
| 16:17:46 | bauzas | this is the defaults, but meh | |
| 16:17:47 | gmann | I have pushed SYSTEM reader->system admin on top of dansmith server policy changes. and I will be pushing more changes this week | |
| 16:17:58 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: well to me policy change are interop issues | |
| 16:18:09 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I don't disagree | |
| 16:18:13 | sean-k-mooney | so change default is a breaking change but lest not repoen that | |
| 16:18:27 | bauzas | but for users, those are transparent if defaults correctly scoped | |
| 16:18:36 | gmann | well policy change does not require spec always. we have fixed (new or default change) many as bug also | |
| 16:19:09 | gmann | yeah, as it is overall change in RBAC, and as described in goal we have way that users will be broken by default | |
| 16:19:23 | gmann | and migration path and plan for them to new policy in next release | |
| 16:19:45 | gmann | *user will not be broken | |
| 16:19:53 | gmann | sorry for typo. :) | |
| 16:20:11 | sean-k-mooney | just to not consume all the time on this is the plan this cycle to walk back the work we had done and focus on identifying the work need with most of the new work happing next cycle | |
| 16:20:20 | sean-k-mooney | i will review the wiki you provided offline | |
| 16:20:40 | gmann | yeah, specially we are isloating the system form project resource and no system reader in yoga | |
| 16:20:52 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:21:11 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: thanks, wiki audit will be helpful | |
| 16:21:48 | bauzas | I think we also said that the TC would document this | |
| 16:22:02 | bauzas | the policy changes, I mean | |
| 16:22:14 | bauzas | I even wrote this in the BP when I approved | |
| 16:22:14 | sean-k-mooney | its in the tc spec to some degree | |
| 16:22:20 | gmann | basically this is what we will do (phase1 ) in nova in yoga #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/consistent-and-secure-rbac.html#phase-1 | |
| 16:22:22 | bauzas | that's my point | |
| 16:22:24 | sean-k-mooney | i would like to see a nova game plan for how to aling to that | |
| 16:22:35 | sean-k-mooney | which is why i ask about a nova spec | |
| 16:22:57 | sean-k-mooney | but if most of that work will happen next cycle im fine with the wiki and specless blueprint for this cycle | |