Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-12-13
17:30:19 gibi sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821423
17:30:27 sean-k-mooney ok that was "fixed" for a different edgecase many releases ago
17:30:40 sean-k-mooney so im surpised tempest has not hit this already
17:33:06 gibi sean-k-mooney: what was actually fixed?
17:33:13 gibi sean-k-mooney: as this bug now has reproduction test
17:34:19 gmann yeah, we never added restriction for add/remove host having server
17:34:29 gmann that is what tempest tests is doing
17:35:09 sean-k-mooney is_safe_to_update_az
17:35:35 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/8e19ef4173906da0b7c761da4de0728a2fd71e24
17:35:39 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/0ad5a64dc9ac4b1cfb8038f9171b6385fdf07f28
17:35:46 gmann ohk, no two different AZ while adding
17:36:22 sean-k-mooney we currently block you form adding or removing the host to the host-aggreate that has the az metadata
17:37:12 gmann different AZ
17:37:14 sean-k-mooney well more when doign az update
17:37:33 sean-k-mooney but this code was ment to alos cater for this usecase
17:38:49 gibi hm the first one is aggregated update, that is different from add/remove host but yes that could race with instance boot
17:39:27 gibi the second is about one host can only be one AZ case
17:39:38 gibi that I think cannot race with instance boot
17:39:43 sean-k-mooney gibi: well yes and no. ading or removign a host form an aggreate is really an update too in the more general sense
17:40:14 sean-k-mooney my point was that https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821423/1/nova/compute/api.py#6458
17:40:27 sean-k-mooney should have been blocking this edgecacse already
17:40:58 sean-k-mooney but it does not hece the need for stephens change
17:42:24 gibi OK, I really need to drop
17:42:27 gibi for today
17:42:35 gibi I will think about it more tomorrow o/
#openstack-nova - 2021-12-14
00:03:42 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for external cpu power managment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/821419
00:19:13 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add per process healthcheck spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/821279
01:09:30 opendevreview Steve Baker proposed openstack/nova master: Allow remaining in in DELETING for ironic cleaning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/813729
01:27:50 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Re-add python 3.6 functional testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821636
02:20:25 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/os-vif master: Updating python testing classifier as per Yoga testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/819204
02:24:05 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/placement master: Updating python testing as per Yoga testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/819206
02:26:24 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Updating python testing as per Yoga testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/819203
02:27:38 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/os-traits master: Updating python testing classifier as per Yoga testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/819205
02:28:58 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Updating python testing classifier as per Yoga testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/819208
04:42:54 gmann gibi: sean-k-mooney this is what I was talking about, my test env is down so did not test that. I will check on morning if any error (feel free to update if you see any)
05:54:28 opendevreview Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: Fill the AcceleratorRequestBindingFailed exception msg info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817326
08:27:41 opendevreview Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: Fill the AcceleratorRequestBindingFailed exception msg info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817326
08:45:56 opendevreview Federico Ressi proposed openstack/nova master: Debug Nova APIs call failures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/806683
08:55:52 bauzas good spec review day, everyone
08:56:26 bauzas this starts with a core ping for my own easy repproval spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/821376
08:56:31 bauzas gibi : ^
09:35:09 gibi on it
09:37:57 gibi bauzas: fast approved
09:55:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose boot a vm with unaddressed port https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/821376
10:01:02 gibi sean-k-mooney: I've left questions in the external-cpu-management spec
10:04:38 gibi bauzas: I skip the update userdata spec for now as you had strong opposition about the use case.
10:05:54 bauzas gibi: I'll revise this spec given they provided a new PS
10:06:07 gibi bauzas: ack
10:18:25 gibi brinzhang0: left feedback in the OWNER_ spec
10:20:35 brinzhang0 gibi:uii:ack, we will review later, thanks
10:20:35 brinzhang0 gibi:uii:ack, we will review later, thanks
10:20:54 brinzhang0 s/uii;//g
10:30:57 brinzhang0 bauzas,gibi: do you have time to review the remove tenat_id series of patches? https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fremove-tenant-id%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
10:31:32 bauzas brinzhang0: yes, will do today
10:32:23 brinzhang0 thanks
11:26:49 gibi brinzhang0: I try to get to it tomorrow
11:28:23 brinzhang0 gibi: cool thanks
12:10:11 gibi bauzas: I'm done with the first round of spec reviews
12:10:19 gibi bauzas: could you please look at https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:any-traits-support today
12:10:25 gibi bauzas: I will try to ask melwitt to look at it too
12:20:46 gtrevisan Hello everyone, quick question. We have a bug currently in progress, which we've also evidenced in stable/ussuri. A fix was uploaded to it, which we believe should also apply to Ussuri. Should we suggest a cherry-pick of this fix to Ussuri as well? Is the Ussuri release still in extended maintenance?
12:25:54 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/os-traits master: Updating python testing classifier as per Yoga testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/819205
12:26:42 gibi gtrevisan: you can propose backports to ussuri yes, but please note that our stable process requires to land the backport in order so first in the newer stable branches
12:55:23 opendevreview mitya-eremeev-2 proposed openstack/nova master: Delete bogus attachments. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820935
12:58:38 opendevreview mitya-eremeev-2 proposed openstack/nova master: Delete bogus attachments. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820935
14:15:40 gibi gmann, sean-k-mooney: do we have somewhere in our stack a inter process reader writer lock? I know fastener 0.16.0 has one but we are still on 0.14.1 https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/upper-constraints.txt#L593
14:18:42 sean-k-mooney not that im aware of we can proably get it from fastener yes that is proably the best option
14:18:58 sean-k-mooney but good point on it needing to be an inter process lock
14:19:02 sean-k-mooney i forgot about that
14:19:12 gibi we cannot get fastener :/ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/813114
14:19:20 gibi eventlet is not compatible
14:19:25 sean-k-mooney ah ok
14:19:39 sean-k-mooney asyncio has some lock
14:19:47 sean-k-mooney maybe the standard lib has one we could use
14:19:52 gibi I will check
14:20:06 sean-k-mooney although if it does not we might need to look at the taging approch instead
14:20:07 gibi worst case I can try to re-implement it based on olso's inter process lock
14:20:29 sean-k-mooney yes that is an option too
14:21:08 sean-k-mooney the semaintic i think we ould want is the writer would not start until all readers had finsihedn and when a writer is queued no new readers can start
14:30:29 bauzas gibi: +2 for both placement specs
14:30:36 gibi bauzas: awesome, thanks
14:31:40 bauzas gibi I guess I need to modify https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2005345 to tell that the task is merged :)
14:31:50 bauzas (of course once we +W the spec)
14:33:18 gibi I think the that part is automatic when the patch merges
15:29:15 bauzas last spec but not the least to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/821279/2/specs/yoga/approved/per-process-healthchecks.rst
15:29:28 bauzas but I have our nova meeting to prepare :)
15:29:56 bauzas reminder : nova meeting in 30 mins, the last of year 2021 ;)
15:34:03 gibi \o/
15:47:09 bauzas gibi: do you know if elodilles is around ?
15:47:20 bauzas or already in some kinda french-like vacations ?
15:47:21 gibi hm I think so
15:47:29 gibi I mean he should be around
15:47:35 bauzas ok
15:48:00 elodilles let me search for him
15:48:08 elodilles o:)
15:48:16 bauzas elodilles: if you have time and be around, please just update your stable branches topic ;)
15:48:34 elodilles oh, meeting time!
15:48:39 bauzas elodilles: this is fine, I'm also sometimes schizophrenic ;)
15:49:08 elodilles sorry, i completely lost in time :S (i was off yesterday and today felt like Monday to me :S)
15:49:48 bauzas not yet talking about me with the 3rd person

Earlier   Later