| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-12-10 | |||
| 15:33:43 | gibi | stephenfin: I hope you are OK that I refreshed ^^ | |
| 15:33:59 | gibi | I would like to add the rejection to the aggregate API to fix the bug | |
| 15:34:07 | gibi | but I figured out that we have more cases to handle | |
| 15:34:11 | gibi | so I added extra tests | |
| 15:51:51 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for external cpu power managment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/821419 | |
| 17:06:31 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: it looks like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/821396/ works | |
| 17:06:44 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: awesome | |
| 17:07:10 | sean-k-mooney | there are some test failerues in the non voting jobs but they are unrelated | |
| 17:07:23 | sean-k-mooney | who normally reivews that repo? do you know? | |
| 17:08:14 | sean-k-mooney | i might check on the qa channel | |
| 17:10:36 | gibi | I don't. lyarwood might know but he is already on PTO | |
| 17:13:52 | sean-k-mooney | ya i just left a message on #openstack-qa | |
| 17:14:07 | sean-k-mooney | honestly it proably wont be seen until moday at this point | |
| 17:14:14 | gibi | gmann: ^^ | |
| 17:14:28 | gibi | gmann: I think you have +2 rights in devstack-plugin-ceph | |
| 17:14:29 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: functional: Add reproducer for #1907775 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766771 | |
| 17:14:30 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject AZ changes during aggregate add / remove host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821423 | |
| 17:17:21 | sean-k-mooney | ya anyone in devstack-core or qa-release or cinder-core | |
| 17:17:23 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/8e51d8f39e33d932a40f03060b861db57a3d25d4,members | |
| 17:19:30 | sean-k-mooney | on one hand its a gate blocker on the ohter hand its friday evening and its not near a milestone so it can proably wait till monday without it being a major problem | |
| 17:20:09 | sean-k-mooney | i can send a mail to the list just to keep everyone in the loop | |
| 17:21:21 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Debug whitebox RBD direct download test failures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821424 | |
| 17:22:15 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: gibi checking | |
| 17:22:21 | gibi | thanks! | |
| 17:32:53 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: left initial feedback on the healtcheck spec | |
| 17:32:59 | gibi | and that I will end my week | |
| 17:33:07 | gibi | see you next week o/ | |
| 17:35:32 | gmann | gibi: sean-k-mooney did not get why it started failing now? is there any recent change triggered this? | |
| 17:43:10 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing nova-ceph-multistore fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821435 | |
| 17:47:51 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: not that i know if i suspect either neutron started requrieing a new version of python3-logging or there was a cpeh package update upstream | |
| 17:54:26 | gmann | i can see only in l-c requirements which should not be installed by devstack | |
| 17:56:46 | sean-k-mooney | ya i was checking on codeasearch | |
| 17:56:52 | sean-k-mooney | not sure what is pulling it in to be honest | |
| 17:59:30 | sean-k-mooney | sean@cloud:~$ apt-cache rdepends python3-logutils | |
| 17:59:32 | sean-k-mooney | python3-logutils | |
| 17:59:34 | sean-k-mooney | Reverse Depends: | |
| 17:59:36 | sean-k-mooney | python3-pecan | |
| 17:59:38 | sean-k-mooney | changeme | |
| 17:59:47 | sean-k-mooney | so its comiy for either python3-pecan or changeme | |
| 17:59:56 | sean-k-mooney | likely python3-pecan | |
| 18:02:10 | sean-k-mooney | ya so thye had a release 2 days ago | |
| 18:02:12 | sean-k-mooney | https://pypi.org/project/pecan/ | |
| 18:02:17 | sean-k-mooney | and its used by neturon | |
| 18:02:57 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: and we udpated the upper constratints this morning https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/e74f91e250d127ff825dad5219527d62efaeb740 | |
| 18:03:00 | gmann | humm, it was there in pecan 1.4.1 which constraints updated in requirement yesterday https://github.com/pecan/pecan/blob/1.4.1/requirements.txt | |
| 18:03:10 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 18:03:16 | sean-k-mooney | so that is likely what broke it | |
| 18:03:22 | gmann | yeah but there is no change in previous version of pecan on logutils | |
| 18:03:35 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/pecan/pecan/blob/master/requirements.txt#L6 | |
| 18:03:43 | sean-k-mooney | the require logutile >=3 | |
| 18:03:58 | gmann | yeah that is there in old version too https://github.com/pecan/pecan/blob/1.3.3/requirements.txt | |
| 18:04:07 | sean-k-mooney | ya 8 years | |
| 18:04:47 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure but that is the best i can come up with the version that is shipped in ubuntu is 0.3.4 i think | |
| 18:05:09 | sean-k-mooney | 0.3.3-7 | |
| 18:05:23 | sean-k-mooney | so ghatt should work | |
| 18:05:33 | gmann | I am trying to check the passing nova-ceph-multistore job and it was not pulled there somwhoe https://zuul.openstack.org/build/590c5996ca1b402486bfe1c7e1d08535/log/job-output.txt | |
| 18:07:29 | sean-k-mooney | its likely a ubuntu or cpeh packageing change | |
| 18:07:39 | sean-k-mooney | to we use the disto ceph or ceph form ceph.com | |
| 18:08:32 | sean-k-mooney | oh | |
| 18:08:38 | sean-k-mooney | the ceph pcakages changed | |
| 18:08:40 | sean-k-mooney | CEPH_PACKAGES='ceph libnss3-tools python3-rados python3-rbd' | |
| 18:08:43 | sean-k-mooney | on passin g | |
| 18:10:34 | sean-k-mooney | actully they end up being the same | |
| 18:10:36 | sean-k-mooney | CEPH_PACKAGES='ceph libnss3-tools python3-rados python3-rbd' | |
| 18:10:51 | gmann | yeah its same | |
| 18:12:05 | sean-k-mooney | et:20 https://download.ceph.com/debian-pacific focal/main amd64 python3-rbd amd64 16.2.7-1focal [386 kB] | |
| 18:12:08 | sean-k-mooney | vs | |
| 18:12:23 | sean-k-mooney | 021-12-10 10:37:05.265864 | controller | Get:48 https://download.ceph.com/debian-pacific focal/main amd64 python3-rbd amd64 16.2.7-1focal [386 kB] | |
| 18:12:33 | sean-k-mooney | so i guess the same version of ceph too | |
| 18:21:58 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: commented about commit msg to add these info and then i am +2 as it is gate blocker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/821396/comment/a2721f12_ea844e6b/ | |
| 18:22:28 | gmann | i cannot find root cause but it is clear it is pulling it recently so removing it is no issue | |
| 18:23:04 | gmann | I can try to ping other core if they are around | |
| 18:32:32 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: thanks yes ill spellcheck it with gramerly on monday | |
| 18:33:39 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: am if tis ok with you ill update teh commit on monday i was just about to leave for the day | |
| 18:34:40 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: ok, or i can update for you if it is ok? and try to get other core if they are around gouthamr or so. so that we can get gate unblocked | |
| 18:37:52 | opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Ensure MAC addresses characters are in the same case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816883 | |
| 20:06:49 | jamesbenson | Can anyone help with refstack tests failing due to additional-properties? | |
| 20:10:53 | jamesbenson | These are, for example this test: tempest.api.compute.servers.test_instance_actions.InstanceActionsTestJSON.test_get_instance_action | |
| 20:11:01 | jamesbenson | Gives me a: jsonschema.exceptions.ValidationError: Additional properties are not allowed ('updated_at' was unexpected) | |
| 20:12:38 | gmann | jamesbenson: hi | |
| 20:13:05 | gmann | jamesbenson: is it with upstream code or modified API? | |
| 20:13:48 | gmann | In tempest, we have strict validation on API response on additional-properties and t will fail if any API return any additional field in response without microversion or in downstream | |
| 20:15:09 | jamesbenson | okay, so I need to add the microversions to my tempest.conf then? Currently I don't have those. | |
| 20:15:39 | jamesbenson | It with a local deployment | |
| 20:17:42 | jamesbenson | @gmann https://gitlab.com/utsa-ics/osias We do regular testing and only ran into this issue with Victoria on. Ussuri wasn't giving any issues. But we haven't merged code for Victoria, Wallaby, or Xena yet because of these issues. | |
| 20:19:59 | gmann | jamesbenson: i see, please cap the max version for victoria in tempest conf as 2.87 max_microversion https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/93a902072fd9986f2bb660166552f37d9eb5bdbb/tempest/config.py#L381 | |
| 20:20:50 | jamesbenson | @gmann, Yeah, these are version locks we have: https://gitlab.com/utsa-ics/osias/-/blob/master/osias_variables.py#L67 | |
| 20:21:32 | jamesbenson | We need to specify both min and max version, correct? | |
| 20:22:13 | gmann | jamesbenson: min version can be None as Nova has not bumped the min version and its 2.1 only. min_microversion as None in tempest conf means nova 2.1 | |
| 20:22:27 | gmann | jamesbenson: so you are getting error with these cap version right? | |
| 20:23:43 | jamesbenson | @gmann, currently we don't have these caps used in our testing and are getting the errors. | |
| 20:24:20 | gmann | jamesbenson: so basically with your current configuration, tempest will request nova microversion 2.80 for victoria | |
| 20:24:42 | jamesbenson | We did use them at some point, but I think we were getting additional errors, so we stopped. But I'm running tests now, so I should know in a couple of hours. | |
| 20:24:52 | gmann | jamesbenson: make min_microversion as None and max_microversion as you have currently in https://gitlab.com/utsa-ics/osias/-/blob/master/osias_variables.py#L72 | |
| 20:24:56 | jamesbenson | Yes, these are what would get put into the tempest.conf file | |
| 20:25:17 | jamesbenson | okay, will do! | |
| 20:25:29 | gmann | jamesbenson: because tempest might fail with min_microversion as 2.80 because few tests might need modification on asserts/schema | |
| 20:26:00 | jamesbenson | gotcha, should I set them all to "None"? | |
| 20:26:07 | gmann | yeah | |
| 20:26:34 | jamesbenson | Xena I have a max of: 2.90 | |