Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-11-23
15:09:39 bauzas sean-k-mooney: ok, then it's a nova bug if we already call it
15:09:50 sean-k-mooney we just dont in that part of the code
15:10:19 sean-k-mooney but part of me is wondering if we would be better off just not using those event until we actully define a contract with neutorn on when they will be sent
15:10:59 gibi sean-k-mooney: but thing might never happen based on past experience ^^ :)
15:11:07 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L7221-L7228
15:11:21 bauzas gibi: sean-k-mooney: I just triaged the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1951623
15:11:28 sean-k-mooney so we check if its active here but we dont for the migration events
15:12:31 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/network/model.py#L488-L508 or here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/network/model.py#L567-L586
15:12:59 sean-k-mooney bauzas: gibi so we just need to update the model fucntion to skip disbaled ports
15:13:15 bauzas ack
15:13:22 bauzas bug confirmed anyway
15:13:37 sean-k-mooney the issue is that in some cases we will get event if the port is disabled
15:13:49 sean-k-mooney which we will now be ignorign but thats is likely ok
15:13:53 gibi yeah
15:20:29 bauzas elodilles: I hadn't time to update the meeting agenda, but add your points if you want
15:20:50 bauzas reminder : nova meeting in 40 mins here in #openstack-nova
15:23:38 elodilles bauzas: adding it now then
15:23:47 DK4 when creating instances they are all stuck in creating state. ive combed thrtough logs and did not find anything special. any advice on debugging that?
15:25:49 elodilles bauzas: done, just added a short info update, quickly
15:26:17 elodilles bauzas: you can edit now the page if you want
15:31:06 sean-k-mooney bauzas: by the way unless youhave actully repoduced the bug or root caused it you should be setting it to triaged not confirmed
15:32:12 sean-k-mooney we treat them more or less the same so i guess it does not matter but confrimed imples we coudl repoduces it triage does not
15:37:20 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Revert project-specific APIs for servers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816206
15:51:06 bauzas last reminder: nova meeting starts in 10 mins here at #openstack-nova IRC chan
15:51:40 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yes and no, we could put in Triaged if we don't know the direction
15:51:53 bauzas sean-k-mooney: we don't ask bug triagers to test all the issues
15:52:00 bauzas (even if Launchpad says it)
15:52:15 bauzas at least that's the census we have
15:52:24 sean-k-mooney yes i know which is why i am saying confirmed is a larger statement
15:53:40 sean-k-mooney triaged just means we think its valid and have some understading of why it happens, confrimed implies you ahve actully tried to repoduce it an have confirmed the behavior is as reported in the bug
15:53:48 sean-k-mooney or at least that is how i treat it
16:00:15 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:15 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Nov 23 16:00:15 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:15 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:15 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:25 gibi o/
16:00:29 elodilles o/
16:00:32 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:00:37 bauzas good day, 'vyone
16:00:37 lyarwood \o
16:01:37 bauzas ok, let's start
16:02:04 bauzas a few folks could be off b/c of some holiday they have on Thursday :)
16:02:16 bauzas not French , tho
16:02:28 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:33 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:02:39 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 29 new untriaged bugs (+1 since the last meeting)
16:02:50 bauzas I did a bit of triage and will continue on it tomorrow
16:03:17 bauzas thanks for the people who did this too
16:03:22 bauzas #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage
16:03:35 bauzas #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 33 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:03:42 bauzas any bug to discuss by now ?
16:04:21 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:04:29 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:04:45 bauzas no new gate bug AFAICS
16:05:03 bauzas btw. we could triage three of them that are NEW :)
16:05:13 bauzas (even 4)
16:05:30 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status
16:05:42 bauzas we have an issue
16:05:57 bauzas #info tempest-integrated-placement job had a CI issue
16:06:13 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/build/43f380b91bd14579806d0b9be0d702c8 the job itself
16:06:44 bauzas looks like an unrelated package issue
16:06:49 gibi it is a known issue https://zuul.openstack.org/build/43f380b91bd14579806d0b9be0d702c8/log/job-output.txt#4206
16:07:02 gibi the pmlogger service did not start
16:07:09 kashyap What does the service even do?
16:07:10 gibi we see it time to time in nova jobs too
16:07:20 gibi kashyap: never digged into it
16:07:26 kashyap Is it this? - https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/pmlogger.1.html
16:07:38 kashyap Anyway, don't want to distract from the main point :)
16:08:05 bauzas #agreed this is a known issue related to pmlogger, should be automatically fixed next run
16:08:13 bauzas agreed on the agreed ? ^
16:08:14 gibi pmlogger.service - Performance Metrics Archive Logge
16:08:25 gibi so yes
16:08:39 gibi bauzas: sure
16:08:48 bauzas ok, if this is done, let's move on
16:08:56 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967)
16:09:06 bauzas any other gate issue to mention ?
16:10:07 bauzas looks not
16:10:13 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:10:23 bauzas Yoga-1 was Nova 18th#link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-1
16:10:27 bauzas dang
16:10:37 bauzas link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-1
16:10:43 bauzas Yoga-1 was Nova 18th
16:10:50 bauzas #info Spec review day helped to merge 3 specs
16:11:06 bauzas thanks people who reviewed them
16:12:34 bauzas #info at Yoga-1 timeframe, Nova already accepted 7 specs and 4 specless BPs
16:12:44 bauzas (sorry, was counting)
16:13:06 bauzas anything to mention about the pace we have ?
16:13:50 bauzas #info reminder that we plan another spec review day mid-Dec, exact date to be discussed in a next meeting
16:14:03 bauzas moving on ?
16:14:40 bauzas I guess so
16:14:46 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:14:56 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:15:02 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews
16:15:11 bauzas that reminds me I need to update this change
16:15:52 bauzas #action bauzas to update his change to reflect the consensus about non-ownership ask for this label
16:16:42 bauzas but then, I'll ask next week what and how people feel about how to asynchronously ask reviewers (cores and non-cores) to look at changes
16:16:53 bauzas or the other way, how reviewers can discover changes
16:17:47 bauzas we have room for contributors happy to review that we can help them how to do this
16:18:19 gibi bauzas: btw, can we remove review priority from https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810220 it is in -1 since 5th of Nov
16:19:06 bauzas gibi: fair enough, you provided good comments on it, and I didn't added my ones since I agree with you

Earlier   Later