| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-11-17 | |||
| 10:49:46 | sean-k-mooney[m] | i might see if i can revie the work to pass the driver form neutron to nova this cycle | |
| 10:50:49 | sean-k-mooney[m] | but without neutron telling us when the event is sent i feel like we will continue to have wack a mole issues | |
| 11:11:18 | gibi | lyarwood: sean-k-mooney[m]: feel free to add me as a reviewer | |
| 12:28:00 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811716 - can you also hit this again today please? | |
| 13:06:21 | gibi | lyarwood: I getting pretty confident that the kernel panic on stable/victoria in nova-live-migration job happens because we are live migrating a guest that is not booted fully up yet. When I added 30 sec sleep before the live migration then the problem dissapeared (5/5 run green) | |
| 13:07:05 | gibi | lyarwood: from the console log I see that that without the sleep tempest would trigger live migration even 10 seconds before the guest fully booted | |
| 13:07:12 | gibi | you can see the run results here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817564 | |
| 13:07:18 | lyarwood | gibi: kk I was sure I tested my PINGABLE/SSHABLE series against it last week and it still failed | |
| 13:07:26 | gibi | so I think your idea to wait for pingable is a good direction | |
| 13:07:44 | gibi | hm, interesting | |
| 13:07:46 | lyarwood | let me look again | |
| 13:08:10 | lyarwood | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817636 | |
| 13:08:34 | lyarwood | I want to say that was against https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/817635/2 | |
| 13:08:47 | lyarwood | I'm just cleaning the series up again now and can retest | |
| 13:10:36 | gibi | lyarwood: I don't see kernel panic in the runs of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817636, but there are other errors. Let's re-test it and see where we are | |
| 13:30:13 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: DNM - Testing volume detach failures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817636 | |
| 13:42:28 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: yes will do | |
| 13:43:06 | lyarwood | thanks | |
| 13:48:04 | sean-k-mooney | ya ok im +1 on that ill get to your spec ater the call im on is over | |
| 14:20:30 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test token expiration during live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817778 | |
| 14:28:45 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test token expiration during live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817778 | |
| 14:52:19 | bauzas | folks, in case you don't know, the OpenInfra keynote is starting in 8 mins | |
| 15:52:38 | gmann | gibi: thanks | |
| 15:52:54 | gibi | gmann: sorry I had no time to go back and properly review that today | |
| 15:52:55 | gibi | :/ | |
| 15:53:13 | gmann | no worry. | |
| 16:13:35 | whoami-rajat | lyarwood, around? | |
| 16:13:50 | lyarwood | whoami-rajat: hey yeah | |
| 16:13:53 | lyarwood | on a call but can chat | |
| 16:13:58 | whoami-rajat | hey | |
| 16:14:00 | whoami-rajat | ack | |
| 16:14:44 | whoami-rajat | so i don't have any issue with your suggestion of keeping the tried and tested way of nova doing the attachment update, but the team agreed on other flow so don't want to go back and forth | |
| 16:15:55 | lyarwood | yeah appreciate that, I wasn't at PTG so wasn't part of the discussions | |
| 16:16:19 | lyarwood | but as someone maintaining this area more than most I'm still against passing the connector around like this | |
| 16:16:34 | lyarwood | it also keeps the cinder implementation straight forward etc so it's a win win in my view | |
| 16:17:21 | lyarwood | if other nova-specs-cores are against this then they can speak out in the spec | |
| 16:18:58 | whoami-rajat | ack, makes sense to me as the code becomes easier to maintain and debug that way, not sure how much optimization that one less API call does | |
| 16:19:45 | whoami-rajat | i tried discussing the same with other cores in yesterday's nova meeting but we went out of time | |
| 16:20:10 | whoami-rajat | so i will update the spec and see if people are against it and we require further discussion on it | |
| 16:22:05 | whoami-rajat | thanks lyarwood for your inputs | |
| 16:22:28 | lyarwood | Awesome thanks and yeah agree, it's avoiding a single c-api call from n-cpu but c-vol will still have the do the same work so it's a tiny optimisation | |
| 16:44:46 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test token expiration during live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817778 | |
| 17:39:20 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test token expiration during live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/817778 | |
| 17:40:07 | lyarwood | gibi: https://42950ae1f17575ae9a7c-fe6c968e98fdbd85f0f135fdbc9bd3ed.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/817636/2/check/nova-live-migration/66b064b/testr_results.html - so that worked pretty well aside from the SG group DELETE blowing up but I can fix that up | |
| 17:40:45 | lyarwood | gibi: had to wait 32 seconds for sshd to start in the instance | |
| 17:41:08 | gibi | that seems align with the logs I collected. The kernel needed more than 10 seconds to boot up | |
| 17:41:26 | gibi | unfortunately there is no timestamps in the cloud init part | |
| 17:41:51 | gibi | but dhcp definetly needs seconds to finish | |
| 17:50:22 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: that being waiting for ssh/ping to work? or soemthing else | |
| 17:50:34 | lyarwood | yeah ssh | |
| 17:51:43 | sean-k-mooney | cores can restore patches that are abandoned that belong to others right | |
| 17:52:28 | sean-k-mooney | i messaged the autor via gerrit but if they dont respond in a few days i might ask ye to unabandong a chagne | |
| 18:01:41 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: yeah cores can restore patch. which patch is it? I can do it | |
| 18:02:06 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741529 | |
| 18:02:44 | melwitt | done | |
| 18:02:52 | sean-k-mooney | thanks | |
| 18:03:25 | sean-k-mooney | since it was there idea i want to give creit where credit is due and reuse there patch rather then start a new one | |
| 18:03:51 | melwitt | makes sense ++ | |
| 19:36:08 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose Add libvirt support for flavor and image defined ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/810868 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-11-18 | |||
| 07:00:09 | opendevreview | Yi Yang proposed openstack/nova master: Support legacy tap interface for OVS DPDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818337 | |
| 09:53:09 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Update libvirt distro support matrix for Xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818357 | |
| 10:05:31 | opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741529 | |
| 10:31:48 | lyarwood | bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/815373 - have you had a chance to look at this btw? | |
| 10:33:09 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/809621 | |
| 10:43:11 | bauzas | lyarwood: sorry was taxi my daughter | |
| 10:43:34 | bauzas | lyarwood: I started to look at it last week indeed but I didn't had time to provide my comments | |
| 10:43:57 | bauzas | lyarwood: your concern looks nice | |
| 10:58:01 | lyarwood | bauzas: ack np thanks | |
| 11:08:53 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Update libvirt distro support matrix for Xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818357 | |
| 11:58:11 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Update libvirt distro support matrix for Xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818357 | |
| 12:06:57 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Enable SQLAlchemy 2.0 deprecation warnings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/804709 | |
| 14:12:58 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Update libvirt distro support matrix for Xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818357 | |
| 15:54:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Switch the default video model from 'cirrus' to 'virtio' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/798680 | |
| 16:19:17 | EugenMayer | trying to assing multiple ip address to one interface using the port and 'allowed ip addresses' - is this the right away at all? (the second ip does not show up on the interface booting up a debian cloud image) | |
| 16:20:09 | EugenMayer | Hmm, it is not supported at all? | |
| 16:20:10 | EugenMayer | https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/rocky/approved/multiple-fixed-ips-network-information.html | |
| 16:29:00 | gibi | EugenMayer: you are right the nova side of that feature was not merged https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-fixed-ips-network-information | |
| 16:30:52 | EugenMayer | gibi thank you for the hint | |
| 16:31:01 | gibi | I think this is the missing piece https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/580742/ | |
| 16:31:10 | gibi | but I did not look deep into it | |
| 16:31:11 | EugenMayer | Are you guys using cloud-init to add the extra ip then or are you just avoiding it | |
| 16:36:38 | melwitt | bauzas: I've been meaning to mention that re: the unified limits patch series, it is ready for review but note that I've spliced in a DNM haxx patch to make it run against unmerged oslo.limit interface changes that are needed. I did it like that in case someone thinks the oslo.limit proposed patches need adjusting, | |
| 16:37:49 | melwitt | so reviewers will want to look at those Depends-On oslo.limit changes as well to see if they are OK with the new interfaces on that side. finally, I have Depends-On tempest test running in nova-next job in the last nova patch as well as some testing in the post test hook to provide at least some integration test of the global/default unified limits | |
| 16:39:12 | melwitt | so in nova-next it will run with unified limits enabled and the tempest test tests the project limits and the post test hook tests the registered-only limits | |
| 17:09:24 | bauzas | melwitt: ack, OK, thanks for the reminder, then I'll look at those patches | |
| 17:22:40 | melwitt | bauzas: k, just wanted to hopefully help make review easier bc it could be confusing with all the dependencies | |
| 20:06:46 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add a WA flag waiting for vif-plugged event during reboot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/813419 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-11-19 | |||
| 03:07:31 | opendevreview | Stanislav Dmitriev proposed openstack/nova master: Retry image download if it's corrupted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818503 | |
| 07:45:25 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: [yoga] Add PCI VPD Capability Handling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/808199 | |
| 07:45:25 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova master: [yoga] Support remote-managed SmartNIC DPU ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812111 | |
| 08:22:33 | opendevreview | Ilya Popov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix to use NUMA cell with free resources first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805649 | |
| 08:35:35 | opendevreview | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add a trait for remote_managed port-capable nodes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/818514 | |
| 08:47:46 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Add a WA flag waiting for vif-plugged event during reboot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818515 | |
| 09:06:35 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Add a WA flag waiting for vif-plugged event during reboot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/818519 | |
| 10:27:35 | pslestang | Hey all | |
| 10:28:09 | pslestang | I would like your opinion about a change I'd like to propose on instance_action | |
| 10:28:55 | pslestang | actually instance_action are never soft-deleted even if an instance is deleted | |
| 10:29:42 | pslestang | I'd like to propose to add an option that let the operator choose if the instance_action have to be deleted or not | |
| 10:29:51 | pslestang | soft-deleted I mean | |
| 10:30:32 | pslestang | something like delete_instance_actions_on_instance_delete = True/False | |