Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-11-02
16:07:33 bauzas Placement periodic job status #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly
16:07:45 bauzas no issues so far ^
16:08:01 bauzas just the usual reminder,
16:08:03 bauzas Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967)
16:08:13 bauzas that's it for gate status
16:08:15 gibi this is a gate fix that needs a second core https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/814036
16:08:20 bauzas oh right
16:08:44 bauzas gibi: I'll look at it while we speak
16:09:12 gibi thanks
16:09:26 bauzas (already looked at it, but need one last glance)
16:09:56 bauzas moving on or any gate failure to mention besides the above one ?
16:10:54 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:10:58 bauzas Yoga-1 is due Nova 18th #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-1
16:11:10 bauzas (3 weeks from now)
16:11:20 bauzas err, 2 weeks
16:11:24 bauzas +2d
16:11:37 bauzas which means, typey typey your specs
16:12:25 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+is:open is not that large
16:12:48 bauzas what makes me tell :
16:12:56 bauzas #startvote Spec review day proposal on Tuesday Nova 16th ? (yes, no)
16:13:22 gibi yes
16:13:26 gibi #yes
16:13:30 gibi (how to vote?)
16:13:30 bauzas dang, the meetbot doesn't tell what to say
16:13:39 bauzas #vote yes
16:13:43 dansmith you have a space in front
16:13:43 gibi #vote yes
16:13:47 dansmith of the startvote
16:13:48 bauzas #startvote Spec review day proposal on Tuesday Nova 16th ? (yes, no)
16:13:48 opendevmeet Begin voting on: Spec review day proposal on Tuesday Nova 16th ? Valid vote options are , yes, no, .
16:13:48 opendevmeet Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
16:13:54 bauzas dansmith: huzzah
16:13:54 gibi #vote yes
16:13:54 opendevmeet gibi: yes is not a valid option. Valid options are , yes, no, .
16:14:02 sean-k-mooney[m] yes
16:14:04 gibi #vote yes, !
16:14:04 opendevmeet gibi: yes, ! is not a valid option. Valid options are , yes, no, .
16:14:06 gibi #vote yes,
16:14:06 opendevmeet gibi: yes, is not a valid option. Valid options are , yes, no, .
16:14:09 dansmith lol
16:14:13 bauzas oh man
16:14:21 bauzas this is an absolutule fail.
16:14:22 dansmith #vote yes,
16:14:22 opendevmeet dansmith: yes, is not a valid option. Valid options are , yes, no, .
16:14:31 dansmith #vote yes, no
16:14:31 opendevmeet dansmith: yes, no is not a valid option. Valid options are , yes, no, .
16:14:33 gibi #vote ,
16:14:33 opendevmeet gibi: , is not a valid option. Valid options are , yes, no, .
16:14:38 dansmith #vote yes, no
16:14:38 opendevmeet dansmith: yes, no is not a valid option. Valid options are , yes, no, .
16:14:41 sean-k-mooney[m] lets just assume we are ok with the 16th and move on
16:14:44 dansmith #vote yes, no,
16:14:44 opendevmeet dansmith: yes, no, is not a valid option. Valid options are , yes, no, .
16:14:45 yuriys this is bot abuse!
16:14:53 bauzas #endvote
16:14:53 opendevmeet Voted on "Spec review day proposal on Tuesday Nova 16th ?" Results are
16:14:53 dansmith #vote meh
16:14:55 gibi thet is fun
16:15:23 bauzas ok I guess this was epic but we should leave this bot quiet back for 5 years
16:15:38 bauzas anyway,
16:15:51 bauzas #agreed Spec review day happening on Nov 16th
16:15:56 bauzas voilà
16:15:59 bauzas moving on
16:16:03 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:16:15 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:16:16 dansmith also leading space
16:16:45 bauzas dansmith: good catch, the copy/paste makes me mad
16:16:50 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:16:57 bauzas #undo
16:16:57 opendevmeet Removing item from minutes: #topic Review priorities
16:17:25 bauzas fun, the meetbot isn't telling new topics
16:17:33 bauzas anyway, next point
16:17:35 dansmith it doesn't on oftc I think
16:17:42 bauzas #action bauzas to propose a documentation change by this week as agreed on the PTG
16:17:47 dansmith but if you don't do it #properly it won't record them either
16:18:13 bauzas for adding a gerrit ACL to let contributors +1ing
16:18:31 bauzas didn't had time to formalize it yet
16:18:49 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:18:59 bauzas elodilles: floor is yours
16:20:02 bauzas I guess he's not around
16:20:05 bauzas so I'll paste
16:20:14 bauzas stein and older stable branches are blocked, needs the setuptools pinning patch to unblock: https://review.opendev.org/q/I26b2a14e0b91c0ab77299c3e4fbed5f7916fe8cf
16:20:37 bauzas we need a second stable core especially on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/813451
16:21:00 bauzas Ussuri Extended Maintenance transition is scheduled to next week (Nov 12)
16:21:07 bauzas the list of open and unreleased patches: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-ussuri-em
16:22:18 bauzas I guess we need to make a few efforts before ussuri becomes EM
16:22:31 bauzas elodilles: again, I offer my help if you ping me
16:22:44 bauzas patches that need one +2 on ussuri: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/ussuri+is:open+label:Code-Review%253E%253D%252B2
16:23:08 bauzas (I'll skim this list)
16:23:22 elodilles oh, sorry, DST :S
16:23:24 bauzas last but not least: https://review.opendev.org/806629 patch (stable/train) needed 14 rechecks, I was pinged with the question whether testing should be reduced in train to avoid this amount of rechecks (mostly volume detach issue)
16:23:54 bauzas elodilles: hah, I warned about it in the channel :p
16:24:06 sean-k-mooney[m] are the detach issue due to the qemu version we have in bionic
16:24:28 sean-k-mooney[m] i assume train is not on focal?
16:24:36 elodilles yes, train is on bionic
16:24:50 elodilles (just like ussuri)
16:26:34 bauzas hmmm, technically, Train is EM
16:26:53 sean-k-mooney[m] im somewhat tempeted to same maybe move it to centos 8 or focal but we could disable the volume tests
16:26:59 sean-k-mooney[m] yes it is
16:27:11 bauzas I'd rather prefer us fixing the gate issues rather than reducing the test coverage, but this depends on any actions we can take

Earlier   Later