Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-19
14:33:33 bauzas I'll put unified limits and vncproxy as a bulk for tomorrow late
14:34:21 gibi ack
14:35:28 opendevreview Pierre-Samuel Le Stang proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer unit test for bug 1934094 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812646
14:35:54 belmoreira thanks gibi bauzas. I will be able to join between 13:00 and 15:00 utc. Just ping me here. I can also join in other timeslots but you will need to tell me in advance
14:41:53 bauzas belmoreira: the only problem is that we also want to wait for melwitt to be there
14:42:16 bauzas belmoreira: so that's why we'd prefer to discuss the vncproxy stuff at 15:00 UTC if you don't mind
14:42:32 bauzas 15:10pm if we break before
14:43:06 belmoreira thanks bauzas. I will join today at 15:10 utc
14:46:41 bauzas belmoreira: thanks, appreciated a lot.
14:47:06 bauzas belmoreira: wait, sorry, it's 3:40pm
14:47:09 bauzas my bad
14:47:18 bauzas we have a interop discussion before
14:47:45 belmoreira ok, thanks
14:53:11 dansmith rbac session coming up in nova yeah?
14:53:29 gibi dansmith: yes
14:53:34 gibi dansmith: at the top of the hour
14:55:43 hgy This is my first session
14:56:23 dansmith I don't see a link to join in the etherpad, can someone paste it here? gibi ?
14:56:42 gibi dansmith: https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/newton
14:56:49 gibi that will redirect
14:56:53 gibi to a zoom call
14:57:13 dansmith thanks, can we put that in the etherpad or is it secret?
14:57:16 gibi sure
14:57:17 gibi I can
14:57:27 dansmith thanks
14:57:30 gibi but it is already on the https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html page
14:57:54 dansmith okay, it's just easier to jump back and forth if the etherpads have them
14:58:42 gibi sure added it L49
14:59:10 dansmith sweet thanks
15:00:01 hgy Is it begin?
15:00:20 gibi hgy: you are in the good place if you are for the rbac discussion
15:00:30 gibi hgy: we will switch to that topic soon
15:01:13 hgy I almost missed it. I thought it was 16:00
15:01:16 hgy Thank you
15:25:06 hgy 1
15:26:57 gibi .11
15:31:53 bauzas I'm lost in translation too
15:32:14 bauzas wondering what to start with the rbac thing :)
15:51:40 stephenfin bauzas: can you mute?
15:51:44 dansmith bauzas: mute
15:52:28 bauzas done and sorry
15:52:33 stephenfin ta
15:52:43 bauzas I was about to mention we have 8 mins and we somehow need to wrap up
15:52:48 bauzas 8 min left*
15:53:28 dansmith bauzas: yeah I have to go to another session at the top of the hour now
15:53:45 bauzas I'll use my stick then
15:54:54 artom "super interesting discussion"
15:55:00 artom gdi the contempt is just dripping
15:55:12 artom :D
16:18:34 belmoreira bauzas it's getting late for me... I will need to leave in 5 min. I see that melwitt is OK with the change in the vncproxy. Thank you all.
16:18:46 bauzas belmoreira: cool
16:19:24 belmoreira regarding the instance move between projects, I guess it will be difficult... there is a lot of complexity
16:19:29 belmoreira see you tomorrow
16:21:07 ralonsoh sean-k-mooney, hi! https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/807359
16:21:12 ralonsoh if you have time, trivial patch
16:22:09 sean-k-mooney ya i can take a look it looks correct
16:22:14 ralonsoh thanks!
16:25:52 artom It's going to be hard to concentrate on the substance with that backdrop!
16:36:24 gibi bauzas: I lost zoom
16:36:26 stephenfin bauzas: did you kill Zoom again?
16:36:26 bauzas NOT ME !
16:36:37 sean-k-mooney sure it wasnt :P
16:36:39 stephenfin oh, it's gmann
16:36:40 artom bauzas, there are better ways to censor me ;)
16:36:42 stephenfin he was host
16:36:46 melwitt it said "the host left"
16:36:59 bauzas nah it was gmann :)
16:37:11 sean-k-mooney so can we restart the same one
16:37:33 gibi it is back
16:37:40 stephenfin https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/newton
16:37:59 stephenfin for anyone rejoining (atom, melwitt, ...?) ^
16:40:28 gmann oh, did i end meeting?
16:41:13 gmann bauzas: so sorry about that. i mean to leave meeting and join horizon. sorry for mesh up
16:41:25 bauzas gmann: heh no worries at all :p
16:41:46 bauzas gmann: you helped me shutting artom's mouth when he was having an argument with me, appreciated :p
16:41:56 stephenfin bauzas: you're unmuted again
16:41:56 bauzas (just kidding)
16:42:00 stephenfin and smiling like a maniac :P
16:42:00 gmann :)
16:42:13 stephenfin stop teasing gmann :P
17:31:29 opendevreview Jan Hartkopf proposed openstack/nova master: ensure samples folder exists for microversion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/813672
17:33:48 melwitt sean-k-mooney: sorry if I missed it but do the review priority labels prevent someone from +1ing or +2ing their own patch? I'm thinking of gibi's point that +1 shouldn't be used as a ping
17:34:43 melwitt (that's how the old manual etherpad process worked, you can only raise attention to someone else's patch)
17:38:16 gmann melwitt: sean-k-mooney i am wondering how to do that in project-config acl. I have not seen exclusive list we can n any label. or you are saying just to document that as guidlines ?
17:38:34 gmann *can add in any label
17:41:27 melwitt gmann: I don't know if it's possible to exclude self in a label, that's what I was asking sean :) is (1) is it possible? and (2) would we want to do that?
17:42:15 gmann ok
19:36:12 opendevreview Ilya Popov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix to use NUMA cell with more free memory first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805649
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-20
00:01:39 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Fix request path to query a resource provider by uuid https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805004
00:31:30 melwitt stephenfin: I noticed that when I try to run a subset of unit tests for db like "tox -epy38 nova.tests.unit.db" the tests fail with "oslo_db.sqlalchemy.enginefacade.AlreadyStartedError: this TransactionFactory is already started". I assume it's related to the db migration stuff but I don't understand how. any ideas?
00:32:27 sean-k-mooney[m] isnt that the error we fixed in the past with the run once decorator
00:32:53 sean-k-mooney[m] when it was reinitalised after SIG_HUP
00:33:19 sean-k-mooney[m] im not really sure why you would see that in the unit tests however
00:34:30 melwitt sean-k-mooney[m]: yeah but this is unit tests? when you run all tests everything passes, when you run only nova.tests.unit.db you get 70+ failures ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
00:34:47 sean-k-mooney[m] melwitt regarding self +1 ill check i think it might be possible to do yes by defining on +0 as allowed for the owner
00:35:24 sean-k-mooney[m] so the owner of the patch would be allowed to clear the review priorty but not set it to +1 or +2
00:35:41 melwitt sean-k-mooney[m]: ack. I brought it up as a possible option for making sure the +1 doesn't get used as a "ping" since some were concerned about that
00:36:31 sean-k-mooney[m] ill see if i can create a draft patch tomorow and include that and we can discuss it in the review
00:37:03 melwitt cool
00:37:19 sean-k-mooney[m] regarding the db failure i have not run them in a few days but i can try it in the morning

Earlier   Later