Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-01
15:35:43 dansmith so I'm not actually sure I can explain priteau's observation of the new versions
15:36:02 dansmith that's how I recalled it working, but I can't back that up with references to the code purely in the deserialization/serialization stuff
15:36:12 priteau These instances were live migrated after the Victoria upgrade, could it explain it?
15:36:22 dansmith do we recreate the numa objects as part of another operation? yeah, like live migration
15:38:17 dansmith this is the test that proves that we don't automatically uplevel it: https://github.com/openstack/oslo.versionedobjects/blob/e7b6d52aa4b1b40e68a21a122c09b968d5959b0e/oslo_versionedobjects/tests/test_objects.py#L778-L785
15:38:31 dansmith which isn't how I remembered it, but re-reading that test jogs my memory about why
15:40:33 dansmith so I think technically that operation should do something like object.VERSION = ObjectClass.VERSION when it goes to save it out
15:46:47 artom So the upleveling happens at serialization then?
15:46:58 artom Or some other operation like live migration, as you've said
15:47:00 dansmith it doesn't
15:47:04 artom But not at de-serialization, at any rate
15:47:20 dansmith I'm thinking live migrations create new numa stuff for the new host and that's how those got updated
15:48:18 dansmith in the past, we've done things like "load and save the object to update it" which would run routines to do updates, but they are probably saving the objects back with the old version but including the updates :/
15:48:28 dansmith I can't find any VERSION updating going on in the tree right now
15:48:42 dansmith like for online data migrations I mean
15:49:08 dansmith technically it probably hasn't mattered, because who (besides artom and priteau) would notice that the version was wrong if the data was right? :)
15:49:54 artom Yeah, maybe it's an academic debate - if it does the right thing...
15:50:00 artom Which it appears to do
15:50:22 priteau I just wanted to check it wouldn't break anything if the version number was not updated
15:50:23 dansmith well, we shouldn't store the version incorrectly just because that's going to be confusing, but yeah the object would still load with the data we wanted so in practice it hasn't mattered
15:50:41 dansmith priteau: right, but we should fix it to update the version though
15:52:02 priteau I will leave that to you if you don't mind :D
15:52:42 dansmith artom: do you want me to do that or will you?
15:53:28 artom dansmith, do what? What priteau said, "fix it to update the version though"?
15:53:38 artom Wouldn't that be within priteau own's patch?
15:53:53 artom Well, maybe not, since the on-load migration is pre-existing...
15:53:54 dansmith artom: I said it, but no, the code that claims to migrate is already in the tree
15:53:55 dansmith right
15:53:55 artom He's just fixin it
15:53:58 dansmith right
15:54:21 dansmith looks like there are several _migrate_* cases in instance_numa.py
15:54:28 artom And probably elsewhere...
15:54:33 dansmith maybe, not sure
15:54:57 dansmith if you do it I can review/+2 but ... :)
15:55:46 artom I mean, the hint of a +2 from dansmith on a PS1 is pretty alluring...
15:55:58 dansmith well, if you get it right in PS1.. :P
15:56:13 artom Crazier things have happened
15:56:14 dansmith let me write you a diff to start, hang on
15:58:13 dansmith I think this should be unified instead of done in multiple places like it is, so something like this: https://termbin.com/iawkf
15:59:12 dansmith oh, you know what,
15:59:22 dansmith the other migrate routine is for non-ovo migrations,
15:59:40 dansmith which is different, so probably no need to break out that helper function anyway
16:00:07 dansmith so just the one line VERSION thing plus an assert in whatever tests this and you're probably good
16:02:13 artom Oh I see (I think), your initial thought was "have any on-load migration call to a helper that updates version to latest"
16:02:49 dansmith yeah, because I thought there were at least two,
16:02:53 dansmith but that's because I didn't read
16:04:19 artom Yeah makes sense
16:04:34 artom My stomach is requiring food, I think lunch first, patch after
16:04:53 dansmith I +2 that ordering
16:05:32 artom \o/
16:48:52 melwitt gmann: no I was not aware of the novnc fail, I will look at it
16:52:32 gmann melwitt: thanks.
20:00:38 melwitt gmann: just to update you, I know what is wrong but I don't find how it's happening yet. tl;dr is the "path" in the vnc proxy is wrong and doesn't contain the token (so it's not even validating a token). according to all of the config files I looked at, it should be working. so there is something I'm missing so far
20:01:01 melwitt this is an example of how the path is supposed to look: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/2a183ce6e15f4ab08d31190d4d286a7b/log/controller/logs/screen-n-novnc-cell1.txt#11
20:01:14 melwitt and this is the bad one that's failing: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9234f33acf1247cdb995416ca9389240/log/controller/logs/screen-n-novnc-cell1.txt#13
20:04:14 melwitt this is where it would pick up the "path" variable https://github.com/novnc/noVNC/blob/v0.4/vnc_auto.html#L106
22:45:16 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add logic to enforce local api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712139
22:45:17 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712142
22:45:17 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota_class APIs for db and api limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712143
22:45:18 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update limit APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712707
22:45:18 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota sets APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712749
22:45:19 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Tell oslo.limit how to count nova resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713301
22:45:19 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce resource limits using oslo.limit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/615180
22:45:20 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add legacy limits and usage to placement unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713498
22:45:21 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota apis with keystone limits and usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713499
22:45:21 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add reno for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/715271
22:45:23 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Run against unmerged oslo.limit changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812236
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-02
01:19:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Run against unmerged oslo.limit changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812236
01:19:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add logic to enforce local api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712139
01:19:28 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712142
01:19:28 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota_class APIs for db and api limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712143
01:19:29 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update limit APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712707
01:19:29 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota sets APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712749
01:19:30 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Tell oslo.limit how to count nova resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713301
01:19:30 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce resource limits using oslo.limit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/615180
01:19:31 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add legacy limits and usage to placement unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713498
01:19:31 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota apis with keystone limits and usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713499
01:19:33 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add reno for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/715271
02:14:52 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Run against unmerged oslo.limit changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812236
03:59:21 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Run against unmerged oslo.limit changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812236
04:09:23 opendevreview Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: vGPU support by Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812247
04:18:32 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Run against unmerged oslo.limit changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812236
05:19:35 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Run against unmerged oslo.limit changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812236
06:20:00 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add logic to enforce local api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712139
06:20:00 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712142
06:20:01 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota_class APIs for db and api limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712143
06:20:01 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update limit APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712707
06:20:02 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota sets APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712749
06:20:02 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Tell oslo.limit how to count nova resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713301
06:20:03 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce resource limits using oslo.limit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/615180
06:20:04 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add legacy limits and usage to placement unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713498
06:20:04 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota apis with keystone limits and usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713499
06:20:06 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add reno for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/715271
06:27:50 opendevreview Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Move the implemented specs for the xena release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/812248
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-03
04:13:11 opendevreview Wenping Song proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Remove usage of six https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/812262
07:24:37 opendevreview Wenping Song proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Remove usage of six https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/812262
17:11:31 opendevreview Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: zuul: Remove trunk live migration testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/812266
#openstack-nova - 2021-10-04
07:36:39 bauzas good wet morning Nova
07:46:34 elodilles good morning. wet? :-o
07:48:25 elodilles here we have the last(?) shiny days of indian summer

Earlier   Later