| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-09-27 | |||
| 12:31:29 | lyarwood | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1943431 even | |
| 12:39:46 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Store old_flavor already on source host during resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810911 | |
| 12:41:03 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Store old_flavor already on source host during resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810913 | |
| 12:47:04 | spatel | sean-k-mooney does Intel Corporation Ethernet 10G 2P X550-t Adapter support SRIOV ? | |
| 12:47:18 | spatel | its copper 10G | |
| 12:49:52 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Store old_flavor already on source host during resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810915 | |
| 12:50:06 | spatel | Its saying but i can't see in lspci -vv command out for any SRIOV reference. let me check in BIOS | |
| 13:08:23 | spatel | sean-k-mooney nevermind, after enable in BIOS > NIC > Config (enable:SRIOV) | |
| 13:08:47 | spatel | i can see SRIOV support in lspci -vv | |
| 14:00:22 | bauzas | gibi: +2d for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810461 but I'd like to first tell about this during tomorrow's meeting before merging it | |
| 14:00:55 | bauzas | it looks to me we have a consensus but I'd prefer to see if anyone has a concern | |
| 14:08:50 | gibi | bauzas: sure | |
| 14:09:28 | bauzas | (and I could miss one=) | |
| 14:10:29 | gibi | the third is the stable setuptools fix | |
| 14:10:31 | gibi | I guess :D | |
| 14:40:10 | opendevreview | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/nova master: rephrasing config description for num_pcie_ports in libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811173 | |
| 15:11:18 | melwitt | gibi, dansmith: just wanted to check whether you wanted to look at the stable patch validation bypass script before approval: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810285 | |
| 15:12:09 | fungi | sean-k-mooney: melwitt: https://review.opendev.org/811181 is the errata update for ossa-2021-002, now that the new fix for stable/ussuri has merged. let me know if you notice anything obviously wrong, i'm planning to send it to mailing lists later today | |
| 15:15:03 | gibi | melwitt: looks good to me. I let you +A it | |
| 15:16:58 | melwitt | fungi: thanks, will look | |
| 15:17:03 | melwitt | gibi: thanks! | |
| 15:54:03 | bauzas | gibi: ++ that was it (the setuptools fix) | |
| 16:18:30 | melwitt | fungi: sean-k-mooney is off today fyi | |
| 16:25:49 | fungi | no worries, just figured i'd see if anyone from nova wanted to give it a once-over. i'm realitively sure it's fit for publication if not | |
| 16:26:01 | fungi | relatively | |
| 16:27:29 | fungi | thanks melwitt! | |
| 18:59:32 | melwitt | elodilles: please let me know which approach you might prefer on the python 2.7 unit test issue on the stable/train open redirect fix patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/806629/2/nova/tests/unit/console/test_websocketproxy.py#662 | |
| 19:41:37 | elodilles | melwitt: commented on the patch. (sounds good to me) | |
| 19:49:50 | melwitt | thanks elodilles | |
| 21:18:57 | clarkb | heads up that devstack jobs are failing nova-status upgrade check checks because "GET /placemen//" status: 404 len: 162 microversion: 1.0 seems to be the request it is generating. For example https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/2b59223b1c8047929b967ad52fdaed19/log/controller/logs/screen-placement-api.txt#257 | |
| 21:32:21 | melwitt | clarkb: ack, looking | |
| 21:34:29 | melwitt | "/placemen//" well, that's really weird :/ | |
| 21:57:03 | clarkb | ya I can't see any updates to keystoneauth or nova taht would explain that | |
| 22:03:19 | gmann | nor on placement sie | |
| 22:03:20 | gmann | side | |
| 22:04:16 | melwitt | same 😑 still looking for where that's coming from. no updates to keystoneauth, nova, placement, keystone. config files look normal | |
| 22:09:13 | gmann | its all started failing since last hr | |
| 22:13:52 | clarkb | let me know if we want to hold a node then we can debug directly | |
| 22:14:03 | clarkb | though in theory a local devstack would exhibit the same behavior if you ahve one | |
| 22:16:10 | melwitt | true | |
| 22:16:38 | melwitt | guess I'll go ahead and try that since I've not found anything else | |
| 22:30:17 | gmann | I do not see any installed pkgs version difference in passing vs failing build | |
| 22:45:36 | melwitt | my local devstack doesn't even get that far: | |
| 22:45:38 | melwitt | Installing collected packages: soupsieve, waitress, sortedcontainers, pyroute2.core, beautifulsoup4, WebTest, simplejson, [...] | |
| 22:45:40 | melwitt | Attempting uninstall: simplejson | |
| 22:45:42 | melwitt | Found existing installation: simplejson 3.16.0 | |
| 22:45:44 | melwitt | ERROR: Cannot uninstall 'simplejson'. It is a distutils installed project and thus we cannot accurately determine which files belong to it which would lead to only a partial uninstall. | |
| 22:47:56 | clarkb | melwitt: the issue there is whatever system you ran devstack on already has simplejson installed via system packages and pip can't uninstall it because the system package is deficient | |
| 22:48:32 | clarkb | I'ev brought it up with zigo as a good thing to help drive in the debuntu world by converting those packages to setuptools instead of distutils. Until then you can manually uninstall python-simplejson/python3-simplejson if on ubuntu. I assume similar package names on fedora/centos | |
| 22:48:42 | melwitt | hm, ok. I just created a new ubuntu focal VM. haven't had this happene before | |
| 22:49:34 | melwitt | ok thanks | |
| 22:54:02 | gmann | i am also creating new 20.04 machine | |
| 22:58:01 | melwitt | I noticed someone mentioned in #openstack-qa earlier today that they were able to hit the same error locally https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-qa/%23openstack-qa.2021-09-27.log.html#t2021-09-27T19:54:38 | |
| 22:58:12 | johnsom | I am hitting it local | |
| 22:58:24 | melwitt | so hopefully one of us will figure out what's wrong | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-09-28 | |||
| 00:00:49 | gmann | I am checking with sync mode also in case async tasks are creating issue here | |
| 00:01:31 | gmann | and some logging for list all endpoints though endpoints seems fine in this case but will be helpful for other issues https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/811246 | |
| 00:15:24 | sean-k-mooney[m] | melwitt if i remember correctly its pulled in by cloud-init | |
| 00:15:49 | sean-k-mooney[m] | just uninstall python-simplejson | |
| 00:16:13 | sean-k-mooney[m] | you have had to do that on fedora in the past and python-yaml too form time to time | |
| 01:01:28 | gmann | seeing same error with async disable too | |
| 06:35:56 | gibi | good morning | |
| 06:36:09 | gibi | I see you had a busy day while I was asleep | |
| 07:32:20 | bauzas | good morning Nova | |
| 07:32:55 | gibi | bauzas: o/ | |
| 07:33:11 | bauzas | yeah I saw this | |
| 07:33:58 | bauzas | I'm glad Ian found the root cause | |
| 07:35:45 | gibi | yepp | |
| 09:27:33 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: tools: Ignore bot-generated branch creation patches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810285 | |
| 10:09:16 | gibi | bauzas: I broke the old qos min bw support in Xena when I extended it with qos min pps support: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1945310 So this bug is probably a Xena regression, but I will only be certain that it wasn't broken after I backported the repro tests to wallaby to see if the fault is not there | |
| 10:09:35 | bauzas | ah zut | |
| 10:11:48 | gibi | I have the fixs locally so I think we can still fit this in RC2 | |
| 10:12:10 | gibi | but we have a broken gate so maybe not | |
| 10:12:35 | bauzas | yep, I dunno what to say | |
| 10:13:02 | bauzas | gibi: maybe we should accept the RC2 proposal for the moment and see whether the fix could be merged tomorrow for providing a RC3 | |
| 10:13:17 | gibi | bauzas: good point | |
| 10:13:22 | gibi | that is the safest bet I think | |
| 10:13:47 | bauzas | gibi: add a comment for our meeting | |
| 10:13:48 | gibi | so lets talk about this on the meeting today, accept the RC2 if nobody against it and I can push for RC3 | |
| 10:13:53 | bauzas | yep | |
| 10:14:12 | gibi | adding it to the meeting.. | |
| 10:15:26 | gibi | done | |
| 10:17:53 | bauzas | gibi: adding the xena-rc-potential tag to your bug report | |
| 10:18:29 | bauzas | can you triage it ? | |
| 10:18:30 | gibi | ack, there is a slight chance that it was similarly broken before xena too hence my hesitation in that | |
| 10:19:04 | gibi | I will triage it | |
| 10:24:46 | lyarwood | do we not have a bug for the Apache/Placement issue at the moment? | |
| 10:25:43 | gibi | lyarwood: I don't see any | |
| 10:25:47 | gibi | lyarwood: I only see the fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/811303 | |
| 10:26:01 | lyarwood | yeah same was just checking I hadn't missed something | |
| 10:26:01 | gibi | partial fix, as grenade still needs love | |
| 10:26:17 | lyarwood | yeah I can't test that until the devstack fix lands | |
| 10:26:18 | gibi | lyarwood: I guess this is not even a placement bug but a devstack one | |
| 10:26:25 | lyarwood | actually I'll just pull both in | |
| 10:26:42 | gibi | lyarwood: wait, there are two grenade issues | |
| 10:26:48 | lyarwood | oh wait sorry I see what you mean re grenade, we need it fixed on both branches | |
| 10:26:56 | gibi | lyarwood: in the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/811303 grenade still fails with the placement issue | |
| 10:26:58 | lyarwood | the devstack issue | |
| 10:27:03 | lyarwood | right | |
| 10:27:20 | lyarwood | yeah so we need to land on stable/xena first | |