| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-09-21 | |||
| 16:11:54 | bauzas | Remember to propose regression bugfixes for a new RC with nova-xena-rc-potential | |
| 16:12:06 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:12:14 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:12:28 | bauzas | this is absolutely empty | |
| 16:12:54 | bauzas | cores, please enjoy this new button until we discuss other ways to use it at the PTG | |
| 16:13:29 | bauzas | is there anyone wanting to have their changes be a priority for reviews ? | |
| 16:13:53 | bauzas | (that's your time, folks) | |
| 16:13:59 | artom | Wait, only cores can set the priority label? | |
| 16:14:15 | bauzas | with the current implementation, yes | |
| 16:14:31 | bauzas | I'm about to propose other possibilities at the PTG | |
| 16:14:41 | bauzas | (which reminds me I have to write something in the etherpad) | |
| 16:14:46 | artom | Can a non-core propose the label, or is the whole thing owned entirely by cores? | |
| 16:15:08 | bauzas | artom: dude, that's the whole discussion we had in the related doc change :) | |
| 16:15:14 | gibi | artom: this is the currently agreed process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792357 but sure we can discuss it on the PTG | |
| 16:15:18 | dansmith | surely it will be totally useless if not curated by a smaller group right? | |
| 16:15:32 | artom | Sorry, not opening pandora's box again, just catching up | |
| 16:15:34 | bauzas | I'm happy to see people offering alternatives :) | |
| 16:15:35 | dansmith | in bug trackers where everyone can set priority, people set their bugs to be "urgent" all the time | |
| 16:15:37 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update min supported service version for Yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809932 | |
| 16:15:42 | dansmith | I can't imagine it will be useful otherwise | |
| 16:15:46 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update min supported service version for Yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809932 | |
| 16:16:10 | bauzas | dansmith: I had an alternative proposal I left in the comments but we can discuss this at the PTG (and I'll propose a documentation change) | |
| 16:16:21 | dansmith | ack | |
| 16:16:21 | artom | Essentially, for my own selfish needs, all I can do with the Priority label is query it, and look at those reviews in case my opinion on them is of any use to anyone, right? | |
| 16:16:51 | bauzas | artom: for the moment, the idea is that cores make some review vows when setting the label | |
| 16:17:04 | gibi | artom: if you help merging reviews in priority then cores will have more bandwidth to look at other reviews including yours :D | |
| 16:17:04 | bauzas | meaning they engage themselves to review this patch in question | |
| 16:17:35 | bauzas | but I'm not sure we should continue this conversation now, we have some agenda left | |
| 16:17:42 | bauzas | (and a stretched time) | |
| 16:18:07 | artom | Understood. | |
| 16:18:45 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:18:55 | bauzas | #topic PTG Planning | |
| 16:19:01 | bauzas | every info is in the PTG etherpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-ptg | |
| 16:19:14 | bauzas | If you see a need for a specific cross project section then please let me know (gibi or bauzas) | |
| 16:19:18 | bauzas | gibi: I jinxed you :p | |
| 16:19:42 | bauzas | at least we can see regular updates from sean-k-mooney :) | |
| 16:20:05 | gibi | I expect more and more topics as we close to the PTG date | |
| 16:20:16 | gibi | I think the current list is normal given we have a month still | |
| 16:20:25 | bauzas | absolutely right | |
| 16:20:26 | gibi | (a bit less of a month | |
| 16:20:27 | gibi | ) | |
| 16:20:31 | bauzas | I'm not afraid of having extra time | |
| 16:20:36 | gibi | me neither | |
| 16:21:15 | bauzas | but I'd say, take this month as an opportunity to start designing your features, so you can raise your questions at the PTG | |
| 16:21:36 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:21:42 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:21:58 | bauzas | (that could last a bit) | |
| 16:22:00 | bauzas | nova's stable/ussuri and stable/train are blocked (due to latest virtualenv uses latest setuptools which removed use_2to3) | |
| 16:22:07 | bauzas | the future proof solution would be to pin virtualenv during tox install for stable branches, otherwise new errors can appear with every new release of setuptools, virtualenv, etc | |
| 16:22:12 | bauzas | until we decide about the right solution we can maybe set lower-constraints job as non-voting ( https://review.opendev.org/809955 ) | |
| 16:22:16 | bauzas | probably placement branches have the same errors | |
| 16:22:21 | bauzas | elodilles: floor is yours | |
| 16:22:30 | gibi | bauzas: yes, this is the same error | |
| 16:22:35 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: Add missing __init__.py in nova/db/api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810192 | |
| 16:22:47 | gibi | it affects a lot of projects that still uses decorator 3.4 as dep | |
| 16:22:56 | gibi | nova affected from ussuri backwards | |
| 16:23:02 | gibi | placement affected all the way to master | |
| 16:23:08 | gibi | (master fix landed) | |
| 16:23:09 | lyarwood | ah I missed this review sorry | |
| 16:23:11 | bauzas | super awesome | |
| 16:23:31 | sean-k-mooney | we may want to consider droping that dep at some point | |
| 16:23:38 | bauzas | we actually have a longer explanation in the open discussion section | |
| 16:23:55 | bauzas | let's just hold this discussion until that point | |
| 16:24:10 | sean-k-mooney | although we are unlikely to hit the same issue again | |
| 16:24:12 | bauzas | (which we will have 30 mins for) | |
| 16:24:20 | bauzas | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | |
| 16:24:37 | bauzas | Libvirt (bauzas) | |
| 16:24:45 | lyarwood | bauzas: happy to take over the libvirt part now you're PTL btw | |
| 16:24:56 | bauzas | lyarwood: awesome | |
| 16:24:58 | bauzas | I was asking for it | |
| 16:25:03 | lyarwood | bauzas: not that I have anything for today but we have a few things this cycle | |
| 16:25:07 | bauzas | any stuff to raise ? | |
| 16:25:08 | bauzas | kk | |
| 16:25:27 | bauzas | #info lyarwood to chair the libvirt subteam by now | |
| 16:25:43 | bauzas | lyarwood: thanks for offering your name | |
| 16:25:55 | artom | Don't take it in vain now | |
| 16:26:03 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:26:10 | bauzas | one last paperwork bit | |
| 16:26:14 | bauzas | (gibi): release liaison role | |
| 16:26:22 | gibi | so | |
| 16:26:38 | gibi | bauzas: is now the PTL and the release liaison as well | |
| 16:26:42 | gibi | which is suboptimal | |
| 16:26:52 | bauzas | which means I'm also a bottleneck now | |
| 16:26:53 | gibi | do we have a volunteer to take that role over? | |
| 16:27:11 | gibi | it is not hard, you will get cc-d to release proposal patches to check and approve | |
| 16:27:19 | bauzas | tbc, the release liaison role is about reviewing patches from the release team | |
| 16:27:46 | bauzas | until either the PTL or the release liaison approves the patch, it can't land | |
| 16:28:03 | sean-k-mooney | i mean i can do it if no one else wants too i really dont mind | |
| 16:28:06 | bauzas | example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/808706 | |
| 16:28:44 | sean-k-mooney | i keep an eye on the os-vif ones anyway but someone on the stable team might make more sense | |
| 16:28:52 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: appreciated | |
| 16:29:19 | bauzas | I'll make the changes in the appropriate repo so you'd get automatically CC'd | |
| 16:29:29 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thank you | |
| 16:29:53 | sean-k-mooney | no worries | |
| 16:29:58 | elodilles | well, as I also a release core and also propose nova releases lately it would be weird to propose and approve my own patches and then +W o:) | |
| 16:30:36 | bauzas | elodilles: heh, depending whether you're schizophrenic, this could work | |
| 16:30:47 | elodilles | :D | |
| 16:31:17 | bauzas | ok, moving on | |
| 16:31:22 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: thanks again | |
| 16:31:38 | bauzas | now the big discussion | |