Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-09-20
09:21:55 sean-k-mooney so bauzas stephenfin created that module in august
09:22:00 sean-k-mooney but missed that file
09:22:33 sean-k-mooney bauzas: so this is a xena release regressions
09:23:23 sean-k-mooney zigo: devstack will be installing this more or less the same way as the distro
09:23:34 zigo Ok.
09:23:44 zigo Well, I don't know, but my patch needs to be merged ! :)
09:23:46 sean-k-mooney we do not install with -e in devstack
09:24:01 sean-k-mooney so it should be copying the files to the site-packages directory
09:24:04 sean-k-mooney and using it form there
09:24:19 sean-k-mooney zigo: did you file a bug
09:24:41 zigo For a single "touch __init__.py" ?!? Seriously ?
09:24:42 zigo :)
09:24:45 gibi in the past (stable/wallaby) nova/db/api contained only the migration scripts that was always independently executed to the main nova services but now it contains code that nova services try to import. So I agree we need to fix this
09:24:45 sean-k-mooney yes
09:24:54 sean-k-mooney zigo: we will need to do an RC2
09:25:02 zigo Ok, filing the bug.
09:26:21 gibi zigo: thank you for catching this
09:29:53 opendevreview Thomas Goirand proposed openstack/nova master: Add missing __init__.py in nova/db/api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809980
09:29:57 zigo There you go...
09:30:11 zigo Bug filled, PR closing it.
09:30:32 zigo I'm used to often do single char patches, this one will be ZERO chars ! :0
09:32:03 sean-k-mooney zigo: technially master is now yoga, which is why we need the bug for backporting and if we want to do an RC2
09:32:25 sean-k-mooney if you saw this last week before we created RC1 we proably could have just merged it
09:33:50 zigo sean-k-mooney: Ok, thanks for letting me know. Should I wait until my first patch is merged before opening the backport PR ?
09:34:25 sean-k-mooney am we should jsut be able to cherry pick this via the api so i think its safe to do it now
09:34:26 zigo Oh also, is there anything to know from the user's point of view about the sqla-migrate -> alembic switch?
09:34:47 zigo Or is it fully transparent?
09:34:48 sean-k-mooney i dont expect this to take long to review given its size :)
09:34:59 sean-k-mooney zigo: well other then the packageing impact no
09:35:11 zigo Ok, cheers.
09:35:27 sean-k-mooney i.e. the nova-mange command is still the same but you obvioulsy need alembic installed
09:38:45 sean-k-mooney zigo: ok that has the flags and marked it as critical since it blocks packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1944111
09:41:29 zigo The stable/xena branch is missing a defaultbranch=stable/rocky in the .gitreview file no ?
09:42:22 gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809759
09:42:54 gibi the setup of stable/xena is not fully done yet as RC1 and the branch was cut last Friday
09:43:23 zigo Ok, so I guess I must wait for that one to merge ... :/
09:45:56 gibi lyarwood, bauzas, elodilles: you you look at https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:create-xena+project:openstack/nova ?
09:46:06 gibi s/you/could/
09:47:58 lyarwood Yup happy to
09:50:56 bauzas gibi: +Wd
09:51:57 bauzas fwiw, also +wd https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809761/1 and the above one
09:52:05 bauzas so we will have the xena release notes
09:52:44 bauzas we miss a second core on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809762
09:52:55 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Fix the wrong exception used to retry detach API calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809934
09:53:08 gibi bauzas: done
09:53:24 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+owner:infra-root%2540openstack.org+is:open shows me all the xena paperwork for our jobs and reno are done
09:53:29 bauzas gibi: thanks
09:53:43 bauzas zigo: sorry was taxidriving my daughter from school
09:55:36 bauzas zigo: +Wd your change
09:56:06 bauzas zigo: please provide a backport change for stable/xena too
09:56:16 bauzas so we will create a RC2
10:05:26 gibi bauzas: after you are back placement also needs care after RC1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/809366
10:06:15 gibi bauzas: I will look into the lower constraints failre in placemenet stable/xena setup patches, probably that impacts placement master too
10:07:52 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: [DNM]: Trigger lower-constaints job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/809994
10:46:11 gibi yepp it seems master lower-constraints also times out in placement too ^^
10:46:28 gibi will fix it based on how neutron fixed it
11:19:40 gibi lyarwood, stephenfin: is it an RC critical fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809934 ?
11:21:07 stephenfin Ah, whoops, probably not (though I'll defer to lyarwood to be sure). I was thinking all bugfixes were fair play right now since we'd branched already /o\
11:21:14 stephenfin gibi: feel free to pull it back out
11:21:45 bauzas gibi: ack, taxying back my kid but I'll be around in 15 mins
11:21:48 lyarwood I was under the same impression
11:22:04 lyarwood gibi: isn't master open for Yoga now?
11:22:27 gibi I think until the final RC we need to keep master close to stable/xena for any last minute backport
11:23:04 lyarwood that's fair, yeah it isn't critical so feel free to yank it out if you can
11:23:41 lyarwood and FWIW I'm not a huge fan of policy we can't enforce in the tooling like this
11:23:41 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix the wrong exception used to retry detach API calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809934
11:23:44 gibi yanked
11:23:48 lyarwood thanks
12:07:30 bauzas gibi: all placement Xena changes are now +Wd https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/placement+owner:infra-root%2540openstack.org+is:open
12:07:51 gibi bauzas: thanks but lower constraints fix will be still be needed
12:07:56 gibi as the job will time out
12:08:01 gibi I'm working on it
12:08:17 bauzas gibi: ack thanks
12:08:25 bauzas gibi: what is the change ?
12:08:46 gibi lower constraint bump on master first
12:08:50 gibi as it effects master
12:09:23 gibi then we can lament on either we bump lower on stable/xena too, or look into somehow pinning setuptools version on stable branches
12:10:01 gibi the thing is that we dont pin setuptools coming from virtualenv package on stable so we use basically the latest on every stable
12:10:40 gibi an the latest setuptools removed support for some features old packages are depends on
12:10:55 bauzas (14:08:46) gibi: lower constraint bump on master first
12:10:58 bauzas can't see it
12:11:03 gibi haven't proposed yet
12:11:09 bauzas oh ok
12:11:15 gibi 14:08 < gibi> I'm working on it
12:11:16 gibi 14:08 < gibi> I'm working on it
12:11:20 gibi 14:08 < gibi> I'm working on it
12:11:24 gibi ups
12:11:26 gibi sorry
12:15:16 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Bump min decorator to 4.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/810001
12:15:23 gibi bauzas: now here it is
12:15:28 bauzas gibi: heh sorry
12:15:37 gibi I was lost couple of hour figuring out what happened
12:15:53 gibi especially as I don't like the ide to bump a lower constraint on stable branch
12:16:01 gibi s/ide/idea/
12:16:07 bauzas agreed
12:16:29 bauzas taxying
12:18:23 gibi as like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardassian ? :)
12:18:48 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809761
12:19:42 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/809762
12:20:20 gibi interestingly nova stable/xena is not effected

Earlier   Later