Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-08-31
16:22:12	bauzas	moving on
16:22:21	gibi	Placement periodic job status #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly
16:22:25	gibi	they are greeen
16:22:44	gibi	and last but not least be prepared that the gate will be slow this week due to Milestone 3
16:23:03	gibi	which brings us to
16:23:03	gibi	#topic Release Planning
16:23:08	gibi	Release tracking etherpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-xena-rc-potential
16:23:16	gibi	Feature freeze is 3rd of Sept which is end of this week.
16:23:20	gibi	Also we have Milestone 3 end of this week that marks the last release of our client libs. Release patches:
16:23:24	gibi	novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/806592
16:23:27	gibi	osc-placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/806580
16:23:45	gibi	I'm not tracking any open novaclient patches
16:24:06	gibi	but for osc-placement the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/804458 consumer_types support client patch would be nice
16:24:42	gibi	the client release should happen this week so we still have a bit of time
16:25:04	bauzas	I can review it
16:25:04	gibi	We are tracking the release TODOs in #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-xena-rc-potential
16:25:34	gibi	bauzas: thanks, I'm also plannig to get to it
16:25:51	gibi	there are two open todos for the release
16:25:56	gibi	We need to produce the cycle highlights
16:26:00	gibi	review is there: #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800755
16:26:04	gibi	I will do a bp status cleanup tomorrow and along that I will update the highlights patch. But you can help me with the highlight by bringing up features in the comments.
16:26:13	opendevreview	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add support for 'hostname' parameter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778550
16:26:13	opendevreview	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: policy: Deprecate field from 'os-extended-server-attributes' policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/806131
16:26:14	opendevreview	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Speed up 'servers' API tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778732
16:26:14	opendevreview	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Address nits for configurable-instance-hostnames series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/806735
16:26:44	gibi	the other todo is
16:26:45	gibi	We need a volunteer to write the release notes prelude (deadline for the prelude is RC1)
16:27:04	dansmith	gosh I wonder who will do that
16:27:44	bauzas	hmmm
16:28:01	gibi	:D
16:28:08	bauzas	but ok, I can volunteer for it
16:28:12	gibi	thanks
16:28:55	gibi	anything else about the release before we jump to open bps?
16:29:41	gibi	#topic Review priorities
16:30:06	gibi	this is a new topic as the gerrit patch enabling the new Review-Priority label has been landed
16:30:47	gibi	you can query the label with something like https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:31:15	gibi	the doc about the label is here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792357
16:31:53	gibi	anyhow as we are close the FF sean-k-mooney collected couple of bps from our list that we quickl agree on to mark as priority
16:32:03	gibi	instance host name https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fconfigurable-instance-hostnames%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
16:32:14	gibi	this is basically approved
16:32:17	gibi	as far as I see
16:32:32	bauzas	let me ask a stupid question
16:32:41	bauzas	do we have a formal process on how to use this flag ?
16:32:47	gmann	or we can run this to filter already +W one #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+Review-Priority:1+label:Verified%253D1++NOT+label:Workflow%253C%253D-1
16:32:53	bauzas	I remember some change I reviewed a while ago
16:32:56	gibi	bauzas: this is where we discussing that https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792357
16:33:01	bauzas	but did we get into some direction ?
16:33:08	sean-k-mooney	bauzas: yes
16:33:12	gibi	I see you have negative comments there :)
16:33:31	sean-k-mooney	well it was +w'd so i assuems we had agreed
16:33:38	bauzas	I can see some consensus
16:33:46	bauzas	so I can rereview this
16:34:09	gibi	sure I have to back to that too
16:34:43	gibi	lets then just quickly check some of the open bps that close to lend and ignore the new label until we agree on the doc
16:34:53	gibi	s/lend/land
16:35:15	gibi	so instance hostname is a basically done we can move on
16:35:20	gibi	vhost multi queue flavor extra spec https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fmultiqueue-flavor-extra-spec%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
16:35:26	sean-k-mooney	well i would prefer to use the new lable and adjust our useage if we need too in a follow up t be hosest but sure lets proced
16:36:01	gibi	sean-k-mooney: I don't want to hold up the meeting agreeing on the usage as we have FF this week
16:36:19	sean-k-mooney	gibi sure we can move on
16:36:19	gibi	so the multique series is a simple one but still lack reviews
16:36:58	sean-k-mooney	ya tl;dr that is supporting a mutlique via the flaovr in addtion to the existing image property
16:37:18	bauzas	gibi: I was looking into the multiqueue series before the meeting
16:37:22	sean-k-mooney	its pretty straigt forward but need reviews
16:37:32	bauzas	so I could mark it with Review-Prio flag :p
16:37:38	gibi	bauzas: you can :P
16:38:16	gibi	if nobody else shows up I can read that too
16:38:21	gibi	moving on
16:38:26	gibi	generic mdevs https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fgeneric-mdevs%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
16:38:31	gibi	as far as I see the code is approved
16:38:36	gibi	the doc patch is open
16:38:45	bauzas	thanks all
16:38:58	gibi	we can land doc only patches after FF so this is in good shape
16:38:59	bauzas	I can work on the doc change btw.
16:39:12	bauzas	but my priority for this weeks is reviews.
16:39:21	gibi	that sounds good to me
16:39:25	gibi	moving on
16:39:30	gibi	pps qos https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522bp/qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/nova
16:39:37	gibi	this is easy as we don't have to rush
16:39:57	gibi	the neturon API extension enabling the new logic probably wont land in Xena
16:40:06	gibi	(but already works on in my env)
16:40:39	sean-k-mooney	ah ok so this is moving to yoga then?
16:40:46	gibi	the neutron impact seems so
16:41:05	gibi	the nova impact is good to land now but it wont be triggered if neutron does not have the new api extension
16:41:10	gibi	so it is dead code
16:41:47	sean-k-mooney	i mean if its dead code its also going to have little or no impact on people deploying xena but sure
16:41:54	gibi	yes
16:42:08	gibi	moving on
16:42:22	gibi	melwitt updated the unified limits https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Funified-limits-nova%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) sries
16:42:50	gibi	dansmith: you had comments before. Will you have time this week to look back to this?
16:42:50	dansmith	I saw her note about not reaching into limit internals but haven't gone back to look
16:43:14	dansmith	I will, but are we really expecting to land this? if we are, then I'll try to prioritize, but if not, I'd focus on other things that are time-critical
16:43:30	dansmith	seems like there are a lot of patches yet to land for thursday,
16:43:45	dansmith	and I know some have had some review, but I don't think all (but could be wrong)
16:43:53	bauzas	agreed with dansmith
16:44:06	bauzas	I'd love this series to merge, but this is very late in time
16:45:33	gibi	dansmith: it was open for a long time so I guess it is not that time critical
16:46:27	dansmith	lots of odd gate fail on the bottom few, which I'm sure is not related to those patches, but just in terms of likelihood for merging all of that by thursday seems unlikely
16:46:33	gibi	I don't see that much thing to close to land in nova but I guess you have commitments outside of nova too
16:46:53	dansmith	yeah I meant other stuff

Earlier   Later