Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-08-27
15:45:47 gibi there is a correlation with the consumer_type series landed and the uptick in the conflict failures in the gate
15:46:20 gibi I know correlation is not causation but still it feel relevant
15:46:34 gibi and the consumer_type series had this transaction logic change
15:46:36 dansmith hrm
15:46:50 gibi i have no better explanation at the moment
15:47:21 dansmith ack
15:53:21 sean-k-mooney dansmith: sorry was on internal call
15:54:17 sean-k-mooney ah am no i know there is a collation but not why
16:11:39 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support boot with extended resource request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800086
16:12:39 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Convert features not supported error to HTTPBadRequest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/806294
16:13:01 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support move ops with extended resource request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800087
16:14:27 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] refactor interface attach with qos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800088
16:15:49 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support interface attach / detach with new resource request format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800089
16:17:10 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] move unshelve test to the proper place https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/793621
16:18:32 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [nova-manage]support extended resource request https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802060
16:19:26 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Remove module level caching https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/806394
16:19:27 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: db: Handle parameters in DB strings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805663
16:19:54 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reno for qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805046
16:30:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add force kwarg to delete_allocation_for_instance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/688802
16:30:39 gibi dansmith, sean-k-mooney, melwitt, lyarwood: based on the above disucssion I inverted the force default value in ^^
16:31:09 gibi lyarwood, stephenfin: I fixed up the nits in the pps series. thanks for the valuable feedback
16:33:39 gibi and with that I end my week. o/
16:42:15 sean-k-mooney gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/787523 has now merged so we shoudl have the review priority lable avaiable just an fyi
16:45:37 gmann finally :)
16:46:14 sean-k-mooney i think https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+Review-Priority:1 is how to use it
16:46:30 sean-k-mooney but we dont have any patches with it set
16:46:36 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+Review-Priority:0 get hits however
16:56:07 gmann or event this, https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+Review-Priority:1+label:Verified%253D1++NOT+label:Workflow%253C%253D-1
16:56:08 gmann sean-k-mooney: ^^
16:56:29 gmann *even
16:57:15 sean-k-mooney perhaps we will need at lest one patch marked as a prioroty to test it
16:57:22 gmann it can be appended with NOT+owner:self
16:57:56 gmann sean-k-mooney: you can test with 0 priority to test query
16:58:52 melwitt gibi: ack
17:22:16 melwitt dansmith: I didn't think changing to a single transaction would make that much of a timing difference either but the consumer types patch series hit that bug far more often than anything else did. I didn't see anything else in those patches that could possibly be related, so I guessed about the db transaction change. my guess might be wrong
17:22:38 dansmith I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just surprised
17:23:05 dansmith and surprised lots of real deployments aren't having trouble with much busier systems before the consumer types patch made the transaction longer
17:23:19 melwitt I was surprised too and thought maybe it was a coincidence but once it merged everything was hitting the bug
17:23:26 dansmith and if that's really it, I sure hope we're not in for crazy pain if that made the transaction like waaaay longer or something
17:24:17 melwitt yeah, same. I haven't seen something like this before
17:37:31 sean-k-mooney i know that i have seen conflict in ci jobs form update avaiable resouces before the consome types change
17:38:01 sean-k-mooney so there was already some conficts happening
17:38:18 sean-k-mooney i dont think it caused test failures but i have seen it in the logs
17:43:15 dansmith oh definitely
17:57:57 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Convert features not supported error to HTTPBadRequest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/806294
18:28:37 melwitt yeah, I know it was occurring prior to consumer types, just saying that on the consumer types series it hit the bug often and after it merged it's happening more often
18:34:49 melwitt and re: "yeah, same. I haven't seen something like this before" I haven't seen grouping writes into a single db transaction cause a significant timing difference before
18:53:26 dansmith melwitt: it failed zuul, but I don't see any conflcit messages in there, although it is one of these "hung until timeout" sorts it seems
18:53:44 dansmith maybe that multicell failure is known and some other pattern?
18:56:18 melwitt dansmith: you're talking about the failure on the force kwarg patch right? I would expect fails on that to not be the conflict bug and at a glance it looks like it is indeed something different
18:58:36 melwitt unrelated to that, this is a new error in the controller compute log on that run: Remote error: DBReferenceError (pymysql.err.IntegrityError) (1452, 'Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails (`nova_cell1`.`instance_info_caches`, CONSTRAINT `instance_info_caches_instance_uuid_fkey`
18:58:46 melwitt https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/575784eb62da4365ab8a1942da0353bc/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#30972
18:59:04 dansmith I saw that too
18:59:35 dansmith maybe that dropped an update and that's why the test waited until timeout?
19:00:20 melwitt and on the instance from the failed tempest test: [instance: 99c8640e-cb21-4fa9-bb90-d3361201ce7c] Failed to allocate network(s): nova.exception.VirtualInterfaceCreateException: Virtual Interface creation failed
19:00:20 melwitt Aug 27 17:45:54.463587 ubuntu-focal-rax-ord-0026150414 nova-compute[111496]: ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance: 99c8640e-cb21-4fa9-bb90-d3361201ce7c] Traceback (most recent call last):
19:00:31 melwitt https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/575784eb62da4365ab8a1942da0353bc/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#33831
19:02:17 melwitt server failed to spawn. the info cache error was on a different instance
19:04:48 melwitt [instance: 217a81e4-b9cf-4e9e-97a9-edcb0fab8349] Can not refresh info_cache because instance was not found
19:05:06 melwitt trying to refresh info cache on an instance that's gone.. that's odd
19:25:24 melwitt oh, it looks like a network event went to the compute/cell that the instance was not in, so when it tried to refresh the info cache, it was not found
21:20:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Avoid modifying the Mock class in test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805759
21:21:04 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: [func test] move port creation to the NeutronFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/787206
#openstack-nova - 2021-08-28
09:56:06 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/wallaby: address open redirect with 3 forward slashes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805818
11:20:56 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Avoid lazy-loading instance.flavor in cold migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/774796
11:26:43 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/victoria: Avoid modifying the Mock class in test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/805823
#openstack-nova - 2021-08-29
03:18:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add stub unified limits driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712137
03:18:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Assert quota related API behavior when noop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712140
03:18:26 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Make unified limits APIs return reserved of 0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712141
03:18:26 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add logic to enforce local api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712139
03:18:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce api and db limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712142
03:18:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota_class APIs for db and api limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712143
03:18:28 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update limit APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712707
03:18:28 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota sets APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712749
03:18:29 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Tell oslo.limit how to count nova resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713301
03:18:30 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce resource limits using oslo.limit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/615180
03:18:30 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add legacy limits and usage to unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713498
03:18:32 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota apis with keystone limits and usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713499
03:18:32 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add reno for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/715271
03:38:33 melwitt gibi, johnthetubaguy[m], dansmith: unified limits set has been updated to do all limits in keystone (no config option quota limits when the UnifiedLimitsDriver is being used) ^ apologies for the delay. I have summarized what I did in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712139/13#message-b41a9e4a8a96136ca7e4bff126b575effa2fe839
04:28:17 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update limit APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712707
04:28:18 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota sets APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/712749
04:28:18 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Tell oslo.limit how to count nova resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713301
04:28:19 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce resource limits using oslo.limit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/615180
04:28:19 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add legacy limits and usage to unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713498
04:28:20 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota apis with keystone limits and usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713499
04:28:20 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add reno for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/715271
12:12:55 maxba hi guys, I have problem about multicast and broadcast in public network. I have much broadcast traffic in the network from stupid application, eg. winbox, windows smb, .... how can I drop these traffic just for my public network?
12:13:57 maxba I use openvswitch for l2 networking
12:15:37 maxba i tested iptables, ebtables, in layer of compute and network namespace of public network in the compute, they didn't work
16:00:46 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Tell oslo.limit how to count nova resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713301
16:00:47 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Enforce resource limits using oslo.limit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/615180
16:00:47 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add legacy limits and usage to unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713498
16:00:48 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update quota apis with keystone limits and usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/713499
16:00:48 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add reno for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/715271
#openstack-nova - 2021-08-30
06:11:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add force kwarg to delete_allocation_for_instance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/688802
06:11:56 gibi melwitt: ^^ removed the co-authored line as you requested
06:34:31 gibi lyarwood, stephenfin, bauzas: we are still pretty much blocking the openstack gate without ^^
06:45:41 lyarwood I'm out today, last public holiday of the year in the UK but I'll review from my phone now.
06:49:43 lyarwood Okay done, LGTM.

Earlier   Later