Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-07-06
16:03:38 gibi #topic Gate status
16:03:43 gibi Nova gate bugs #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure
16:04:06 gibi the latest in that list https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1934519
16:04:13 gibi it solved itself magically
16:04:42 gibi is there any recent gate issue that is happening but not in this list?
16:05:55 gibi #topic Release Planning
16:05:55 sean-k-mooney just a note that i finaly fixed the os-vif gate
16:06:01 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
16:06:05 sean-k-mooney although the patch still needs review
16:06:14 gibi link it up here please
16:06:35 sean-k-mooney sure one sec continue on while i find it
16:06:46 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/798038
16:07:04 sean-k-mooney all 3 jobs were using ovn instead of the mix of backend that is fixed by that patch
16:07:08 gibi thanks, I will check it after the meeting
16:07:30 gibi so
16:07:30 gibi #topic Release Planning
16:07:34 gibi Milestone 2 is next Thursday (15 of July) which is spec freeze
16:07:48 gibi Today is spec review day #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-June/023083.html
16:08:15 gibi we already have 15 bps approved
16:08:18 gibi that seems plenty
16:08:43 gibi we have 8 open specs
16:08:51 gibi all of them has some form of feedback already
16:09:11 gibi so we did a good job reviewing specs today
16:09:21 gibi there is still time to land them
16:09:33 gibi but I hoping for a spec freeze without any FFE
16:09:49 gibi any qustions comment about the coming milestone?
16:10:30 bauzas nope
16:11:09 gibi #topic Stable Branches
16:11:16 gibi stable gates are not blocked as far as I know
16:11:20 gibi this patch could spare us some rechecks if merged all the way back till pike: https://review.opendev.org/q/Id3e4452883f6a3cf44ff58b39ded82e882e28c23
16:11:24 gibi EOM (from elodilles )
16:11:42 gibi do we want to push some stable releases around M2?
16:12:19 elodilles that might be good i think
16:12:58 bauzas do we need some review eyes for the stable branches ?
16:13:07 elodilles as we haven't released recently (maybe 1-2 month ago)
16:13:52 elodilles bauzas: reviews are always welcome on stable branches :)
16:14:35 gibi elodilles: you can hit me with the release patches
16:14:36 elodilles but I don't have any specific patch (except the one linked above)
16:15:07 elodilles gibi: what is the best timing? ASAP now, or just after ML2?
16:15:15 gibi elodilles: I think we can be flexible
16:15:30 gibi whathever fits the stable team agenda
16:15:56 elodilles OK, I'll check the release content and will see
16:16:02 gibi cool, thanks
16:16:09 gibi any other stable business for today?
16:16:31 elodilles nothing from me
16:17:03 gibi #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:17:06 gibi Libvirt (bauzas)
16:17:13 bauzas nothing to tell
16:17:25 gibi #topic Open discussion
16:17:35 gibi there is one topic on the agenda
16:17:57 gibi yonglihe: Hi, gibi and everyone, here is the smartnic patch set status: 6 of 7 patches got +2 from alex_xu, the functional testing is under reviewing. seems a bulk of core time needed, thanks anyone's help on it, sincerely. https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fsriov-smartnic-support%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
16:18:11 gibi so basicly yonglihe asking for review
16:18:57 gibi I'm pretty swamped these days so if somebody has time, then please go ahead
16:19:01 sean-k-mooney oh that reminds me ill respin the review priorty patch sorry forgot to do that
16:19:14 gibi sean-k-mooney: good point, we can start using that
16:19:36 stephenfin I have one other thing to add
16:19:41 sean-k-mooney ill do that after the meeting
16:19:45 gibi thanks
16:19:57 gibi I see no cores queueing up for reviewing the smart nic impl so I will keep it on my radar
16:20:02 gibi stephenfin: stage is yours then
16:20:21 stephenfin I brought up the changes to os-vif stable core membership on openstack-discuss a week and a half ago and didn't hear any objections http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-June/023305.html
16:20:34 stephenfin so I think we can proceed with that change now
16:21:05 gibi elodilles, lyarwood, sean-k-mooney: any last minute objection?
16:21:18 sean-k-mooney not form me
16:21:21 gibi or from anybody else?
16:21:41 gibi then lets do it
16:21:44 elodilles no objection from me
16:22:43 gibi cool
16:22:53 gibi then I will note the agreement in the review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/798071
16:23:05 gibi anything else for today?
16:24:31 gibi if not then thanks for joining today.
16:24:41 gibi #endmeeting
16:24:41 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jul 6 16:24:41 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:24:41 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-07-06-16.00.html
16:24:41 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-07-06-16.00.txt
16:24:41 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-07-06-16.00.log.html
16:25:37 sean-k-mooney gibi: cool am i started reviewing the placment chagne by the way i got intrupted yesteday so just pushed what i have sofar. ill review it porperly again tomorow
16:25:41 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/784020
16:26:02 sean-k-mooney so far it look pretty good but i think you can simplfy it slightly
16:26:03 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks a lot
16:27:17 sean-k-mooney tl;dr i dont think we need one branc to set it to none and another to set it to a different value although what you have now is still technially correct and will work
16:27:52 stephenfin bauzas: have I answered your questions on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/793199 ? Care to bump your +1 if so?
16:28:34 gibi sean-k-mooney: ack, I will look into that suggestion later this week
16:28:43 gibi my brain already fried for today
16:28:58 gmann stephenfin: gibi can you check policy warnings patches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/799422 and placement which is already reviewed by stephenfin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/799418
16:28:59 bauzas stephenfin: just did +W
16:29:16 sean-k-mooney ack i was not leand towrad -1 more of a nit anyway
16:29:24 gibi gmann: ack
16:30:21 gmann thanks
16:34:41 sean-k-mooney brb
16:36:58 stephenfin gmann: Apologies for inflicting unnecessary pain on you there. The warning seemed like the only way to get people to use the new thing, but it is very noisy to be fair
16:37:16 stephenfin i.e. https://github.com/openstack/oslo.policy/blob/3.7.0/oslo_policy/policy.py#L1538
16:37:57 gmann stephenfin: yeah, I am updating all the current usage for those warning https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22fix-oslo-policy-warnings%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
16:38:34 gmann stephenfin: and once we merge all these then I am thinking to convert it to error from oslo side so that all the DeprecatedRule usgae in new RBAC work will be proper
16:39:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose "vm-boot-with-unaddressed-port" spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/793199
16:49:00 sean-k-mooney ralonsoh: stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/799680 so it looks that os-vif patch works well
16:49:25 sean-k-mooney i modified the nova live migration and grenade jobs to use it
16:50:16 ralonsoh sean-k-mooney, do you think we need to add more testing? to add more tempest tests?
16:50:21 ralonsoh just for the spec
16:51:29 sean-k-mooney i think the exising jobs can be configured to cover the different cases. e.g. we can test ovn with per port bridges in nova-livemigration but use ml2/ovs with iptables in nova-livemigration-ceph

Earlier   Later