| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-06-23 | |||
| 13:26:36 | gibi | you as a user get the same vgpu in your vm | |
| 13:26:37 | bauzas | that's my point | |
| 13:27:17 | sean-k-mooney | that point is incompatbale with "use different RC to tack ownwership" they are identical form a user point of view so shoudl have the same resouce class | |
| 13:27:17 | bauzas | if a device profile is a set of request groups, OK | |
| 13:27:18 | gibi | so if two service represents non interchangeable resource then the difference in capability needs to be modelled in placement (as a trait) | |
| 13:27:54 | gibi | if the two service represents the interchangeable resource then we use the same RC and we forbid to deploy a mixed cloud | |
| 13:28:11 | gibi | as a mixed could would be undecideable | |
| 13:28:22 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: in this case (the mixed one), this is absolutely OK to get allocation candidates from a device profile that AREN'T cyborg managed hosts | |
| 13:28:27 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: well you could use aggreate for that | |
| 13:28:36 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yeah we can allow that | |
| 13:28:40 | gibi | maybe | |
| 13:29:23 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i dont agree | |
| 13:29:52 | sean-k-mooney | if that is the case then its absolutely ok to get allcoations form a pci passthough alias form cyborg | |
| 13:29:59 | sean-k-mooney | or to get mdevs from cyborg | |
| 13:30:07 | sean-k-mooney | when using generic mdevs | |
| 13:30:39 | bauzas | agreed, with VGPU standard request, you could end up getting a cyborg managed host | |
| 13:30:42 | sean-k-mooney | we can support that but if we do it has to be symetirc | |
| 13:30:45 | bauzas | and I'm OK with this | |
| 13:31:06 | bauzas | but you said it's more than a standard RC | |
| 13:31:24 | sean-k-mooney | lets take that case | |
| 13:31:32 | sean-k-mooney | you have resouce:vgpu1 | |
| 13:31:34 | bauzas | but as I said, I'm OK with getting results using an explicit request group that maps a device profile | |
| 13:31:42 | sean-k-mooney | its alocated form a cyborg RP | |
| 13:31:49 | sean-k-mooney | how do you boot that vm | |
| 13:32:23 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: the device profile is in its own requet group by the way | |
| 13:32:24 | bauzas | the conductor which gets the candidates would see this is cyborg target and accordingly would ask the agent to bind the arq | |
| 13:32:32 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: what arq | |
| 13:32:41 | sean-k-mooney | we just had resouces:vgpu | |
| 13:32:55 | sean-k-mooney | there is not arq or device type referenced in the flavor | |
| 13:33:02 | sean-k-mooney | *device-profile | |
| 13:33:17 | sean-k-mooney | and without a device-profile you cannot create an arq | |
| 13:34:01 | bauzas | so, again, that means we CAN'T be scheduler agnostic | |
| 13:34:23 | bauzas | in this case, you're asking for orange | |
| 13:34:29 | bauzas | and not appel | |
| 13:34:31 | bauzas | apple | |
| 13:34:45 | sean-k-mooney | but we agree that the device the guest sees is idential | |
| 13:34:53 | sean-k-mooney | so they are apples | |
| 13:35:13 | gibi | nova implementation needs a distintion but for the user the result is the same | |
| 13:35:14 | sean-k-mooney | they just have different requiremetn to consume them | |
| 13:35:24 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: exactly | |
| 13:35:30 | gibi | that is bad :/ | |
| 13:35:40 | sean-k-mooney | this is an internal impleemntaiton detail of how the cloud was deployed | |
| 13:35:52 | gibi | we have two way to get the to the same goal :/ | |
| 13:36:05 | sean-k-mooney | technially 3 | |
| 13:36:11 | gibi | :D | |
| 13:36:28 | sean-k-mooney | amd and nviai now supprot vgpu via palin sriov | |
| 13:36:38 | sean-k-mooney | so you can jsut use pci passthough | |
| 13:36:39 | bauzas | what I'm sad is that I thought cyborg would accept the mixed scenario | |
| 13:36:51 | bauzas | but they explicitely ask to split the cloud | |
| 13:37:01 | bauzas | due to implementation details | |
| 13:37:12 | sean-k-mooney | its not cyborg fault | |
| 13:37:23 | sean-k-mooney | nova is not being expresive enough in its query to placment | |
| 13:37:24 | bauzas | as they're unable to post-create the resources | |
| 13:37:33 | bauzas | no | |
| 13:37:41 | sean-k-mooney | no we coud but we do not have the info required | |
| 13:37:43 | bauzas | you're asking placement to give you apples | |
| 13:38:04 | bauzas | it's not nova's fault that you ask for apples coming specially from Tesco | |
| 13:38:07 | sean-k-mooney | for example we could list all the device-profile that request the vgpu resouce and select one | |
| 13:38:18 | sean-k-mooney | and use that to create teh arq | |
| 13:38:35 | sean-k-mooney | ah but that is not what we asked for | |
| 13:38:42 | sean-k-mooney | we assed for resouce:vgpu=1 | |
| 13:38:47 | sean-k-mooney | with no other qulifyer | |
| 13:39:01 | bauzas | ok, back to the original thoughts (that's already 2 hours we're tangling the problem) | |
| 13:39:07 | bauzas | we progressed | |
| 13:39:07 | sean-k-mooney | the current propsal uses ownwer traits and a prefilter to make that owrk | |
| 13:39:32 | bauzas | we know we wanna express 'placement, give me apples that come from tesco and not from carrefour" | |
| 13:39:53 | sean-k-mooney | transparent ot the user or admin by adding a required trati for nova or forbidnint trait for cyborg in the resouce:vgpu case | |
| 13:40:06 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: in this case, I'd prefer the forbidden trait way | |
| 13:40:22 | sean-k-mooney | we can do that but it makes nova special | |
| 13:40:23 | bauzas | "placement, give me apples from Tesco" in the cyborg case | |
| 13:40:41 | bauzas | "placement, give me apples not coming from Tesco as I know you got some of them" | |
| 13:40:57 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: only if cyborg is configured on this cloud | |
| 13:41:05 | bauzas | this is the "as I know" | |
| 13:41:34 | sean-k-mooney | that works if the class is only shared across 2 service but not 3+ | |
| 13:41:36 | bauzas | nothing would change for operators who don't give a single penny to cyborg | |
| 13:41:54 | sean-k-mooney | there is another way i guess | |
| 13:42:05 | sean-k-mooney | we could use placment aggreate to track ownership | |
| 13:42:07 | bauzas | the other way is aggregates | |
| 13:42:29 | bauzas | "placement, don't give me apples coming from those supermarkets" | |
| 13:42:32 | sean-k-mooney | each proejct woudl add all there rps to an aggate | |
| 13:42:49 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I insist | |
| 13:42:52 | sean-k-mooney | and then nova would in the nova case add a member_of requirement to the vgpu request group | |
| 13:43:21 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: whatever the solution is, the prefilter which would have the excluding logic (for the nova case) should only do this if cyborg manages hosts | |
| 13:43:26 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Add check job for FIPS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790519 | |
| 13:43:45 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: that is trival to do | |
| 13:43:57 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we just have a config option for it | |
| 13:44:06 | sean-k-mooney | like pcpus | |
| 13:44:06 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I don't want upgrade impacts if the operator doesn't use cyborg yet | |
| 13:44:44 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: can we express "give me hosts that are not from this aggregate" ? | |
| 13:44:44 | sean-k-mooney | there wont be one if we do this correctly regarless of ownwer traits ro differnt resouce classes | |
| 13:44:54 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: yes | |
| 13:45:09 | bauzas | ok, so there are no operations for nova-managed hosts | |
| 13:45:12 | sean-k-mooney | but i do not think we shoudl do a negitive member_or for cyborg | |
| 13:45:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: the other way | |
| 13:45:33 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: cyborg would manage an aggregate of managed hosts | |
| 13:45:53 | sean-k-mooney | for nova the prefilter when enabled would do member_op=nova-aggate or member_of=cyborg-aggreate | |
| 13:45:56 | bauzas | the prefilter would ask for hosts that are members of this agg in the cyborg case | |
| 13:46:03 | sean-k-mooney | when prefilter is off it wont do anything | |
| 13:46:25 | bauzas | but in the nova case, the prefilter would ask hosts that AREN'T hosts of this agg | |
| 13:46:40 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: again, I don't wanna manage a fleet of nova hosts | |