Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-06-02
17:08:59 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add same_subtree field to RequestLevelParams https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791503
17:13:10 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Bump min placement microversion to 1.36 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791504
17:13:18 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support same_subtree in allocation_canadidate query https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791505
17:16:36 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support the new port resource_request format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/787208
17:18:45 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transfer RequestLevelParams from ports to scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791506
17:21:58 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] ports with both bw and pps resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792394
17:22:02 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [func test] move unshelve test to the proper place https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/793621
17:30:48 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/osc-placement master: default to max version when no session https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/794276
17:33:28 rm_work \o/
17:35:22 sean-k-mooney lol i broke the docs because thre app is non
17:35:49 sean-k-mooney File "/home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/osc-placement/osc_placement/version.py", line 141, in get_version
17:35:51 sean-k-mooney if obj.app.client_manager.session is None:
17:35:53 sean-k-mooney AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'client_manager'
17:37:49 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/osc-placement master: default to max version when no session https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/794276
17:38:07 sean-k-mooney rm_work: ok ^ should be the final patch unless peopel ask for feedback
17:38:12 sean-k-mooney well provide feedback
17:38:35 sean-k-mooney gibi: can you add https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/794276 to your review queue
17:39:08 rm_work would docs not also want latest?
17:39:44 sean-k-mooney maybe
17:39:50 rm_work but, starts to be hard to code for every little case like that when you're basically making an inference about the caller
17:39:59 sean-k-mooney but they were previouly getting the oldest
17:40:01 rm_work not "if for_docs:"
17:40:06 rm_work yeah...
17:40:22 sean-k-mooney i can do this a different way
17:40:30 sean-k-mooney i can catch the other error type
17:40:40 sean-k-mooney PluginAtributeERROR
17:41:05 sean-k-mooney but i dont like that since it actully trys to connect the cloud
17:41:37 stephenfin melwitt: Won't have a chance now (I'm just finishing up) but I think I didn't have any concerns of my own, so if you're happy to +W then go for it :)
17:42:20 melwitt cool, thanks stephenfin
17:42:23 sean-k-mooney rm_work: let me see what the docs are using it for
17:48:39 sean-k-mooney rm_work: its from cliff/sphinxext.py
17:49:14 rm_work so not the client auto-doc stuff?
17:49:22 rm_work or that is it
17:49:41 sean-k-mooney well kind of
17:49:53 sean-k-mooney its form _generate_nodes_per_command
17:50:06 sean-k-mooney so it is the auto generation of docs for cliff commands
17:50:36 sean-k-mooney previously that was raising an atribute error but we were catching it and returning the oldest version
17:55:27 sean-k-mooney rm_work: lol i may have missed that comment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/794276/5/osc_placement/version.py#146
17:55:37 sean-k-mooney that is why the try is there
17:56:21 rm_work heh yeah
17:56:49 rm_work I would say "let's use the maximum one" but that's just me
17:57:22 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Error anti-affinity violation on migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/784166
17:57:34 sean-k-mooney ya that would be my prefernce too
17:58:12 rm_work might be a bigger change than just "bugfix regression on bash completion"
17:58:56 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Allow provider re-parenting in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/788243
17:59:25 sean-k-mooney rm_work: ya for now im not going to chagne it
17:59:34 sean-k-mooney but i left a review comment
18:00:49 rm_work yep, left a reply too :D
18:31:36 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: [stable-only] Fix ceph install in live migration hook https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794000
18:35:15 opendevreview Rodrigo Barbieri proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Error anti-affinity violation on migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794328
22:13:49 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: zuul: Replace grenade and nova-grenade-multinode with grenade-multinode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794345
22:32:55 tosky melwitt: crossing fingers :)
22:33:13 melwitt :)
#openstack-nova - 2021-06-03
01:19:17 gmann melwitt: replied on this - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/762013/2/doc/source/configuration/policy-concepts.rst#220
01:20:03 gmann melwitt: I agree on your point. I will add the current limitation for force_host and requested_destination
01:20:41 gmann zero_disk and external-network seems good. later one depends on neutron policy but that is open for project reader also
01:37:05 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Remove PROJECT_ADMIN limitation from zero-disk and external-network policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794360
01:38:07 gmann melwitt: ^^
02:18:06 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Improve policy doc for supported scope info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/762013
02:18:10 gmann melwitt: stephenfin ^^ updated
05:06:39 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Make test_refresh_associations_* deterministic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794396
05:10:22 melwitt gmann: did you mean to remove the table when you went from PS2 to PS3? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/762013/2..3/doc/source/configuration/policy-concepts.rst#b307
05:17:05 melwitt added a comment on the review ^
07:44:13 bauzas hmpf, reminder that we have an office hour in 15 mins , I guess
07:58:04 gibi yes
07:58:09 gibi in 2 mins :)
07:58:17 gibi I'm almost ready to start
07:58:17 gibi ...
08:00:16 gibi #startmeeting nova_extra
08:00:17 opendevmeet Meeting started Thu Jun 3 08:00:16 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:00:18 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:00:20 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova_extra'
08:00:58 gibi welcome o/
08:01:16 suzhengwei__ \o/
08:01:38 XinxinShen o/
08:01:51 gibi ... waiting a minute to lets everybody join
08:03:24 gibi So a quick summary. We agree to have this meeting time slot one a Months in every first Thursday here in #openstack-nova
08:03:33 gibi s/one/once/
08:04:04 gibi but we haven't talked about yet what would be a good format for it
08:04:19 gibi should we go through the normal meeting agenda
08:04:33 gibi talking about bugs, CI, release, stable,
08:04:44 gibi or just go with an open agenda, like in an office hour
08:05:06 gibi what is the preference of the people present?
08:05:14 gibi I can do both if needed
08:07:07 suzhengwei__ This is the first extra meeting. My colleague didn't prepare for it enough.
08:07:18 gibi suzhengwei__: no worries
08:07:56 suzhengwei__ Open agenda will be all right.
08:08:09 gibi If no oppinions about the format then I would go with the simple open agenda
08:08:19 gibi suzhengwei__: cool, then we are on the same page
08:08:23 suzhengwei__ ok
08:08:27 gibi and we can change later if needed
08:08:59 gibi I have one agenda point for today
08:09:47 gibi just want to refresh the process we have in nova about the release
08:09:56 gibi so we just had Milestone 1 last week
08:10:07 gibi that that point of time there is no special deadline in nova
08:10:23 gibi the next Milestone will happen in 5 weeks from now
08:10:33 gibi at Milestone 2 we will do spec freeze
08:11:09 gibi it means that if you have open specs then you have to get merged before M2 or it will need to be re-proposed to the Y release during the autumn
08:11:21 gibi I'm planning to have a spec review day before M2
08:11:29 gibi similarly how we had such day before M1

Earlier   Later