Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-05-20
13:57:06 sean-k-mooney *was
13:57:06 sean-k-mooney *was
13:57:42 gibi sean-k-mooney: based on the os-resource-classes review if that would happen in a spec it would have been approved by the same set of cores anyhow
13:57:42 gibi sean-k-mooney: based on the os-resource-classes review if that would happen in a spec it would have been approved by the same set of cores anyhow
13:58:24 sean-k-mooney * sean-k-mooney regrest that i had to proxy my inovlvment in this through others and was not directly invovle din the review a the time
13:59:20 gibi sean-k-mooney: don't feel bad about it, it just a name, we have soo many names to decide on in the future
13:59:20 gibi sean-k-mooney: don't feel bad about it, it just a name, we have soo many names to decide on in the future
13:59:29 sean-k-mooney lol :)
13:59:29 sean-k-mooney lol :)
13:59:33 gibi :)
14:00:34 sean-k-mooney gibi: well min bandwidth just feels a little more personal since i first discussed it with you after the briton mid cycle when you visited intel shannon
14:00:34 sean-k-mooney gibi: well min bandwidth just feels a little more personal since i first discussed it with you after the briton mid cycle when you visited intel shannon
14:01:41 sean-k-mooney and i tired to follow the implemation later via other at a high level but i tought we were still using the name in the orginal spec
14:01:41 sean-k-mooney and i tired to follow the implemation later via other at a high level but i tought we were still using the name in the orginal spec
14:01:52 sean-k-mooney anyway are you going to push an updates spec soon
14:01:52 sean-k-mooney anyway are you going to push an updates spec soon
14:02:02 gibi old times
14:02:02 gibi old times
14:02:04 sean-k-mooney with the other poitn address or should i re review the current version
14:02:05 sean-k-mooney with the other poitn address or should i re review the current version
14:02:15 gibi just read the current version
14:02:15 gibi just read the current version
14:02:28 sean-k-mooney ok will do
14:02:28 sean-k-mooney ok will do
14:02:31 gibi I will wait bauzas to check back about the OVS RP question
14:02:31 gibi I will wait bauzas to check back about the OVS RP question
14:02:47 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
14:02:47 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
14:06:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Use the new type HostDomainOpt. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788240
14:06:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Use the new type HostDomainOpt. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788240
14:06:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Move remaining non-libvirt fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790967
14:06:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Move remaining non-libvirt fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790967
14:07:07 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Split external service fixtures out https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790968
14:07:07 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Split external service fixtures out https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790968
14:10:51 gibi sean-k-mooney: I do remember the bristol mid cycle, but I haven't visited Intel Ireland. :)
14:10:51 gibi sean-k-mooney: I do remember the bristol mid cycle, but I haven't visited Intel Ireland. :)
14:11:37 gibi I hope I'm not that old that I already forget about these things :)
14:11:38 gibi I hope I'm not that old that I already forget about these things :)
14:11:43 sean-k-mooney really? i could have swore you were the person that acompanied jay pipes
14:11:43 sean-k-mooney really? i could have swore you were the person that acompanied jay pipes
14:12:13 gibi that was somebody else
14:12:13 gibi that was somebody else
14:12:19 gibi we should ask jay :)
14:12:19 gibi we should ask jay :)
14:13:12 sean-k-mooney really. i wonder who it was then. it was me jay rodolfo adrian and mistry person in a room
14:13:12 sean-k-mooney really. i wonder who it was then. it was me jay rodolfo adrian and mistry person in a room
14:13:34 sean-k-mooney well and malini and adrian hoban
14:13:35 sean-k-mooney well and malini and adrian hoban
14:13:59 sean-k-mooney i tough it was you since i assumed you were going to visit errison in athlone
14:13:59 sean-k-mooney i tough it was you since i assumed you were going to visit errison in athlone
14:14:14 sean-k-mooney maybe it was someone form his company
14:14:14 sean-k-mooney maybe it was someone form his company
14:14:32 sean-k-mooney i think he woudl have been at mirantis at the time
14:14:32 sean-k-mooney i think he woudl have been at mirantis at the time
14:14:36 sean-k-mooney anyway not imporant
14:14:37 sean-k-mooney anyway not imporant
14:14:50 sean-k-mooney excpt im clearly imanging things.
14:14:50 sean-k-mooney excpt im clearly imanging things.
14:15:06 gibi our mind fills up the gapes
14:15:06 gibi our mind fills up the gapes
14:15:08 gibi gaps
14:15:08 gibi gaps
14:15:45 sean-k-mooney ya they do which what we precivie as the logical answer
14:15:45 sean-k-mooney ya they do which what we precivie as the logical answer
14:16:25 gibi yepp
14:25:27 gibi now I got in a nostalgic mood. I miss jaypipes, cdent, mriedem, efried, and others :/
14:25:27 gibi now I got in a nostalgic mood. I miss jaypipes, cdent, mriedem, efried, and others :/
14:29:30 lyarwood elod / melwitt / bauzas ; https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788467 - stable reviews on this would be great if anyone has time
14:29:30 lyarwood elod / melwitt / bauzas ; https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788467 - stable reviews on this would be great if anyone has time
14:31:22 lyarwood gibi: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1928063 - if you have time today, it's blocking some downstream SEV verification
14:31:22 lyarwood gibi: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1928063 - if you have time today, it's blocking some downstream SEV verification
14:31:30 gibi looking...
14:31:30 gibi looking...
14:32:47 gibi lyarwood: This morning I was looking at the next libvirt version we declare in the libvirt/driver.py. It is 7.0.0. Do we actually promise to bump to it in Xena? I'm asking this as focal still only has 6.0.0
14:32:47 gibi lyarwood: This morning I was looking at the next libvirt version we declare in the libvirt/driver.py. It is 7.0.0. Do we actually promise to bump to it in Xena? I'm asking this as focal still only has 6.0.0
14:33:54 lyarwood gibi: I think the comments suggest we will but it has never been enforced
14:33:54 lyarwood gibi: I think the comments suggest we will but it has never been enforced
14:34:08 lyarwood gibi: we even missed it for a few cycles after all
14:34:08 lyarwood gibi: we even missed it for a few cycles after all
14:34:11 lyarwood * lyarwood checks the docs again
14:34:34 gibi yeah I saw on the wiki that we kept the same versions for multiple releases
14:34:34 gibi yeah I saw on the wiki that we kept the same versions for multiple releases
14:35:26 lyarwood yup, let me updated the wiki page with the latest
14:35:26 lyarwood yup, let me updated the wiki page with the latest
14:35:40 lyarwood but yeah if we are stuck on focal anyway for Xena we can't bump
14:35:40 lyarwood but yeah if we are stuck on focal anyway for Xena we can't bump
14:36:03 gibi I agree, we have no test coverage at the moment with 7.0.0 so we should not bump
14:36:03 gibi I agree, we have no test coverage at the moment with 7.0.0 so we should not bump
14:36:09 gibi thanks for updating the wiki!
14:36:09 gibi thanks for updating the wiki!
14:44:04 gibi lyarwood: regarding the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790659/3/nova/objects/image_meta.py Do we need to persist the image_ref in the sysmeta? Can we simply fill image_meta.id from instance.image_ref when an ImageMeta is constructed?
14:44:04 gibi lyarwood: regarding the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790659/3/nova/objects/image_meta.py Do we need to persist the image_ref in the sysmeta? Can we simply fill image_meta.id from instance.image_ref when an ImageMeta is constructed?
14:45:57 gibi we anyhow filling ImageMeta from instance.system_metadata so we always need to have a ref for an instance when we create the ImageMeta object
14:45:57 gibi we anyhow filling ImageMeta from instance.system_metadata so we always need to have a ref for an instance when we create the ImageMeta object
14:46:37 lyarwood gibi: yeah true
14:46:37 lyarwood gibi: yeah true
14:46:46 lyarwood gibi: I was sure there was a reason I left this in
14:46:46 lyarwood gibi: I was sure there was a reason I left this in
14:46:51 lyarwood gibi: maybe test fallout?
14:46:51 lyarwood gibi: maybe test fallout?

Earlier   Later