Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-05-20
11:45:27 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: you could not wait for my -1
11:45:27 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: you could not wait for my -1
11:45:40 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: you forgot to add a check in _validate_flavor_image_nostatus
11:45:40 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: you forgot to add a check in _validate_flavor_image_nostatus
11:45:43 stephenfin you must -1 faster :P
11:45:43 stephenfin you must -1 faster :P
11:46:00 sean-k-mooney that invokes the new fuction you put in hardware.py
11:46:00 sean-k-mooney that invokes the new fuction you put in hardware.py
11:46:22 stephenfin wdym? I added tests in test_hardware.py if that's what you mean
11:46:22 stephenfin wdym? I added tests in test_hardware.py if that's what you mean
11:46:30 sean-k-mooney nope
11:46:30 sean-k-mooney nope
11:46:42 sean-k-mooney you are ment to check for flavor and image conflcit in the api
11:46:42 sean-k-mooney you are ment to check for flavor and image conflcit in the api
11:46:43 stephenfin ohh, gotcha
11:46:43 stephenfin ohh, gotcha
11:46:44 stephenfin yes
11:46:44 stephenfin yes
11:46:48 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/82141b12c356fe374822038bdf0a6f0aaa32047b/nova/compute/api.py#L643
11:46:48 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/82141b12c356fe374822038bdf0a6f0aaa32047b/nova/compute/api.py#L643
11:46:50 stephenfin I'll add that. Thanks
11:46:50 stephenfin I'll add that. Thanks
11:47:08 stephenfin and then, lunch
11:47:08 stephenfin and then, lunch
11:47:11 sean-k-mooney ohter then that and the need for a specless blueprint and docs which you have just added looked good
11:47:11 sean-k-mooney ohter then that and the need for a specless blueprint and docs which you have just added looked good
11:48:16 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: can you add this to the meeting adgenda later
11:48:16 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: can you add this to the meeting adgenda later
11:48:47 admin0 i have checked that there are no instances in nova.instance where hostname = $hostname(.) .. so all instances are set to $hostname (without .) only
11:48:47 admin0 i have checked that there are no instances in nova.instance where hostname = $hostname(.) .. so all instances are set to $hostname (without .) only
11:48:52 admin0 placement has only hosts without .
11:48:52 admin0 placement has only hosts without .
11:48:56 admin0 so this all looks good
11:48:56 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: sure
11:48:56 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: sure
11:48:56 admin0 so this all looks good
11:49:45 admin0 but openstack migrate $uuid --wait --live $dest_host returns => compute host $source not found (400)
11:49:45 admin0 but openstack migrate $uuid --wait --live $dest_host returns => compute host $source not found (400)
11:58:10 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add 'hw:vif_multiqueue_enabled' flavor extra spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792356
11:58:11 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Document virtio-net multiqueue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792362
11:58:11 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Address TODO https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792363
11:58:12 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Move 'hw:pmu', 'hw_pmu' parsing to nova.virt.hardware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792364
11:58:47 artom sean-k-mooney, IIRC no, the audit command checks for allocations, not RPs themselves
11:58:47 artom sean-k-mooney, IIRC no, the audit command checks for allocations, not RPs themselves
12:00:42 admin0 how to check how servers are selected for migration ?
12:00:42 admin0 how to check how servers are selected for migration ?
12:00:59 admin0 i mean what would cause an openstack migrate to say $source not found
12:00:59 admin0 i mean what would cause an openstack migrate to say $source not found
12:01:32 admin0 nova hypervisor-servers h7 .. now shows all servers with hostname as h7 (without the .)
12:01:32 admin0 nova hypervisor-servers h7 .. now shows all servers with hostname as h7 (without the .)
12:13:33 sean-k-mooney you might need to restart the nova schduler
12:13:33 sean-k-mooney you might need to restart the nova schduler
12:13:48 sean-k-mooney i know we send som data taht is cached in the schduler for the hoststate objects
12:13:49 sean-k-mooney i know we send som data taht is cached in the schduler for the hoststate objects
12:14:02 sean-k-mooney but i did not think it would cause that type of error
12:14:03 sean-k-mooney but i did not think it would cause that type of error
12:14:18 sean-k-mooney although its possibel the host mappigns in the api db need to be updated too
12:14:18 sean-k-mooney although its possibel the host mappigns in the api db need to be updated too
12:14:58 sean-k-mooney admin0: check nova_api.host_mappings
12:14:58 sean-k-mooney admin0: check nova_api.host_mappings
12:21:22 admin0 sean-k-mooney, this is what i see: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/a1git/aeba25d6e7a37241ce2ed8ef1547953e/raw/df42c1309a7ad88f393980a7654992fb93bd365a/gistfile1.txt
12:21:22 admin0 sean-k-mooney, this is what i see: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/a1git/aeba25d6e7a37241ce2ed8ef1547953e/raw/df42c1309a7ad88f393980a7654992fb93bd365a/gistfile1.txt
12:29:26 sean-k-mooney ok so they all look correct
12:29:26 sean-k-mooney ok so they all look correct
12:29:55 sean-k-mooney you are still getting the same error after restarting the scheduler?
12:29:55 sean-k-mooney you are still getting the same error after restarting the scheduler?
12:30:29 admin0 wait .. that is something i did not restarted
12:30:29 admin0 wait .. that is something i did not restarted
12:30:31 admin0 one moment
12:36:14 admin0 sean-k-mooney, i restared the whole nova containers .. but still get Compute host h7 could not be found. (
12:36:14 admin0 sean-k-mooney, i restared the whole nova containers .. but still get Compute host h7 could not be found. (
12:39:56 gibi stephenfin, sean-k-mooney, bauzas: I responded in the pps spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/785014 Thanks for the reviews. Would be good to make some decision about the additional OVS RP question then I will respin the spec fixing up the things you asked for
12:39:56 gibi stephenfin, sean-k-mooney, bauzas: I responded in the pps spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/785014 Thanks for the reviews. Would be good to make some decision about the additional OVS RP question then I will respin the spec fixing up the things you asked for
12:40:16 gibi stephenfin: could you check back to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/785014/7/specs/xena/approved/qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate.rst#82 as I might missed the point of your comment
12:40:17 gibi stephenfin: could you check back to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/785014/7/specs/xena/approved/qos-minimum-guaranteed-packet-rate.rst#82 as I might missed the point of your comment
12:42:22 sean-k-mooney gibi: im hoping we just will never support multiple openvswitch on the same host
12:42:22 sean-k-mooney gibi: im hoping we just will never support multiple openvswitch on the same host
12:42:36 sean-k-mooney gibi: it comes up every few months
12:42:36 sean-k-mooney gibi: it comes up every few months
12:42:40 gibi :)
12:42:48 sean-k-mooney for those that want to support ovs-dpdk and kernel ovs at the same time
12:42:49 sean-k-mooney for those that want to support ovs-dpdk and kernel ovs at the same time
12:43:00 sean-k-mooney but it woudl be a fairly invaise change
12:43:00 sean-k-mooney but it woudl be a fairly invaise change
12:43:17 sean-k-mooney we would need to modify the ml2 driver to include the ovs connection detail in the port bindings
12:43:17 sean-k-mooney we would need to modify the ml2 driver to include the ovs connection detail in the port bindings
12:43:29 sean-k-mooney and modify os-vif to then use those
12:43:29 sean-k-mooney and modify os-vif to then use those
12:44:17 gibi it would be almost free to add the extra RP now except that we would need to reparent the bridge RPs which needs the new placement version
12:44:17 gibi it would be almost free to add the extra RP now except that we would need to reparent the bridge RPs which needs the new placement version
12:44:40 sean-k-mooney yep but what value does it add
12:44:40 sean-k-mooney yep but what value does it add
12:45:28 gibi it models the reality a bit better as the agent and the OVS instance is two different software service i
12:45:28 gibi it models the reality a bit better as the agent and the OVS instance is two different software service i
12:45:46 sean-k-mooney so woudl modling the pps on the br-int
12:45:46 sean-k-mooney so woudl modling the pps on the br-int
12:45:58 gibi no
12:45:58 gibi no
12:46:07 sean-k-mooney and the reality is today you can only have one ovs agent per host
12:46:07 sean-k-mooney and the reality is today you can only have one ovs agent per host

Earlier   Later