| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-05-19 | |||
| 10:50:23 | gibi | but the logic behind the failure can be the same | |
| 10:50:23 | gibi | but the logic behind the failure can be the same | |
| 10:50:38 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: well its disabled by default | |
| 10:50:38 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: well its disabled by default | |
| 10:51:12 | sean-k-mooney | because it need the nova patch to be present to enable it | |
| 10:51:12 | sean-k-mooney | because it need the nova patch to be present to enable it | |
| 10:51:19 | gibi | also it only changes _get_neutron_events_for_live_migration() which is fairly live migration specific | |
| 10:51:19 | gibi | also it only changes _get_neutron_events_for_live_migration() which is fairly live migration specific | |
| 10:51:55 | gibi | ohh you talk about the neutron fixes | |
| 10:51:55 | gibi | ohh you talk about the neutron fixes | |
| 10:52:04 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 10:52:11 | gibi | we can try that | |
| 10:52:11 | gibi | we can try that | |
| 10:52:25 | gibi | as you said we want that to default to true anyhow | |
| 10:52:25 | gibi | as you said we want that to default to true anyhow | |
| 10:52:26 | sean-k-mooney | the nova patch was just so that the neutron fix would not break live migraiton | |
| 10:52:27 | sean-k-mooney | the nova patch was just so that the neutron fix would not break live migraiton | |
| 10:52:51 | sean-k-mooney | and because we needed the nova fix the neutron one defaulted to false for last cycle | |
| 10:52:51 | sean-k-mooney | and because we needed the nova fix the neutron one defaulted to false for last cycle | |
| 10:53:14 | sean-k-mooney | but now it can go to ture since the nova patch is present and backported | |
| 10:53:14 | sean-k-mooney | but now it can go to ture since the nova patch is present and backported | |
| 10:54:07 | gibi | lets switch it to true on master | |
| 10:54:07 | gibi | lets switch it to true on master | |
| 10:54:25 | sean-k-mooney | would you like me to submit a patch to change the default and note the evacuation bug you filed as a related bug? or will i leave that to you | |
| 10:54:25 | sean-k-mooney | would you like me to submit a patch to change the default and note the evacuation bug you filed as a related bug? or will i leave that to you | |
| 10:54:58 | gibi | you have a bit more context on that neutron flag so if you have time please propose the switch | |
| 10:54:58 | gibi | you have a bit more context on that neutron flag so if you have time please propose the switch | |
| 10:55:39 | sean-k-mooney | ok ill go do that shortly i have a docs meeting at the top of the hour so ill likely do it after that | |
| 10:55:39 | sean-k-mooney | ok ill go do that shortly i have a docs meeting at the top of the hour so ill likely do it after that | |
| 10:59:01 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 11:00:18 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: it seems the devstack default OVN change has been reverted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/791104 | |
| 11:00:18 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: it seems the devstack default OVN change has been reverted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/791104 | |
| 11:01:03 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok that would explain why we are seeing ml2/ovs | |
| 11:01:03 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok that would explain why we are seeing ml2/ovs | |
| 11:01:10 | sean-k-mooney | things exploded? | |
| 11:01:10 | sean-k-mooney | things exploded? | |
| 11:01:25 | gibi | based on the revert commit message yes there are extra things to fix | |
| 11:01:25 | gibi | based on the revert commit message yes there are extra things to fix | |
| 11:01:47 | sean-k-mooney | im really happy we did not make the default change during feature freeze then :) | |
| 11:01:48 | sean-k-mooney | im really happy we did not make the default change during feature freeze then :) | |
| 11:02:35 | gibi | yes :) | |
| 11:02:35 | gibi | yes :) | |
| 11:02:40 | gibi | good judgement | |
| 11:02:40 | gibi | good judgement | |
| 11:23:29 | bauzas | * bauzas goes afk for the afternoon if you look at me (getting a new electric car ;) | |
| 11:24:08 | gibi | bauzas: congrats! | |
| 11:24:08 | gibi | bauzas: congrats! | |
| 11:24:16 | gibi | is it a tesla? | |
| 11:24:17 | gibi | is it a tesla? | |
| 11:24:31 | bauzas | gibi: nope, for my wife, a Peugeot 208 | |
| 11:24:31 | bauzas | gibi: nope, for my wife, a Peugeot 208 | |
| 11:25:17 | bauzas | I already have a PHEV (Skoda Superb iV) for me :) | |
| 11:25:17 | bauzas | I already have a PHEV (Skoda Superb iV) for me :) | |
| 11:26:03 | gibi | sounds cool :) | |
| 11:26:03 | gibi | sounds cool :) | |
| 11:39:04 | lyarwood | elod: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788720 - thoughts on landing this series? | |
| 11:39:04 | lyarwood | elod: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788720 - thoughts on landing this series? | |
| 11:42:09 | elod | lyarwood: sorry, yes, I started to look it yesterday, but want to see the "whole picture" first o:) | |
| 11:42:09 | elod | lyarwood: sorry, yes, I started to look it yesterday, but want to see the "whole picture" first o:) | |
| 11:43:13 | elod | lyarwood: it is (again) a bit too big for my taste for stable, but it's more or less clean if I'm not mistaken.... | |
| 11:43:13 | elod | lyarwood: it is (again) a bit too big for my taste for stable, but it's more or less clean if I'm not mistaken.... | |
| 11:46:43 | lyarwood | elod: yeah agreed it's pretty large but while it's clean I thought it would be useful | |
| 11:46:43 | lyarwood | elod: yeah agreed it's pretty large but while it's clean I thought it would be useful | |
| 11:46:51 | lyarwood | elod: it's something we wanted downstream for Wallaby either way | |
| 11:46:52 | lyarwood | elod: it's something we wanted downstream for Wallaby either way | |
| 11:47:06 | lyarwood | elod: so if we can squeeze it in early this cycle it would be great :) | |
| 11:47:06 | lyarwood | elod: so if we can squeeze it in early this cycle it would be great :) | |
| 11:48:48 | elod | lyarwood: understood :) I'll try to go through the patches today | |
| 11:48:48 | elod | lyarwood: understood :) I'll try to go through the patches today | |
| 11:50:58 | lyarwood | many thanks | |
| 11:50:58 | lyarwood | many thanks | |
| 11:52:57 | gibi | elod: as far as I remember it is a clean cherr-pick all the way. I did a mistake when I first tried to cherry-pick it as I used some old unmereged version of a patch | |
| 11:52:57 | gibi | elod: as far as I remember it is a clean cherr-pick all the way. I did a mistake when I first tried to cherry-pick it as I used some old unmereged version of a patch | |
| 12:04:07 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i have been debating about getting an eletric car for a while but 1 i like my mini and 2 i driver maybe 5000KMs per year so its har to justtify spending more then a few grand on a car | |
| 12:04:07 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i have been debating about getting an eletric car for a while but 1 i like my mini and 2 i driver maybe 5000KMs per year so its har to justtify spending more then a few grand on a car | |
| 12:08:29 | elod | gibi: that part is OK then :) just have to think whether the series is valid for backport or not o:) (by looking at the code and patches yesterday it was a bit "featurish" for me, but probably there's no risk to backport... but haven't looked all of the patches yet) | |
| 12:08:29 | elod | gibi: that part is OK then :) just have to think whether the series is valid for backport or not o:) (by looking at the code and patches yesterday it was a bit "featurish" for me, but probably there's no risk to backport... but haven't looked all of the patches yet) | |
| 12:32:25 | gibi | elod: it does not change any external interfaces except the two new config options, but those can be removed, if you wish, from the backport. There is also no externally visible behavior change except the fix of the failure | |
| 12:32:25 | gibi | elod: it does not change any external interfaces except the two new config options, but those can be removed, if you wish, from the backport. There is also no externally visible behavior change except the fix of the failure | |
| 12:33:51 | gibi | I guess you feel it as a feature becuase we started using a different mechanism to talk to libvirt regarding the attachment, we went from polling to waiting for events. And waiting for events needed extra preparation in the code | |
| 12:33:51 | gibi | I guess you feel it as a feature becuase we started using a different mechanism to talk to libvirt regarding the attachment, we went from polling to waiting for events. And waiting for events needed extra preparation in the code | |
| 12:35:00 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think its a featue its just a refacotiong | |
| 12:35:00 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think its a featue its just a refacotiong | |
| 12:35:24 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yes, it needed a sizeable refactoring to properly fix that bug | |
| 12:35:24 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yes, it needed a sizeable refactoring to properly fix that bug | |
| 12:35:32 | sean-k-mooney | the behaivior before and after modulo bugs is identical from blackbox perspctive | |
| 12:35:32 | sean-k-mooney | the behaivior before and after modulo bugs is identical from blackbox perspctive | |
| 12:35:43 | gibi | yepp | |
| 12:43:51 | elod | yes... the refactor... o:) thanks for the details, it is useful for me to hear other opinions as well! | |
| 12:43:51 | elod | yes... the refactor... o:) thanks for the details, it is useful for me to hear other opinions as well! | |
| 12:44:13 | lyarwood | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790660 - core reviews on this bugfix would be appreciated if anyone has time this week | |
| 12:44:13 | lyarwood | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790660 - core reviews on this bugfix would be appreciated if anyone has time this week | |
| 12:44:23 | lyarwood | and the series below it sorry | |
| 12:44:23 | lyarwood | and the series below it sorry | |
| 12:44:37 | gibi | lyarwood: added to my queue | |
| 12:44:37 | gibi | lyarwood: added to my queue | |
| 12:44:43 | lyarwood | thanks | |
| 13:18:17 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add same_subtree field to RequestLevelParams https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791503 | |
| 13:18:18 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Bump min placement microversion to 1.36 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791504 | |
| 13:18:18 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support same_subtree in allocation_canadidate query https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791505 | |