Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-05-14
21:28:18 artom Anyways, I'm just happy I got my head around it
21:28:18 artom Anyways, I'm just happy I got my head around it
21:28:52 artom I could never reconcile the "we just need a better error message" with the error that libvirt was throwing. We were clearly doing *something* wrong
21:28:52 artom I could never reconcile the "we just need a better error message" with the error that libvirt was throwing. We were clearly doing *something* wrong
21:29:47 sean-k-mooney as i said in the downstream bz the neutron extinon is broken by desing
21:29:47 sean-k-mooney as i said in the downstream bz the neutron extinon is broken by desing
21:29:55 sean-k-mooney and im suprised we support in our down stream product
21:29:55 sean-k-mooney and im suprised we support in our down stream product
21:30:17 sean-k-mooney when writeble mtus was first intoduced it was for just one out of tree network backend
21:30:17 sean-k-mooney when writeble mtus was first intoduced it was for just one out of tree network backend
21:30:28 sean-k-mooney and no integration was added with nova
21:30:28 sean-k-mooney and no integration was added with nova
21:30:31 artom Right, I get that part
21:30:31 artom Right, I get that part
21:30:47 artom Neutron added a thing that Nova was never modified to support
21:30:47 artom Neutron added a thing that Nova was never modified to support
21:30:58 artom Well... Yeah, I see where you're coming from
21:30:58 artom Well... Yeah, I see where you're coming from
21:31:21 artom It's not a bug if Neutron unilaterally changed the data on us
21:31:21 artom It's not a bug if Neutron unilaterally changed the data on us
21:31:31 sean-k-mooney yes and that was not intended to work with ovn or ml2/ovs at the time
21:31:31 sean-k-mooney yes and that was not intended to work with ovn or ml2/ovs at the time
21:31:43 sean-k-mooney at somepoint it started to be used with those i guesss
21:31:43 sean-k-mooney at somepoint it started to be used with those i guesss
21:32:14 artom Yeah
21:32:14 artom Yeah
21:32:26 artom Anyways, sorry for the noise :) As I said, just happy I groked it
21:32:26 artom Anyways, sorry for the noise :) As I said, just happy I groked it
21:32:33 artom *Fully* groked it
21:32:33 artom *Fully* groked it
21:32:40 artom * artom is halfway through his beer
21:33:11 sean-k-mooney no worries
21:33:11 sean-k-mooney no worries
21:34:07 sean-k-mooney https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1671634
21:34:09 sean-k-mooney https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1671634
21:34:09 openstack Launchpad bug 1671634 in neutron "[RFE] Allow to set MTU for networks" [Wishlist,Fix released] - Assigned to Ihar Hrachyshka (ihar-hrachyshka)
21:34:09 openstack Launchpad bug 1671634 in neutron "[RFE] Allow to set MTU for networks" [Wishlist,Fix released] - Assigned to Ihar Hrachyshka (ihar-hrachyshka)
21:34:14 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/483518
21:34:14 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/483518
21:34:20 sean-k-mooney this is when it was intoduced
21:34:20 sean-k-mooney this is when it was intoduced
21:37:13 sean-k-mooney artom: and this is where i added the mtu https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/553072 to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1747496
21:37:15 sean-k-mooney artom: and this is where i added the mtu https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/553072 to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1747496
21:37:15 openstack Launchpad bug 1747496 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "MTUs are not set for VIFs if using kernel ovs + hybrid plug = false" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to sean mooney (sean-k-mooney)
21:37:15 openstack Launchpad bug 1747496 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "MTUs are not set for VIFs if using kernel ovs + hybrid plug = false" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to sean mooney (sean-k-mooney)
21:39:46 sean-k-mooney artom: anyway enjoy your weekend i was loging in to start backing up file before i resintall my home server
21:39:46 sean-k-mooney artom: anyway enjoy your weekend i was loging in to start backing up file before i resintall my home server
21:40:14 artom sean-k-mooney, o/ you too man
21:40:14 artom sean-k-mooney, o/ you too man
#openstack-nova - 2021-05-15
04:05:13 openstackgerrit Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: Support Cpu Compararion on Aarch64 Platform https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/763928
06:16:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Reject open redirection in the console proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791297
06:16:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Reject open redirection in the console proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791297
07:18:35 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Reject open redirection in the console proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791577
07:18:35 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Reject open redirection in the console proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/791577
13:24:07 zigo Hi. Does https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764246 also solves (live) migration of VMs that are using LUKS encryption?
13:24:07 zigo Hi. Does https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764246 also solves (live) migration of VMs that are using LUKS encryption?
17:49:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Stop leaking ceph df cmd in RBD utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/789374
17:49:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Stop leaking ceph df cmd in RBD utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/789374
#openstack-nova - 2021-05-16
11:02:56 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Speed up server details https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/791620
11:15:42 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
12:36:40 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
12:56:04 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
13:02:06 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
13:18:08 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
13:21:41 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
13:46:43 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
13:58:30 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
14:11:46 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
14:17:57 openstackgerrit norman shen proposed openstack/nova master: Saving security group to info_cache https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/786348
#openstack-nova - 2021-05-17
06:45:37 brinzhang stephenfin: hello, for the remove tenant_id patch, I dont know which is wrong, the releasenote always failed, I tried to change it in my local env, but it has the same issue, could you please help me to check why it is failed?
06:45:37 brinzhang stephenfin: hello, for the remove tenant_id patch, I dont know which is wrong, the releasenote always failed, I tried to change it in my local env, but it has the same issue, could you please help me to check why it is failed?
06:45:53 brinzhang stephenfin: links in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768852/15
06:45:53 brinzhang stephenfin: links in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768852/15
11:00:39 tosky elod: so (context: EOL ocata) I guess I need to abandon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/714958/ ?
11:00:39 tosky elod: so (context: EOL ocata) I guess I need to abandon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/714958/ ?
11:32:26 elod tosky: yes, I don't think it will merge, so yes :)
11:32:26 elod tosky: yes, I don't think it will merge, so yes :)
11:32:38 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from List/Update Servers APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764292
11:32:38 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace all_tenants with all_projects in List Server APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765311
11:32:39 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from Rebuild Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766380
11:32:39 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from List SG API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766726
11:32:39 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from List SG API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766726
11:32:40 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from Flavor Access APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/767704
11:32:40 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from List/Show usage APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768509
11:32:40 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from Flavor Access APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/767704
11:32:40 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from List/Show usage APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768509
11:32:41 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace tenants* with projects* of policies https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765315
11:32:41 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace os-simple-tenant-usage with os-simple-project-usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768852
11:32:41 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace tenants* with projects* of policies https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765315
11:32:41 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace os-simple-tenant-usage with os-simple-project-usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768852
11:32:42 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace tenant_id with project_id in os-quota-sets path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768851
11:32:42 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace tenant_id with project_id in Limits API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768862
11:32:42 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace tenant_id with project_id in os-quota-sets path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768851
11:32:42 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace tenant_id with project_id in Limits API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768862
11:32:43 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace tenant* with project* in codes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769329
11:32:43 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace tenant* with project* in codes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769329
11:41:47 gibi bauzas: hi! I've replied both in the re-parenting and in the packet rate spec. let me know if we need to have a chat on any of the open issues
11:41:47 gibi bauzas: hi! I've replied both in the re-parenting and in the packet rate spec. let me know if we need to have a chat on any of the open issues
11:45:37 sean-k-mooney1 gibi: did we decided when the spec review day would be is that tomorrow?
11:45:37 sean-k-mooney1 gibi: did we decided when the spec review day would be is that tomorrow?

Earlier   Later