| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-05-12 | |||
| 10:37:26 | sean-k-mooney | yes if but there was never a cross project agreement to do that as far as i knew | |
| 10:37:26 | sean-k-mooney | yes if but there was never a cross project agreement to do that as far as i knew | |
| 10:37:52 | sean-k-mooney | but if its happeing then i just hope it gets done this cycle | |
| 10:37:52 | sean-k-mooney | but if its happeing then i just hope it gets done this cycle | |
| 10:38:07 | sean-k-mooney | draging it out over multiple cycle will not be a good ux | |
| 10:38:07 | sean-k-mooney | draging it out over multiple cycle will not be a good ux | |
| 10:38:39 | sean-k-mooney | which is why i was expecting this type of change to be a cross project goal | |
| 10:38:39 | sean-k-mooney | which is why i was expecting this type of change to be a cross project goal | |
| 10:38:40 | gibi | OK, then please propose a revert on the osc patch and lets bring it up on cross project levels | |
| 10:38:40 | gibi | OK, then please propose a revert on the osc patch and lets bring it up on cross project levels | |
| 10:39:04 | stephenfin | I don't think this is a serious issue | |
| 10:39:04 | stephenfin | I don't think this is a serious issue | |
| 10:39:16 | stephenfin | If people don't like it, then they'll let us know | |
| 10:39:16 | stephenfin | If people don't like it, then they'll let us know | |
| 10:39:18 | gibi | It seems it is serious for sean-k-mooney | |
| 10:39:18 | gibi | It seems it is serious for sean-k-mooney | |
| 10:39:29 | stephenfin | Otherwise 🤷 | |
| 10:39:29 | stephenfin | Otherwise 🤷 | |
| 10:41:29 | jrosser | if i put debug=True in [DEFAULT] of nova.conf (for example) should that be sufficient to then be able to see https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/oslo_messaging/_drivers/impl_rabbit.py#L608-L610 in the nova-conductor log file? | |
| 10:41:29 | jrosser | if i put debug=True in [DEFAULT] of nova.conf (for example) should that be sufficient to then be able to see https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/oslo_messaging/_drivers/impl_rabbit.py#L608-L610 in the nova-conductor log file? | |
| 10:41:37 | sean-k-mooney | i just dont want to have to explain in our downstream doc and to customer why openstack server create and openstack resource provider list work differently | |
| 10:41:37 | sean-k-mooney | i just dont want to have to explain in our downstream doc and to customer why openstack server create and openstack resource provider list work differently | |
| 10:42:24 | sean-k-mooney | jrosser: am im not sure i thought that was only for the nova log level | |
| 10:42:24 | sean-k-mooney | jrosser: am im not sure i thought that was only for the nova log level | |
| 10:42:36 | sean-k-mooney | but maybe its everything | |
| 10:42:36 | sean-k-mooney | but maybe its everything | |
| 10:43:05 | jrosser | sean-k-mooney: yeah, i'm not seeing those and am struggling to find how to enable oslo.messaging debug in the context of a nova service | |
| 10:43:05 | jrosser | sean-k-mooney: yeah, i'm not seeing those and am struggling to find how to enable oslo.messaging debug in the context of a nova service | |
| 10:44:24 | gibi | jrosser: I think you need this config https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.default_log_levels | |
| 10:44:24 | gibi | jrosser: I think you need this config https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.default_log_levels | |
| 10:44:46 | gibi | there the oslo.messaging is set to INFO by default | |
| 10:44:46 | gibi | there the oslo.messaging is set to INFO by default | |
| 10:44:51 | gibi | so you have to change that | |
| 10:44:51 | gibi | so you have to change that | |
| 10:45:01 | jrosser | ah! let me try that | |
| 10:45:01 | jrosser | ah! let me try that | |
| 11:18:45 | ignaziocassano1 | ralonsoh looking at this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917675 seems redhat released patches only for rhel8 ....so Think for centos8 | |
| 11:18:46 | ignaziocassano1 | ralonsoh looking at this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917675 seems redhat released patches only for rhel8 ....so Think for centos8 | |
| 11:18:46 | openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1917675 in openstack-nova "Nova evacuate fails due to timeout waiting for a network-vif-plugged event for instance" [Urgent,On_qa] - Assigned to smooney | |
| 11:18:46 | openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1917675 in openstack-nova "Nova evacuate fails due to timeout waiting for a network-vif-plugged event for instance" [Urgent,On_qa] - Assigned to smooney | |
| 11:19:19 | ignaziocassano1 | I am using centos7 | |
| 11:19:19 | ignaziocassano1 | I am using centos7 | |
| 11:20:02 | sean-k-mooney | you are using packages from RDO not form Redhat | |
| 11:20:02 | sean-k-mooney | you are using packages from RDO not form Redhat | |
| 11:20:31 | sean-k-mooney | ignaziocassano1: and RDO support train on 7 and 8 | |
| 11:20:31 | sean-k-mooney | ignaziocassano1: and RDO support train on 7 and 8 | |
| 11:21:05 | ignaziocassano1 | Yes, I wonder if they will be' released on rdo for centos 7 | |
| 11:21:07 | ignaziocassano1 | Yes, I wonder if they will be' released on rdo for centos 7 | |
| 11:21:18 | sean-k-mooney | the RDO packages and the OSP packages are not the same | |
| 11:21:18 | sean-k-mooney | the RDO packages and the OSP packages are not the same | |
| 11:21:35 | sean-k-mooney | ignaziocassano1: yes still have an automated build for train on centos7 so it should be eventually | |
| 11:21:35 | sean-k-mooney | ignaziocassano1: yes still have an automated build for train on centos7 so it should be eventually | |
| 11:21:40 | sean-k-mooney | if we backport it upstream | |
| 11:21:40 | sean-k-mooney | if we backport it upstream | |
| 11:22:39 | ignaziocassano1 | Patching manually seems do not work | |
| 11:22:39 | ignaziocassano1 | Patching manually seems do not work | |
| 11:23:55 | ignaziocassano1 | Will you backport them on rdo centos 7? | |
| 11:23:55 | ignaziocassano1 | Will you backport them on rdo centos 7? | |
| 11:24:45 | ignaziocassano1 | I would like to migrate on train on centos7 then try to upgrade to centos 8 | |
| 11:24:45 | ignaziocassano1 | I would like to migrate on train on centos7 then try to upgrade to centos 8 | |
| 11:25:33 | ignaziocassano1 | I think it is a solution for not reinstall all | |
| 11:25:33 | ignaziocassano1 | I think it is a solution for not reinstall all | |
| 11:26:23 | sean-k-mooney | im not currently plannign to work on backporting it. i may in the future but i have some other things i need to work on | |
| 11:26:23 | sean-k-mooney | im not currently plannign to work on backporting it. i may in the future but i have some other things i need to work on | |
| 11:28:17 | ignaziocassano1 | So, what can I do to solve it? Next year we 'll invest money for acquire red hat support, but now we cannot | |
| 11:28:17 | ignaziocassano1 | So, what can I do to solve it? Next year we 'll invest money for acquire red hat support, but now we cannot | |
| 11:31:41 | sean-k-mooney | one option is to try propose the backport yourself or see if rodolfo or others have time to backport it. i generally try to help people regardless of if they are a customer or not but this partical set of bugs has made me consider quiting opentack developemnt and doing something else with my life so not that its finally merged i dont really want to spend more time on it | |
| 11:31:41 | sean-k-mooney | one option is to try propose the backport yourself or see if rodolfo or others have time to backport it. i generally try to help people regardless of if they are a customer or not but this partical set of bugs has made me consider quiting opentack developemnt and doing something else with my life so not that its finally merged i dont really want to spend more time on it | |
| 11:34:12 | ignaziocassano1 | Yes, I understand your position | |
| 11:34:12 | ignaziocassano1 | Yes, I understand your position | |
| 11:35:50 | jrosser | gibi: thanks for the default_log_levels tip, it's working for me now | |
| 11:35:50 | jrosser | gibi: thanks for the default_log_levels tip, it's working for me now | |
| 11:36:02 | gibi | jrosser: cool. happy to help | |
| 11:36:02 | gibi | jrosser: cool. happy to help | |
| 12:56:12 | kashyap | lyarwood: Can you double-confirm: I don't see any use of QEMU's internal snapshots in the code (`qemu-img snapshot ...`) | |
| 12:56:12 | kashyap | lyarwood: Can you double-confirm: I don't see any use of QEMU's internal snapshots in the code (`qemu-img snapshot ...`) | |
| 12:56:29 | kashyap | lyarwood: The only known use was removed way back in 2013 in this commit: 8c985874c7885f31871204d3f83ce547fefc5fb6) | |
| 12:56:29 | kashyap | lyarwood: The only known use was removed way back in 2013 in this commit: 8c985874c7885f31871204d3f83ce547fefc5fb6) | |
| 12:56:59 | lyarwood | kashyap: you mean qcow2 snapshots right? | |
| 12:56:59 | lyarwood | kashyap: you mean qcow2 snapshots right? | |
| 12:57:00 | kashyap | lyarwood: I ask because ... a certain enterprise distro might deprecate internal snapshots (for good reasons) | |
| 12:57:00 | kashyap | lyarwood: I ask because ... a certain enterprise distro might deprecate internal snapshots (for good reasons) | |
| 12:57:16 | kashyap | lyarwood: Yes, exactly. I recall we used to use it; and I don't see any trace of it (good thing) | |
| 12:57:16 | kashyap | lyarwood: Yes, exactly. I recall we used to use it; and I don't see any trace of it (good thing) | |
| 13:01:34 | lyarwood | kashyap: yeah I can't think of any examples where we do | |
| 13:01:34 | lyarwood | kashyap: yeah I can't think of any examples where we do | |
| 13:01:48 | kashyap | lyarwood: Cool; I just checked the code, I don't see any other traces. That's great | |
| 13:01:48 | kashyap | lyarwood: Cool; I just checked the code, I don't see any other traces. That's great | |
| 13:01:49 | lyarwood | kashyap: even the NFS based cinder backends that use qcow2 use backing files | |
| 13:01:49 | lyarwood | kashyap: even the NFS based cinder backends that use qcow2 use backing files | |
| 13:01:57 | kashyap | Sweet | |
| 13:01:57 | kashyap | Sweet | |
| 13:02:44 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Create 'nova.tests.fixtures' module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790965 | |
| 13:02:44 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Create 'nova.tests.fixtures' module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790965 | |
| 13:02:45 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Move ConfFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790966 | |
| 13:02:45 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Move ConfFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790966 | |
| 13:02:46 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Move remaining non-libvirt fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790967 | |
| 13:02:47 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Split external service fixtures out https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790968 | |
| 13:02:47 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Move libvirt-specific fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790969 | |
| 13:02:48 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Add os-brick fixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790970 | |