Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-04-29
16:59:29 sean-k-mooney unless the recnelty added secure boot support feature regressed that behavior
16:59:29 sean-k-mooney unless the recnelty added secure boot support feature regressed that behavior
16:59:36 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: kashyap ^
16:59:36 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: kashyap ^
17:00:32 stephenfin BLZbubba: what version of nova?
17:00:32 stephenfin BLZbubba: what version of nova?
17:02:16 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Prior to the secure boot feature, we defaulted the secure boot firmware https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/363710b655434a15b6b85d9ca65343210b104e56
17:02:17 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Prior to the secure boot feature, we defaulted the secure boot firmware https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/363710b655434a15b6b85d9ca65343210b104e56
17:02:44 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: but we did not enable secureboot in the xml so it was disabled in the geust
17:02:45 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: but we did not enable secureboot in the xml so it was disabled in the geust
17:02:46 stephenfin though we didn't set the necessary flags, so it should be using the firmware but not enabling the feature
17:02:46 stephenfin though we didn't set the necessary flags, so it should be using the firmware but not enabling the feature
17:02:50 stephenfin yes
17:03:11 sean-k-mooney so the firmwar was capable fo secure boot but qemu woudl not try to use it
17:03:11 sean-k-mooney so the firmwar was capable fo secure boot but qemu woudl not try to use it
17:03:17 sean-k-mooney so we should still have the same behavior
17:03:17 sean-k-mooney so we should still have the same behavior
17:03:35 stephenfin yes
17:03:58 sean-k-mooney BLZbubba: is this breaking you some how?
17:03:58 sean-k-mooney BLZbubba: is this breaking you some how?
17:04:51 sean-k-mooney BLZbubba: os_secure_boot prior to the wallaby relesae was only suppoted by hyperv
17:04:51 sean-k-mooney BLZbubba: os_secure_boot prior to the wallaby relesae was only suppoted by hyperv
17:05:37 BLZbubba I'm using ubunbu lts: 2:21.1.2-0ubuntu1
17:05:38 BLZbubba I'm using ubunbu lts: 2:21.1.2-0ubuntu1
17:06:20 sean-k-mooney so ussuri
17:06:20 sean-k-mooney so ussuri
17:06:24 BLZbubba yes
17:06:24 BLZbubba yes
17:06:44 sean-k-mooney in that release the libvirt dirver does not support securebot or os_secure_boot
17:06:45 sean-k-mooney in that release the libvirt dirver does not support securebot or os_secure_boot
17:07:08 sean-k-mooney only the hyperv driver supported os_secure_boot at that time
17:07:08 sean-k-mooney only the hyperv driver supported os_secure_boot at that time
17:07:24 sean-k-mooney BLZbubba: your vms are not actlly using secure boot in this case
17:07:25 sean-k-mooney BLZbubba: your vms are not actlly using secure boot in this case
17:10:38 BLZbubba ok thanks for the info. I just know that if OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd is in the libvirt xml (which it is by default) they fail to boot. but it sounds like it should work... i'll play around with the qemu options and see if I can figure this out.
17:10:38 BLZbubba ok thanks for the info. I just know that if OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd is in the libvirt xml (which it is by default) they fail to boot. but it sounds like it should work... i'll play around with the qemu options and see if I can figure this out.
17:10:42 BLZbubba thanks!
17:10:42 BLZbubba thanks!
17:11:52 sean-k-mooney sound like there is a bug in the ovmf package that canonical is shiping in 20.04
17:11:52 sean-k-mooney sound like there is a bug in the ovmf package that canonical is shiping in 20.04
17:12:19 sean-k-mooney i think they recently rebased the version fo qemu they ship in the cloud archive
17:12:19 sean-k-mooney i think they recently rebased the version fo qemu they ship in the cloud archive
17:12:26 sean-k-mooney maybe that broke something
17:12:26 sean-k-mooney maybe that broke something
17:28:29 erbarr hello, what could be causing this, I stacked last night with FORCE_CONFIG_DRIVE on ussuri and ran into it. Didn't see it on other branches up to train https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/p1kmwH0W/image.png
17:28:29 erbarr hello, what could be causing this, I stacked last night with FORCE_CONFIG_DRIVE on ussuri and ran into it. Didn't see it on other branches up to train https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/p1kmwH0W/image.png
17:29:46 sean-k-mooney its a python 3 issue
17:29:46 sean-k-mooney its a python 3 issue
17:30:00 sean-k-mooney in this case i thik its cause by libguestfs
17:30:00 sean-k-mooney in this case i thik its cause by libguestfs
17:30:36 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: gibi ^ is that the libguestfs issue ye were seeing in the gate
17:30:37 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: gibi ^ is that the libguestfs issue ye were seeing in the gate
17:31:12 lyarwood that's ironic so I wouldn't think so
17:31:13 lyarwood that's ironic so I wouldn't think so
17:31:16 lyarwood and configdrive related
17:31:16 lyarwood and configdrive related
17:32:03 sean-k-mooney well maybe its form makeiso
17:32:03 sean-k-mooney well maybe its form makeiso
17:32:20 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement stable/wallaby: Add a reproduction test for bug story/2008831 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787525
17:32:20 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement stable/wallaby: Add a reproduction test for bug story/2008831 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787525
17:32:27 sean-k-mooney its the same bytes vs str issue
17:32:27 sean-k-mooney its the same bytes vs str issue
17:32:29 lyarwood hard to tell from that trace tbh
17:32:29 lyarwood hard to tell from that trace tbh
17:32:31 lyarwood yeah
17:32:37 lyarwood it's that underlying issue
17:32:37 lyarwood it's that underlying issue
17:34:27 sean-k-mooney so that being raised form here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/ussuri/nova/virt/ironic/driver.py#L544-L548
17:34:27 sean-k-mooney so that being raised form here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/ussuri/nova/virt/ironic/driver.py#L544-L548
17:34:44 sean-k-mooney but i feel like the excption is actully happening in ironic
17:34:45 sean-k-mooney but i feel like the excption is actully happening in ironic
17:35:19 sean-k-mooney and they are just propagating it up to us
17:35:19 sean-k-mooney and they are just propagating it up to us
17:35:40 sean-k-mooney erbarr: do you ahve any error in the ironic conductor for the deploy
17:35:40 sean-k-mooney erbarr: do you ahve any error in the ironic conductor for the deploy
17:39:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement stable/wallaby: Make sure the policy upgrade check get a valid config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787526
17:39:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement stable/wallaby: Make sure the policy upgrade check get a valid config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787526
17:43:50 erbarr sean-k-mooney, looks similar and that's the only errors there: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/aPWzwmpk/image.png
17:43:50 erbarr sean-k-mooney, looks similar and that's the only errors there: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/aPWzwmpk/image.png
17:45:22 sean-k-mooney yep the node is the same
17:45:22 sean-k-mooney yep the node is the same
17:45:38 sean-k-mooney so its an ironic bug
17:45:38 sean-k-mooney so its an ironic bug
17:45:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Add weekly jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508
17:45:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/placement master: Add weekly jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508
17:46:19 erbarr okay, thanks
17:46:19 erbarr okay, thanks
17:46:39 sean-k-mooney https://opendev.org/openstack/ironic/src/branch/stable/ussuri/ironic/conductor/deployments.py#L351-L360
17:46:40 sean-k-mooney https://opendev.org/openstack/ironic/src/branch/stable/ussuri/ironic/conductor/deployments.py#L351-L360
17:46:52 sean-k-mooney the file is being opened in text mode
17:46:52 sean-k-mooney the file is being opened in text mode
17:47:05 sean-k-mooney mode=wt
17:47:05 sean-k-mooney mode=wt
17:47:18 sean-k-mooney so im not sure why its saying it need a byte like obejct
17:47:18 sean-k-mooney so im not sure why its saying it need a byte like obejct
17:47:46 sean-k-mooney oh there we go https://opendev.org/openstack/ironic/commit/0da73cdd30f6726548992090bb3626292e3518b0
17:47:46 sean-k-mooney oh there we go https://opendev.org/openstack/ironic/commit/0da73cdd30f6726548992090bb3626292e3518b0
17:47:55 sean-k-mooney erbarr: your missing ^
17:47:55 sean-k-mooney erbarr: your missing ^
17:49:43 sean-k-mooney erbarr: do you have [deploy]configdrive_use_object_store=True set

Earlier   Later