| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-04-29 | |||
| 14:28:12 | gibi | I did not know that | |
| 14:28:12 | gibi | I did not know that | |
| 14:28:46 | sean-k-mooney | if it works with anything else its by acident wew never extended support to anything else | |
| 14:28:46 | sean-k-mooney | if it works with anything else its by acident wew never extended support to anything else | |
| 14:30:41 | gibi | it seems they are using it :) | |
| 14:30:41 | gibi | it seems they are using it :) | |
| 14:34:19 | sean-k-mooney | well im pretty sure that it wont work the way they intend | |
| 14:34:19 | sean-k-mooney | well im pretty sure that it wont work the way they intend | |
| 14:35:11 | sean-k-mooney | it might allow them to change the mac adress but ovs wont make the port promisous and the security group rules will still be enforced | |
| 14:35:11 | sean-k-mooney | it might allow them to change the mac adress but ovs wont make the port promisous and the security group rules will still be enforced | |
| 14:40:52 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ok i have marked it as incomplete for now https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1926375 | |
| 14:40:54 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1926375 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova-compute service failed to start up" [Undecided,Incomplete] | |
| 14:40:54 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ok i have marked it as incomplete for now https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1926375 | |
| 14:40:54 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1926375 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova-compute service failed to start up" [Undecided,Incomplete] | |
| 14:41:10 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks | |
| 14:41:10 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks | |
| 15:49:39 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bond_mode enum 802.1ad -> 802.3ad https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788790 | |
| 15:49:39 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bond_mode enum 802.1ad -> 802.3ad https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788790 | |
| 15:49:59 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: could you double check that I understood this right ^^ ? | |
| 15:50:00 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: could you double check that I understood this right ^^ ? | |
| 15:52:24 | gibi | nova meeting starts in 8 minutes in #openstack-meeting-3 | |
| 15:52:24 | gibi | nova meeting starts in 8 minutes in #openstack-meeting-3 | |
| 15:57:49 | gibi | dansmith: regarding yesterday service version check discussion. You said that you think the version alias is wrong. I've double checked and I don't see the problem. 54 was the first Wallaby service version. 52 is the first Victoria service version | |
| 15:57:49 | gibi | dansmith: regarding yesterday service version check discussion. You said that you think the version alias is wrong. I've double checked and I don't see the problem. 54 was the first Wallaby service version. 52 is the first Victoria service version | |
| 15:58:21 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: am sure | |
| 15:58:22 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: am sure | |
| 15:58:48 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Replace grenade and nova-grenade-multinode with grenade-multinode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885 | |
| 15:58:48 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Replace grenade and nova-grenade-multinode with grenade-multinode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885 | |
| 15:59:24 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Remove nova-dsvm-multinode-base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778908 | |
| 15:59:25 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Remove nova-dsvm-multinode-base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778908 | |
| 16:00:28 | lyarwood | \o/ | |
| 16:00:28 | lyarwood | \o/ | |
| 16:00:33 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ya 802.3ad is lacp bonding 802.1 is QinQ | |
| 16:00:33 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ya 802.3ad is lacp bonding 802.1 is QinQ | |
| 16:00:39 | gibi | lyarwood: ++ | |
| 16:00:39 | gibi | lyarwood: ++ | |
| 16:00:43 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 16:04:23 | sean-k-mooney | it shows how frequetly people use the network jsone templating if we are only seeing this now | |
| 16:04:23 | sean-k-mooney | it shows how frequetly people use the network jsone templating if we are only seeing this now | |
| 16:05:51 | sean-k-mooney | this is used to validate https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.injected_network_template right | |
| 16:05:52 | sean-k-mooney | this is used to validate https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#DEFAULT.injected_network_template right | |
| 16:06:39 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: ooh, I did not know about that | |
| 16:06:39 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: ooh, I did not know about that | |
| 16:06:42 | gibi | but I guess yes | |
| 16:06:42 | gibi | but I guess yes | |
| 16:07:41 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing bionic drop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788791 | |
| 16:07:41 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: testing bionic drop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788791 | |
| 16:07:46 | sean-k-mooney | well im not sure what we might be using the network.json for other then the network metadta consumed by cloud init which i think is generated by that template | |
| 16:07:46 | sean-k-mooney | well im not sure what we might be using the network.json for other then the network metadta consumed by cloud init which i think is generated by that template | |
| 16:10:54 | gibi | it make sense | |
| 16:10:54 | gibi | it make sense | |
| 16:11:44 | gibi | btw sean-k-mooney you promised on the PTG to add periodic jobs for placement and then we can look at the results in regularly on the nova meeting | |
| 16:11:44 | gibi | btw sean-k-mooney you promised on the PTG to add periodic jobs for placement and then we can look at the results in regularly on the nova meeting | |
| 16:12:00 | gibi | let me know if you need help adding them | |
| 16:12:00 | gibi | let me know if you need help adding them | |
| 16:12:21 | sean-k-mooney | oh i should be in the meeting didn realise it started | |
| 16:12:22 | sean-k-mooney | oh i should be in the meeting didn realise it started | |
| 16:12:30 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:13:03 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508 | |
| 16:13:03 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508 | |
| 16:13:12 | sean-k-mooney | you looked at the patch already | |
| 16:13:13 | sean-k-mooney | you looked at the patch already | |
| 16:14:39 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: lol, I totally forgot | |
| 16:14:39 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: lol, I totally forgot | |
| 16:15:02 | gibi | thanks again | |
| 16:15:02 | gibi | thanks again | |
| 16:26:31 | elod | lyarwood: I've checked the placement patch meanwhile and +2+W'd as it looks appropriate | |
| 16:26:31 | elod | lyarwood: I've checked the placement patch meanwhile and +2+W'd as it looks appropriate | |
| 16:26:52 | lyarwood | ack thanks | |
| 16:26:52 | gmann | elod: lyarwood its base patch too -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787525/2 | |
| 16:26:52 | lyarwood | ack thanks | |
| 16:26:52 | gmann | elod: lyarwood its base patch too -https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787525/2 | |
| 16:29:35 | gibi | and if you are reviewing placement already could you please hit this too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508 ? | |
| 16:29:35 | gibi | and if you are reviewing placement already could you please hit this too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/787508 ? | |
| 16:29:43 | gibi | simple job addition | |
| 16:29:43 | gibi | simple job addition | |
| 16:29:51 | elod | gmann: +2+W'd, too | |
| 16:29:51 | elod | gmann: +2+W'd, too | |
| 16:31:17 | gmann | elod: thanks | |
| 16:31:17 | gmann | elod: thanks | |
| 16:31:45 | elod | np | |
| 16:31:45 | elod | np | |
| 16:33:11 | gmann | gibi: lgtm, +A | |
| 16:33:11 | gmann | gibi: lgtm, +A | |
| 16:34:10 | gmann | gibi: sean-k-mooney that is good idea. I will try this for few of QA repos too where we do not have frequent changes and end up finding failing gate if there is any change. | |
| 16:34:10 | gmann | gibi: sean-k-mooney that is good idea. I will try this for few of QA repos too where we do not have frequent changes and end up finding failing gate if there is any change. | |
| 16:37:39 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: the weekly pipeline give a nice cadence to them too | |
| 16:37:39 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: the weekly pipeline give a nice cadence to them too | |
| 16:38:22 | kashyap | lyarwood: Hey | |
| 16:38:22 | kashyap | lyarwood: Hey | |
| 16:38:32 | sean-k-mooney | being realistinc peopel are not going to check them daily and if its a 2 second line item in the weekly meeting just to make sure the last build ran and it was green then i think its useful | |
| 16:38:32 | sean-k-mooney | being realistinc peopel are not going to check them daily and if its a 2 second line item in the weekly meeting just to make sure the last build ran and it was green then i think its useful | |
| 16:38:52 | kashyap | lyarwood: We don't use "virtio-blk,scsi=on" as a SCSI passthrough, right? From my `grep`ing around, we don't... | |
| 16:38:52 | kashyap | lyarwood: We don't use "virtio-blk,scsi=on" as a SCSI passthrough, right? From my `grep`ing around, we don't... | |
| 16:39:13 | kashyap | lyarwood: I ask because, QEMU folks pinged me to tell that support for it was removed in Linux v5.6; and QEMU deprecated it in 5.0 | |
| 16:39:14 | kashyap | lyarwood: I ask because, QEMU folks pinged me to tell that support for it was removed in Linux v5.6; and QEMU deprecated it in 5.0 | |
| 16:39:29 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: true, we check periodic jobs in QA office hours weekly and it will hell to add these type of jobs in less-active repo | |
| 16:39:29 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: true, we check periodic jobs in QA office hours weekly and it will hell to add these type of jobs in less-active repo | |
| 16:39:40 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: i dont belive we do | |
| 16:39:40 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: i dont belive we do | |