| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-04-28 | |||
| 22:07:56 | dansmith | or maybe that's what you meant. | |
| 22:07:56 | dansmith | or maybe that's what you meant. | |
| 22:08:07 | andrewbogott | yeah, a lot of pain | |
| 22:08:07 | andrewbogott | yeah, a lot of pain | |
| 22:09:18 | andrewbogott | So a real bug but not one that's worth fixing | |
| 22:09:18 | andrewbogott | So a real bug but not one that's worth fixing | |
| 22:09:37 | openstackgerrit | Dmitrii Shcherbakov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Introduce Transport Nodes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/787458 | |
| 22:10:24 | andrewbogott | dansmith: I need to run -- thanks again for getting me unstuck! | |
| 22:10:24 | andrewbogott | dansmith: I need to run -- thanks again for getting me unstuck! | |
| 22:15:41 | dansmith | yup | |
| 22:15:42 | dansmith | yup | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-04-29 | |||
| 00:34:11 | brinzhang | gibi, gmann: the nova-grenade-multinode task always failed, is there a bug tracing? | |
| 00:34:11 | brinzhang | gibi, gmann: the nova-grenade-multinode task always failed, is there a bug tracing? | |
| 00:34:59 | brinzhang | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-grenade-multinode | |
| 00:34:59 | brinzhang | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-grenade-multinode | |
| 00:52:38 | gmann | brinzhang: i see error 'Failed to start rtslib-fb-targetctl.service: Unit rtslib-fb-targetctl.service is not loaded properly: Exec format error.' | |
| 00:52:38 | gmann | brinzhang: i see error 'Failed to start rtslib-fb-targetctl.service: Unit rtslib-fb-targetctl.service is not loaded properly: Exec format error.' | |
| 00:52:47 | gmann | but that is passing sometime | |
| 00:52:47 | gmann | but that is passing sometime | |
| 00:52:51 | gmann | not 100% failure | |
| 00:52:52 | gmann | not 100% failure | |
| 00:53:18 | gmann | clarkb: ^^ are you aware of this error - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/599cfa422a0648168c8b00a27fbd3114/log/logs/grenade.sh.txt#46891-46912 | |
| 00:53:18 | gmann | clarkb: ^^ are you aware of this error - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/599cfa422a0648168c8b00a27fbd3114/log/logs/grenade.sh.txt#46891-46912 | |
| 00:55:33 | gmann | brinzhang: if you see, there are some passing job also on master gate https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-grenade-multinode | |
| 00:55:33 | gmann | brinzhang: if you see, there are some passing job also on master gate https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-grenade-multinode | |
| 00:56:05 | gmann | but yes, it is happening more frequently | |
| 00:56:05 | gmann | but yes, it is happening more frequently | |
| 01:18:13 | brinzhang_ | gmann: yes, there are always failed in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764292 | |
| 01:18:13 | brinzhang_ | gmann: yes, there are always failed in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764292 | |
| 01:21:42 | gmann | brinzhang_: this one https://askubuntu.com/questions/1334619/failed-to-start-rtslib-fb-targetctl-service | |
| 01:21:42 | gmann | brinzhang_: this one https://askubuntu.com/questions/1334619/failed-to-start-rtslib-fb-targetctl-service | |
| 01:26:46 | brinzhang_ | gmann: ok, it seems there is no answer with this question | |
| 01:26:47 | brinzhang_ | gmann: ok, it seems there is no answer with this question | |
| 03:56:39 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose smartnic support spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/783632 | |
| 05:22:39 | erbarr | hi, is there an issue with configdrive and ussuri? | |
| 05:22:39 | erbarr | hi, is there an issue with configdrive and ussuri? | |
| 07:10:58 | gibi | gmann, brinzhang: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/788429 should have fixed the grenade issue | |
| 07:10:58 | gibi | gmann, brinzhang: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/788429 should have fixed the grenade issue | |
| 07:11:22 | gibi | gmann, brinzhang: and when this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885 finally lands | |
| 07:11:22 | gibi | gmann, brinzhang: and when this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885 finally lands | |
| 07:11:43 | gibi | we don't need to pin ISCSI_HELPER any more | |
| 07:11:43 | gibi | we don't need to pin ISCSI_HELPER any more | |
| 08:09:21 | brinzhang | gibi: ack | |
| 08:09:21 | brinzhang | gibi: ack | |
| 10:08:12 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: zuul: Replace grenade and nova-grenade-multinode with grenade-multinode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885 | |
| 10:08:12 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: zuul: Remove nova-dsvm-multinode-base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778908 | |
| 10:08:12 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: zuul: Replace grenade and nova-grenade-multinode with grenade-multinode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885 | |
| 10:08:12 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: zuul: Remove nova-dsvm-multinode-base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778908 | |
| 10:08:55 | lyarwood | gibi: ^ that series was still using the older detach flow and seeing errors, I've rebased to pickup your new code and hopefully that should allow it to pass | |
| 10:08:56 | lyarwood | gibi: ^ that series was still using the older detach flow and seeing errors, I've rebased to pickup your new code and hopefully that should allow it to pass | |
| 10:09:37 | gibi | hm, I thought zuul rebases the patches | |
| 10:09:37 | gibi | hm, I thought zuul rebases the patches | |
| 10:09:52 | gibi | before running the tests | |
| 10:09:52 | gibi | before running the tests | |
| 10:10:24 | gibi | anyhow I +Ad them | |
| 10:10:24 | gibi | anyhow I +Ad them | |
| 10:13:25 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: zuul merges the patch with the head of master and if you use depends on in the same repor it merged with that too | |
| 10:13:25 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: zuul merges the patch with the head of master and if you use depends on in the same repor it merged with that too | |
| 10:13:37 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: so not a rebase but similar | |
| 10:13:37 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: so not a rebase but similar | |
| 10:13:46 | gibi | then it should have picked up my detach fixes | |
| 10:13:46 | gibi | then it should have picked up my detach fixes | |
| 10:14:12 | lyarwood | AFAICT it didn't | |
| 10:14:13 | lyarwood | AFAICT it didn't | |
| 10:14:20 | lyarwood | this is just in the check queue btw | |
| 10:14:20 | lyarwood | this is just in the check queue btw | |
| 10:14:27 | lyarwood | it didn't make it to the gate this run | |
| 10:14:27 | lyarwood | it didn't make it to the gate this run | |
| 10:14:31 | sean-k-mooney | yep check should do the same | |
| 10:14:31 | sean-k-mooney | yep check should do the same | |
| 10:14:48 | sean-k-mooney | it will speculetlivly merge and then run on the result | |
| 10:14:48 | sean-k-mooney | it will speculetlivly merge and then run on the result | |
| 10:15:15 | sean-k-mooney | its why sometimes test pass locally and fail in the gate | |
| 10:15:16 | sean-k-mooney | its why sometimes test pass locally and fail in the gate | |
| 10:15:33 | sean-k-mooney | and you have to do a local rebase to see the isssues locally | |
| 10:15:34 | sean-k-mooney | and you have to do a local rebase to see the isssues locally | |
| 10:16:02 | sean-k-mooney | could it have just been a timing thing? | |
| 10:16:02 | sean-k-mooney | could it have just been a timing thing? | |
| 10:16:23 | sean-k-mooney | check jobs dont restart if something merges | |
| 10:16:24 | sean-k-mooney | check jobs dont restart if something merges | |
| 10:16:24 | lyarwood | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/02d0c22ca9334a1094782df2f9570c35/log/compute1/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt and req-d017e833-5df2-4c5e-b348-f2625a2a608d is the old flow as it's using loopingcall | |
| 10:16:25 | lyarwood | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/02d0c22ca9334a1094782df2f9570c35/log/compute1/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt and req-d017e833-5df2-4c5e-b348-f2625a2a608d is the old flow as it's using loopingcall | |
| 10:16:26 | sean-k-mooney | unlike gate | |
| 10:16:26 | sean-k-mooney | unlike gate | |
| 10:17:40 | gibi | * gibi clicks | |
| 10:18:08 | gibi | yepp the logs are from the old code | |
| 10:18:08 | gibi | yepp the logs are from the old code | |
| 10:18:19 | lyarwood | anyway it's rebased now | |
| 10:18:19 | lyarwood | anyway it's rebased now | |
| 10:18:21 | lyarwood | so hopefully | |
| 10:18:21 | lyarwood | so hopefully | |
| 10:18:37 | gibi | fingers crossed | |
| 10:18:37 | gibi | fingers crossed | |
| 10:19:18 | gibi | lyarwood: it is a grenade run, so I guess before the upgrade it have to run the old code from Wallaby | |
| 10:19:18 | gibi | lyarwood: it is a grenade run, so I guess before the upgrade it have to run the old code from Wallaby | |
| 10:19:34 | lyarwood | aaaaaaaah | |
| 10:19:34 | lyarwood | aaaaaaaah | |
| 10:19:37 | lyarwood | right | |
| 10:19:37 | lyarwood | right | |
| 10:19:42 | lyarwood | I didn't even think | |