Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-04-28
13:20:36 openstackgerrit Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/nova master: Use the new type HostDomainOpt. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/788240
14:51:56 lyarwood elod / bauzas / melwitt ; https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/787943 - If you have time today can I get reviews on this backport please.
14:51:56 lyarwood elod / bauzas / melwitt ; https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/787943 - If you have time today can I get reviews on this backport please.
14:52:35 bauzas lyarwood: we have our meeting in 9 mins and then I'll need to go to a blood donating but I'll try
14:52:35 bauzas lyarwood: we have our meeting in 9 mins and then I'll need to go to a blood donating but I'll try
14:53:45 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional regression test for bug 1853009 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/695012
14:53:47 openstack bug 1853009 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ussuri "Ironic node rebalance race can lead to missing compute nodes in DB" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853009 - Assigned to Mark Goddard (mgoddard)
14:53:47 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional regression test for bug 1853009 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/695012
14:53:47 openstack bug 1853009 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ussuri "Ironic node rebalance race can lead to missing compute nodes in DB" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853009 - Assigned to Mark Goddard (mgoddard)
14:53:54 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Clear rebalanced compute nodes from resource tracker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/695187
14:53:54 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Clear rebalanced compute nodes from resource tracker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/695187
14:53:56 lyarwood bauzas: yup no issues if you can't get to it
14:53:57 lyarwood bauzas: yup no issues if you can't get to it
14:54:08 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Invalidate provider tree when compute node disappears https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/695188
14:54:08 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Invalidate provider tree when compute node disappears https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/695188
14:54:34 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent deletion of a compute node belonging to another host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/694802
14:54:34 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent deletion of a compute node belonging to another host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/694802
14:54:47 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Fix inactive session error in compute node creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/695189
14:54:47 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Fix inactive session error in compute node creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/695189
14:54:52 bauzas lyarwood: /me clicks anyway
14:54:52 bauzas lyarwood: /me clicks anyway
14:55:21 lyarwood ah crap the patch below hasn't actually landed
14:55:22 lyarwood ah crap the patch below hasn't actually landed
14:55:32 lyarwood sorry I thought it had, this isn't urgent in that case
14:55:32 lyarwood sorry I thought it had, this isn't urgent in that case
15:23:23 melwitt lyarwood: ack, I can look
15:23:23 melwitt lyarwood: ack, I can look
15:54:58 stephenfin Is it just me, or is nova-grenade-multinode failing 100% right now?
15:54:59 stephenfin Is it just me, or is nova-grenade-multinode failing 100% right now?
15:55:11 stephenfin * stephenfin compares two jobs
15:56:19 stephenfin Yeah, looks like Ubuntu is broken
15:56:19 stephenfin Yeah, looks like Ubuntu is broken
15:56:20 stephenfin Failed to start rtslib-fb-targetctl.service: Unit rtslib-fb-targetctl.service is not loaded properly: Exec format error.
15:56:21 stephenfin Failed to start rtslib-fb-targetctl.service: Unit rtslib-fb-targetctl.service is not loaded properly: Exec format error.
15:57:11 lyarwood yeah it is
15:57:11 lyarwood yeah it is
15:57:55 lyarwood stephenfin: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1926411 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/788429
15:57:57 openstack Launchpad bug 1926411 in devstack "legacy bionic based dsvm jobs failing with Failed to start rtslib-fb-targetctl.service" [Undecided,In progress]
15:57:57 lyarwood stephenfin: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1926411 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/788429
15:57:57 openstack Launchpad bug 1926411 in devstack "legacy bionic based dsvm jobs failing with Failed to start rtslib-fb-targetctl.service" [Undecided,In progress]
15:58:32 stephenfin aha, thanks
15:58:32 stephenfin aha, thanks
15:58:43 stephenfin I saw something about bionic scroll by earlier but didn't realize it was related
15:58:44 stephenfin I saw something about bionic scroll by earlier but didn't realize it was related
15:58:57 lyarwood argh and that's blocked by https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1926434
15:59:03 lyarwood argh and that's blocked by https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1926434
15:59:03 openstack Launchpad bug 1926434 in devstack "devstack@memory_tracker.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE" [High,In progress]
15:59:08 lyarwood and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/620198
15:59:09 lyarwood and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/620198
16:12:16 lyarwood stephenfin: oh and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885 hasn't landed yet but is also seeing failures related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1926434
16:12:20 openstack Launchpad bug 1926434 in devstack "devstack@memory_tracker.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE" [High,In progress]
16:12:20 lyarwood stephenfin: oh and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778885 hasn't landed yet but is also seeing failures related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1926434
16:12:20 openstack Launchpad bug 1926434 in devstack "devstack@memory_tracker.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE" [High,In progress]
16:56:38 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: QoS minimum guaranteed packet rate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/785014
18:21:13 openstackgerrit Jessie Lass proposed openstack/nova master: Add emulation support if host arch != guest arch. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772156
18:21:13 openstackgerrit Jessie Lass proposed openstack/nova master: Add emulation support if host arch != guest arch. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772156
19:59:51 clarkb Hello nova. Hitting a weird error that doesn't happen 100% of the time. https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/c7c698c95f2b4590ba95f14a6c97ffc0/log/nodepool/openstack/screen-n-api.txt#1735-1805 seems like when doing a server create somtimes nova forgets about the keystone domain?
19:59:51 clarkb Hello nova. Hitting a weird error that doesn't happen 100% of the time. https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/c7c698c95f2b4590ba95f14a6c97ffc0/log/nodepool/openstack/screen-n-api.txt#1735-1805 seems like when doing a server create somtimes nova forgets about the keystone domain?
20:00:45 clarkb note this would've been run against master devstack (which is master nova). And the rough sequence of events that sometimes trips it is: `source /opt/devstack/openrc admin admin && openstack --os-project-name demo --os-username demo server create --flavor cirros256 --image $cirros_image unmanaged-vm --network public`
20:00:45 clarkb note this would've been run against master devstack (which is master nova). And the rough sequence of events that sometimes trips it is: `source /opt/devstack/openrc admin admin && openstack --os-project-name demo --os-username demo server create --flavor cirros256 --image $cirros_image unmanaged-vm --network public`
20:01:25 clarkb one suspicion for why it doesn't fail 100% of the time is that the traceback shows nova hitting _refresh_neutron_extensions_cache() which maybe isn't called on every request?
20:01:25 clarkb one suspicion for why it doesn't fail 100% of the time is that the traceback shows nova hitting _refresh_neutron_extensions_cache() which maybe isn't called on every request?
20:01:44 clarkb note that the devstack openrc should be providing the keystone user and project domain values
20:01:44 clarkb note that the devstack openrc should be providing the keystone user and project domain values
20:02:13 clarkb Is this familar to anyone? I'm happy to help debug further but quickly running out of thread to pull on
20:02:13 clarkb Is this familar to anyone? I'm happy to help debug further but quickly running out of thread to pull on
21:24:56 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: 'video.vram' property must be an integer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757618
21:24:56 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: 'video.vram' property must be an integer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757618
21:25:18 gmann clarkb: nova work on default domain, also there is no recent change on devstack side to remove default domain or so.
21:25:18 gmann clarkb: nova work on default domain, also there is no recent change on devstack side to remove default domain or so.
21:25:28 gmann i am not sure why that is happening.
21:25:28 gmann i am not sure why that is happening.
21:32:54 andrewbogott This is mostly a question for dansmith but I welcome advice from anyone :) I've just upgraded my install to V and all of my hypervisors are saying "Current Nova version does not support computes older than Ussuri but the minimum compute service level in your cell is 40..."
21:32:54 andrewbogott This is mostly a question for dansmith but I welcome advice from anyone :) I've just upgraded my install to V and all of my hypervisors are saying "Current Nova version does not support computes older than Ussuri but the minimum compute service level in your cell is 40..."
21:33:22 andrewbogott A totally reasonable warning except I cannot for the live of me figure out /why/ that's the minimum service level. All my nodes are updated,
21:33:22 andrewbogott A totally reasonable warning except I cannot for the live of me figure out /why/ that's the minimum service level. All my nodes are updated,
21:33:49 andrewbogott I've read the code, looked in all my DBs, no idea where that 40 is coming from. Can you tell me what the process is for calculating that? Is it cached someplace?
21:33:50 andrewbogott I've read the code, looked in all my DBs, no idea where that 40 is coming from. Can you tell me what the process is for calculating that? Is it cached someplace?
21:34:03 dansmith it should be stored on the service record
21:34:03 dansmith it should be stored on the service record
21:34:23 dansmith and yeah I'd guess maybe some old record is being considered (or you have one node not updated like you think)
21:34:23 dansmith and yeah I'd guess maybe some old record is being considered (or you have one node not updated like you think)
21:35:15 andrewbogott tell me more about 'the service record'?
21:35:15 andrewbogott tell me more about 'the service record'?
21:35:34 dansmith the records in the services table in the db
21:35:34 dansmith the records in the services table in the db
21:36:16 andrewbogott so you would think that 'delete from services where topic='compute' and version != 53;' would fix it right?
21:36:16 andrewbogott so you would think that 'delete from services where topic='compute' and version != 53;' would fix it right?
21:36:25 andrewbogott (which I already did and it didn't)
21:36:25 andrewbogott (which I already did and it didn't)
21:36:38 dansmith no, I'd say look at them first and let's figure out what's going on
21:36:38 dansmith no, I'd say look at them first and let's figure out what's going on
21:36:50 dansmith they're all the new version?
21:36:50 dansmith they're all the new version?
21:37:01 andrewbogott there were several entries in there from nodes that don't exist anymore referring to old versions
21:37:01 andrewbogott there were several entries in there from nodes that don't exist anymore referring to old versions
21:37:05 andrewbogott that's why I ran that delete.
21:37:05 andrewbogott that's why I ran that delete.
21:38:07 dansmith okay, and you've restarted services?
21:38:07 dansmith okay, and you've restarted services?

Earlier   Later