Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-03-25
14:55:58 bauzas but I forgot to lookup the last job run
14:56:31 dansmith well, reviewers should be checking this stuff too
14:56:56 bauzas either way, ship has sailed but we can hold RC1 until we merge the fix
14:57:00 bauzas gibi: ^
14:57:17 bauzas dansmith: you're already on it ? or you want me to fix the caller ?
14:57:25 gibi we will hodl the RC1 until the fix lands
14:57:45 dansmith bauzas: I'm looking yeah, hang on
14:57:58 bauzas gibi: thanks
14:58:06 bauzas dansmith: AFAIR, we don't have a long list of callers
14:58:34 stephenfin Mea culpa. I didn't think to at the existing CI run past seeing everything was green. I figured breakages would be obvious. I can work on a fix if no one else is?
14:59:13 gibi I don't see the obvious failure in the patch :/
14:59:35 bauzas dansmith: interesting, looks to me it's dead code
14:59:49 bauzas or I'm blind
15:00:26 dansmith eh?
15:00:28 bauzas oh, wait no
15:00:30 bauzas I'm tired
15:00:43 bauzas _is_instance_storage_shared()
15:01:06 bauzas that's a compute to compute call
15:01:12 dansmith yeah, I'm running tests now to figure out what needs to change in there
15:02:12 bauzas all looks we only mock this caller
15:02:18 bauzas and we don't verify it
15:03:14 bauzas but maybe we verify it's called
15:10:52 bauzas dansmith: gibi: stephenfin: I have to get my kids off school but I'm back in 20-ish minutes
15:15:03 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix check_instance_shared_storage() call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783026
15:15:22 dansmith bauzas: gibi ^
15:15:26 gibi ack looking
15:15:39 bauzas dansmith: already on it
15:15:42 bauzas all looks good
15:15:54 dansmith assuming that clears the one fail, we should still examine the logs for more stuff
15:15:57 bauzas I know I reordered a few params
15:16:11 bauzas agreed
15:16:38 bauzas just giving a +2 as it doesn't harm but I agree on the fact we should wait for the next grenade run
15:17:26 gibi ack, I hold my +W until grenade
15:18:09 bauzas a very brief look on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761452/14/nova/compute/rpcapi.py makes me think it was the only method I switched the args
15:20:53 gibi bauzas: yes, I agree I don't see any other reordering
15:22:01 dansmith fwiw I was looking for more subtle fails when I found this
15:22:28 dansmith reorderings I would have expected to be caught by unit tests
15:27:53 gibi now I looked through the log you linked and the rest of the warning seems acceptable to me
15:50:50 gibi nova meeting starts in 10 minutes in #openstack-meeting-3
15:54:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/train: Add config parameter 'live_migration_scheme' to live migration with tls guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/782430
16:22:51 stephenfin gibi, melwitt: In case you haven't seen it yet, the placement fix is here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/782988
16:23:01 stephenfin Might be worth putting into RC1
16:23:18 stephenfin If not, it should be an immediate backport given how easy this is to hit
16:23:33 sean-k-mooney why was that not caut by the existing testing for duplicates?
16:23:49 sean-k-mooney oh
16:23:52 stephenfin Cos they use SQLite, I'm going to guess
16:23:54 sean-k-mooney that is useing sqlite
16:24:00 stephenfin yarp
16:24:08 sean-k-mooney ya ok makes sense
16:24:49 sean-k-mooney we could look at adding the same opertunistic testign we don in nova but that might eb overkill for the func tests
16:25:43 gibi stephenfin: I don't have cycles today any more
16:25:51 sean-k-mooney it makes sense why we are only seeing this now
16:25:57 gibi stephenfin: and I won't hold up RC1 for it
16:26:25 stephenfin Makes sense
16:26:38 stephenfin I'll propose the backport once we have the stable/wallaby branch
16:27:15 sean-k-mooney gibi: well it would not hold up RC1 of nova in either case
16:27:29 stephenfin he means placement RC1 I would assume
16:27:30 gibi sean-k-mooney: it is palcement :)
16:27:34 gibi yepp
16:27:39 sean-k-mooney yep
16:28:08 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: by the way didnt we talk about moveing placment back to launchpad form story borad
16:28:31 sean-k-mooney i guess we never came to a conclution or did anything about it
17:37:14 dansmith gibi: the errors are gone from the logs on my patch, so I think it's good to +W
17:37:25 dansmith still looking through it for other stuff
17:55:20 gibi dansmith: thanks will check in a minute
17:59:32 gibi I only saw message timeouts in the logs https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/a22940c76b4e4c269bdcae178f081381/log/logs/subnode-2/screen-n-cpu.txt?severity=3 but I confirm that your fix solved the previous issue and I don't see any new problem
18:11:07 gibi OK those messaging timeouts was there before even the R6.0 bump so I think it is normal and relates to the upgrade
18:11:44 gibi so I'm approved the patch
18:12:05 gibi I hope it lands before I go to bed
18:12:16 gibi if not then I will leave notes in the RC1 patch
18:36:33 dansmith gibi: the timeouts are during the upgrade I think, where conductor is down
18:36:37 dansmith that's not new
19:23:59 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for unshelve with SRIOV port https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783084
19:48:25 openstackgerrit Mark Goddard proposed openstack/nova master: Check volume encryption keys prior to resize and migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/781079
19:53:59 gibi dansmith: ack, then my guess way right about the upgrade
20:40:08 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Test numa and vcpu topologies bug: #1910466 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769601
20:40:09 openstack bug 1910466 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "NUMA instance spawn fails on get_best_cpu_topology when there is no 'threads' preference" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1910466 - Assigned to sean mooney (sean-k-mooney)
20:40:10 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Fix max cpu topologies with numa affinity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769614
21:31:30 gibi dansmith: the 6.0 fix is failed on the gate on unrealted error. But zuul haven't voted yet. I left a comment in the RC1 release patch and delegated power to you to update / +1 it if the fix lands while I'm asleep.
21:31:30 gibi o/
21:32:30 dansmith gibi: okay, will keep an eye on it
22:39:51 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix check_instance_shared_storage() call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/783026
#openstack-nova - 2021-03-26
03:06:39 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Use subqueryload() instead of joinedload() for (system_)metadata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761812
03:12:34 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Delegate OVS plug to os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/602432
03:16:19 eandersson melwitt do you know what is going on at the rocky ci?
03:16:33 eandersson > Cherry pick hash 9e9c022bde3a3ffdf0dd87e21bf9afde0dbc1e74 not on any master or stable branches
03:17:26 sean-k-mooney thats form the cherry pick script we have to ensure we dont skip branches wehn we backport
03:17:37 sean-k-mooney its run as part of the pep8 job
03:18:25 sean-k-mooney eandersson: this has not merge in trian yet so all the previous version will fail
03:18:53 sean-k-mooney that has been cherry picked incorrectly
03:19:06 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/356020 is merged
03:19:23 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/782982 is pending
03:19:48 sean-k-mooney but we shoudl have the cherry picked form lines for each branch
03:20:15 sean-k-mooney well
03:20:24 sean-k-mooney its bit that its incorrect persay
03:20:37 sean-k-mooney but untill https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/782982 merges it cant pass pep8
03:21:01 sean-k-mooney eandersson: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/tools/check-cherry-picks.sh
03:21:08 sean-k-mooney that is what is causing it to fail
03:22:11 sean-k-mooney eandersson: im not sure why the first cherry pick start a train
03:23:01 sean-k-mooney i guess this merged a year ago so maybe train was correct

Earlier   Later