| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-03-11 | |||
| 15:41:52 | stephenfin | Yeah, it's a heading that doesn't affect the structure of the document | |
| 15:41:53 | kashyap | "Under the rubric of Y" | |
| 15:42:03 | kashyap | Right; thx | |
| 15:42:03 | stephenfin | So it won't appear in a table of contents | |
| 15:42:19 | kashyap | stephenfin: Nice; I bow to your rST wisdom | |
| 15:42:24 | sean-k-mooney | ist that what cascade list use internally | |
| 15:42:44 | sean-k-mooney | i always hade when heading are not linkable in our docs | |
| 15:42:52 | sean-k-mooney | *hate | |
| 15:43:19 | stephenfin | cascade list? | |
| 15:43:54 | gibi | nova meeting will start in 16 minutes on #openstack-meeting-3 | |
| 15:44:26 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: what we sue here https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/nova/master/doc/source/user/flavors.rst | |
| 15:44:34 | sean-k-mooney | for the titles | |
| 15:44:43 | stephenfin | oh, definition lists | |
| 15:44:48 | sean-k-mooney | yep those | |
| 15:44:50 | stephenfin | no, similar but different | |
| 15:45:00 | stephenfin | rubric is it's own thing | |
| 15:45:05 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok | |
| 15:45:10 | stephenfin | similar to an aside (warning, tip, information, ...) | |
| 15:46:05 | sean-k-mooney | can we make definiton lists linkable by the way | |
| 15:46:24 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. with a css selector | |
| 15:46:56 | kashyap | stephenfin: Thx also for cleaning up the Hyper-V docs, and as is your wont, general "docs excellency". Added my +1, FWIW. | |
| 15:47:03 | sean-k-mooney | the curent issue is while the definitoin list title elemnt is sepreate it does not have an id | |
| 15:47:42 | sean-k-mooney | so you cant do http://.../#id-of-list-item-title | |
| 15:47:43 | bauzas | gibi: I'll have to bail out from the nova meeting after 10 mins #curfew | |
| 15:48:20 | bauzas | gibi: no stories to tell from the libvirt subteam | |
| 15:48:40 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: I'm not sure off the top of my head, tbh | |
| 15:49:08 | sean-k-mooney | i think i asked you before and you said no | |
| 15:49:28 | stephenfin | I don't see any href on any of the definitions in the policy doc so I don't think Sphinx does it natively | |
| 15:49:32 | stephenfin | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/policy.html | |
| 15:49:43 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: they should not be hrefs | |
| 15:49:55 | stephenfin | sorry, ids | |
| 15:50:09 | sean-k-mooney | right so nova has one https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/policy.html#nova | |
| 15:50:26 | sean-k-mooney | but none of the other items | |
| 15:50:26 | stephenfin | whereas we do have them for the config doc https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html | |
| 15:50:36 | sean-k-mooney | yep we dont use definition list there i think | |
| 15:50:42 | stephenfin | that's because 'oslo_policy.sphinxext' uses a custom domain, which means you can index them | |
| 15:50:45 | sean-k-mooney | we generate that form code | |
| 15:50:52 | stephenfin | sorry, 'oslo_config.sphinxext' | |
| 15:50:59 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 15:51:05 | stephenfin | whereas 'oslo_policy.sphinxext' is just using definition lits | |
| 15:51:07 | stephenfin | lists | |
| 15:51:14 | stephenfin | we could improve that, of course | |
| 15:51:18 | stephenfin | I just haven't gotten to do it yet | |
| 15:51:22 | gibi | bauzas: ack | |
| 15:51:24 | gibi | bauzas: thanks | |
| 15:51:46 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: ya its more of a minor annowyance but it also affect ones we write by hand | |
| 15:52:12 | sean-k-mooney | althoguh when writing them by hand we can just add anchors to fix it | |
| 15:52:27 | sean-k-mooney | which we do in thing like the schduler doc if i remeber correctly | |
| 15:53:55 | sean-k-mooney | oh we dont | |
| 15:53:58 | sean-k-mooney | it has the same issue | |
| 15:54:09 | stephenfin | I have a huge doc rework to fix that | |
| 15:54:10 | sean-k-mooney | anyway not importnat right now just annoying ux | |
| 15:54:16 | stephenfin | I'll get people to take a look after feature freeze | |
| 15:54:21 | bauzas | stephenfin: the os secure boot eventually got my approval till the func test | |
| 15:54:32 | bauzas | stephenfin: waiting for gerrit to tell me about the func test | |
| 15:54:46 | bauzas | stephenfin: but I guess you got no issues locally, right? | |
| 15:55:03 | stephenfin | I tested before I pushed. Works as expected, if that helps | |
| 15:55:11 | stephenfin | and it won't merge if the CI isn't happy even with +W | |
| 15:55:18 | stephenfin | as we're seeing :'( | |
| 15:59:35 | artom | stephenfin, hey, so turns out with sean-k-mooney's port affinity patch on top of mine, we discovered an issue with devices that have parents | |
| 15:59:56 | artom | I was setting pool['socket'], and that cause bad side effects when doing pool comparisons later on | |
| 16:00:08 | artom | So I had to respin and kick it out of the gate | |
| 16:01:41 | gibi | and I'm already +2 :) | |
| 16:25:35 | bauzas | dansmith: I haven't forgotten the rpc changes but reviews day hell here | |
| 16:25:44 | bauzas | tomorrow, that's better. | |
| 16:40:47 | dansmith | bauzas:ack | |
| 16:41:04 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: you just too good for the nova meeting these days? | |
| 16:41:38 | sean-k-mooney | sorry forgot it was time for it joining | |
| 16:42:21 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: so I asked a question there expecting maybe a response from you and realized you weren't around | |
| 16:42:22 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: ah its just over | |
| 16:42:31 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: related to the glance metadef api, | |
| 16:42:40 | dansmith | you probably saw the OSSN and query about getting ops feedback | |
| 16:42:58 | dansmith | but I (and stephenfin) thought you might be aware of how this is used | |
| 16:43:11 | sean-k-mooney | the metadef api | |
| 16:43:14 | dansmith | I think horizon uses it to present templates of nova metadata you can apply to things in some way | |
| 16:43:27 | sean-k-mooney | its use by heat i belive and yest its used by horizon | |
| 16:43:42 | dansmith | but it's not clear to me if that's like really useful, widely-used, etc | |
| 16:43:44 | sean-k-mooney | to generate the view that is ues to add flaovr extra specs and image poeprtyes | |
| 16:44:13 | dansmith | okay, does it allow you to create those things or just use it to show? | |
| 16:44:24 | sean-k-mooney | you can create them too | |
| 16:44:35 | sean-k-mooney | i belive that is admin only | |
| 16:44:39 | dansmith | it's not | |
| 16:44:43 | dansmith | at least on the glance side | |
| 16:44:46 | sean-k-mooney | really | |
| 16:44:58 | dansmith | it's also not properly isolated, | |
| 16:45:09 | sean-k-mooney | well its not ment ot be per tenant | |
| 16:45:20 | sean-k-mooney | its ment to be a global registry | |
| 16:45:22 | dansmith | which means you can use (apparently horizon) to poke and see if other tenants have things defined | |
| 16:45:47 | sean-k-mooney | right but this was not ment to be per tenant | |
| 16:45:49 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: it's completely wide open by default | |
| 16:46:05 | sean-k-mooney | ok so the issue there is that writing to it is allowd | |
| 16:46:14 | sean-k-mooney | reading form it by default is fien for everyone | |
| 16:46:16 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: also, it is clearly tenantified a little bit, just not well | |
| 16:46:41 | sean-k-mooney | is see i was not aware of that | |
| 16:46:45 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: so tenants can create things that aren't shown to other tenants, but if you know the name, you can see it | |
| 16:46:56 | sean-k-mooney | ah i see | |
| 16:47:09 | sean-k-mooney | i did not see the OSSN for this by the way | |
| 16:47:17 | sean-k-mooney | so didnt know that context | |
| 16:47:24 | dansmith | it seems to be that namespace is the thing that is tied to the tenant, | |
| 16:47:51 | dansmith | and you create things tied to that namespace that are private to you, but if someone knows the name (or happens to pick the same one you did) then ... oopsie, here's their data | |