Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-02-25
15:17:07 bauzas but I don't think you'll need to change the RPC calls, right?
15:17:22 bauzas just how the objects are passed
15:17:23 sean-k-mooney correct i dont
15:17:31 bauzas anyway, that's fine
15:17:36 sean-k-mooney i just need to add a new value to the dev_type field for vdpa
15:17:41 bauzas we should work on bumping the APIs only after FF
15:17:45 sean-k-mooney in the PciDevice object
15:18:03 bauzas but given we had a long day from the last bump, I preferred to work on it sooner than later
15:18:18 sean-k-mooney for the port numa work i only need the request_networksin in the request spec which you already added
15:18:24 bauzas and I was right, I'm facing weirdo bugs
15:18:27 sean-k-mooney so no object or rpc change there
15:18:33 bauzas ++
15:50:49 gibi nova weekly meeting starts in 9 minutes in #openstack-meeting-3
16:01:19 stephenfin bauzas: Think you could add https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/756552 to your review queue also? 0:)
16:03:08 bauzas stephenfin: ack, CC'd
16:37:45 sean-k-mooney did the nova meeting finish already?
16:38:24 gibi sean-k-mooney: yepp
16:38:42 gibi sean-k-mooney: did you missed it?
16:38:57 sean-k-mooney yep having a downstream conversation
16:39:00 sean-k-mooney was about to join
16:39:38 gibi sean-k-mooney: sorry we run out of topics early so I closed it
16:39:47 sean-k-mooney thats ok
16:39:54 gibi sean-k-mooney: is there anything you wanted to raise?
16:40:31 sean-k-mooney kind of we have a downstram bz filed for one of nova default polices
16:40:36 sean-k-mooney https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933047
16:40:38 openstack bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1933047 in openstack-nova "Provider Networks have to be shared or Nova will fail to create a server with "not allowed to create an interface on external network"" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to nova-maint
16:41:09 sean-k-mooney im not really sure im comforatble changeign that behavior downstrema only but its not really a bug in my view either
16:41:26 sean-k-mooney on the other hand that policy may not be required anymore.
16:41:35 sean-k-mooney so i wanted to get more input
16:45:57 gibi sean-k-mooney: hm if the provider net was created with --project for a specific tenant then I would expect that tenant can boot a VM on that net
16:46:09 sean-k-mooney it can
16:46:15 sean-k-mooney if its not an external network
16:46:20 sean-k-mooney at least i think it can
16:46:26 sean-k-mooney the issue here is its both
16:47:37 gibi OK then I don't have enough knowledge on the networking side of this.
16:48:04 gibi sean-k-mooney: ooh we have a nova policy for this
16:48:19 sean-k-mooney thats ok. external networks are network whose subnets are sued for floating ip and neutron router gateway ports
16:48:27 sean-k-mooney gibi: yes we do
16:48:39 sean-k-mooney i dont think neutron supported this when we added the policy
16:48:50 gibi so the admin when creates the external net for a tenant can give the tenant servers_policies.NETWORK_ATTACH_EXTERNAL rights in nova, and then it will work
16:49:23 sean-k-mooney via custom plolicy rules yes
16:50:01 gibi then it is a config issue on the admin side
16:50:11 gibi the admin only did half of the work to provide the access for the tenant
16:50:21 sean-k-mooney yep
16:50:36 sean-k-mooney the issue is we do not supprot custom policy in our product
16:50:37 gibi would that be a good answer for your BZ?
16:50:42 gibi aaah
16:50:43 gibi I see
16:50:50 sean-k-mooney so we are being asked is this policy valid anymore
16:50:54 sean-k-mooney and can it be removed
16:51:19 sean-k-mooney im trying to understand if there is a usecase for this now or should we allow neutron to enforce this
16:51:46 sean-k-mooney my concern is that the precednce around policy changes is to have a deprecation cylce
16:52:16 sean-k-mooney meaning we could only change or remove this in xena even if we deperacted its current value this cycle
16:52:56 sean-k-mooney we can support this for a customer explicty via a supprot excption downstream
16:53:18 sean-k-mooney im just not sure im comfortable changing the default downstream without fully understaind all the implication of that policy
16:57:12 gibi I don't have the networking background to decide on if having a tenant attaching to an external net is a valid use case
16:57:42 sean-k-mooney ya i think we are going to start a mailing list post on this topic
16:59:01 gibi good idea
17:11:23 sean-k-mooney gibi: thanks for looking by the way
17:11:31 gibi no problem
18:16:23 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Bump the Compute RPC API to version 6.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761452
18:16:55 bauzas oh f**** we just merged interface attach which conflicts with ^
18:17:06 bauzas I'm a sad panda
18:17:33 bauzas oh man, wait
18:20:57 sean-k-mooney didnt that merge a few days ago
18:20:57 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Bump the Compute RPC API to version 6.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761452
18:21:16 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yup, don't know why my local rebase didn't get it previously
18:21:28 bauzas anyway, just done
18:21:36 sean-k-mooney looks like you fixed it quickly in anycase
18:21:43 bauzas sean-k-mooney: and fwiw, I'll need to respin my work for your vDPA change
18:21:55 bauzas as I forgot we look at the service level
18:22:17 bauzas which is bumped everytime we provide a new object field
18:24:09 sean-k-mooney its not a new field
18:24:17 sean-k-mooney its a new value for an existing field
18:24:32 sean-k-mooney so object verion is bumpted but not service version right
18:24:43 sean-k-mooney either tat or i need to add a service version bump to that patch
18:25:00 bauzas ahha no, then
18:25:40 sean-k-mooney its a small change let me show you https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/777481
18:26:18 sean-k-mooney im trying to keep them small and self contianed
18:56:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Fixes the elapsed time logged during a live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/776428
20:38:45 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: support per port numa policies with sriov https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773792
21:06:11 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: fix sr-iov support on Cavium ThunderX hosts. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/777679
21:25:55 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: fix sr-iov support on Cavium ThunderX hosts. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/777679
21:26:13 openstackgerrit Ade Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Replace md5 for fips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/777686
23:34:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: [placement] Add status and links fields to version document at / https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/751240
#openstack-nova - 2021-02-26
01:33:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: only wait for plugtime events in pre-live-migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770745
07:58:44 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Smartnic support - cyborg drive https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771362
07:58:45 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - new vnic type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771363
07:58:46 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758944
08:13:04 yonglihe gibi: few test case may missing, but coming soon. thanks that comments.
08:26:04 gibi yonglihe: thanks
15:51:16 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Update resources once in update_available_resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/612295
17:05:47 gibi what a silent friday
17:06:45 gmann Recharge day...
17:09:04 gibi ohh that explanse a lot
20:11:15 atmark Hello, I have PCI passthrough configure in nova configs and also set an alias in the flavor but I'm getting this error when I create an instance
20:11:18 atmark Invalid PCI alias definition: [{'vendor_id': '1344', 'product_id': '51b2', 'device_type': 'type-PF', 'name': 'pf1'}] is not of type 'object'
20:11:37 atmark Here is my config http://paste.openstack.org/show/803047/
#openstack-nova - 2021-02-27
05:06:00 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: compute: Lock by instance.uuid lock during swap_volume https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758732
16:04:14 legochen hey guys, I’m trying "Launch an instance from a volume”

Earlier   Later