Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-02-19
14:59:03 bauzas gibi: I'll enter some bug triage meeting in a second (and I have to host it), could we postpone our discussion by one hour ?
14:59:13 gibi bauzas: sure, I will be her
14:59:17 gibi sean-k-mooney: I'm admin
14:59:38 sean-k-mooney gibi: can you try listing the filed explictly?
14:59:42 gibi sean-k-mooney: also verifyed that in this case the subnet has no segment_id from the neutron code perspective
14:59:48 gibi sean-k-mooney: sure
14:59:50 bauzas gibi: my wife will look at me as we have curfew at 6pm, so I won't be able to stay late as we need to visit supermarkets but we can continue for 10 mins
14:59:51 sean-k-mooney or doign it with debug
14:59:56 sean-k-mooney osc may not render it
15:00:11 sean-k-mooney by default that is
15:00:54 sean-k-mooney just reading your pastbin but need to jump to same meeting as bauzas brb
15:01:10 gibi sean-k-mooney: ack, have a nice meeting :)
15:01:11 gibi http://paste.openstack.org/show/802829/
15:01:26 gibi so the REST API returns segment_id null
15:01:59 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: I've about three patches that bauzas would benefit from, IMO, but I obviously don't want to make a review chain even longer /o\
15:02:09 stephenfin (the secure boot one is 12 patches long already)
15:03:38 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: ya i know just point it out to show we currently use the Name field
15:03:47 sean-k-mooney so Segment
15:04:06 sean-k-mooney not the alias field
15:04:06 stephenfin ah, yes, good point
15:04:17 stephenfin who ever thought that was a good idea...
15:04:21 stephenfin *whoever
15:04:39 sean-k-mooney whomever?
15:05:00 sean-k-mooney clearly the most important question of the day
15:06:28 stephenfin whoever
15:06:42 stephenfin I will give it to whomever wants it
15:07:04 stephenfin you can sub whomever with him, her, us etc.
15:07:11 sean-k-mooney imperitive vs questioning ?
15:07:15 stephenfin Whoever wants it can have it
15:07:33 stephenfin you can sub whoever for he, she, we, etc.
15:08:08 stephenfin so if e.g. "him" would make sense, choose whomever, else choose whoever
15:08:16 stephenfin at least I think that's how it works :)
15:08:59 stephenfin Yup, Google agrees with me https://www.grammarly.com/blog/2-effective-ways-to-deal-with-whoeverwhomever-confusion/
15:10:15 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: pci: implement the `socket` NUMA affinity policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772779
15:17:50 gibi sean-k-mooney, bauzas: I think I figured out another interesting thing. A subnet can be created without providing a segment id but also with --network-segment the user can provide a segment_id for a subnet. In the former case the segments plugin ignore the subnet and no placement and nova aggregates are created. But in the latter case the segment plugin acts on the subnet. However in both cases nova
15:17:56 gibi considers the network having a a segment as the segments list command returns the segment regardless of how the subnet was created.
15:29:34 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: pci: implement the `socket` NUMA affinity policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772779
15:58:45 bauzas gibi: I'm back
15:59:14 bauzas wrapping up on your comments
16:07:31 bauzas gibi: what you said last doesn't look an issue to me, right?
16:07:48 bauzas it's more the operator who messed up
16:09:40 gibi bauzas: no, both config is valid and both network is a valid network
16:10:06 gibi I think neutron considers net3 as a non routed network while net4 as a routed network
16:10:16 gibi but now consider both as routed and try to find the aggergate for net3
16:10:18 gibi and fails
16:10:52 gibi s/but now/but nova/
16:11:39 bauzas gibi: you refer to http://paste.openstack.org/show/802828/ ?
16:12:10 gibi sorry I refer to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773976/10/nova/scheduler/utils.py#1370
16:12:56 sean-k-mooney gibi: yes subnets dont need to have segment ids
16:13:11 sean-k-mooney gibi: but a network requires that all subnets either have them or none of them do
16:13:54 sean-k-mooney gibi: we shoudl have support for both routed and non routed netowrks in teh same cloud
16:14:16 gibi sean-k-mooney: ^^ yeah this is what my example in the comment tries out
16:14:56 sean-k-mooney no what i mean is i pointed this out already and bauzas added a func test to make sure this works if i am not rembereing
16:15:03 gibi so we can have one network with a segment and with subnet without that segment, and also another network with a segmetn and a subnet that has that segment
16:15:16 sean-k-mooney gibi: we will check every network but if a netwrok does not have segment it wont break anything
16:15:36 sean-k-mooney we are ment to catch InvalidRoutedNetworkConfiguration in the prefilter
16:15:37 gibi sean-k-mooney: yes but if the network has a segment but the subnet does not
16:15:58 bauzas gibi: and you're passing a port ?
16:16:00 sean-k-mooney segments are mapped to subnets
16:16:04 sean-k-mooney not to networks
16:16:14 gibi sean-k-mooney: but nova queries segment list
16:16:14 bauzas that ^
16:16:18 gibi for networks
16:16:34 bauzas gibi: for net3, it won't return segments, right?
16:16:43 sean-k-mooney no we get the segment on a network and look those up
16:16:46 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773976/10/nova/scheduler/utils.py#1356
16:17:01 sean-k-mooney the network itself never has a segment
16:17:14 gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773976/10/nova/network/neutron.py#3510
16:17:15 sean-k-mooney and all subnets in a singel networ will eithe rhave segments or not
16:17:23 sean-k-mooney neutorn does not allow you to mix within a netowrk
16:17:41 gibi bauzas: for net3 the segment list will return a segment
16:18:10 bauzas because of provider-segment ?
16:18:41 gibi I guess becuase it is a provider network
16:18:46 sean-k-mooney net3 in the test not http://paste.openstack.org/show/802828/ right
16:18:55 sean-k-mooney sorry need to try an pull up the same thing your looking at
16:19:16 sean-k-mooney same
16:19:32 bauzas I don't see how neutron can end up creating segments by the network
16:19:38 gibi sean-k-mooney: you see in that paste that for net3 the segmetn list returns a segment
16:19:47 sean-k-mooney what is net 3
16:19:58 sean-k-mooney the first vxlan one
16:20:08 sean-k-mooney sorry vlan
16:20:10 sean-k-mooney 0437d333-a597-4d50-867e-d1bee7e4fc59 | None | a75a232f-c1df-4b71-9597-92acc8e83dad | vlan | 103 | <-- this is net3
16:20:12 gibi sean-k-mooney: give me a sec, I put up a full reproduction printouit
16:20:29 bauzas gibi: looks to me the segmentation_id on the network is a VLAN ID
16:20:32 gmann lyarwood: ack, looks ok to me, I will merge that.
16:20:45 bauzas which makes no sense on a L3
16:20:49 bauzas but whatever
16:20:56 sean-k-mooney gibi: provider:segmentation_id is not the same as the segment-id
16:21:01 bauzas my point ^
16:21:04 sean-k-mooney provider:segmentation_id is the vlan id
16:21:08 bauzas \o/
16:21:13 bauzas I'm a network expert !
16:21:14 bauzas :D
16:22:05 bauzas gibi: that being said, does https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773976/10/nova/network/neutron.py#3510 returns you some segments for net3 ?
16:22:10 bauzas it shouldn't
16:22:33 sean-k-mooney gibi: so ya the neutron plugin is slightly wrong
16:22:35 bauzas gibi: could you actually issue the CLI call against net3 ?
16:22:42 sean-k-mooney but it wont break us
16:22:56 gibi http://paste.openstack.org/show/802832/
16:23:03 sean-k-mooney we are doing the right thing and only looking a subnet segment_ids

Earlier   Later