Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-02-15
11:29:49 lyarwood you would think
11:30:02 lyarwood don't they recompile the kernel now?
11:30:02 kashyap Yeah, don't assume.
11:30:07 sean-k-mooney im not
11:30:20 sean-k-mooney i have use it with sata before
11:31:00 sean-k-mooney although i dont know if i have used it with sata and q35
11:31:17 sean-k-mooney i have used it with sata and pc
11:32:35 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: are you lookign at a gate failure by the way
11:33:13 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: yeah the tip of my q35 series switches nova-next over to using q35 and some tests that rely on config drive (device tagging etc) are failing
11:33:29 sean-k-mooney ah ok
11:33:42 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: have a local reproducer anyway and I can't see anything related to SATA in dmesg within the instance
11:37:19 sean-k-mooney ya its strang
11:37:23 sean-k-mooney i booted it too
11:37:29 sean-k-mooney so it boots fine with sata
11:37:36 sean-k-mooney but lsblk and blkid are empty
11:38:55 lyarwood f33 finds the device fine
11:39:07 lyarwood weird, I could make the cdrom bus host configurable?
11:39:13 lyarwood as a workaround
11:39:23 sean-k-mooney well its configurable via the image alredy
11:39:52 sean-k-mooney whats odd its ist not in /sys/block
11:40:50 kashyap [root@rawhide-1 ~]# dmesg | grep -i sata | head -1
11:40:50 kashyap [ 1.724456] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0000 32 slots 6 ports 1.5 Gbps 0x3f impl SATA mode
11:41:21 sean-k-mooney i dont see it in /dev either
11:41:54 sean-k-mooney kashyap empty
11:43:15 lyarwood I wonder if SCSI would be a better bus for this anyway
11:43:34 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Look for `dmesg | grep -i sata`
11:43:41 kashyap What gues did you boot?
11:43:41 lyarwood ah I guess we don't know if we have the controller setup
11:43:56 sean-k-mooney kashyap: i did and it gives nothing
11:44:06 kashyap What guest?
11:44:07 lyarwood yeah same for me with cirros
11:44:11 sean-k-mooney cirros
11:45:16 kashyap Right; my guest is Fedora ("Rawhide" - rolling)
11:45:51 sean-k-mooney yes which is not what we are trying to debug
11:46:12 sean-k-mooney its odd because im not seeing anyting in /dev
11:46:18 sean-k-mooney or /sys for the disk
11:46:36 sean-k-mooney im really confused how the root filestyem is currenlty mounted
11:47:02 kashyap sean-k-mooney: I was posting it for info; not saying Fedora is what we're debugging here
11:47:51 kashyap lyarwood: sean-k-mooney: I see some forums online say CirrOS does not support SATA interface
11:48:53 sean-k-mooney unless we use the vfat config driver format that woudl be a problem
11:49:33 sean-k-mooney we cant really assuem scsi will work and virtio-blk is not avalid for a cdrom
11:50:10 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: ah check /etc/modules
11:50:22 sean-k-mooney just deleted them to try scsi
11:50:45 lyarwood scsi should work but I think we can get sata to also work by updating /etc/modules
11:51:38 sean-k-mooney that woudl requrie cirros to be updated
11:52:03 sean-k-mooney given its botting it is able to use sata somehow
11:52:19 sean-k-mooney /etc/modules is just the set of addtional moduels to load
11:53:12 sean-k-mooney by the way why i said scsi isnt really an option is windows does not have teh virtio-scsi drivers by default
11:53:19 sean-k-mooney so we could not change the default to scsi
11:53:33 sean-k-mooney we chose sata becasue it shoudl work on all operating systmes
11:53:42 lyarwood is scsi == virtio-scsi?
11:53:51 lyarwood you have to set the model to virtio-scsi for that to be the case right?
11:54:01 sean-k-mooney yes you do
11:54:12 sean-k-mooney the other scsi contoller are all quite old
11:54:20 sean-k-mooney im not sure we would want to use any of those by default
11:54:31 lyarwood well at least Windows would support it then
11:54:34 lyarwood but yeah
11:54:58 sean-k-mooney im not sure if it would it might
11:55:07 sean-k-mooney using scsi works by the way for cirros
11:55:12 sean-k-mooney show up as normal
11:56:03 lyarwood not for me as the config cdrom drive
11:56:10 lyarwood so I think there's something still missing there
11:56:17 lyarwood I found https://bugs.launchpad.net/cirros/+bug/1715009 from a while ago
11:56:19 openstack Launchpad bug 1715009 in CirrOS "Missing modules for scsi cdrom config_drive in ppc64le" [Medium,Fix committed]
11:56:34 lyarwood so I wonder if there's additional things we need on x86_64
11:57:02 sean-k-mooney so looking at /lib/modules/...
11:57:14 sean-k-mooney cirros hs sfcsi and virtio drivers
11:57:17 sean-k-mooney but not sata
11:57:52 sean-k-mooney it only has the virtio scsi drivers by the way
11:58:16 sean-k-mooney im guessing the init ramfs has the sata drivers
11:58:45 sean-k-mooney or it fell back to an in kernel driver
11:58:51 sean-k-mooney rahter then a module
12:02:37 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: by the way we have a bug with bfv
12:02:58 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: shocking i know but bfv does not select the correct bus when you use sata
12:03:04 sean-k-mooney it will use scsi instead
12:03:13 sean-k-mooney i fixed this years ago for non bfv
12:03:27 sean-k-mooney but it looks like it back or was never fixed for bfv
12:03:46 kashyap Sorry for my choppiness here. Struggling with something today.
12:08:13 openstackgerrit Hemanth N proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Update pci stat pools based on PCI device changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/761824
12:26:48 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: sorry had to go afk, with hw_disk_bus=sata?
12:30:13 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: ya if you hw_disk_bus=sata with bfv on ussuri then you get scsi
13:02:12 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Record the machine_type of instances in system_metadata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/767533
13:02:13 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add machine_type get command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769548
13:02:13 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add machine_type update command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/774896
13:02:14 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP nova-manage: Add machine_type list_unset command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/774897
13:02:14 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: nova-status: Add hw_machine_type check for libvirt instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770643
13:02:15 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add a config update workflow test for [libvirt]hw_machine_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/774898
13:02:15 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Add admin docs for configuring and updating machine types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/774899
13:57:15 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: nova-next: Start testing the 'q35' machine type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/708701
15:36:43 lyarwood stephenfin: thanks for the review, would you mind if I hold off on that respin until the rest of the series has been looked at? ./me doesn't want to hammer CI
15:36:57 stephenfin yup, fine by me. Working through it atm
15:37:51 lyarwood stephenfin: excellent thanks
15:38:08 openstackgerrit Lucas Alvares Gomes proposed openstack/nova master: DO NOT REVIEW: Test OVN devstack module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/748226
15:53:19 kukacz hi. having queens, nova disk with images_type=raw, when doing server resize I'm ending up with unbootable instance. I noticed that new (resized up) boot disk is being created as qcow, not raw. Is this a bug or am I rather missing some configuration detail?
15:57:39 lyarwood kukacz: that sounds like a bug, can you open one and share some logs of the resize?
15:58:59 lyarwood https://launchpad.net/nova/+bug for the bug btw if you didn't know
16:06:22 kukacz lyarwood: sure, thanks, I'll collect logs+details into the bug. I'll need to switch the server to different configuration (lvm backend) for production, most probably not being able to collect more details or tests into the bug when required for some weeks. is it reasonable to file the bug despite such constraint?
16:08:02 lyarwood kukacz: yup I might try to reproduce this tomorrow anyway
16:09:38 kukacz lyarwood: perfect! I'll do that then
16:10:53 kukacz btw. what is the current status of LVM backen resize support in Nova? I did a similar test with it and was (correctly) refused, stating it in logs that it's not supported. has that changed in newer releases?

Earlier   Later