Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-01-21
13:01:22 lyarwood gibi: ^ went down a rabbit hole for a while with the ppc64 stuff but I think https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741545 is required now.
13:02:56 gibi lyarwood: will look at it after my call
13:03:04 lyarwood gibi: ack thanks
13:03:12 gibi I thank you
13:03:43 lyarwood stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771711 - not sure if you saw my ping about this last night btw, finally copied some notes from Matt into our docs
13:16:57 brinzhang sean-k-mooney, gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/769120 this patch based on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/769857, but why the fist patch still run the stable branch zuul job?
13:17:05 brinzhang do you have time to check this?
13:18:51 brinzhang jobs tempest-full-py3 , tempest-full-victoria-py3, tempest-full-ussuri-py3, and tempest-full-train-py3 already failed, because of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/768852
13:19:48 brinzhang and another issue is the nova patch and tempest patch depends-on each other, I have no idea to deal them :(
13:21:45 brinzhang if you have time to help, please left comment or said in irc, I will back home now, thanks
13:26:50 sean-k-mooney why are you skiping the usage tests?
13:28:17 sean-k-mooney tempest is ment to be branchless right and work with any version of openstack
13:30:14 sean-k-mooney i think what we need to do is update the tempest tests such that they use the old microversion when doing usage checks
13:30:32 sean-k-mooney not skip
13:30:36 gibi yepp ^^ commented the same thing
13:31:56 sean-k-mooney brinzhang: that will break the cylic depency as the tempest change is not depent on the nova one then
14:09:44 elod lyarwood: as I added some info to Nova Meeting's stable section (feel free to extend it :)) I realized, that rocky is still blocked. could you have a look at this easy patch some time to unblock it? >>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766492
14:10:09 lyarwood elod: ack will do
14:10:34 elod lyarwood: thx in advance :]
14:14:50 stephenfin lyarwood: I did but hadn't got to it yet. Looking
14:15:14 lyarwood stephenfin: ack sorry didn't mean to spam
14:15:24 stephenfin nope, all good
14:40:15 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Try harder to exclude encrypted volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771822
14:40:40 dansmith lyarwood: we're also suddenly running cinder encrypted tests in that multistore job despite the blacklist regex, which are coming from the cinder tempest plugin
14:40:46 dansmith lyarwood: ^ this tries to hit them too
14:43:04 sean-k-mooney hehe i like the title
14:43:25 dansmith I dunno why that has started failing all the sudden,
14:43:32 dansmith like if a name changed and we started running those or something
14:43:46 dansmith but they end up putting an image int he wrong glance repo, which doesn't work
14:44:46 dansmith oh, heh
14:44:57 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/commit/5ab3fef76283ca91b92fa130ba2685886bd8af68
14:44:58 dansmith looks like there's already something in gate
14:45:00 sean-k-mooney maybe that
14:45:10 dansmith sean-k-mooney: yuuup
14:46:08 sean-k-mooney so ya just new test added
14:47:38 dansmith lyarwood: sorry, just saw yours from 1am.. I had half figured this out last night but ran out of time, thanks for grabbing that
14:47:52 dansmith that makes three distinct and legit non-nova, non-glance issues with that job in a week :)
14:53:12 sean-k-mooney well at least there is now testing for this so its still progress
14:53:26 sean-k-mooney even if there are teething issues
14:59:12 dansmith lyarwood: I assume that snuck in because we run the whole tempest-cinder-plugin on that job, but they don't gate on it.. so my first thought was just to not load their tempest plugin in there to prevent this from happening in the future.. thoughts on that?
14:59:44 dansmith sean-k-mooney: yes, especially good when they're actual problems and not just flaky or unreliable tests
15:03:19 lyarwood dansmith: morning, sorry was afk
15:03:51 lyarwood dansmith: yeah correct, I was going to see if we could add this job into their gate tbh
15:03:56 dansmith lyarwood: np, it took a night of sleep to realize that test was from a tempest plugin, thanks for nailing that whilst I slept
15:04:02 dansmith lyarwood: that also works
15:04:50 lyarwood so what's the deal with these project specific tempest plugins
15:05:01 lyarwood from what I've seen most of this should live in core tempest anyway
15:05:03 dansmith I dunno, asking for trouble :)
15:05:21 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Replace blind retry with libvirt event waiting in detach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770246
15:05:29 lyarwood hehe
15:05:52 lyarwood I just don't get the need for loads of different test repos all doing the same time tbh, I'll go away and read up
15:05:54 dansmith without co-gating it's just an attack vector
15:12:56 lyarwood dansmith: multistore attempts to cover some edge usecases right?
15:21:06 dansmith lyarwood: the whole arrangement in devstack is edgy yeah
15:21:49 lyarwood dansmith: cool, so looking at the actual test that borked here this might be something we can fix on their side
15:22:16 lyarwood dansmith: for whatever reason the test is creating a unique image for the instance to use
15:22:41 lyarwood dansmith: when it really isn't required as the test is about cloning an encrypted volume attached to the instance
15:23:06 lyarwood I'll submit a few changes to the cinder plugin before adding our job to their gate somehow
15:23:06 dansmith yeah, and it creates it in the wrong glance store, which is the problem
15:23:18 lyarwood we might be able to drop the blacklist around encrypted volumes after all
15:23:26 lyarwood skiplist*
15:23:36 dansmith brownlist
15:23:40 dansmith like, turds
15:25:31 lyarwood ^_^
15:26:02 spatel noonedeadpunk: In your designate example where is pool_id? http://paste.openstack.org/show/801787/
15:26:55 noonedeadpunk o_O
15:27:01 spatel i had issue that issue and when i put pool id then it works
15:27:08 spatel what is the workaround for that?
15:27:47 spatel does OSA generate random pool id ? (because default isn't valid)
15:28:43 spatel sorry folks wrong channel
15:34:57 sean-k-mooney i had issue with the pool id in kolla ansible too
15:35:37 sean-k-mooney for me i had to both mess with the config and the db to eventulaly get it to work
15:36:00 sean-k-mooney but i remmeber id did not jsut work for me when it was deployed
15:36:38 sean-k-mooney i added
15:36:40 sean-k-mooney [service:central]
15:36:43 sean-k-mooney default_pool_id = 6a67bd3a8e654ddeb3675b8534899f16
15:36:45 sean-k-mooney workers = 5
15:36:54 sean-k-mooney and then i think i needed to edit the db to make it match
15:37:03 sean-k-mooney it was strange
15:46:04 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: zuul: Allow encryption tests in nova-ceph-multistore again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771837
15:46:09 lyarwood dansmith: ^ hopefully this work
15:46:33 lyarwood that links through to a fix and another change adding the job to gate of the tempest plugin
15:47:18 lyarwood ah I think I also need to fix some core tempest tests
15:47:21 lyarwood my bad
15:47:41 dansmith yeah, there are core tests too, and that's why last night I was like "wtf, how is this just now breaking when nothing has changed here"
15:48:53 lyarwood ack kk, I'll let this fail and then fix them up, it's likely the same bogus image creation copy pasted between tempest and the plugin tbh
15:49:21 dansmith wouldn't be surprised, yeah
15:49:28 dansmith which is further support for "why is this separate?"
15:49:44 lyarwood yup
15:50:48 gibi nova weekly meeting starts in 10 minutes in #openstack-meeting-3
15:50:55 bauzas gibi: given the curfew we have at 6pm, I'll stay in the meeting until 5.30pm our time
15:54:52 gibi bauzas: O
15:54:53 gibi K
16:06:39 dansmith hey sean-k-mooney, you like devstacking.. would you run this locally and compare before/after numbers? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/771505
16:07:57 sean-k-mooney " know this is going to be controversial, but hear me out." L)
16:08:03 sean-k-mooney * :)
16:08:08 sean-k-mooney sure i can try that
16:08:20 dansmith I actually maybe should remove that,
16:08:30 dansmith because so far it has been super stable for me, and easy to debug things
16:08:45 dansmith initial attempt interleaved all the parallel logging, which I knew would be hard to swallow for people

Earlier   Later