| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-12-11 | |||
| 15:21:35 | stephenfin | To avoid the £150 postage fee | |
| 15:21:36 | sean-k-mooney | nope its coming on a pallet | |
| 15:21:47 | sean-k-mooney | it ways 96KG | |
| 15:21:53 | stephenfin | oh | |
| 15:21:56 | stephenfin | well then | |
| 15:22:14 | stephenfin | that's more than I weigh | |
| 15:22:20 | sean-k-mooney | ya its over the wight limit | |
| 15:22:33 | stephenfin | 150 doesn't sound so bad now, heh | |
| 15:23:20 | sean-k-mooney | yep also the server the drives cost more then the server i would have been over 3500 for the same capasity in dirves | |
| 15:24:11 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: you passthrough a physical GPU for the windows gaming VM? | |
| 15:24:28 | sean-k-mooney | that is my plan yes | |
| 15:24:37 | sean-k-mooney | i did before but its currenly in my desktop | |
| 15:24:48 | gibi | interesting | |
| 15:24:55 | sean-k-mooney | jsut using pci passthoough in the flavor not the vgpu support | |
| 15:25:28 | sean-k-mooney | gpus that support vGPU are still $$$$ | |
| 15:26:29 | gibi | yeah, and I guess you don't need multiple gpus in your openstack cluster | |
| 15:26:46 | sean-k-mooney | it might be nice but ya i dont | |
| 15:27:21 | sean-k-mooney | if amd or intel add it to a consume gpu that would be a huge add value to me | |
| 15:27:40 | sean-k-mooney | but im not spendign 3000 on a nvida gpu + lisciening | |
| 15:28:19 | gibi | yeah | |
| 15:34:37 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Disable qos resize tempest test for nova-multi-cell job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766474 | |
| 15:36:04 | gibi | lyarwood: I've backorted ^^ so we can even chose to redo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749 by squashing ^^ into it and remove making nova-multi-cell non-votin | |
| 15:36:23 | gibi | but I'm OK keeping it as is | |
| 15:36:58 | lyarwood | gibi: it's just in the check queue at the moment so feel free to if you have time | |
| 15:37:14 | gibi | lyarwood: OK, the I will respin it quikly | |
| 15:37:28 | melwitt | gibi: np, just checked it (master change) finally merged, geesh | |
| 15:37:41 | gibi | melwitt: yeah, we are making progress.. :) | |
| 15:38:55 | gibi | melwitt: I will drop an update to the ML thread about where we are before I leave for today | |
| 15:39:04 | melwitt | ++ | |
| 15:40:27 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose "Secure Boot support for KVM & QEMU guests" for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/759731 | |
| 15:40:30 | kashyap | gibi: Fixed the nit | |
| 15:41:00 | gibi | kashyap: re-applied my badge | |
| 15:41:14 | kashyap | Thanks! :) | |
| 15:41:20 | gibi | I thank you | |
| 15:47:49 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: lower-constraints: Bump packaging to 20.4 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749 | |
| 15:47:54 | gibi | lyarwood: ^^ | |
| 15:48:16 | lyarwood | gibi: awesome thanks | |
| 15:48:47 | gibi | melwitt: could you babysitt ^^ during your day if needed? | |
| 15:49:06 | melwitt | gibi: yep | |
| 15:49:20 | gibi | thanks | |
| 15:49:29 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: fungi raised an interesting point regarding the usefullness of lower constriants. personlly i only found it use full to detect when we use a new feature that is not in the version used by lower constraits | |
| 15:49:48 | sean-k-mooney | it has some other uses but do we want to discuss if we ant to keep supporting it | |
| 15:50:48 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I don't have to much past knowledge about why we added lower constraints in the first place | |
| 15:51:04 | sean-k-mooney | in principal i do like the idea of tracking you min requirements and testing it but on the other hand i dont know if distos actully use this | |
| 15:51:23 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: it was mainly for distos to tell them what the min version they could use was | |
| 15:51:33 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: lower-constraints: Bump packaging to 20.4 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749 | |
| 15:51:45 | gibi | OK, then we need to see if distros are depending on this information or not | |
| 15:52:00 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: gibi yeah that is very open thing to discuss on how we should test it and whether we should test it or not | |
| 15:52:29 | gmann | one place it is helpful is while upgrade | |
| 15:52:55 | sean-k-mooney | only partly | |
| 15:52:58 | melwitt | gibi: were you meaning to write more on this line or is it just a typo? "and bug" at the end https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749/7//COMMIT_MSG#15 | |
| 15:53:07 | sean-k-mooney | knowing that there is an overlap is useful yes | |
| 15:53:21 | gibi | melwitt: typo, I've pushed a new ps | |
| 15:53:26 | sean-k-mooney | but in a none conatienrised env it get complicated bwtween multipel serivces | |
| 15:53:46 | gibi | melwitt: my editor moved the #<bugnumber> ot the beginning of the next line and git ignored that line as a comment :) | |
| 15:54:15 | melwitt | gibi: that was nice of it :) | |
| 15:54:18 | sean-k-mooney | :) hehe helpful editors strike again | |
| 15:54:47 | gibi | I'm not even mad, it is soo friday and soo many fires | |
| 15:57:06 | sean-k-mooney | ya if that is the most pressing problem on a friday its not bad. hopefully the rest wont take you too long or can wait till monday | |
| 15:59:20 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: master is unblocked and the stable/v unblocking patch is going forward again. So yeah I will sleep well tonight | |
| 16:03:03 | melwitt | bauzas: could you take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749 ? gate unblock patch for stable/victoria has gotten a new patch squashed into it | |
| 16:03:13 | bauzas | melwitt: sure | |
| 16:04:11 | melwitt | thanks | |
| 16:04:31 | bauzas | melwitt: when squashing, should we add the cherry-picked SHA1s for all the squashed backports ? | |
| 16:04:33 | bauzas | gibi: ^ | |
| 16:04:56 | bauzas | fortunately, we have the gerrit IDs within the commit msg, so it's more a procedural question | |
| 16:05:04 | gibi | bauzas: I can do that | |
| 16:05:14 | gibi | give me 5 | |
| 16:05:16 | bauzas | it's an open question, I dunno | |
| 16:05:39 | melwitt | good question, I can't remember if we normally do. will do a quick gerrit search | |
| 16:05:41 | bauzas | we very rarely squash commits when backporting | |
| 16:06:55 | bauzas | eyes at https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#proposing-fixes | |
| 16:08:04 | gibi | it says cherry-pick with -x | |
| 16:08:12 | gibi | and that does include that hash | |
| 16:08:14 | melwitt | yeah. I find examples of both in the gerrit search | |
| 16:08:42 | gibi | bauzas: if you feel that the commit hash is helpful then I can add that no problme | |
| 16:09:00 | bauzas | I'm not *that* opiniated | |
| 16:09:12 | bauzas | gibi: but if you feel OK with it, please do | |
| 16:09:14 | bauzas | it doesn't harm | |
| 16:09:25 | bauzas | the more the better in this case | |
| 16:12:18 | gibi | oops, we need to merge | |
| 16:12:19 | gibi | ||
| 16:12:23 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766720 | |
| 16:12:26 | gibi | to master first | |
| 16:12:57 | gibi | as now it is part of the squashy commit on stable/v | |
| 16:13:15 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: lower-constraints: Bump packaging to 20.4 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765749 | |
| 16:13:23 | gibi | bauzas: could you look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766720 please? | |
| 16:13:27 | bauzas | done | |
| 16:13:40 | gibi | thanks | |
| 16:32:00 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: [stable-only] Cap bandit to 1.6.2 and raise hacking to 1.1.0 in LC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766171 | |
| 16:33:56 | lyarwood | okaas~. | |
| 16:34:42 | lyarwood | gah sorry ssh died | |
| 16:45:19 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: [stable-only] lower-contraints: Bump hacking to 3.0.1 and amqp to 2.5.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/766738 | |
| 16:45:37 | lyarwood | ^ so I can't actually build these lower-constraint venvs locally thanks to virtualenv pulling in weird versions of setuptools | |
| 16:46:03 | lyarwood | I'm going to go afk for a few hours to deal with some childcare stuff and then attack this again later, with beer. | |
| 16:47:51 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: you can contol the version fo setup tools with a flag | |
| 16:50:27 | fungi | sean-k-mooney: i did not mean to suggest that jobs testing lower-bounds of our (transitive) dependency sets wouldn't be useful, simply that we don't have (and haven't ever had) them. when they were originally proposed i pointed out the problem is intractable without implementing it in pip or duplicating a large portion of pip's routines, but folks decided to just punt because the (in this case | |
| 16:50:29 | fungi | especially incorrect) version selections pip failed to particularly enforce were considered "good enough" | |
| 16:52:57 | sean-k-mooney | fungi: sure but i konw at least form a redhat downstream point of view lower constratis and upper constraits are not really used | |
| 16:53:48 | sean-k-mooney | they are useful but due to downstream backports and other issues outside of a pip based install they are not directly translateable to distro versions | |