Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-04-15
01:58:30 brinzhang_ In _cleanup_when_reschedule_fails()[1] we clean the arqs if _create_and_bind_arqs() failed, but I think we just only clean it at L847 if the _create_and_bind_arqs() failed [3]. If we add "compute_utils.delete_arqs_if_needed(context, instance)"[2] in _cleanup_when_reschedule_fails()[1], once we call _cleanup_when_reschedule_fails() it will be cleanup arqs with dp name in instance's flavor, I think that will increase Nova's call to Cyborg (by
01:58:30 brinzhang_ cyborgclinet), right?
01:58:43 brinzhang_ [1]https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/conductor/manager.py#L582
01:58:51 brinzhang_ [2]https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/conductor/manager.py#L598
01:58:57 brinzhang_ [3]https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/conductor/manager.py#L848-L849
01:59:16 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in remaining servers policies https://review.opendev.org/720116
02:00:24 brinzhang_ IMO, if I am correct, I think we should move "compute_utils.delete_arqs_if_needed(context, instance)"[2] to the right place, i.e., when _create_and_bind_arqs() failed
02:05:00 gmann johnthetubaguy: i replied on server policies comments and finished the remaining one. please check. my worried is to allow host attr for project that is why i kept them system-admin for now
02:20:21 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix follow up comments on policy work https://review.opendev.org/717835
02:23:37 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Use oslo policy flag to disable default change warning instead of all https://review.opendev.org/717884
03:10:20 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Introduce scope_types in quota set Policies https://review.opendev.org/719317
03:44:48 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix server actions to be system and project scoped https://review.opendev.org/720123
05:56:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in server group policies https://review.opendev.org/717175
06:35:39 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in quota sets policies https://review.opendev.org/719361
06:45:13 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add doc for policy new defaults https://review.opendev.org/720129
07:05:38 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix server actions to be system and project scoped https://review.opendev.org/720123
07:25:21 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in remaining servers policies https://review.opendev.org/720116
07:37:10 bauzas good morning Nova
07:38:52 gibi bauzas: good morning
07:39:52 bauzas gibi: good news, now that I'm done with the last series I had to work on, I'll do upstream bug triage today \o/
07:40:37 bauzas it's been a while
07:42:18 bauzas gibi: stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: lyarwood: since you reviewed the vGPU multiple types series, you could be interested in that quite easy series for fixing cold migration issues for vGPUs
07:42:45 bauzas tl;dr: that's just adding a new argument to resize virt methods and just calling a new method
07:42:59 bauzas the main review is just for the functional test
07:43:08 gibi bauzas: \o/
07:43:43 gibi bauzas: hit me with the link
07:44:01 bauzas gibi: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712741 and below
07:44:47 gibi thanks
07:44:55 bauzas gibi: thanks for you :p
07:45:18 gibi bauzas: I'm looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1868033 so you can skip that
07:45:18 openstack Launchpad bug 1868033 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Booting instance with pci_device fails during rocky->stein live upgrade" [High,New]
07:45:27 bauzas gibi: ack
07:48:44 bauzas 103 bugs... :(
07:54:12 gibi and I already triaged couple of yesterday :)
07:54:23 gibi at least we won't be bored
07:59:22 bauzas gibi: yeah, my main worries go to find some potential bugs that are Ussuri regressions
08:10:10 bauzas gibi: heh, from what I can see, nothing really changes from my day-to-day internal bug triage https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1777608
08:10:10 openstack Launchpad bug 1777608 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova compute calls plug_vifs unnecessarily for ironic nodes in init_host" [Medium,New]
08:10:22 bauzas gibi: sorry if you feel getting trampled by OSP :p
08:11:48 gibi :)
08:18:34 bauzas lyarwood: looks a valid bug, do you confirm ?
08:18:38 bauzas whoops
08:18:42 bauzas lyarwood: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1871861
08:18:42 openstack Launchpad bug 1871861 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Share the snapshot of volume-backed instance to other tenant, but can not build instance with this image." [Undecided,New]
08:23:27 nightmare_unreal sean-k-mooney: I saw your comments/review here : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715395/ . I have added my draft, what do you suggest ?
08:23:37 nightmare_unreal Thanks
08:23:43 lyarwood bauzas: looking
08:23:58 bauzas lyarwood: tl;dr: glance allowed to share an image
08:24:18 bauzas lyarwood: another tenant can take this image to build an volume-baked instance
08:24:30 bauzas lyarwood: but this fails miserably
08:24:44 lyarwood bauzas: yeah the issue is it's not an image, it's just a metadata store pointing to the volume snapshot that's in the other tenant still
08:25:08 bauzas but then a cinder bug, correct ?
08:25:24 bauzas we just get the metadata from cinder, nope ?
08:25:37 lyarwood bauzas: yeah it's a cinder feature bug
08:25:58 lyarwood well, between glance and cinder at least
08:25:58 bauzas lyarwood: thanks, I'm done with this bug
08:26:14 bauzas we're talking about upstream bug triage
08:26:23 bauzas I just want the cinder folks to look at it
08:26:39 lyarwood tbh there might be a way of forcing the data to actually end up in glance
08:26:46 lyarwood ack yeah
08:26:55 lyarwood I'll take a look quickly but I'll leave it to them if I can't find anything
08:34:09 johnthetubaguy lyarwood: do cinder do volume snapshot sharing between tenants?
08:34:33 johnthetubaguy (or get glance to copy it, I guess)
08:36:43 bauzas johnthetubaguy: I feel this bug will potentially require a cross-project effort in order to get fixed
08:36:52 bauzas (but there could be duplicates)
08:36:55 johnthetubaguy bauzas: sounds like it
08:37:19 johnthetubaguy I mean, I actually don't think nova should do anything here, but I would say that :P
08:37:31 lyarwood johnthetubaguy: yeah I was thinking you could force the upload into glance to workaround
08:38:02 johnthetubaguy lyarwood: I was thinking glance forces an upload into cinder for the additional project, but either way I guess
08:38:57 lyarwood that could also work, at least c-api/c-vol can offload things to the backends that way
08:41:29 bauzas johnthetubaguy: feel free to add nova as a related project to the bug then ;)
08:41:47 bauzas johnthetubaguy: I only marked cinder, but obviously glance and maybe nova could be added
08:58:54 bauzas gibi: I've seen you started to look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1871583
08:58:54 openstack Launchpad bug 1871583 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Migrate the instance, the destination host is not specified. When the "destination host" == " source host" , will set the instance's state error." [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Qiu Fossen (fossen123)
08:59:44 bauzas gibi: I'm confused with the exception
09:01:03 bauzas gibi: so, libvirt doesn't support resizing to the same host
09:01:56 bauzas hence the exception
09:02:12 bauzas anyway, nevermind
09:02:18 bauzas I think what to triage
09:02:22 bauzas what/how
09:06:48 slaweq gibi: hi
09:07:06 slaweq gibi: I was hoping that when https://review.opendev.org/#/c/717662/ will be merged, we will be good with grenade jobs finally
09:07:29 slaweq gibi: but I saw job from yesterday which failed again https://7ad29d1b700c1da60ae0-1bae5319fe4594ade335a46ad1c3bcc9.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/717083/5/check/neutron-grenade-multinode/2be9497/logs/grenade.sh.txt
09:07:50 slaweq gibi: can You maybe take a look if that is some new issue or still the same?
09:07:54 slaweq thx in advance
09:14:48 hrw https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712607/ has two +2, has +W, has +1 from zuul. needs recheck to go to gate?
09:16:55 bauzas hrw: looking
09:17:13 hrw bauzas: thx
09:18:01 hrw bauzas: I am looking at rebasing https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714439/ on top of 712607 and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714311/ but without changing them again.
09:21:50 bauzas hrw: okay, so two things
09:22:02 bauzas hrw: yes you need to recheck 712607
09:22:31 bauzas hrw: and if you rebase 714439 on top of ^, then 712607 will also be checked
09:23:01 bauzas hrw: do you know http://zuul.openstack.org/status ?
09:23:17 hrw bauzas: yes. I even wrote userscript for it
09:23:33 hrw just not familar with nova jobs
09:23:40 bauzas all cool then, you can see what goes into th check pipeline
09:23:44 bauzas the*
09:24:06 bauzas hrw: nothing really here is related to nova jobs, it's just zuul ordering
09:24:23 bauzas (and gerrit)
09:24:23 hrw bauzas: can you look at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714425/ too? simple 'check for SEV only on x86' patch

Earlier   Later