| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-04-09 | |||
| 12:15:53 | bauzas | gibi: just upped to +2 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700812/22 do you want to +W ? | |
| 12:16:04 | gibi | bauzas: no, go ahead with +W | |
| 12:16:12 | gibi | and thanks | |
| 12:38:59 | sean-k-mooney | artom: just noticed you had https://review.opendev.org/#/c/672127/1 for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/train/+bug/1836389 | |
| 12:39:00 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1836389 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ussuri "Device role tagging doesn't work for SRIOV PF" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Artom Lifshitz (notartom) | |
| 12:39:29 | sean-k-mooney | i just went and triaged the bug but are you actully planning to pick that back up since its been 9 months | |
| 12:40:18 | sean-k-mooney | it would be good to fix it but not sure if you will have time between now and rc1 | |
| 12:51:52 | artom | sean-k-mooney, we had another downstream bug for that downstream, I can try to find the link | |
| 12:52:04 | artom | sean-k-mooney, yeah, I guess I can try and get that in before RC | |
| 12:53:48 | sean-k-mooney | you had the link in the upstream bug | |
| 12:54:25 | artom | sean-k-mooney, ah ok - I wonder why that stalled out | |
| 12:55:08 | sean-k-mooney | you proably got pulled into something else that was on fire | |
| 12:56:38 | sean-k-mooney | from the looks of it the bug was filed by the nfv dfg as they were trying to use the device role tagging for configuring the trex trafic generator | |
| 12:57:22 | sean-k-mooney | i would guess they just worked around it manually | |
| 13:25:28 | stephenfin | bauzas: comments from sean-k-mooney and I on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715490/ | |
| 13:38:24 | bauzas | stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: yup, sorry, I was off for my kids | |
| 13:40:32 | bauzas | will provide a new patchset | |
| 13:59:48 | openstackgerrit | Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: Fix ut error on Aarch64(And other non-x86 platform) https://review.opendev.org/713163 | |
| 14:00:53 | lyarwood | hmm did the gate just get reset? | |
| 14:02:56 | lyarwood | actually nvm I don't think it did | |
| 14:03:14 | gmann | gibi ping | |
| 14:14:04 | bauzas | stephenfin: gibi: sean-k-mooney: new patch for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715490/ is on its way | |
| 14:15:48 | sean-k-mooney | cool ill review it when its ready | |
| 14:17:21 | bauzas | just running tests locally | |
| 14:17:34 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you left a -1 but I didn't understand exacly why | |
| 14:20:05 | gibi | gmann: ping | |
| 14:20:27 | sean-k-mooney | it was for the fact we skiped creating the mdev if the could not instead of failing to start the agent | |
| 14:21:32 | gmann | gibi: i will be requesting the FFE for policy things as few are still need to be merged and I am thinking to do for deprecated APIs also | |
| 14:21:37 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: so this comment https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715490/10/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py@814 | |
| 14:21:47 | stephenfin | same comment for me | |
| 14:22:11 | gmann | gibi: I will request on ML. my question is for cycle highlights - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712498/2/deliverables/ussuri/nova.yaml@25 | |
| 14:23:00 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: okay, fixed by the rev I'm testing | |
| 14:23:22 | bauzas | need to adapt a few more tests than planned, but fair enough | |
| 14:23:25 | gmann | should we include policy things in highlights because amending later might not be acceptable (or at least might get missed by various other forum ) | |
| 14:23:28 | bauzas | won't be a FUP | |
| 14:24:12 | gibi | gmann: hm, let's try to grant FFE for policy bp on the today's meeting and if nobody is against that then I can add info about it to the cyclehighlight | |
| 14:24:20 | gibi | gmann: but I would need some doc I can link to | |
| 14:26:07 | gmann | gibi: ok. then let me work on doc part and release notes first. thanks. | |
| 14:26:16 | gibi | gmann: thanks | |
| 14:26:44 | gmann | gibi: you want me to send FFE on ML and then discuss in meeting or directly in meeting ? | |
| 14:27:18 | gibi | gmann: let's have a mail about the FFE but it is OK to send the mail after the meeting | |
| 14:27:39 | gmann | i see. let's wait for meeting. | |
| 14:27:41 | gibi | my point is to let's discuss that today | |
| 14:27:50 | gmann | sure | |
| 14:28:04 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Support different vGPU types per pGPU https://review.opendev.org/715490 | |
| 14:28:05 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Functional test with pGPUs https://review.opendev.org/717975 | |
| 14:30:28 | bauzas | gibi: stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: last revision, based on your feedback, hardstopping if two types are provided but only one is having PCI devices | |
| 14:31:01 | gibi | bauzas: ack, will look shortly | |
| 14:31:10 | bauzas | how can I help now ? | |
| 14:31:28 | bauzas | gibi: my time is free, so maybe time for you to handover some reviews if you want | |
| 14:32:55 | gibi | bauzas: are you familiar with gmann's policy changes? he just pinged me about an FFE request, so we could speed that series up with some review | |
| 14:33:06 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we get a company day in ireland for good friday and then monday is a public holiday | |
| 14:33:20 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: so stephenfin and i wont be around until tuesday | |
| 14:33:42 | bauzas | gibi: I was knowing a bit, but I can look | |
| 14:33:56 | gibi | bauzas: cool, that would help | |
| 14:34:02 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yup, I know, also UK, Germany, Hungary and other EU countries AFAICU | |
| 14:34:09 | gibi | yepp, me too ^^ | |
| 14:34:30 | bauzas | some US states aren't working too | |
| 14:34:39 | bauzas | I don't know for Canada, artom ? | |
| 14:34:48 | gibi | but having the covid situation I might check in a bit each day | |
| 14:34:49 | sean-k-mooney | i may have forgot easter was a thing until remineded by stephenfin that i dont need to work on friday or monday... | |
| 14:34:59 | artom | bauzas, tomorrow? Yeah, we're off | |
| 14:35:03 | bauzas | k | |
| 14:35:04 | artom | Monday too | |
| 14:35:24 | bauzas | so, afaict, I can see our Chinese contributors be around and maybe France | |
| 14:35:32 | bauzas | can't speak for Italy and Spain | |
| 14:35:36 | sean-k-mooney | i basically know this as FF week instead of easter | |
| 14:39:45 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: my wife and I just realized on Monday it was Easter this week | |
| 14:39:51 | bauzas | you're not alone | |
| 14:41:55 | gmann | lbragstad: this can go in or should i add the diff in some doc ? - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/717879/3 | |
| 14:41:56 | bauzas | gibi: mind giving me the gmann's policy patches ? | |
| 14:42:24 | gmann | bauzas: these - https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/policy-defaults-refresh+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | |
| 14:42:27 | gibi | bauzas: it is multiple thread of patches but each is on this topic https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/policy-defaults-refresh | |
| 14:42:44 | stephenfin | gmann: How many of those are left to do? | |
| 14:42:45 | gmann | bauzas: i need to update few policies also and deprecated API policy | |
| 14:42:53 | stephenfin | if you know off the top of your head? | |
| 14:44:28 | gmann | stephenfin: other than which are already up + 3 APIs new + deprecated APIs. i think doing deprecated APIs also good to update also to make it consistent as they still stay. | |
| 14:44:44 | bauzas | gibi: gmann: FWIW, I remember our discussions at the Shanghai PTG, any important points you wanna me to explain before I go reviewing ? | |
| 14:45:03 | bauzas | or is it something not new from Shanghai, just implementation thingies ? | |
| 14:45:22 | nightmare_unreal | if someone has time, can you look at this : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715395/ . | |
| 14:45:22 | nightmare_unreal | Thanks. | |
| 14:45:30 | gmann | bauzas: key things is the existing test coverage at the first patch and then see how those gets changed for scope and new defaults | |
| 14:46:25 | gmann | bauzas: nothing new from shanghai. it is just implementation of that in all policies | |
| 14:46:27 | bauzas | nightmare_unreal: we're cutting M-3 tonight with Feature Freeze, I'll spend a reasonable couple of hours for reviewing bugs in the next week | |
| 14:46:41 | bauzas | gmann: perfect, then I know the outcomes | |
| 14:47:02 | nightmare_unreal | aah o.O thanks for your work :) | |
| 14:47:04 | bauzas | gmann: will you be around tomorrow or off ? | |
| 14:47:17 | bauzas | gmann: (can't remember where you live, I apologize) | |
| 14:47:20 | gmann | bauzas: thanks. I am working tomorrow and Monday too. might be on weekend too | |
| 14:47:25 | gmann | bauzas: canada | |
| 14:48:10 | bauzas | gmann: ok, gtk, just saying because we just discovered we'll miss a couple of countries for work tomorrow, including Canada | |
| 14:48:24 | gmann | yeah. | |
| 14:48:25 | bauzas | (at least for Red Hat) | |
| 14:50:19 | artom | bauzas, in practice, feature freeze is today :P | |
| 14:50:44 | sean-k-mooney | nightmare_unreal: that --overwrite kind of acts like a --force would | |
| 14:50:53 | bauzas | gmann: patches seem not to be piled in a branch, but rather only by topic name | |
| 14:51:05 | bauzas | artom: I fuckingly know about it | |
| 14:52:03 | gmann | bauzas: correct. 2 are olso one which I are almost ready to go. | |
| 14:52:03 | bauzas | gmann: that makes reviewing a bit hard, I don't know where to start and a couple of patches got -1 from Zuul | |
| 14:52:14 | bauzas | gmann: so I need guidance for reviews | |