Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-03-23
20:38:44 sean-k-mooney you should be able to set it to 300 safely enough
20:41:10 spatel cool
21:15:00 sean-k-mooney dansmith: gibi Sundar just finished reviewing the cyborg series. i noticed a few nits all of which could be adressed in a follow up patch but one thing is definetly missing. i think we all agree that cyborg integration qualifies for a release note but i dont see one in the series
21:16:16 sean-k-mooney we could add it in the followup patch when adressing some fo the nits but strictly speaking i belive it should be added here https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673735/46 and then update by each of the follow on patches to reflect the different capablities
21:16:44 sean-k-mooney that said we can just add it in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674726/9 which is the last functional patch
21:21:11 Sundar sean-k-mooney: Ack. I'll take a look
21:21:24 Sundar Thanks for the reviews.
21:21:44 Sundar Any luck with testing the rescheduling?
21:33:17 sean-k-mooney i have not had a chance to test it but i might get to do it tomororow. i will be redeploying the latest version tomorow in anycase
21:33:43 sean-k-mooney i was condiering locally modifying the spawn to fail on one node to then assert the correct behaviro for reschdule
21:42:06 sean-k-mooney artom: whitebox is breaking thing it should not be able to break...
21:42:08 sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/bc5fd77019b74363ab3b06478fd386de
21:42:51 sean-k-mooney artom: its causing tempest-tox-plugin-sanity-check to fail
21:43:01 sean-k-mooney .
21:43:04 artom Whoa
21:43:23 sean-k-mooney i have no idea why its checking whitebox either
21:43:34 sean-k-mooney but we should proably fix that
21:44:07 sean-k-mooney its becasue we merged https://opendev.org/x/whitebox-tempest-plugin/commit/c1285626fee890a00f247ff0d0bde1249b90a59f
21:44:17 artom sean-k-mooney, right, I get the error
21:44:28 artom I just have no idea how we ended up in that job
21:44:40 artom TO my knowledge we didn't "register" anywhere as a tempest plugin
21:44:42 sean-k-mooney did your governance patch merge
21:44:49 artom No
21:45:01 sean-k-mooney then ya im not sure either
21:45:16 sean-k-mooney i guess we need to set a default for the config
21:45:27 sean-k-mooney so 0?
21:45:27 artom I was gonna say - that's probably the easiest fix
21:45:29 artom Yeah
21:45:38 sean-k-mooney shoudl we also add that job to whitebox
21:45:49 artom Let's fix it for now
21:46:03 sean-k-mooney ok want me to do it now or will i leave it to you
21:46:17 artom sean-k-mooney, we need each other to review it :)
21:46:46 sean-k-mooney yes but in this case i think we can self approve
21:46:56 sean-k-mooney once the other revies its also trival
21:52:05 artom sean-k-mooney, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714539/
21:52:20 sean-k-mooney artom: hehe you bet me too it
21:53:45 artom sean-k-mooney, ah, I think that tempest job dynamically gets a list of projects that are tempest plugins from gerrit: https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/tools/generate-tempest-plugins-list.py
21:54:20 sean-k-mooney ya so i guess its trying to make sure that changes to tempest dont break plugins
21:55:06 artom Risky as hell though
21:55:24 artom Though they can blacklist projects too
21:55:29 artom So maybe not to much
21:55:31 artom *so much
21:55:58 artom I'll email the ML
21:56:28 sean-k-mooney ya. well i think that reinforces the idea we proably should run that job on the mailing list but on the plus side they should be warned if they would breake whitebox atleast to some degree
22:01:19 artom sean-k-mooney, not sure how running that job would work, it depends on scripts in the tempest rpo
22:01:21 artom *repo
22:01:50 artom Anyways, we can continue this later, I need to make supper
22:02:19 sean-k-mooney ya im also done for the day. but runing that job would use the script form the tempest repo
22:02:41 sean-k-mooney it would tell use if we were making a change that woudl cause it to fail before we merge it
22:02:58 artom OK, so should work then
22:03:04 artom But yeah, tomorrow
22:03:05 artom o/
22:03:10 sean-k-mooney o/
23:42:52 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: try to get some debug info for bug 1844929 https://review.opendev.org/701478
23:42:54 openstack bug 1844929 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "grenade jobs failing due to "Timed out waiting for response from cell" in scheduler" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1844929
#openstack-nova - 2020-03-24
00:28:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add service version check for live migrate with qos https://review.opendev.org/713679
00:29:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add service version check for evacuate with qos https://review.opendev.org/713680
00:29:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Stop setting glance_api_version in cinder.conf in nova-live-migration https://review.opendev.org/713843
00:29:52 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Replace ansible --sudo with --become in live_migration/hooks scripts https://review.opendev.org/713844
00:29:59 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: nova-live-migration: Wait for n-cpu services to come up after configuring Ceph https://review.opendev.org/713845
00:49:07 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: try to get some debug info for bug 1844929 https://review.opendev.org/701478
00:49:10 openstack bug 1844929 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "grenade jobs failing due to "Timed out waiting for response from cell" in scheduler" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1844929
03:02:42 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: [Trivial] fixing some nits in instance actions policy tests https://review.opendev.org/714560
03:16:03 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: WIP Microversion 2.83 - action event fault details https://review.opendev.org/714561
03:21:38 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/train: DNM: try to get some debug info for bug 1844929 https://review.opendev.org/713116
03:21:39 openstack bug 1844929 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "grenade jobs failing due to "Timed out waiting for response from cell" in scheduler" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1844929
03:40:45 openstackgerrit Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM] Run tempest jobs on Arm64 needed fix https://review.opendev.org/714564
09:08:10 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674726/3/nova/compute/api.py@3389, do we need to block the rebuild?
09:10:40 brinzhang_ In https://review.opendev.org/#/c/631245/62/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py@3484, when we rebuild a server with accerators, but I think the accel_info always None, so I think we also should block the rebuild compute API
09:36:27 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.83 - action event fault details https://review.opendev.org/714561
09:53:02 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: support live migration with vpmems https://review.opendev.org/687856
09:53:02 openstackgerrit Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: bug-fix: set do_cleanup always True for libvirt driver https://review.opendev.org/714593
10:30:04 openstackgerrit jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Support for nova-manage placement heal_allocations --cell https://review.opendev.org/714459
10:30:42 stephenfin gibi: could you revisit https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666915/ today, please?
10:30:51 gibi stephenfin: sure
10:30:56 stephenfin ta
10:31:35 nightmare_unreal hey can someone look at my patch . I am stuck.
10:31:48 nightmare_unreal a comment in right direction can be helpful. Thanks
10:32:37 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Add stub unified limits driver https://review.opendev.org/712137
10:32:37 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Assert quota related API behavior when noop https://review.opendev.org/712140
10:32:38 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Make unified limits APIs return reserved of 0 https://review.opendev.org/712141
10:40:39 gibi stephenfin: responded.
10:41:00 gibi nightmare_unreal: link the patch please
10:42:11 nightmare_unreal https://review.opendev.org/714459
10:42:48 nightmare_unreal bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1868531
10:42:49 openstack Launchpad bug 1868531 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova manage placement doesn't support registration per Cell." [Undecided,New] - Assigned to jayaditya gupta (jayssj11)
10:44:04 gibi looking
10:46:43 nightmare_unreal Thanks
10:52:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: [Trivial] fixing some nits in instance actions policy tests https://review.opendev.org/714560
10:52:23 brinzhang stephenfin: can you review this patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694430/?
10:54:41 gibi nightmare_unreal: I left some comment I hope they help
10:55:19 nightmare_unreal thanks
11:22:23 lyarwood kashyap: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696834/ - would you mind hitting this again?
11:23:16 lyarwood elod: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/713036/ - should be ready for stable/pike now, hopefully unblocking the branch.
11:23:38 kashyap lyarwood: Yep, a sec
11:24:51 elod lyarwood: thanks, looking!
11:26:15 elod lyarwood: just a minor thing: it's not backkported from the latest commit
11:26:25 elod from queens
11:26:27 lyarwood hmm it should be
11:27:30 lyarwood elod: ah it's PS2, I pushed the stable/pike change to the stable/queens change in PS3 by accident

Earlier   Later