| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-03-23 | |||
| 08:58:02 | brinzhang | gibi: yeah. will remove, but nova-runways doesn't seem to work well enough. | |
| 08:58:17 | gibi | brinzhang: you are right. | |
| 09:11:57 | aarents | morning, lyarwood: I'm considering implementation of finish_unshelve as you suggested in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696084 I have a question see my last post when you will have time for that | |
| 09:25:00 | brinzhang | gibi, lyarwood: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682772/ this patch addressed all your comments | |
| 09:57:18 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Avoid circular reference during serialization https://review.opendev.org/714148 | |
| 09:58:30 | nightmare_unreal | hello, how can one verify cell-id passed in nova-manage CLI ? | |
| 09:58:59 | nightmare_unreal | basically how to validate passed cellID/UUID | |
| 10:07:44 | nightmare_unreal | found it | |
| 10:15:21 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: nova-live-migration: Only stop n-cpu and q-agt during evacuation testing https://review.opendev.org/714057 | |
| 10:22:02 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: nova-live-migration: Ensure subnode is fenced during evacuation testing https://review.opendev.org/713961 | |
| 10:23:00 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: nova-live-migration: Ensure subnode is fenced during evacuation testing https://review.opendev.org/713962 | |
| 10:23:02 | lyarwood | aarents: ack sorry will try to look this afternoon | |
| 10:23:08 | lyarwood | brinzhang_: ack will also try to look this afternoon | |
| 10:23:44 | brinzhang_ | lyarwood: yeah, thanks | |
| 10:43:23 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Add MigrationTypeField https://review.opendev.org/706013 | |
| 10:46:20 | kashyap | lyarwood: Just looking at the Q35 upstream job - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708701/ | |
| 10:46:36 | kashyap | While I look at the logs; what was the issue you're alluding to there, that worked for you locally? | |
| 10:47:30 | bauzas | gibi: stephenfin: efried_gone told he was +2 on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/589085/7 if I was writing a specific email | |
| 10:47:37 | bauzas | are you okay with this ? | |
| 10:47:55 | bauzas | I haven't written it until I was providing https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712118/2 | |
| 10:47:58 | lyarwood | kashyap: yeah on F30, I can reproduce the failure on Ubuntu | |
| 10:48:06 | lyarwood | kashyap: I haven't had time to circle back to it yet | |
| 10:48:25 | stephenfin | bauzas: sure | |
| 10:48:25 | lyarwood | kashyap: but it looks like the config drive is missing it's LABEL causing the test to fail | |
| 10:49:15 | kashyap | I see; I'll see if I can poke more to see why Zuul complains | |
| 10:51:20 | lyarwood | kashyap: tbh I think it might be a bug with the version of q35 Ubuntu is using | |
| 10:51:39 | lyarwood | kashyap: well QEMU but you get the point | |
| 10:51:44 | kashyap | Hmm, didn't think of it; you mean version of QEMU? | |
| 10:51:49 | kashyap | Bingo | |
| 10:51:50 | lyarwood | yeah | |
| 10:52:13 | kashyap | lyarwood: BTW, be careful with the term "circle back"; Urban Dictionary has a harsh definition of it. Not gonna link it :D | |
| 10:53:25 | kashyap | I'll check the QEMU version of Ubuntu; sometimes they miss to backport some bug fixes. FWIW, we've pointed them out before | |
| 10:53:38 | kashyap | (I mean, in a different scenario) | |
| 11:08:10 | openstackgerrit | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: change UEFI check to handle AArch64 better https://review.opendev.org/714311 | |
| 11:09:21 | hrw | this patch should pass tests (does 'tox -e py38') and better shows issue | |
| 11:10:07 | kashyap | hrw: Hi | |
| 11:10:13 | hrw | hi kashyap | |
| 11:10:18 | hrw | others | |
| 11:10:52 | kashyap | hrw: Good point on the undefine with NVRAM thing | |
| 11:10:55 | hrw | now I have one of those nasty days when I look at nova code... | |
| 11:10:57 | kashyap | Will look post-lunch | |
| 11:11:03 | kashyap | :D | |
| 11:11:31 | hrw | speaking of q35... when it will be finally default? | |
| 11:12:44 | hrw | x86 users will get hit hard with it. pleasure to look would be | |
| 11:13:43 | bauzas | gibi: stephenfin: done http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-March/013507.html | |
| 11:14:15 | gibi | bauzas: thanks | |
| 11:26:01 | hrw | "kernel doesn't support AMD SEV" message is funny | |
| 11:26:18 | hrw | as it gets checked on all archs instead of just x86 | |
| 11:53:04 | hrw | I wonder how much it will be rewritten once it will be supported somewhere else than amd cpus | |
| 11:54:44 | stephenfin | gibi: did you ever do a blog post on the bandwidth-aware scheduling feature? | |
| 11:55:05 | stephenfin | I recall there being one floating around before a past PTG but heck if I can find it now | |
| 11:55:09 | gibi | stephenfin: rubasov did one in the early days. let me find the link | |
| 11:55:38 | gibi | stephenfin: is this the one you remember? https://rubasov.github.io/2018/09/21/openstack-qos-min-bw-demo.html | |
| 11:56:12 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: there was two summit presentations too | |
| 11:56:36 | stephenfin | gibi: That's the one, yup. Thanks! | |
| 11:56:51 | sean-k-mooney | one descirbiing the poc and then one describing the final feature | |
| 11:57:22 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I only remember showing the PoC | |
| 11:58:04 | sean-k-mooney | yes showed the poc in vancovour and the final version in denver i think | |
| 11:58:24 | gibi | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls9RXpG6Is0 | |
| 11:58:48 | gibi | there was some PTG presentation, true. The above is a summit presentation | |
| 11:59:02 | sean-k-mooney | sorry yes that is waht im thinking of | |
| 11:59:23 | gibi | I think we don't have any recording, other than the blog post, about the PTG presentation | |
| 12:01:34 | hrw | https://paste.centos.org/view/abe36617 - does it look ok to send for review? skipping AMD SEV check on !x86-64 | |
| 12:09:47 | hrw | fixed missing import, running tox, will send | |
| 12:11:44 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Avoid circular reference during serialization https://review.opendev.org/714148 | |
| 12:12:20 | openstackgerrit | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: check for AMD SEV only on x86-64 https://review.opendev.org/714425 | |
| 12:18:43 | kashyap | hrw: Upstream there's a CI job to test it: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708701/ | |
| 12:19:32 | kashyap | hrw: "it" == q35; and aiming to switch to it in the 'V' release, or early, if possible. | |
| 12:20:51 | hrw | kashyap: cool ;) | |
| 12:21:41 | hrw | kashyap: I start to think how to add aarch64 ci job ;D | |
| 12:22:12 | kashyap | I'm not good with the CI stuff, but probably check with #openstack-infra or other folks here (like Sean) might tell you more. | |
| 12:22:35 | kashyap | It is "usually" take-an-existing-job-and-tweak-it | |
| 12:22:48 | hrw | I know | |
| 12:22:56 | hrw | handled too much of CI in kolla | |
| 12:26:17 | kashyap | Oh, dear. Okay :) | |
| 12:28:37 | lyarwood | melwitt / elod: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1867380+status:open - could you hit the rest of these today please? | |
| 12:29:05 | openstackgerrit | Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: Add default cpu model for aarch64 https://review.opendev.org/709494 | |
| 12:29:17 | lyarwood | https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1813789+status:open should also be ready to review | |
| 12:31:07 | hrw | sean-k-mooney: which nova ci job would be best to run on aarch64? | |
| 12:32:41 | sean-k-mooney | start with i think tempest-integrated-compute? | |
| 12:32:51 | sean-k-mooney | let me see if i can get the correct name | |
| 12:33:26 | sean-k-mooney | ya tempest-integrated-compute | |
| 12:33:54 | sean-k-mooney | if you have that working we disucsed that you really need 2 multi node jobs | |
| 12:34:10 | sean-k-mooney | one with qcow image backedn and cinder with lvm | |
| 12:34:15 | sean-k-mooney | and the second with ceph | |
| 12:35:02 | kevinz | sean-k-mooney: hrw: so the nova CI still rely on devstack CI test finished ? | |
| 12:35:23 | sean-k-mooney | that way you can test live and code migration with both block and volume backed migration in the first job and shared storage in teh second | |
| 12:35:31 | hrw | kevinz: thx | |
| 12:35:52 | sean-k-mooney | kevinz: can you rephrase that? | |
| 12:36:35 | sean-k-mooney | kevinz: the upstream integration ci jobs outside of install projects all use devstack to deploy the code under test | |
| 12:36:52 | sean-k-mooney | and then use tempest to exectue the tests if that is what you were asking | |
| 12:36:54 | kevinz | I mean "tempest-integrated-compute" test need devstack jobs ready? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708317/ | |
| 12:37:38 | sean-k-mooney | kevinz: ah right well yes unless you are going to do alot more work and port one of the install jobs | |
| 12:38:14 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. create a job based on osa or kolla-ansible or something that can deploy on aarch64 | |
| 12:38:43 | sean-k-mooney | kevinz: although is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708317/ for aarch64 as arm64 is technically a different architecutre | |
| 12:38:46 | gibi | dansmith: went through cyborg series again, I had only couple of things so I feel we are close | |
| 12:40:49 | kevinz | sean-k-mooney: OK, so based on Devstack CI jobs, some tempest test are not stable...means failed "sometimes" | |
| 12:41:24 | sean-k-mooney | kevinz: well that happens on x86 too you know | |
| 12:41:28 | sean-k-mooney | is it more unstable | |
| 12:43:09 | kevinz | hrw: sean-k-mooney: I'm going to enlarge the VM to 16GB to see if it works better... | |