| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-03-20 | |||
| 10:10:20 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: review tox.ini and https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/latest/contributor/developing.html | |
| 10:10:27 | nightmare_unreal | thanks lyarwood , but how to add my doc code. for eg. i made a new flag | |
| 10:10:57 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: look for changes under docs (using tig and/or tig blame) for examples. | |
| 10:11:09 | jkulik | Can someone close https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1855776 it should have been fixed by https://review.opendev.org/#/c/710214/ as it seems to be a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1865040 | |
| 10:11:09 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1855776 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Aggregate ID validation" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Mykola Yakovliev (vegasq) | |
| 10:11:10 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1865040 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Able to show update and delete aggregate with invalid id" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to Johannes Kulik (jkulik) | |
| 10:11:11 | nightmare_unreal | thanks | |
| 10:11:28 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova stable/train: bug-fix: Reject live migration with vpmem https://review.opendev.org/714064 | |
| 10:11:28 | lyarwood | ygk_12345: sorry no idea | |
| 10:14:38 | lyarwood | jkulik: if you can still reproduce against master feel free to reuse https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1855776 and submit a fix. | |
| 10:14:38 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1855776 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Aggregate ID validation" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Mykola Yakovliev (vegasq) | |
| 10:15:40 | jkulik | lyarwood, it looks exactly like the problem in the second bug, which got closed by merging. I just want that bug closed, too :) | |
| 10:17:46 | gibi | ygk_12345: regarding bug #1868203 I feels like a QEMU problem on your compute. If QEMU fails to start then nova will not know the available resources on that compute | |
| 10:17:46 | openstack | bug 1868203 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova-compute error" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868203 | |
| 10:18:04 | gibi | ygk_12345: you should reach out the QEMU devs | |
| 10:20:33 | gibi | jkulik: marked the bug as duplicate of 1865040 | |
| 10:20:42 | gibi | jkulik: thanks for noticing | |
| 10:20:46 | jkulik | gibi, thanks | |
| 10:25:04 | ygk_12345 | @gibi the libvirtd service is in error state | |
| 10:25:59 | lyarwood | ygk_12345: if libvirtd isn't starting then that's a bug for the libvirt folks | |
| 10:26:19 | gibi | ygk_12345: based on the libvird service logs you added to the bug report the libvirtd is in error most probably due to QEMU cannot be started | |
| 10:27:12 | ygk_12345 | @gibi and what is that placement error I mentioned ? is it related to this libvirtd ? | |
| 10:27:47 | gibi | ygk_12345: could be related yes | |
| 10:28:12 | gibi | ygk_12345: is reported missing RP has the same uuid as the faulty compute node uuid? | |
| 10:28:27 | gibi | sorry I have to jump on a call very soon | |
| 10:39:09 | kashyap | ygk_12345: How is libvirtd failing to start? /me looks at the scroll | |
| 10:39:52 | ygk_12345 | kashyap http://paste.openstack.org/show/790930/ | |
| 10:41:37 | ygk_12345 | @las | |
| 10:41:45 | ygk_12345 | kashyap it is ubuntu 18 | |
| 10:42:05 | kashyap | ygk_12345: What libvirt and QEMU versions? | |
| 10:42:28 | kashyap | This "relocation error" looks like some dependency problem | |
| 10:42:46 | ygk_12345 | kashyap how to check ? | |
| 10:44:01 | kashyap | ygk_12345: To get versions? Please use 'apt' command: `apt list libvirt` (or whatever Ubuntu calls it) | |
| 10:44:02 | ygk_12345 | kashyap libvirtd (libvirt) 5.4.0 | |
| 10:44:08 | kashyap | And also QEMU version | |
| 10:44:38 | ygk_12345 | root@b2a-1:~# apt list qemu | |
| 10:44:38 | ygk_12345 | Listing... Done | |
| 10:44:39 | ygk_12345 | qemu/bionic-updates,now 1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.3~cloud0 amd64 [installed] | |
| 10:47:59 | stephenfin | artom: When you're about, I've replied on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/631053/ | |
| 10:48:20 | stephenfin | artom: let me know if you want me to rework the commit message to make my point clearer | |
| 10:50:00 | nightmare_unreal | hello if i want to add something to doc for e.g. in quota docs here : https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/pike/cli/command-objects/quota.html | |
| 10:50:03 | nightmare_unreal | how can i do it | |
| 10:50:10 | nightmare_unreal | I want to add doc for --force flag | |
| 10:50:21 | nightmare_unreal | i have just submitted a patch for it | |
| 10:50:30 | nightmare_unreal | but don't know how to add doc for it | |
| 10:53:22 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: edit doc/source/cli/command-objects/quota.rst | |
| 10:53:35 | kashyap | ygk_12345: Your installation on Ubuntu of QEMU/libvirt is kaput with broken libraries. How did you even install it? | |
| 10:53:42 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: FWIW this channel isn't for python-openstackclient btw, just being polite and trying to help. | |
| 10:53:54 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: #openstack might be a better place to ask these questions. | |
| 10:53:57 | ygk_12345 | kashyap it came with openstack ansible rocky version | |
| 10:54:00 | kashyap | ygk_12345: Also, your output is truncated, please post this in the bug: systemctl status libvirtd --full | |
| 10:54:01 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: or the mailing list. | |
| 10:54:10 | stephenfin | *#openstack-sdks | |
| 10:54:19 | ygk_12345 | kashyap ok sure | |
| 10:54:22 | kashyap | ygk_12345: Can you just run this: `/usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc64` and tell what you get? | |
| 10:54:28 | nightmare_unreal | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/KuPFLZ4Q/quota.rst | |
| 10:54:37 | nightmare_unreal | lyarwood: but that file has like no content. | |
| 10:54:40 | nightmare_unreal | see the snippet | |
| 10:55:10 | ygk_12345 | @kashya | |
| 10:55:19 | ygk_12345 | kashyap root@b2a-1:~# /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc64 | |
| 10:55:29 | ygk_12345 | root@b2a-1:~# /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc64 | |
| 10:55:54 | kashyap | ygk_12345: Does that open a QEMU window or not? | |
| 10:56:06 | ygk_12345 | it is commandline | |
| 10:56:11 | ygk_12345 | no GUI | |
| 10:57:53 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: ah sorry it builds that list automatically | |
| 10:58:18 | nightmare_unreal | exactly, that's what I was thinking how to add | |
| 10:58:19 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: where's your osc change? | |
| 10:59:03 | kashyap | ygk_12345: That's supposed to launch a GUI window; and do you see any error on the command-line? | |
| 10:59:30 | kashyap | ygk_12345: Either way, your installation is broken; please look for Ubuntu's guidance for re-installing virtualization packages properly. | |
| 10:59:33 | ygk_12345 | kashyap /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc64: relocation error: /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc64: symbol fdt_check_full version LIBFDT_1.2 not defined in file libfdt.so.1 with link time reference | |
| 10:59:50 | stephenfin | nightmare_unreal: if you're adding this functionality to the code then you don't need to edit the docs - they're generated automatically, as lyarwood notes | |
| 11:00:06 | stephenfin | you need to add the functionality though as it doesn't exist at the moment, as noted on openstack-discuss | |
| 11:00:13 | lyarwood | yeah just building the docs with https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714062/1 now that I assume fixes this | |
| 11:00:13 | nightmare_unreal | oh okay | |
| 11:00:38 | nightmare_unreal | yes | |
| 11:01:10 | kashyap | ygk_12345: Okay, that's broken; as I told above, please re-install Virt Packages from scratch. Read documentation with patience, and take notes of failures. | |
| 11:02:46 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: yeah https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714062/ will list --force under quota set now | |
| 11:03:31 | nightmare_unreal | thanks for clarifcation , i just submitted that patch and thought i made mistake by not writing doc | |
| 11:03:37 | nightmare_unreal | first patch :D | |
| 11:04:29 | lyarwood | nightmare_unreal: np, there should be a docs job that builds this in CI, I'll confirm with a link once it does | |
| 11:06:17 | stephenfin | nightmare_unreal: I left a review on that patch. There are a couple of things you need to fix. Feel free to ping me on #openstack-sdks if you have questions/need help | |
| 11:06:44 | nightmare_unreal | sure stephenfin | |
| 11:14:03 | lyarwood | stephenfin: is that the channel for osc now? | |
| 11:14:26 | stephenfin | to the best of my knowledge, yes | |
| 11:14:47 | stephenfin | that's where I've always gone to discuss stuff with mordred et al | |
| 11:18:40 | openstackgerrit | Kevin Zhao proposed openstack/nova master: Add default cpu model for aarch64 https://review.opendev.org/709494 | |
| 11:20:34 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: nova-live-migration: Wait for n-cpu services to come up after configuring Ceph https://review.opendev.org/713837 | |
| 11:26:42 | ygk_12345 | @kas | |
| 11:27:16 | ygk_12345 | kashyap now the libvirtd is running fine but still the same nova-compute resource error. I have updated the bug report with my findings | |
| 11:34:35 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: it makes total sense to run c-vol on the subnode and we run g-api on the sub node to do multile glance store testing so dont remove either of them | |
| 11:35:15 | sean-k-mooney | c-vol is on the sub node so cinder can do testing with multiple backends too | |
| 11:35:19 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt:driver:Disallow AIO=native when 'O_DIRECT' is not available https://review.opendev.org/682772 | |
| 11:36:11 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: im not sure we we need eitehr in our specific jobs but other project want that for there jobs | |
| 11:40:53 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: right, the way we layout the services at the moment isn't granular enough IMHO, we should really have a subnode layout *just* for compute migration testing | |
| 11:45:13 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: im not sure i agree but we could | |
| 11:45:31 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714057/ - can you hit that regardless | |
| 11:45:37 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: in a hyper convered deployment i wound not find it unusal to have cinder vol on a compute | |
| 11:45:49 | sean-k-mooney | glance api is a littel weired but we only have two nodes | |
| 11:45:58 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: our default deployment topologies shouldn't be HCI | |
| 11:46:05 | sean-k-mooney | i think it should | |