| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-21 | |||
| 21:09:04 | sean-k-mooney | and are you useing hugepage for the guest | |
| 21:09:16 | Sundar | dansmith: If somebody pulls in the patch series till 'create/bind', but not the later ones, we'll have a problem anyway -- because that would create/use resources in Cyborg but not free them, or handle reboots, etc. | |
| 21:09:31 | Sundar | Not sure if I am misunderstanding your point | |
| 21:10:24 | sean-k-mooney | lucidguy: https://access.redhat.com/articles/1436373#nova the limist are taken form base rhel but they are not tested as part of the product | |
| 21:10:38 | dansmith | Sundar: yes, which is why we're holding a -2 on the bottom patch so we can *try* to land them all together.. however the rule in nova is that all patches should be deployable whenever possible, so we're trying to limit the number of places where we land part of your set and it's broken | |
| 21:10:59 | Sundar | dansmith: Ok, not to belabor the point, I'll just do the 2-patch thing. | |
| 21:11:21 | dansmith | Sundar: I'd really like to not have your set as broken as it is in the middle, but also trying to be practical.. however, not adding more places where we don't handle something as basic as reschedules until later is not going the right direction | |
| 21:11:32 | sean-k-mooney | lucidguy: its likely that you can acigve the kvm limits set in https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-kvm-limits but i suspect that to do that you both need tohave signifcantly more meory on the host and use things like hugepages | |
| 21:12:05 | lucidguy | sean-k-mooney: It lists a limit of 4TB | |
| 21:12:13 | dansmith | Sundar: I understand it's somewhat academic, which is why I'm not insisting on the existing isses | |
| 21:12:16 | dansmith | *issues | |
| 21:12:22 | lucidguy | I can't seem to start up an instance with 1.2TB | |
| 21:12:44 | sean-k-mooney | lucidguy: how much memory is on the host | |
| 21:12:45 | lucidguy | 1TB yes, 1.2TB, same image, kernel panic. | |
| 21:12:53 | lucidguy | 1.5TB | |
| 21:12:58 | sean-k-mooney | ok | |
| 21:13:26 | sean-k-mooney | if i rememebr correctly the kernel panic you posted before looked liek a kernel kvm bug | |
| 21:13:34 | lucidguy | It's driving me crazy, the amount of time I spent troubleshooting this. | |
| 21:14:07 | lucidguy | I've tride numerous kernels, upgraded the entire host. Still no luck. | |
| 21:14:24 | dansmith | Sundar: any chance you noticed my patch to fix creation of orphaned device providers? | |
| 21:14:29 | lucidguy | It's as if the problem resides with the Image itself. | |
| 21:14:49 | dansmith | Sundar: I'd guess it probably needs your blessing | |
| 21:15:09 | sean-k-mooney | lucidguy: its posible. unlikely but possible | |
| 21:15:24 | dansmith | Sundar: it came from me using devstack on a host with a FQDN which caused cyborg not to find the parent provider of the compute node, creating an orphaned provider, which required database surgery to fix | |
| 21:18:33 | lucidguy | Happy to tweak the image, if only I knew what was wrong. | |
| 21:19:10 | sean-k-mooney | lucidguy: what image are you using | |
| 21:19:30 | lucidguy | Right now I'm testing with Centos 7 generic cloud images | |
| 21:19:51 | sean-k-mooney | lucidguy: ok can you try grabing a ubunut cloud image | |
| 21:20:06 | lucidguy | I've tried that before also, same results | |
| 21:20:07 | sean-k-mooney | it will have a signifcalty differet kernel | |
| 21:20:23 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok | |
| 21:21:09 | sean-k-mooney | honestly i dont have the hardware to repoduce and since the error is in the qemu/kvm/kernel layers im not real sure how to help | |
| 21:21:13 | dansmith | I dunno about sean-k-mooney, but I'd say: prove you can boot this with 1.5TB in bare KVM, show us what config does that, and then we can look to see if nova can/should do something different | |
| 21:21:34 | dansmith | otherwise, this isn't really actionable by us or relevant for this development channel | |
| 21:21:39 | sean-k-mooney | ya that is a good point | |
| 21:22:10 | lucidguy | sean-k-mooney: Sometimes the system boots and I can see the kernel dump, no errors on the host. Other times it fails to boot and I see emulation errors on the hypervisor. | |
| 21:22:38 | lucidguy | And openstack puts in a paused state | |
| 21:29:25 | Sundar | dansmith: I did. Thanks. I have included that patch in my env but have nopt specifically tested it yet | |
| 21:29:49 | dansmith | Sundar: okay | |
| 23:13:05 | alex_xu | efried: gibi brinzhang I thought I +2 yesterday but it is not, hope it isn't too late | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-22 | |||
| 00:22:07 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: trivial: Merge unnecessary 'NovaProxyRequestHandlerBase' separation https://review.opendev.org/705655 | |
| 01:53:56 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: trivial: Remove 'run_once' helper https://review.opendev.org/705656 | |
| 02:11:08 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Support re-configure deleted_on_termination in server https://review.opendev.org/580336 | |
| 07:15:28 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/nova master: Add scheduler filter for routed_segments https://review.opendev.org/709280 | |
| 10:33:10 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/nova master: Add scheduler filter for routed_segments https://review.opendev.org/709280 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-23 | |||
| 01:27:16 | gmann | efried: gibi: brin: sorry for not replying on friday, due to hospital visit. I am +1 on that approach (commented on spec). | |
| 04:49:36 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/nova master: Add scheduler filter for routed_segments https://review.opendev.org/709280 | |
| 05:05:11 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/nova master: Add scheduler filter for routed_segments https://review.opendev.org/709280 | |
| 08:35:06 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: ksa auth conf and client for Cyborg access https://review.opendev.org/631242 | |
| 08:35:06 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add Cyborg device profile groups to request spec. https://review.opendev.org/631243 | |
| 08:35:07 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Define Cyborg ARQ binding notification event. https://review.opendev.org/692707 | |
| 08:35:07 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Create and bind Cyborg ARQs. https://review.opendev.org/631244 | |
| 08:35:08 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Pass accelerator requests to each virt driver from compute manager. https://review.opendev.org/698581 | |
| 08:35:08 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Compose accelerator PCI devices into domain XML in libvirt driver. https://review.opendev.org/631245 | |
| 08:35:09 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs for an instance when the instance is deleted. https://review.opendev.org/673735 | |
| 08:35:09 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable hard/soft reboot with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/697940 | |
| 08:35:10 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable start/stop of instances with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/699553 | |
| 08:35:10 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable and use COMPUTE_ACCELERATORS trait. https://review.opendev.org/699554 | |
| 08:35:11 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Bump compute rpcapi version and reduce Cyborg calls. https://review.opendev.org/704227 | |
| 08:35:11 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Block unsupported instance operations with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/674726 | |
| 08:35:12 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add cyborg tempest job. https://review.opendev.org/670999 | |
| 13:59:01 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/nova master: Add scheduler filter for routed_segments https://review.opendev.org/709280 | |
| 19:04:01 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: trivial: Remove 'u' prefix from string https://review.opendev.org/709080 | |
| 19:47:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: setup.cfg: Various Python 3 fixes https://review.opendev.org/708824 | |
| 19:47:14 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: tox: Configure 'ignore_basepython_conflict' https://review.opendev.org/708830 | |
| 19:47:15 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove six https://review.opendev.org/708831 | |
| 19:47:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Bump to hacking 2.x https://review.opendev.org/708832 | |
| 19:47:17 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Random cleanups https://review.opendev.org/709081 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-24 | |||
| 01:13:39 | brinzhang_ | gmann: refresh default policy of os-instance-action API meet a problem, could you please review this patch [1]? I have a SPEC need this change. [1]https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707777/2/nova/tests/unit/policies/test_instance_actions.py@131 | |
| 01:21:35 | brinzhang_ | gmann, johnthetubaguy: There is an issue is the context.can(xx,xx, fatal=false), since fatal=False the unauthorized role cannot get the expect raise exception, so I would like to get your suggestion, and than fast complete this change | |
| 01:24:46 | brinzhang_ | gmann, johnthetubaguy: and another change is the destroy-instance-with-datavolume SPEC, and I will refresh the os-volumes API's default policy, because of I will add a new PATCH API to the os-volumes API. In order to use the new policy, I had to do this work in advance, please unstand me do this. | |
| 01:26:23 | brinzhang_ | gmann, johnthetubaguy: s/os-volumes API/os-volumes-attachments API | |
| 02:00:21 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce scope_types in os-volumes-attachments policy https://review.opendev.org/709388 | |
| 08:55:24 | openstackgerrit | Fan Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix hypervisors paginted collection_name. https://review.opendev.org/709431 | |
| 10:19:51 | openstackgerrit | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent deletion of a compute node belonging to another host https://review.opendev.org/694802 | |
| 10:31:18 | bauzas | ergh, fuckingly impacted by https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709389/ | |
| 10:34:06 | bauzas | frickler: would appreciate a +2 on ^ in order to fix my issues | |
| 10:34:13 | bauzas | (I just recreated my tox venv :() | |
| 10:40:52 | frickler | bauzas: humm, usually I don't vote on reqs. but I guess in this case I can reapply the +3 by prometheanfire and smcginnis | |
| 10:41:08 | bauzas | as you can | |
| 10:46:45 | frickler | guess I also need to promote it in gate, everything else is currently failing, right? | |
| 10:51:34 | frickler | infra-root: wanting to promote the reqs fix https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709389/ , zuul command is now broken by the thing this patch is fixing, too http://paste.openstack.org/show/789920/ | |
| 10:51:59 | frickler | ehm, wrong chan | |
| 10:59:56 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: do you remember my issue with stestr last week ? | |
| 11:00:17 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I fully cleaned all my local eggs but I still had the issue | |
| 11:00:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: and I finally was able to fix it by asking tox to use sdist (ie. removing use_develop in tox.ini) | |
| 11:01:30 | bauzas | weirod | |
| 11:01:33 | bauzas | weirdo | |
| 11:03:54 | bauzas | stephenfin: you're a pbr expert (heh), any idea why https://tox.readthedocs.io/en/latest/example/general.html#avoiding-expensive-sdist doesn't work for me and why by not asking use_develop=True works ? | |
| 11:04:00 | bauzas | for the nova repo | |
| 11:12:50 | bauzas | stephenfin: context is http://paste.openstack.org/show/789922/ and looks like I can't use use_develop, but I rather need to create a packaged install | |
| 11:32:32 | stephenfin | bauzas: Not sure, but I don't think that's the issue. I think the issue is with the latest major version of oslo.config | |
| 11:32:49 | stephenfin | We've been seeing issues with other projects like oslo.policy because of it | |
| 11:34:22 | stephenfin | bauzas: What do you mean it doesn't work though? | |
| 11:34:43 | bauzas | stephenfin: like I said, I get http://paste.openstack.org/show/789922/ by not modifying tox.ini | |
| 11:35:15 | bauzas | stephenfin: but if i ask to not using the development mode (ie. https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/tox.ini#L11) then it works | |
| 11:35:30 | stephenfin | and if you remove that, things work? Can you give me the output until 'py37 run-test:' ? | |
| 11:36:32 | bauzas | stephenfin: yes, but WDYM by py36 run-test N | |
| 11:36:36 | bauzas | whoops | |
| 11:36:41 | bauzas | py37 run-test | |