| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-11 | |||
| 05:53:52 | alex_xu | ileixe: also this one https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/pike/admin/config-routed-networks.html | |
| 05:56:53 | ileixe | alex_xu: Hm.. maybe I understand what neutron does for routed network | |
| 05:57:11 | ileixe | What I do not understand is.. how nova use resource provider which neutron gave | |
| 05:57:55 | alex_xu | ileixe: maybe i'm wrong, i saw the note from the matt, looks like neutorn side impelemnt, but yes, nova side do nohting now | |
| 05:58:44 | ileixe | iirc, matt you said is the owner of the commit (https://review.opendev.org/#/c/656885/) right? | |
| 05:59:13 | alex_xu | ileixe: yes, he isn't working on that anymore | |
| 05:59:14 | ileixe | And the commit does not implemented which I thought for routed network. | |
| 05:59:55 | ileixe | So.. I assume that routed network does not work (especially related to nova scheduling) | |
| 06:00:21 | alex_xu | ileixe: yes, I think you are right | |
| 06:00:57 | ileixe | alex_xu: Hm... thanks for the answer.. | |
| 06:02:00 | alex_xu | np | |
| 08:24:11 | mriosfer | Hi guys, after change in the flavor and image the vram value, in our openstack queens and rebuild the instance i saw in the virsh xml that its correctly added to vm config "<model type='qxl' ram='65536' vram='131072' vgamem='16384' heads='1' primary='yes'/>" with windows with dxdiag detect 0MB vram. Is it correct? Should be running? | |
| 08:33:00 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Expose instance action event details out of the API https://review.opendev.org/694430 | |
| 08:35:08 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add server actions v82 samples test https://review.opendev.org/706251 | |
| 08:38:12 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance actions v82 samples test https://review.opendev.org/706251 | |
| 08:49:03 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Merge qos related renos for Ussuri https://review.opendev.org/706766 | |
| 08:50:28 | gibi | bauzas: I'm here if you want to chat about NUMA | |
| 08:50:41 | bauzas | gibi: 10 mins please but yeah :) | |
| 08:50:47 | gibi | bauzas: sure | |
| 09:01:41 | bauzas | ok, processed the whole bunch of comments for the NUMA in Placement spec... | |
| 09:02:22 | gibi | ok | |
| 09:02:39 | gibi | I just realized tha sean-k-mooney and efried also commented while I was away... reading them... | |
| 09:10:54 | bauzas | gibi: I'm back | |
| 09:11:05 | bauzas | gibi: FWIW efried mostly replied on your concerns | |
| 09:11:23 | bauzas | the spec needs another round of rewrites so I'm starting it now | |
| 09:12:40 | openstackgerrit | HYSong proposed openstack/nova master: Update request_specs.availability_zone during live migration https://review.opendev.org/706647 | |
| 09:12:52 | gibi | bauzas: I'm still reading efried's comments, I will get back to you soon | |
| 09:13:05 | bauzas | cool | |
| 09:28:50 | openstackgerrit | HYSong proposed openstack/nova master: Update request_specs.availability_zone during live migration https://review.opendev.org/706647 | |
| 09:33:53 | openstackgerrit | HYSong proposed openstack/nova master: Update request_specs.availability_zone during live migration https://review.opendev.org/706647 | |
| 09:35:44 | openstackgerrit | HYSong proposed openstack/nova master: Update request_specs.availability_zone during live migration https://review.opendev.org/706647 | |
| 09:44:50 | bauzas | gibi: unrelated, see my last comment on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/706647/5 | |
| 09:45:45 | bauzas | I know not a lot of folks know about AZs, so I want to make sure that all of us as cores know about the design consensus :) | |
| 09:45:47 | gibi | bauzas: ack, queued for double check | |
| 09:47:21 | bauzas | no rush, it's more for a knowledge | |
| 09:53:21 | gibi | bauzas: replyied in the NUMA spec. I agree Eric's proposals in his reply. I'm still a bit open in the upgrade check case but that is a low prio issue | |
| 09:53:38 | bauzas | cool, I'm just modifying things as we speak | |
| 09:54:07 | gibi | bauzas: you did a great job pulling the piece together I think I see the light of the end of this tunnel | |
| 10:02:11 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: set default value to 0 instead of '' https://review.opendev.org/706730 | |
| 10:04:17 | gibi | bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/706647 thanks for chiming in I agree with you. I missed the fact that we don't allow moving instance between AZs (in recent microversions) | |
| 10:06:24 | bauzas | gibi: no worries, again, my ping is just for making sure we share our knowledge | |
| 10:06:45 | bauzas | I'm always on and off upstream, so the more people know about AZs, the better it will be | |
| 10:42:58 | bauzas | shit, I lack time for fixing all the comments | |
| 10:45:05 | bauzas | gibi: I think we need efried and sean-k-mooney around this afternoon for discussing the upgrade pre-flight check and the Ussuri condition | |
| 10:45:37 | bauzas | I'm personnally in favor of keeping NUMA workloads in Ussuri as they are | |
| 10:46:06 | bauzas | ie. no migration asked | |
| 10:46:16 | bauzas | and a pre-flight check pre-Victoria | |
| 10:46:35 | bauzas | because if not, that's a chicken-and-egg issue | |
| 10:50:44 | gibi | sure lets see what they think | |
| 12:14:22 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: api: Add support for extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/704643 | |
| 12:24:29 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support unshelve with qos ports https://review.opendev.org/704759 | |
| 12:25:58 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Enable unshelve with qos ports https://review.opendev.org/705475 | |
| 12:27:26 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Merge qos related renos for Ussuri https://review.opendev.org/706766 | |
| 12:36:41 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: api: Add support for extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/704643 | |
| 12:38:24 | frickler | hello nova, the new alembic==1.4.0 is causing this failure, please have a look https://c264ca14759376f2bea5-6cd49316b9babb1f90743cae9cd67f9e.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/705380/10/check/cross-nova-py36/8bcec81/testr_results.html , I'll pin to the previous version for now, see https://review.opendev.org/705380 | |
| 13:14:23 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: api: Add support for extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/704643 | |
| 13:23:18 | efried | bauzas, gibi: o/ | |
| 13:23:18 | efried | What's the question? | |
| 13:25:19 | gibi | efried: my remaning open question is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/552924/16/specs/ussuri/approved/numa-topology-with-rps.rst@223 about upgrade checks | |
| 13:25:49 | gibi | but I have to jump on a call for the next 1 and a half hour so talk to you later | |
| 13:36:09 | bauzas | efried: gibi: will ping you later, just updating the spec now | |
| 13:47:27 | alex_xu | bauzas: I leave one also https://review.opendev.org/#/c/552924/16/specs/ussuri/approved/numa-topology-with-rps.rst@421 | |
| 13:50:35 | bauzas | ack | |
| 13:52:31 | bauzas | alex_xu: good point, I was thinking of the upgrade issue when rolling the compute upgrades | |
| 13:53:23 | alex_xu | good news, we can just copy the way of standard-cpu-resource-tracking way | |
| 13:53:55 | alex_xu | probably need another workaround config option for disable the fallback placement query | |
| 13:53:57 | bauzas | I'll sat this | |
| 13:54:06 | bauzas | say* | |
| 14:39:16 | efried | bauzas, gibi: responded. | |
| 14:39:33 | bauzas | dammit, need to Ctrl-R | |
| 14:39:46 | bauzas | I'm litterally writing live | |
| 14:40:00 | efried | bauzas: shouldn't be anything earth-shattering in my response. | |
| 14:40:01 | bauzas | eek, sean-k-mooney did too | |
| 14:42:20 | bauzas | efried: for the placement-ish syntax, I'm all for docs | |
| 14:42:26 | bauzas | and not code | |
| 14:42:27 | bauzas | FWIW | |
| 14:42:36 | bauzas | like, you can do it but you can mess it | |
| 14:42:39 | bauzas | your dog | |
| 14:43:10 | bauzas | anyway, continuing to write | |
| 14:43:49 | efried | IMO the only reason we shouldn't block placement-ish syntax is because we might miss something in our translation utility and have to provide a workaround until we fix it. | |
| 14:44:11 | efried | even there be tygers. | |
| 14:45:20 | LiangFang | gibi: hi gibi, regarding https://review.opendev.org/#/c/689070/ | |
| 14:47:01 | LiangFang | gibi: how do you think to set trait for the host machine, and specify trait in flavor extra spec? | |
| 14:47:59 | LiangFang | gibi: so the guest can be scheduled to the host with cache capability | |
| 15:22:12 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Proposes NUMA topology with RPs https://review.opendev.org/552924 | |
| 15:22:38 | bauzas | efried: gibi: sean-k-mooney: alex_xu: thanks for the comments, here is another baking of NUMA topology spec https://review.opendev.org/552924 | |
| 15:23:18 | gibi | LiangFang: if we only care about having a cache configured on the host then it can be a capability represented by a trait. If we also needs to think about the available size of the caches then it is a resource | |
| 15:24:15 | gibi | bauzas, efried: ack, will check back soon | |
| 15:39:49 | stephenfin | dansmith: Any particular reason we don't use entrypoints for custom scheduler filters? Is it something we could/should do? | |
| 15:40:05 | dansmith | don't we already? | |
| 15:40:09 | dansmith | bauzas: | |
| 15:40:27 | stephenfin | Custom scheduler drivers, yes. Not filters for the filter_scheduler though | |
| 15:40:44 | dansmith | I was sure we did | |
| 15:40:53 | stephenfin | You've to configure them via a python path in '[filter_scheduler] enabled_filters' | |
| 15:40:55 | stephenfin | fwict | |
| 16:02:28 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: morning | |
| 16:02:42 | spatel | let me know if you around i want to share my load-test result. | |
| 16:06:31 | gibi | bauzas: thanks for the update on the NUMA spec it looks good to me now | |
| 16:24:39 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: im skiming through it now but ya im more or less happy with it. ill proably +1 it when i finish this pass | |
| 16:26:55 | bauzas | dansmith: sorry was AFK | |