| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-03 | |||
| 17:13:14 | efried | Yes | |
| 17:13:15 | bauzas | I need to process this information but that seems reasonable to me | |
| 17:13:29 | bauzas | but for 2/, I don't see any counter-proposal | |
| 17:13:34 | efried | For 2/, the grandchild concept makes group_policy *moot* | |
| 17:13:56 | efried | meaning we can ignore it and let the other parts of the code (e.g. bandwidth stuff) set it as needed. | |
| 17:13:58 | bauzas | ah cool, I missed the whole point | |
| 17:14:12 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: becasue of how it modeled in the tree with same_tree we dont care what group_policy is set to | |
| 17:14:14 | bauzas | ok, I'll sharp my pen and write a new rev | |
| 17:14:14 | efried | btw, this was one of the things we noticed when we were working on the 'nested magic' design for placement. | |
| 17:14:20 | sean-k-mooney | in the 3 level proposal | |
| 17:14:42 | efried | ...that group_policy no longer really makes sense. | |
| 17:14:44 | bauzas | that's a very good alternative then, thanks both of you for the better proposal | |
| 17:24:10 | sean-k-mooney | efried: one minor point. so we have same_subtree=!NUMA_1,NUMA_2 | |
| 17:24:18 | sean-k-mooney | right | |
| 17:24:49 | sean-k-mooney | we technically should be doing that for each of the multi numa ones if we want to skip that in the numa filter | |
| 17:24:50 | efried | I don't believe so, no. | |
| 17:25:42 | sean-k-mooney | ok then without group_policy=isolate we are not guarenteed that we get the correct behavior | |
| 17:26:30 | sean-k-mooney | that said the numa toplogy filter could do the check | |
| 17:26:41 | efried | sean-k-mooney: See https://docs.openstack.org/placement/train/specs/train/implemented/2005575-nested-magic-1.html#default-group-policy-to-none | |
| 17:26:43 | sean-k-mooney | so i dont see it as a blocker | |
| 17:27:11 | efried | Though that asserts that we did default it. We didn't. | |
| 17:28:04 | efried | anyway, yeah, I think you're right. | |
| 17:28:10 | efried | And the bw code defaults it to 'none' https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/nova/train.html#other-notes | |
| 17:28:19 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 17:28:34 | efried | gibi: I can't remember what the motivation was for that ^ | |
| 17:28:56 | efried | whether there was a strong reason for it to be 'none', or if it was more or less a coin toss just so we didn't bounce the placement request. | |
| 17:29:07 | sean-k-mooney | so with out support for not same_subtree we cant fully express the constratis without group_policy=isolate | |
| 17:29:20 | efried | Because this (numa stuff) gives a decent motivation to "default" (conceivably even enforce) isolate. | |
| 17:29:25 | sean-k-mooney | efried: none is the correct default | |
| 17:29:44 | sean-k-mooney | efried: if we default to isolate you cant have two ports with a bandwith request | |
| 17:29:55 | sean-k-mooney | form the same backend | |
| 17:30:11 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. you cant booth a vm with two ovs ports with min bandwith | |
| 17:30:22 | efried | mm, so that would be a limitation if we always set it to 'isolate' for NUMA | |
| 17:30:28 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 17:30:37 | sean-k-mooney | which is why we cant do that | |
| 17:30:46 | efried | well | |
| 17:30:50 | sean-k-mooney | and why im saying the numa toplogy filter should handel it | |
| 17:30:55 | efried | we would have to weigh whether it's better or worse to have that limitation vs using the ntf | |
| 17:31:21 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. filter based on the allcoation and ensure there are the expecte number of numa nodes or we addn "same_subtree=!...." | |
| 17:31:33 | efried | yeah, I think that's probably the right call. Perhaps we should look into designing the granular isolation thing suggested in the spec. | |
| 17:32:03 | sean-k-mooney | we could | |
| 17:32:27 | sean-k-mooney | but i think for this case the not same_subtree is more useful | |
| 17:32:28 | efried | It won't be simple, I'm afraid. Which is why we didn't do it yet. | |
| 17:32:59 | sean-k-mooney | the not_same_subtree is usful for nic for bonding reasons too | |
| 17:33:15 | efried | Yeah, there's all kinds of anti-affinity use cases | |
| 17:33:17 | sean-k-mooney | so you can ask for VFs from different PFs | |
| 17:33:23 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 17:34:12 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: I have question, i have project name foo and it has bunch of instance and now i want to rename foo project to "bar" is that possible? | |
| 17:34:33 | sean-k-mooney | i think so | |
| 17:34:41 | sean-k-mooney | you do that in keystone | |
| 17:34:49 | sean-k-mooney | we just recorred the uuid in nova i think | |
| 17:35:05 | sean-k-mooney | so the uuid wont change but the name that is shown to the user should be able too | |
| 17:35:16 | sean-k-mooney | that siad i have never tried it | |
| 17:36:21 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: interesting... let me try and see.. | |
| 17:36:51 | spatel | i am trying to standardize name across multiple openstack cloud | |
| 17:37:58 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: does cellv2 technology stable enough to deploy? I am tried of managing isolated cloud :( | |
| 17:38:17 | spatel | tired* | |
| 17:38:34 | sean-k-mooney | it is enabled by default on all clouds after pike | |
| 17:38:39 | sean-k-mooney | so yes | |
| 17:38:58 | sean-k-mooney | all deployment are cellv2 deployment with 1 cell | |
| 17:39:07 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tox: Integrate mypy https://review.opendev.org/676208 | |
| 17:39:07 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: mypy: Add type annotations to 'nova.pci' https://review.opendev.org/676209 | |
| 17:39:29 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: default 1 Cell and if i want to add more cell i can do that right without major changes | |
| 17:39:35 | spatel | right? | |
| 17:40:43 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 17:44:50 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: Thanks!!! let me do some research :) | |
| 18:01:09 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate base rules in favor of new rules https://review.opendev.org/701624 | |
| 18:04:21 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: openstack project set foo_project --name bar_project works :) | |
| 18:10:35 | lyarwood | https://paste.centos.org/view/69c69b50 - Has anyone seen this when running `$ tox -evenv -- tempest verify-config -uro /tmp/tmp.TdRrD4s6eN` | |
| 18:10:46 | lyarwood | PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/opt/stack/tempest/.tox/venv/log/.lock' | |
| 18:14:48 | lyarwood | ah nvm, I mounted /opt/stack as root over sshfs, fail! | |
| 18:17:58 | sean-k-mooney | spatel: cool | |
| 18:18:39 | sean-k-mooney | spatel: i theory i did not know if a reason why it would not work but untill you try its hard to know | |
| 18:19:18 | sean-k-mooney | spatel: one thing to keep in mind is the legacy openrc file you use for loggin in sometimes have the project names in them | |
| 18:19:25 | sean-k-mooney | but they normally have the project uuid | |
| 18:19:58 | sean-k-mooney | if they only have the name they would have to be updated but if you use the cloud.yaml or openrc file with the uuid then renameing shoudl be fine | |
| 18:21:49 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: Yes.. i will deal with that.. we mostly use terraform so its going to be lots of change but one time | |
| 18:23:46 | sean-k-mooney | spatel: ya while slightly annoying, the uuid is fixed so in generally you should prefer using that anyway. | |
| 18:24:04 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: ++ (totally with you) | |
| 18:27:31 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Add functional recreate test for bug 1829479 and bug 1817833 https://review.opendev.org/699698 | |
| 18:27:31 | openstack | bug 1829479 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "The allocation table has residual records when instance is evacuated and the source physical node is removed" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1829479 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem) | |
| 18:27:32 | openstack | bug 1817833 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Check compute_id existence when nova-compute reports info to placement" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1817833 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem) | |
| 19:39:30 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix os-attach-interfaces policy to be admin_or_owner https://review.opendev.org/705135 | |
| 19:39:45 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old policy enforcement in attach_interfaces https://review.opendev.org/705127 | |
| 19:40:01 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing attach_interfaces policies https://review.opendev.org/705126 | |
| 19:55:35 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Remove extra instance.save() calls related to qos SRIOV ports https://review.opendev.org/702261 | |
| 19:55:41 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Use common server create function for qos func tests https://review.opendev.org/701353 | |
| 19:56:51 | openstackgerrit | François Palin proposed openstack/nova master: Add retry to cinder API calls related to volume detach https://review.opendev.org/669674 | |
| 19:56:51 | openstackgerrit | François Palin proposed openstack/nova master: Add retry to cinder API calls related to volume detach https://review.opendev.org/669674 | |
| 19:58:40 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing attach_interfaces policies https://review.opendev.org/705126 | |
| 20:10:25 | openstackgerrit | Victor Coutellier proposed openstack/nova master: Non-Admin user can filter their instances by more filters https://review.opendev.org/701609 | |
| 20:13:45 | openstackgerrit | Victor Coutellier proposed openstack/nova master: Non-Admin user can filter their instances by more filters https://review.opendev.org/701609 | |
| 20:22:21 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Functional tests for NUMA live migration https://review.opendev.org/672595 | |
| 20:22:23 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA LM: Add func test for bug 1845146 https://review.opendev.org/687404 | |
| 20:22:23 | openstack | bug 1845146 in OpenStack Compute (nova) train "NUMA aware live migration failed when vCPU pin set" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1845146 - Assigned to Dan Smith (danms) | |
| 20:22:23 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: func tests: move _run_periodics() into own mixin https://review.opendev.org/705545 | |
| 20:22:23 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: tests: work around malformed serial XML https://review.opendev.org/705546 | |
| 20:47:38 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove use of legacy 'FloatingIP' object https://review.opendev.org/697153 | |
| 21:03:38 | openstackgerrit | Mykola Yakovliev proposed openstack/nova master: Fix boot_roles in InstanceSystemMetadata https://review.opendev.org/698040 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-04 | |||
| 03:51:31 | openstackgerrit | Guo Jingyu proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Proposal for a safer noVNC console with password authentication https://review.opendev.org/623120 | |