| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-01-25 | |||
| 20:02:08 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable and use COMPUTE_ACCELERATORS trait. https://review.opendev.org/699554 | |
| 20:02:08 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add cyborg tempest job. https://review.opendev.org/670999 | |
| 20:02:09 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Bump compute rpcapi version and reduce Cyborg calls. https://review.opendev.org/704227 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-01-26 | |||
| 14:57:48 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Mask the token used to allow access to consoles https://review.opendev.org/704255 | |
| 15:02:13 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Mask the token used to allow access to consoles https://review.opendev.org/704255 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-01-27 | |||
| 09:45:23 | stephenfin | bauzas: Today's a spec review day for me. Just reviewed https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702943/ | |
| 09:49:00 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Small fixes to unified limits spec https://review.opendev.org/703773 | |
| 09:59:44 | bauzas | stephenfin: ack, thanks | |
| 10:00:08 | bauzas | FWIW, I should do the same... | |
| 10:38:49 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-proposes multiple vGPU types in libvirt https://review.opendev.org/702943 | |
| 10:50:47 | stephenfin | bauzas, efried: Think you folks could look at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682655/ today? It's just a reproposal and I hope to have the mostly trivial code up later this week | |
| 11:17:20 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Additional upgrade clarifications for cpu-resources https://review.opendev.org/666032 | |
| 11:30:10 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: spec update: virtual persistent memory https://review.opendev.org/695868 | |
| 11:53:03 | stephenfin | kashyap: Loads of comments left on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/693844/, when you have time | |
| 11:54:46 | kashyap | stephenfin: Will check, on the phone; thanks! | |
| 12:07:02 | kashyap | stephenfin: Thanks for taking time to review; reasonable questions, will respond there. | |
| 12:15:54 | stephenfin | huaqiang: Is it you that's working on bp/use-pcpu-and-vcpu-in-one-instance ? If so, just hit the spec at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/668656/ | |
| 12:33:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove remaining nova-network quotas https://review.opendev.org/697152 | |
| 13:35:41 | gibi | stephenfin: replied in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701763 | |
| 14:00:57 | gibi | stephenfin: you were the second +2 on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699669/ but did not +A it. Is it intentional? | |
| 14:11:44 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-proposes multiple vGPU types in libvirt https://review.opendev.org/702943 | |
| 14:18:16 | efried | stephenfin: Would you please make a blueprint for that? | |
| 14:35:30 | openstackgerrit | Vladyslav Drok proposed openstack/nova master: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/704330 | |
| 14:36:36 | openstackgerrit | Vladyslav Drok proposed openstack/nova master: Make RBD imagebackend flatten method idempotent https://review.opendev.org/704330 | |
| 14:50:03 | efried | lyarwood: I've been procrastinating on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/669121/ -- at some point would you mind directing me to the piece of the CI that shows it's doing what's expected? | |
| 14:51:41 | efried | oh, I guess it's not waiting on me, since there's an open dep. That makes me feel less slackerish. | |
| 14:55:33 | lyarwood | efried: yup I've been pinging away in openstack-qa about this for a while, I'll try to get it over the line today. The CI you're looking for is actually against that change as the dep is for an openstack/grenade change. | |
| 14:57:06 | efried | thanks | |
| 14:58:10 | lyarwood | gah .gz files, has zuul regressed recently in terms of being able to display these .gz log files as plain text via the web ui? | |
| 14:58:40 | lyarwood | or were these just plain text before and are now .gz? | |
| 14:59:16 | lyarwood | either way it's now impossible to share URLs to specific log lines etc | |
| 15:01:43 | efried | lyarwood: Yeah, infra changed a thing, something about swift, and now a few jobs, including legacy ones, are double-compressing log files. It's a serious PITA. | |
| 15:02:41 | efried | Apparently we can fix it somewhere in the job definition itself, but so far nobody has gone and done that. Not sure how much of that is because nobody knows how (that's certainly *my* excuse) or just haven't had the time. | |
| 15:03:16 | efried | Another hesitation with that is that we *should* just go convert those jobs to zv3, which would make the problem go away, and which we're supposed to be doing anyway. | |
| 15:03:43 | efried | that also has been not done, and for similar reasons I imagine. | |
| 15:03:55 | efried | smarter people than me have made attempts, but nothing has closed | |
| 15:04:31 | lyarwood | efried: ack thanks, I did start looking at switching the nova-lvm job over last week but didn't post anything. | |
| 15:04:54 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: have you started converting any of the grenade jobs to zuulv3? | |
| 15:05:04 | lyarwood | iirc you were looking at this right? | |
| 15:05:07 | efried | I will personally buy a cookie for whoever makes the .gz problem go away, I don't care how. | |
| 15:21:28 | gmann | lyarwood: grenade job zuulv3 work https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:grenade_zuulv3+status:open | |
| 15:22:32 | lyarwood | gmann: awesome thank you, I'll take a look shortly | |
| 15:50:10 | lyarwood | melwitt: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703005/ - Did you have another openstack/nova change using https://review.opendev.org/#/c/548936/ btw? | |
| 16:02:32 | melwitt | lyarwood: yeah, I was dual purposing this https://review.opendev.org/701478 | |
| 16:03:32 | lyarwood | melwitt: ah cool thanks | |
| 16:04:29 | melwitt | I got motivated to test out the grenade change while trying to get some info on that cell timeout gate failure in grenade jobs (bc the log files are all gzipped and annoying to have to download). zuul v3 conversion solves that problem | |
| 16:13:12 | dansmith | efried: just want to make sure it's clear that I'm waiting for you to ack this before I really do much with it: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/631243/52 | |
| 16:14:38 | efried | dansmith: okay, thanks for the heads up. | |
| 16:15:03 | dansmith | efried: seems like you haven't been through that set lately, are you planning to go through it again soon? | |
| 16:15:18 | efried | I can do that, yes. | |
| 16:15:33 | efried | dansmith: I was actually mostly waiting for you to be happy with it. | |
| 16:15:46 | dansmith | efried: last time I did I got to like patch #4 and found yet many more sections of code where there wasn't any testing, and/or tests that asserted things were called, but not with any specific parameters and got annoyed | |
| 16:16:03 | efried | okay. | |
| 16:16:14 | dansmith | and so I'm feeling a little like I'm the only guy digging deep on those things, which is exhausting | |
| 16:24:38 | efried | I'll take a thorough swipe this week. You should take some time off to prevent burnout. Go do some sledding or something. | |
| 16:25:17 | dansmith | well, I'm just back from time off for general burn-out reasons, | |
| 16:25:18 | dansmith | but I also don | |
| 16:25:51 | dansmith | I also don't want to get too myopic on this set, so I think it would be good to have someone else take a pass through and see if they find things I'm not seeing | |
| 16:26:26 | dansmith | like, a little more than just my comments get changed each time and I don't want to settle into an itemized list of "yes, my comment was addressed" without looking close enough at the whole change | |
| 16:26:40 | efried | ack | |
| 16:37:58 | lyarwood | melwitt: sorry got slightly distracted, did you want to use that change to switch things over to the new zuulv3 job or should we create a fresh one? | |
| 16:38:41 | melwitt | lyarwood: I'd create a fresh one. I don't know why I didn't make a fresh one, sorry | |
| 16:40:22 | lyarwood | melwitt: ack np I can take a swing at that now | |
| 16:40:38 | melwitt | lyarwood: yeah sure, go ahead. thanks | |
| 16:41:17 | melwitt | just have to remove the -py3 from the name, I think that's all | |
| 16:41:53 | melwitt | (and depends-on tosky's grenade change) | |
| 16:42:45 | lyarwood | melwitt: yeah, doesn't our grenade job also run some live migration tests? | |
| 16:43:06 | melwitt | lyarwood: I ... don't know tbh | |
| 16:44:18 | lyarwood | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/80539a5e849bf8ec1239f0ed01433a7f8a54015b/playbooks/legacy/nova-grenade-multinode/run.yaml#L57-L59 - yeah it does, I don't think the new job includes this yet. | |
| 16:44:19 | melwitt | note that I was referencing only the single node grenade job earlier, we also have a multinode grenade job that I did _not_ try to convert to yet using tosky's change | |
| 16:44:27 | lyarwood | ah okay I see | |
| 16:44:34 | melwitt | so that might be the one | |
| 16:44:49 | melwitt | and you already linked it so yes | |
| 16:46:13 | tosky | and tosky wasn't able to find a proper workaround for the failures when using grenade plugins (shame on him) | |
| 16:54:58 | melwitt | tosky: do you have a change where you are working on getting plugins to work? is that here? https://review.opendev.org/639774 is there any way we could help? | |
| 16:56:46 | tosky | melwitt: I don't have a change; the problem is that I'm not able to figure out where the py2 openstackclient is installed and make sure its CLI used over its py3 counterpart | |
| 16:57:08 | melwitt | oh, interesting | |
| 16:57:26 | tosky | I would expect that starting from a py3 deployment, even if the py2 version is installed afterwards, the py3 version installed first would still be the one used for the CLI | |
| 17:00:10 | melwitt | I would expect that as well | |
| 17:01:28 | stephenfin | efried: create a blueprint for what? | |
| 17:02:43 | lyarwood | stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/702943 - I think he was talking about that spec that had just merged. | |
| 17:03:01 | stephenfin | ah, makes sense | |
| 17:03:03 | stephenfin | will do | |
| 17:03:32 | tosky | talking about jobs, a few days ago the nova-live-migration job was failing in stable/pike; do you know if it has been solved? | |
| 17:04:38 | melwitt | tosky: it has not been solved yet. sean-k-mooney said they would try to dig into it more soon. it's not 100% failure rate but seems like it's close to that | |
| 17:06:44 | efried | stephenfin: I was talking about https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682655/ | |
| 17:07:04 | efried | It looks like you're using a new bp name for this round, but there's no bp by that name. | |
| 17:09:31 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: zuul: Switch to the Zuulv3 grenade job https://review.opendev.org/704364 | |
| 17:10:50 | stephenfin | efried: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/flavor-extra-spec-validators | |
| 17:11:00 | efried | thanks | |
| 17:15:19 | sean-k-mooney | tosky: its actully the other way around. which ever version is installed last get used but only if its the first installation | |
| 17:15:40 | sean-k-mooney | if you upgrade an existing install it does not replace the console script i think | |
| 17:16:11 | sean-k-mooney | so ify its py2 then py3 on n-1 1 and py3 only on n i thing the console scrript will point to py2 | |
| 17:17:15 | sean-k-mooney | anyway its a bit of a pain. we likely should make the py2 install in py3 mode optional in train | |
| 17:17:26 | sean-k-mooney | so we can disable it in the greade job | |
| 17:18:15 | sean-k-mooney | but yes i will try to look at nova-live-migration this week. i think i have got a downstream backport working so i should have more time to look at it this week | |
| 17:18:35 | sean-k-mooney | i might try to set aside tomorow to look at it | |
| 17:26:32 | stephenfin | gibi: RE: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701763/4/specs/ussuri/approved/non-admin-filter-instance-by-az.rst@83, are you saying it's not possible to use policy to allow any user access to the API? | |
| 17:28:45 | gibi | stephenfin: I think the policy is not per field | |
| 17:30:12 | gibi | stephenfin: so if we want to make some fields available for filtering to the normal user then we need to change code | |