Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-01-15
18:17:03 dansmith well, isn't there a way to configure it to *not* honor the user's configdrive request?
18:17:47 dansmith ah, nevermind, looks like they can always ask for it
18:17:48 dansmith so yeah I think you're good
18:18:45 sean-k-mooney fungi: the only thing they shoudl have to do is make sure the iso vfat tools are installed so nova can actully create the config drive
18:18:57 sean-k-mooney but they will be on any normal install
18:19:14 fungi right, already suggested that to them
18:19:24 fungi either genisofs or mkisofs depending on the vintage
18:19:36 sean-k-mooney yep
18:19:49 fungi i have a feeling they just need to adjust their nodepool launcher config
18:20:58 fungi they provided a `openstack show server` paste which indicated config_drive was not True and i expect that comes down to the boot parameters it provided
18:22:22 sean-k-mooney right. it could be forced in there config but nodepool has a setting for that too right
18:23:01 sean-k-mooney you can use https://zuul-ci.org/docs/nodepool/configuration.html#attr-providers.[openstack].diskimages.config-drive
18:24:04 sean-k-mooney actully it looks like node pool does not use the boot parmater since that is on the image and instead is using the image metadata right?
18:24:57 sean-k-mooney there are 3 ways to trun on cofig drive, the force_config_drive config option, the api boot request or the image metadata
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: ksa auth conf and client for Cyborg access https://review.opendev.org/631242
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add Cyborg device profile groups to request spec. https://review.opendev.org/631243
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Define Cyborg ARQ binding notification event. https://review.opendev.org/692707
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Create and bind Cyborg ARQs. https://review.opendev.org/631244
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Pass accelerator requests to each virt driver from compute manager. https://review.opendev.org/698581
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Compose accelerator PCI devices into domain XML in libvirt driver. https://review.opendev.org/631245
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs for an instance when the instance is deleted. https://review.opendev.org/673735
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable hard/soft reboot with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/697940
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable start/stop of instances with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/699553
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable and use COMPUTE_ACCELERATORS trait. https://review.opendev.org/699554
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add cyborg tempest job. https://review.opendev.org/670999
18:39:56 openstackgerrit waleed mousa proposed openstack/os-vif master: [Follow Up] OVS DPDK port representors support https://review.opendev.org/665965
18:43:29 artom dansmith, sorry, was on a 1:1
18:43:36 artom dansmith, thanks! I'll be sure to hound your ass then
19:01:40 efried #success With the merging of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696518/ mox is finally purged from nova \o/
19:02:02 sean-k-mooney cool
19:02:06 efried takashin, stephenfin: ^ I closed out the bp
19:02:20 efried hm, no response from successbot
19:02:30 efried shrug
19:02:43 sean-k-mooney it was so amazed that its finally done it need a minute
19:03:19 sean-k-mooney or its borked
19:06:03 dansmith maybe it is opinionated now and doesn't agree it's a successbot-worthy moment?
19:06:59 sean-k-mooney in that case can we get it to do code reviews for us too
19:07:42 sean-k-mooney its tallens are clearly being wasted
19:11:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove MIN_LIBVIRT_KVM_AARCH64_VERSION https://review.opendev.org/695901
19:16:00 efried stephenfin: done, and the one a couple further up the series.
19:19:00 fungi openstackstatus is not present in here. checking to see if it's fallen victim to a netsplit or something, hold on
19:22:40 fungi efried: okay, try again!
19:22:53 efried #success With the merging of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696518/ mox is finally purged from nova \o/
19:22:54 openstackstatus efried: Added success to Success page (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Successes)
19:22:58 efried nice, thanks fungi!
19:23:05 fungi it was disconnected for the past 50 minutes due to some shakeup in freenode
19:23:11 fungi but should be fine now
19:23:21 efried you da person
19:23:24 fungi efried: thanks for communicating the moxtermination!
19:23:44 fungi i think we've all been looking forward to it for a *very* long time
19:24:23 fungi heh
19:25:21 sean-k-mooney fungi: while you are here. do you know what the plan will be regarding ubuntu 20.04 i assume we will move to it sometime in V
19:26:30 sean-k-mooney i guess that decsion wont be made untill closer to the start of V but just said i would ask
19:26:45 fungi sean-k-mooney: it's slated to be released around ussuri rc1 last i looked, so we'll likely have images available before ussuri releases but maybe not as soon as master reopens for victoria commits
19:27:29 sean-k-mooney is it actully victoria. i did not see a poll for the name although i might have missed it
19:28:17 fungi aiui, the tc is ready to declare ubuntu 20.04 a release platform for victoria though: https://review.opendev.org/693743
19:29:28 sean-k-mooney ok cool we were discussing a kerenl 5.4 feature downstream earlier and the reason i asked is i think 20.04 will be based on 5.4
19:30:46 fungi sean-k-mooney: yeah, voting on the v cycle name happened in early december, collecting ideas started in mid-november
19:30:49 fungi http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010880.html
19:30:55 fungi http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-January/011947.html
19:31:19 sean-k-mooney ah ok i saw the tread on the proposal but i obviously missed the vote likely when i went on vaction
19:31:19 fungi announcement was ^ last week after legal was done with trademark searches and risk eval
19:32:07 fungi and the w cycle naming process is about to get underway: https://review.opendev.org/702414
19:36:37 sean-k-mooney cool thanks for the update :)
19:38:19 sean-k-mooney efried: dansmith i currently have sundars latest update stacking. ill likely test it out tomorow however since im about to call it a day
19:38:28 dansmith cool
20:02:27 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-traits master: Add a trait that compute manager can handle accelerator requests. https://review.opendev.org/698961
20:33:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove unused exceptions https://review.opendev.org/697149
20:34:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove unnecessary 'neutronv2' prefixes https://review.opendev.org/696776
20:42:59 openstackgerrit waleed mousa proposed openstack/os-vif master: [Follow Up] OVS DPDK port representors support https://review.opendev.org/665965
20:46:05 efried lyarwood: I updated your os-traits release patch to pick up COMPUTE_ACCELERATORS which just merged.
20:46:53 sean-k-mooney ya i had to use libs_from_git to pull that in for testing the cyborg changes so that would be useful
21:27:37 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Improve metadata server performance with large security groups https://review.opendev.org/697517
21:28:44 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Functions to merge provider configs to provider tree https://review.opendev.org/676522
21:28:45 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Enable loading and merging of provider configs https://review.opendev.org/693460
21:45:34 efried msg diablo_rojo
21:45:38 efried sigh
21:46:25 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: block_device: Copy original volume_type when missing for snapshot based volumes https://review.opendev.org/696686
22:18:06 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Enable loading and merging of provider configs https://review.opendev.org/693460
22:49:04 efried dustinc: ready for re-review?
#openstack-nova - 2020-01-16
00:58:18 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove MIN_QEMU_FILE_BACKED_DISCARD_VERSION https://review.opendev.org/695915
01:39:19 xiaolin hello guys, I'm trying to run tempest test "rally verify start --pattern set=volume", but got an error "Forbidden: Policy doesn't allow os_compute_api:os-assisted-volume-snapshots:create to be performed. (HTTP 403)", can anyone give me some advice ?
01:39:31 xiaolin when i modify base.RULE_ADMIN_API to base.RULE_ANY in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/policies/assisted_volume_snapshots.py, the test passed
01:39:48 xiaolin Is this permission setting reasonable?
01:59:56 openstackgerrit wangjiajing proposed openstack/nova master: Optimize the comments for the "test_resize_cross_cell_weigher_filtered_to_target_cell_by_spec" method. https://review.opendev.org/702781
02:05:00 alex_xu xiaolin: that API I thought should be called by cinder side, probably can go to check the cinder side's nova config, whether it is admin user
04:33:17 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: FUP Populate the 'updated_at' when aggregate metadata is updated https://review.opendev.org/702790
06:15:06 LiangFang hi folks, regarding the volume local cache spec. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/689070/
06:16:37 LiangFang I'm thinking to simply the logic. If the compute node have cache capability, then leverage it. If not have the capability, then just go ahead without caching.
06:17:31 LiangFang We can use aggregate to group the servers that has cache capability
06:20:17 LiangFang this way is not perfect for every scenarios, e.g. only support libvirt, not schedule by flavor. But in some private cloud, it is simple and useful.
06:25:25 LiangFang in the cinder spec https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684556/, lots of concerns if we fail the attach volume operation
07:51:12 openstackgerrit Marek Lyčka proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Enable REST quiescing https://review.opendev.org/702810
08:07:16 openstackgerrit Marek Lyčka proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Enable REST quiescing https://review.opendev.org/702810
08:21:39 lyarwood efried: ack thanks for that, I missed that another trait had or at least was about to land.
08:26:28 openstackgerrit Marek Lyčka proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Enable REST quiescing https://review.opendev.org/702810
08:47:05 gibi dansmith: hi! stephenfin would like you to look at one of the qos patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702261/ and if you are there already the rest is also ready for review
09:14:47 openstackgerrit Marek Lyčka proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Enable REST quiescing https://review.opendev.org/702810
09:22:14 stephenfin efried: Probably would have waited til https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702440/ was merged to mark that BP as complete, personally - I'd like to get the whole thing closed out
09:22:26 stephenfin but hey, the hardest work is done

Earlier   Later