| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-01-08 | |||
| 15:31:39 | efried | Okay. If there's a reason, so be it. I don't super care to challenge the status quo, since it's easy to add properties. Really just curious why they were different. | |
| 15:32:11 | efried | but back to stephenfin's question, which seems odd to me as worded | |
| 15:32:22 | sean-k-mooney | well the topic of makeing the extra specs versioned like the image meta has come up before | |
| 15:32:40 | dansmith | I think the "images live forever and are controlled by users" is the reason | |
| 15:32:42 | sean-k-mooney | but then we dont have a place to do the current non standdard thngs | |
| 15:33:10 | efried | Right, we've always punted on it because of the nonstandard things, things we don't know about etc. | |
| 15:33:22 | efried | which is one of the challenges stephenfin is facing with the validation effort. | |
| 15:33:54 | dansmith | yeah, it's also why I have a hard time getting excited about that | |
| 15:34:13 | sean-k-mooney | ya so we could always add a seperate sandardsed metadata filed that was versioned and leve extra specs for the unversioned stuff but its never really been urgent enough | |
| 15:34:17 | dansmith | I know we need to do it, | |
| 15:34:18 | dansmith | but it's always been a big bag of stuff | |
| 16:04:11 | efried | gibi: Could I ask you to review this please https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699050/ ? It bumps us to using placement 1.35, sets a request_level_params next to requested_resources in the RequestSpec, and lets us unwind the request filter hacks where we were transiently modifying the flavor extra specs. | |
| 16:04:40 | efried | ...and Dan is +2. | |
| 16:11:21 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700529/ | |
| 16:11:55 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that's a different bug but okay | |
| 16:12:48 | sean-k-mooney | yes its a similar cause the _copy_resources function does create a copy and instead modifyes the stats | |
| 16:12:49 | openstackgerrit | Victor Morales proposed openstack/nova master: Update Testing NUMA documentation https://review.opendev.org/701301 | |
| 16:43:14 | stephenfin | I'm seeing a lot of failures in the nova-next job, all due to 'Multiple possible networks found, use a Network ID to be more specific.' | |
| 16:43:33 | stephenfin | I feel we have a bug open against this. Anyone know of one? | |
| 16:44:03 | artom | stephenfin, it does ring a bell... | |
| 16:50:57 | efried | stephenfin: Yeah, this cropped up again recently and was fixed again. I could dig, but probably asking in -neutron would be the fastest way to get to the bottom. | |
| 16:53:53 | stephenfin | efried: Yeah, I'll do that | |
| 16:56:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Update Testing NUMA documentation https://review.opendev.org/701301 | |
| 17:03:27 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add a placement audit command https://review.opendev.org/670112 | |
| 17:03:27 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid PlacementFixture silently swallowing kwargs https://review.opendev.org/695180 | |
| 17:21:57 | gibi | efried: added https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699050/ to my queue | |
| 17:22:09 | gibi | efried: I will look at it tomorrow morning | |
| 17:22:28 | efried | thanks gibi! | |
| 17:28:59 | mriedem | efried: since i reviewed that before, i've +2ed the latest since it lgtm, but will let someone else approve | |
| 17:29:28 | efried | mriedem: okay, cool, thank you. | |
| 17:32:44 | efried | stephenfin: in case you missed it, vTPM spec is updated as discussed earlier. But I was curious about your comment about viewing/setting the image meta props. | |
| 17:41:13 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: define boot from volume in the glossary https://review.opendev.org/699009 | |
| 18:23:54 | openstackgerrit | Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Enable loading and merging of provider configs https://review.opendev.org/693460 | |
| 18:29:09 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add a workaround config toggle to refuse ceph image upload https://review.opendev.org/657078 | |
| 18:29:33 | dansmith | efried: ^this is left over from a couple PTGs ago. You were +2 on it and I just tweaked a few things you and mriedem pointed out | |
| 18:38:14 | efried | ... | |
| 18:56:13 | efried | dansmith: pretty much ready to +2 that; if you could just respond to those couple of comments please. | |
| 18:56:28 | efried | And would prefer at least the backtick change be made. I'm here to re-look quickly. | |
| 18:59:36 | dansmith | efried: I'll fix the backticks, section naming and s/ceph/rbd. | |
| 18:59:55 | efried | cool | |
| 19:01:39 | efried | dansmith: I was referring to the suggestion of adding compute_driver=libvirt as a related option. | |
| 19:02:15 | dansmith | oh, missed that too I guess | |
| 19:02:27 | dansmith | I had made a few of these changes right when the feedback came in like a year ago | |
| 19:02:28 | efried | I don't consider that blocking, just .. yeah, wanted to make sure you had at least seen it | |
| 19:02:32 | dansmith | and then went back to finish just now, so.. | |
| 19:02:37 | efried | nbd | |
| 19:04:06 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add a workaround config toggle to refuse ceph image upload https://review.opendev.org/657078 | |
| 19:04:23 | dansmith | efried: ^ | |
| 19:07:36 | efried | dansmith: missed the rename in the reno; and while you're respinning, a quick change to the conf help. | |
| 19:08:01 | dansmith | oh doh | |
| 19:08:53 | dansmith | lol | |
| 19:09:28 | dansmith | the backticks thing I looked a line below to see if the went in or out and then didn't do what I saw | |
| 19:09:34 | efried | heh | |
| 19:09:42 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add a workaround config toggle to refuse ceph image upload https://review.opendev.org/657078 | |
| 19:09:45 | dansmith | how about this one? JEEZ | |
| 19:10:02 | efried | this is why we recommend avoiding the hard liquor during work hours. | |
| 19:10:11 | efried | Fortified wine max. | |
| 19:10:36 | efried | +2 | |
| 19:10:47 | efried | I really should have racked up some -1s for stackalytics there. | |
| 19:11:35 | dansmith | heh | |
| 19:42:20 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: move os-vif-ovs to be a non legacy job. https://review.opendev.org/701601 | |
| 19:58:30 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: optimise tempest testing https://review.opendev.org/701607 | |
| 20:21:51 | mriedem | since i got a ping, i left comments on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657078/ | |
| 20:29:41 | openstackgerrit | Victor Coutellier proposed openstack/nova master: Non-admin user can filter their instances by AZs https://review.opendev.org/701609 | |
| 20:30:43 | openstackgerrit | Victor Coutellier proposed openstack/nova master: Non-admin user can filter their instances by AZs https://review.opendev.org/701609 | |
| 20:43:49 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add a workaround config toggle to refuse ceph image upload https://review.opendev.org/657078 | |
| 20:57:39 | efried | dansmith: Remind me where it's written that microversion requires spec? I thought http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/readme.html but no | |
| 20:58:18 | dansmith | uh, on the walls? I dunno | |
| 21:05:57 | sean-k-mooney | efried: i think it was more a micorversion bump is an api change and all api changes need a spec | |
| 21:06:40 | efried | sean-k-mooney: okay, but I thought we had that documented somewhere. | |
| 21:07:34 | mriedem | it's in the template | |
| 21:07:37 | mriedem | spec template | |
| 21:07:43 | sean-k-mooney | ya i thought that was in the spec repo readme but its not | |
| 21:07:44 | efried | aha, https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/process.html#when-do-i-need-a-blueprint-vs-a-spec | |
| 21:07:46 | mriedem | and there is a doc on when new microversions are needed | |
| 21:07:46 | sean-k-mooney | oh the template | |
| 21:08:09 | efried | I like how it says you should ask the PTL. Like I would know. | |
| 21:08:34 | mriedem | also https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/blueprints.html | |
| 21:08:44 | mriedem | right at the top(ish) | |
| 21:09:56 | efried | thanks | |
| 21:10:19 | dansmith | efried: it's in the template | |
| 21:10:57 | efried | cool | |
| 21:12:12 | efried | fyi I was working on this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701609/ | |
| 21:13:49 | sean-k-mooney | ya filtering on az makes sense since the user can see what az the vm is in in a few ways | |
| 21:15:44 | efried | dansmith: I marked your bug Wishlist. Should I make it Triaged, Confirmed, Won't Fix, ...? (<== mriedem) | |
| 21:16:18 | dansmith | well, we will fix it by implementing a feature at some point, which is whyI don't really think it's a bug | |
| 21:16:24 | dansmith | wishlist and confirmed is fine with me | |
| 21:16:31 | dansmith | as is closed, rejected, etc :) | |
| 21:16:50 | efried | ack, done | |
| 21:17:31 | efried | I guess I would rather close it somehow so it doesn't clutter our bug numbers, but meh. | |
| 21:19:05 | dansmith | well, this patch doesn't fix it, so don't close it because of that.. but yeah, that's why I didn't want to open in | |
| 21:19:17 | efried | understood | |
| 21:19:28 | dansmith | you could reject it as "not a bug" and it would still fulfill the purpose of providing a link in the workaround config | |
| 21:25:13 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate base rules in favor of new rules https://review.opendev.org/701624 | |
| 21:29:10 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in Admin Action API policies https://review.opendev.org/676682 | |
| 21:30:57 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure we pass a target in admin actions https://review.opendev.org/663095 | |
| 21:41:04 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing admin_password policies https://review.opendev.org/701629 | |
| 21:43:45 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing admin_password policies https://review.opendev.org/701629 | |
| 21:52:51 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce scope_types in os-admin-password https://review.opendev.org/701630 | |
| 22:24:20 | openstackgerrit | Victor Coutellier proposed openstack/nova master: Non-admin user can filter their instances by AZs https://review.opendev.org/701609 | |