Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-11-27
16:04:23 efried sean-k-mooney: ...except that I don't think nova is yet using the placement microversion that allows a resourceless request group.
16:04:55 sean-k-mooney but at least in the prefilter case for image type or the device modeles which im addeing supprot for there are not resouce requests
16:04:58 sean-k-mooney right
16:05:02 efried So: I thought there might be some places in the nova side where we check and forbid resourceless request groups, but I don't see them on a quick skim
16:05:02 efried But: placement is going to bounce it if you try.
16:05:51 sean-k-mooney right so i woudl either have to continue to modify the flavor for the traits case so they get included in the unnumbered group
16:06:06 sean-k-mooney or we woudl need to increase the microverion we use
16:06:22 openstackgerrit Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Do not update root_device_name during guest config https://review.opendev.org/696339
16:06:44 efried which would be nbd, and we're going to want to do it very soon anyway.
16:06:55 efried but hm, I don't see which microversion added support for resourceless request groups.
16:07:18 sean-k-mooney nbd?
16:07:27 efried (no big deal)
16:07:33 sean-k-mooney oh ok cool
16:07:41 sean-k-mooney also i should be in a meeting so brb
16:07:44 efried 1.35 supports root_required, which is actually the place we should be doing traits like that.
16:08:06 sean-k-mooney ok ill read up on that
16:08:29 sean-k-mooney i just want to make sure i can refactor my stuff to work with what you are doining when i start on it again
16:09:43 efried so yeah, this appears to have happened https://docs.openstack.org/placement/latest/specs/train/implemented/2005575-nested-magic-1.html#resourceless-request-groups but I can't figure out which microversion we did it in.
16:10:10 efried ah, looks like it's part of the same_subtree microversion.
16:10:31 efried which is 1.36
16:10:40 efried but for your purposes, root_required might be better
16:11:01 efried in fact, for many things where we're currently just using the unnumbered request group, we should be using root_required instead.
16:11:16 efried that may even let gibi resolve that TODO he mentioned earlier...
16:16:02 gibi efried: interesting. It would remove the motivation (e.g. the pain) to try to do the bigger surgery discussed in the ML post linked above
16:16:17 efried pretty sure that's why we did it in the first place.
16:18:13 gibi I'am totally not against using root_required
16:18:16 gibi for the prefilters
16:24:36 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Mask the token used to allow access to consoles https://review.opendev.org/220622
16:24:37 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Extend NeutronFixture to handle multiple bindings https://review.opendev.org/696246
16:26:01 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Do not mock setup net and migrate inst in NeutronFixture https://review.opendev.org/696247
16:30:25 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support live migration with qos ports https://review.opendev.org/695905
16:30:37 efried gibi: do bw requests have traits today?
16:31:12 gibi efried: yes they have
16:31:17 gibi custom traits
16:31:53 efried cause there's a few paths that were using ResourceRequest.__init__, without processing RequestSpec.requested_resources, in order to accumulate all the traits for a request.
16:32:10 efried That seems like a hole, but one that probably doesn't matter; I need to look closer at what those traits were being used for.
16:32:17 gibi exampl of a port with resource request http://paste.openstack.org/show/786810/
16:33:18 gibi if you see a possible bug then link me to the holes and I will try to help
16:34:06 efried okay, example, isolate_aggregates collects all the traits
16:34:32 efried which means if you wanted to isolate based on a trait in a bw request, it wouldn't work before (but will once I push this "refactor")
16:36:33 gibi ohh
16:36:41 gibi what an interesting feature interaction
16:38:01 efried I guess I should cover that in test, huh.
16:39:03 gibi logically it is a bug but from end user perspective I don't see why the admin would want to isolate aggregates based on physnet or vnic type
16:39:13 efried right.
16:39:17 gibi as those are the two traits that could come today from ports
16:39:29 efried the only other example is libvirt driver accumulating cpu flags, which *should* never exist on a bw request
16:39:51 efried or an accel request?? maybe??
16:40:27 gibi yeah a bw request will not have cpu flag traits
16:43:01 openstackgerrit Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Do not update root_device_name during guest config https://review.opendev.org/696351
16:44:42 openstackgerrit Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Do not update root_device_name during guest config https://review.opendev.org/696353
16:46:25 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Process requested_resources in ResourceRequest init https://review.opendev.org/696354
16:46:38 efried gibi, stephenfin: ^
16:49:37 gibi efried: ack
17:03:31 stephenfin efried: Care to send this docs patch on its way? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686817
17:03:37 efried ...
17:04:57 stephenfin I chose you by lucky dip, if that makes you feel better
17:05:11 stephenfin I imagine it does
17:20:45 efried got it. And I was folded funny, so I got picked.
17:21:04 efried btw, '...' is "on it, please stand by".
17:21:11 efried dunno why so many people are confused by that.
17:40:55 efried stephenfin: +2, couple of typos, I'll fast approve if you want to respin for those.
17:41:26 efried afaict no conflicts on the subsequent patches, so no need to rebase them
17:43:45 efried did I miss you? :(
17:48:29 sean-k-mooney maybe ill ping him on watsap an tell him to check irc but he normally heads home around now
18:11:36 efried dansmith: do we need RPC version bump when adding a method to an OVO?
18:11:46 dansmith no
18:12:00 efried cool, thx
18:12:07 dansmith efried: if it's remotable, you need a version bump on the object, but neither affect a regular rpc interface
18:12:22 efried if the *method* is remotable?
18:12:36 dansmith only methods are remotable, so.. yes
18:12:40 efried (as opposed to the *object*, which doesn't make sense... yeah)
18:13:46 dansmith objects are sendable over rpc only if they are *registered*, but their version(s) are handled independently (and automatically) from rpc versions
18:15:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: [stable-only] Disable cinder-backup service in nova-next job https://review.opendev.org/690593
18:19:34 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Reusable RequestGroup.add_{resource|trait} https://review.opendev.org/696380
18:19:51 efried gibi, stephenfin: there's another sanity refactor ^
18:26:48 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Blast most references to nova-network https://review.opendev.org/686817
18:28:16 efried stephenfin: I went ahead and fixed up those typos and fast approved that docs patch ^
18:52:13 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: YAML file loading and schema validation https://review.opendev.org/673341
18:52:13 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Function to further validate and retrieve configs https://review.opendev.org/676029
18:52:14 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: Provider Config File: Functions to merge provider configs to provider tree https://review.opendev.org/676522
18:52:14 openstackgerrit Dustin Cowles proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Provider Config File: Enable loading and merging of provider configs https://review.opendev.org/693460
19:29:28 openstackgerrit Vladyslav Drok proposed openstack/nova master: Make removal of host from aggregate consistent https://review.opendev.org/696392
21:38:12 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Reusable RequestGroup.add_{resource|trait} https://review.opendev.org/696380
22:42:59 efried dansmith: still around?
22:43:44 efried mm, now I see where you said you were headed out early
23:05:50 openstackgerrit Vladyslav Drok proposed openstack/nova master: Make removal of host from aggregate consistent https://review.opendev.org/696392
23:17:11 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Reusable RequestGroup.add_{resource|trait} https://review.opendev.org/696380
23:17:12 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use string suffixes and provider mappings https://review.opendev.org/696418
23:17:21 efried gibi: ^ !
#openstack-nova - 2019-11-28
02:10:49 openstackgerrit Eric Xie proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add 'TYPE_PLOOP' image type. https://review.opendev.org/696435
08:13:53 openstackgerrit Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Do not update root_device_name during guest config https://review.opendev.org/696469
08:19:11 gibi efried_pto: ack, I will try to look into those refactors / enhancements while you folks having turkey
08:54:48 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove associate, disassociate network APIs https://review.opendev.org/686814
08:55:11 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove references to nova-net service from tests https://review.opendev.org/686818
09:03:29 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: So this is referencing a function that doesn't appear to exist. I assume this entire function is never being called? https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py#L274-L275
11:01:51 stephenfin wait for it
11:01:54 stephenfin wait for it...
11:02:06 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Blast final references to nova-network https://review.opendev.org/696498
11:02:07 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: nova-net: Remove final references to nova-net from functional tests https://review.opendev.org/696499

Earlier   Later