Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-11-25
19:00:41 gmann johnthetubaguy: for new policy rule added due to granularity, new name should be fine right? we decided not to change name for any existing policy - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/648480/18/nova/policies/services.py@22
19:07:38 efried kashyap: Forgive me if you've already had this argument^Wdiscussion with stephenfin, but why are we not squashing at least the three "remove MIN_*" patches into the bump patch?
19:08:23 efried to me, "do X and get rid of dead code that was made obsolete by X" counts as "one logical change".
19:10:23 efried "I did it separately as it cleanly highlights that we consciously picked those versions based on distro research. If we squash it in, the intention just gets buried in this noise." meh meh meh
19:17:10 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Remove stale BDMs on reserve_block_device_name failure https://review.opendev.org/682594
19:50:22 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Don't delete compute node, when deleting service other than nova-compute https://review.opendev.org/695383
19:50:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Add functional regression test for bug 1849409 https://review.opendev.org/690720
19:50:28 openstack bug 1849409 in OpenStack Compute (nova) rocky "openstack server list --deleted --limit -1 hangs" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1849409 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
20:33:03 dansmith artom: when I pay you to just agree with all my review comments, you're supposed to make it look non-obvious
20:37:41 artom dansmith, ok, 0. You don't pay nearly enough. 1. I only agreed on one thing. 2. I disagreed on the big thing.
20:38:42 dansmith artom: each comment was like "I agree with Dan and his bribe money, ...." :P
20:39:20 artom dansmith, either I misunderstood you, or you misunderstood me.
20:39:42 artom I thought you were saying you don't want the workaround conf option approach. I'm saying the "real" fix isn't backportable, so OK.
20:51:58 dansmith artom: no, I know
20:54:52 artom dansmith, but seriously, "subtlety" is only available in the Premium package, you need to upgrade
20:55:56 dansmith I'm calling my credit card company
20:56:58 artom *snerk*
20:57:07 artom "I'd like to charge back these bribes I made"
20:57:29 artom "Turns out corruption isn't the panacea I was hoping for."
21:00:26 dansmith sounds legit to me, I'm sure they've got my back
21:00:43 dansmith just like reporting that your dealer to the cops when he stiffed you on the dime bag
21:17:25 artom Hey man, get with the advanced countries, my dealer's *the government*
21:22:40 mriedem artom: dansmith: i've tl;dr'ed the patch, i need someone to ack on the path forward because i'm getting mixed messages on the nova changes and the os-traits change from efried
21:22:58 mriedem if it's more work than it's worth i'll just abandon all of it and let the bugs continue to get opened
21:24:00 efried what are we talking about?
21:24:48 artom mriedem, I obviously don't have +/-2 powers, but seems like a simple enough patch, so if it fixes some people's issues, don't see why not
21:25:04 artom Sure, it's not the prettiest thing I've ever seen, but... frankly, neither is most of Nova :P
21:27:12 mriedem efried: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1748697+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
21:28:17 mriedem artom: as for pretty, you try having hundreds (thousands?) of random people put their dirty fingers all over you for 10 years and see how pretty you are
21:29:04 artom mriedem, oh, I fully understand *why*
21:29:17 mriedem (apparently 989 contributors according to github)
21:30:53 mriedem i've long advocated for py black pre-commit hooks but just no one else wants it :)
21:40:35 artom Oh this is weird...
21:40:48 artom I'm triaging a downstream bug related to external events
21:41:07 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Add functional regression test for bug 1849409 https://review.opendev.org/690724
21:41:07 openstack bug 1849409 in OpenStack Compute (nova) rocky "openstack server list --deleted --limit -1 hangs" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1849409 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
21:41:07 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Fix listing deleted servers with a marker https://review.opendev.org/690725
21:41:25 artom 17:34:14.868 No waiting events found dispatching network-vif-plugged-3dccb72d-c922-4032-8f34-d7421fe2cff6
21:41:34 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add a way to exit early from a wait_for_instance_event() https://review.opendev.org/695985
21:41:36 dansmith efried: ^
21:41:40 artom 17:33:48.037
21:41:42 efried dansmith: ack
21:41:49 artom 17:33:48.037 Preparing to wait for external event network-vif-plugged-3dccb72d-c922-4032-8f34-d7421fe2cff6
21:42:10 artom So I guess something is consuming those events before?
21:42:15 artom Sorry for rubber-ducking y'all
21:43:00 dansmith artom: mriedem: remember the race-to-wait-for-event stuff with neutron and migration?
21:43:13 dansmith the patch I just pushed up would probably have helped us
21:43:13 mriedem how could i forget
21:43:15 artom dansmith, I do, but this isn't it. It's boot.
21:43:31 dansmith artom: yep, talking about that other thing
21:43:38 artom dansmith, ack, yeah
21:43:41 artom Looking
21:43:43 dansmith lots of event'n going on today
21:46:07 dansmith I don't remember the exact details of the neutron thing, but if we could have checked with one poll to see if a thing was done, we could have used this to safely be graceful about when the events show up and not lose our race-proof-ness
21:46:56 dansmith I think it was coming early for some backends, which is what this is about
21:47:00 artom dansmith, I haven't grokked your patch fully, but I'm not sure about that. We were getting the events *before* we even started waiting for them
21:47:08 dansmith right, that's what this is for
21:47:35 dansmith we're about to have a situation where for cyborg, an event could come before we're ready to wait for it
21:47:52 dansmith and we want to be able to handle that good situation (work is done before we have to stop and wait) without losing our race-proof-ness
21:51:18 artom Oh, that's your second para in the commit message
21:51:29 mriedem artom: we were getting them before we were waiting b/c the compute manager updating the port binding which trigggered the event before the driver's finish_revert_migration or whatever registered the event listener
21:51:52 mriedem so, we do control what was triggering the event
21:52:20 artom mriedem, yep
21:52:37 dansmith mriedem: I thought there was some component of it where we weren't use based on vif type if it came early or late? but maybe I'm remembering one of the reverted attempts?
21:52:44 dansmith s/use/sure/
21:52:48 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Add functional regression test for bug 1849409 https://review.opendev.org/690734
21:52:48 openstack bug 1849409 in OpenStack Compute (nova) rocky "openstack server list --deleted --limit -1 hangs" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1849409 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
21:52:48 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Fix listing deleted servers with a marker https://review.opendev.org/690735
21:53:11 mriedem we do base it on vif type or something
21:53:35 dansmith ack, well, anyway, if we _can_ get in front of it, that's better obviously
21:53:46 mriedem https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/ee25a82c2c1c12b0e290ed524e4d66b1a8a7a500/nova/compute/manager.py#L4459
21:54:43 artom (That apparently broke Midonet, for unclear reasons: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675021/)
21:59:58 mriedem can i abandon that yet?
22:00:08 mriedem if they don't care enough to pursue since oct 1 it must not be a big deal
22:02:10 artom daycare taxi time
22:03:30 mriedem done
22:04:10 mriedem you should crank up the space truckin' organ solo from made in japan for the kiddies
22:04:19 efried dansmith: Reviewed, thanks for putting that together.
22:42:54 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Update keypairs in saving an instance object https://review.opendev.org/683043
22:47:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Pick NEXT_MIN libvirt/QEMU versions for "V" release https://review.opendev.org/694821
23:41:07 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec: Ussuri: Encrypted Emulated Virtual TPM https://review.opendev.org/686804
23:42:02 efried dansmith: Simplified this ^ by restricting backup of vTPM data to only shelve and backup. Reasoning and effects are explained in the spec. It actually simplifies things considerably. I think with proper documentation, this is the happy middle ground.
#openstack-nova - 2019-11-26
00:23:50 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: doc: Update Testing document https://review.opendev.org/695995
00:59:42 openstackgerrit Guo Jingyu proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Proposal for a safer noVNC console with password authentication https://review.opendev.org/623120
01:14:05 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Do not update root_device_name during guest config https://review.opendev.org/670000
01:27:38 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-services API policies https://review.opendev.org/648480
01:34:49 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default rules and mapping in policy base class https://review.opendev.org/645452
01:35:30 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Suppress policy deprecated warnings in tests https://review.opendev.org/676670
01:36:40 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Suppress policy deprecated warnings in tests https://review.opendev.org/676670
01:37:02 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-services API policies https://review.opendev.org/648480
02:18:57 openstackgerrit Huachang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor the code path of creating instance with a NUMA topology https://review.opendev.org/688932
02:18:58 openstackgerrit Huachang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: Assign instance dedicated CPU set through `cpu_pinning` field https://review.opendev.org/688933
02:18:58 openstackgerrit Huachang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce a new instance CPU allocation policy: mixed https://review.opendev.org/688934
02:18:59 openstackgerrit Huachang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: metadata: export the vCPU IDs that are pinning on the host CPUs https://review.opendev.org/688936
02:18:59 openstackgerrit Huachang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: More tests for validating CPU policy by 'resources:PCPU' and 'resources:VCPU' https://review.opendev.org/696007
02:19:00 openstackgerrit Huachang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: support unbalanced dedicatd CPU distribution on instance NUMA nodes https://review.opendev.org/696008
02:19:00 openstackgerrit Huachang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: Create 'mixed' instance from PCPU and VCPU resources https://review.opendev.org/696009
02:38:48 openstackgerrit Eric Xie proposed openstack/nova master: Fix incorrect command examples https://review.opendev.org/695832
04:39:56 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Handle target host cross-cell cold migration in conductor https://review.opendev.org/642591
04:40:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Validate image/create during cross-cell resize functional testing https://review.opendev.org/642592

Earlier   Later