Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-11-21
23:51:05 mriedem well, just give this to whoever? https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/troubleshooting/orphaned-allocations.html
23:51:25 mriedem i wrote that b/c of all of this
23:51:46 melwitt we don't have heal_allocations yet. but I'm gonna backport it after this convo
23:51:49 mriedem help with my service delete backports
23:51:50 melwitt in queens
23:51:58 mriedem and then review my wip thing which is the last piece
23:51:58 eandersson Awesome
23:52:08 mriedem eandersson: i think she's talking about internal to rhosp
23:52:09 mriedem so you're sol
23:52:35 eandersson awh
23:52:38 melwitt yeah, I have to get these things unwedged first
23:52:56 mriedem sylvain has this audit thing he's been working on for about 3 years as well
23:53:00 melwitt and I don't know for sure whether service delete caused the issue, but I think there's a fair chance
23:53:03 mriedem between contract negotiations and skiing
23:53:24 eandersson tbh we are almost always backporting these things ourselfs, but much better to have it officially backported :p
23:53:37 mriedem eandersson: you know you could propose backports *upstream*
23:53:49 eandersson So much work to do, so little time :D
23:54:02 mriedem or at least be like, "can you guys backport x because that would be gr8 lol"
23:54:04 eandersson I am still top1 of lines contributed for U :D
23:54:11 melwitt yeah, just hang on, I got involved with these bugs within the last couple of weeks. I didn't understand them before
23:54:15 mriedem if operators speak up about needing shit we usually jump on it a bit faster
23:54:43 mriedem did you know belmiro has a dedicated line to dansmith's office?
23:55:10 eandersson I tend to backport things, but a lot of the nova backports are high complexity due to the number of changes between master and stable branches.
23:55:56 eandersson So a lot of my effort goes into projects I already understand (e.g. designate, senlin etc).
23:56:04 eandersson But I do try to report them here =]
23:56:06 melwitt all of the compute/service/host/node/RP/allocation intermingling stuff has not been my area of expertise
23:56:26 mriedem it's confusing
23:57:00 melwitt now that I have some idea wtf is going on, sure I will help with the backports and all that
23:57:34 eandersson Sometimes I wish I wasn't a manager. Would give me more time behind the keyboard. =]
#openstack-nova - 2019-11-22
00:25:42 mriedem i've seen your minions in here
00:26:04 mriedem but yes TPS reports are important
00:42:12 mriedem artom: i have a gift for you
00:42:38 mriedem and it's not even this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqY3bS6v6Wc
00:43:59 artom Back pocket then?
00:46:09 mriedem no, this: https://review.opendev.org/695609
00:47:09 mriedem oh gdi
00:47:25 artom I think you missed 'git add <new file>'
00:47:35 mriedem yup, pushing
00:47:56 mriedem gerritbot must also be dead
00:54:42 artom mriedem, thanks dude! Left some random thoughts after a quick read. Now must read bedtime story to daughter.
00:58:11 mriedem tell her the story about the dream where you thought you could change the image on a server during cold migrate
01:10:51 artom mriedem_afk, but... you can?
01:11:13 artom Isn't that why we went through that whole RUN_ON_REBUILD in the filters saga years ago?
01:11:21 artom Or am I massively confused
01:13:24 artom *facepalm* rebuild != cold migrate
02:00:21 openstackgerrit Wei Hui proposed openstack/nova master: bugfix device_type=type-PCI passthrough failed https://review.opendev.org/695416
06:39:01 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/stein: Don't delete compute node, when deleting service other than nova-compute https://review.opendev.org/695381
08:00:24 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: ZVM: Implement update_provider_tree https://review.opendev.org/694897
08:43:42 stephenfin artom: you is welcome.
09:12:38 stephenfin bauzas: Wanna take a look at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686809/ today?
09:19:37 openstackgerrit Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova master: Do not update root_device_name during guest config https://review.opendev.org/670000
09:23:52 bauzas hah
09:24:21 bauzas stephenfin: yeah you weren't around while we discussed between gibi, johnthetubaguy and others and when we agreed on a microversion as a signal
09:24:47 stephenfin I've already replied to johnthetubaguy. It doesn't make any sense
09:24:55 bauzas stephenfin: but your comment makes sense indeed
09:25:12 bauzas I'm honestly not really opionated
09:25:21 stephenfin Yeah, look at the other examples I referenced. This is what we've done in the past and I think it's correct
09:25:22 bauzas let's just move the ball running and
09:25:31 bauzas see what we can signal at the end
09:25:42 stephenfin coolness :)
09:26:04 stephenfin would be good to drag mriedem in when we get there since he's done this stuff in the past too
09:29:40 bauzas stephenfin: you were at the gym or feeding too much stuff in your mouth
09:29:57 stephenfin that does sound like me alright
09:30:38 bauzas btw. are we around Thanksgiving ?
09:30:49 bauzas channel was quiet yesterday
09:35:47 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks for the bandwidth bug report. efried: thanks for the summary mail. I will dive in
09:37:10 mlycka Hello. What's the opinion on taking another stab https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/mitaka/approved/expose-quiesce-unquiesce-api.html?
09:38:19 stephenfin bauzas: I am
09:38:25 stephenfin if that's who you're asking?
09:38:47 bauzas stephenfin: you are what ?
09:39:01 bauzas I was wondering whether it was Thanksgiving period
09:39:11 bauzas (disclaimer, it's absolutely not a thing here)
09:39:13 stephenfin Ah, I read that as are _you_ around
09:39:17 stephenfin whoops
09:39:32 bauzas but I can check the calender
09:39:45 bauzas nope, it's next week
09:39:46 bauzas sorted.
09:48:59 openstackgerrit Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova master: Do not update root_device_name during guest config https://review.opendev.org/670000
11:59:35 sean-k-mooney melwitt: the non-ironic case is because they were following our scale in docs which direct them to delete the compute service however they skipped step 1 which is remove all instances form the node first. and i guess ensure that all allocations are removed before doing the service delete
12:00:35 sean-k-mooney so they delete the compute service with vms running then the bug got filed to help them fix that and prefereabel keep the vms by migrating them.
12:00:59 sean-k-mooney so its a self inflicted failure
12:04:34 sean-k-mooney efried: gibi: by the way the downstream bug is just the bugzilla for validating support for bandwidth support. i think on ebug is being filed for triplo but we have not filed one for nova yet because i wanted to disucss what we found first to make sure what the behavior should be.
12:04:48 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Include removal of ephemeral backing files in the image cache manager https://review.opendev.org/689422
12:04:55 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "nova shared storage: rbd is always shared storage" https://review.opendev.org/682523
12:04:56 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Rename _is_storage_shared_with to _is_path_shared_with https://review.opendev.org/693337
12:05:18 gibi sean-k-mooney: agree. Right now we need to find a backportable solution (see my mail on the ML about the problems with efried's proposal)
12:05:46 gibi sean-k-mooney: for nova I will create a small spec to add the node uuid filtering capability to os-hypervisors
12:06:01 gibi sean-k-mooney: for neutron I would like to wait for the neutron folks to react
12:06:04 sean-k-mooney efried: gibi this is the downstream bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463838 fyi but let continue upstream
12:06:05 openstack bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1463838 in openstack-nova "[RFE] Guaranteed minimum bandwidth" [Urgent,On_qa] - Assigned to smooney
12:06:44 sean-k-mooney gibi: am what we need ist to be able to query it by host or hypervior host
12:06:49 sean-k-mooney not by uuid
12:07:28 gibi sean-k-mooney: my bad, yes, we need to be able to filter by service host name
12:07:33 gibi to get the node uuid
12:07:36 sean-k-mooney yep
12:08:07 sean-k-mooney we might be able to do that already we can certenly just do a hypervior show
12:08:24 sean-k-mooney and i think that will accpet the host but i need to check the hypervioru api
12:08:52 sean-k-mooney im still catching up on the mail trhead so ill comment more once i have read it
12:09:47 sean-k-mooney in terms of backport it would need to be backported to train and stein if we did backport a fix
12:10:11 sean-k-mooney but for the sepecific case we found customer should not hit it

Earlier   Later