| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-11-08 | |||
| 16:05:21 | dansmith | I believe I called that as abandonware before we merged :) | |
| 16:05:47 | mriedem | efried: i can do it in there, it just means rebasing and pushing the other 3 changes on top as well | |
| 16:05:57 | mriedem | which likely means i'll be doing rechecks | |
| 16:06:01 | efried | oh | |
| 16:06:10 | efried | then I guess fup it | |
| 16:06:24 | efried | unless it waits too long to get another +2 | |
| 16:06:50 | mriedem | yeah if i have to resolve a merge conflict obviously i'd fix there, but i'll fup for now | |
| 16:07:04 | mriedem | dansmith: you just still have s390x ptsd from your early days | |
| 16:07:27 | mriedem | remember, they were doing virtualization since before it was hip | |
| 16:07:43 | dansmith | no, I have ptsd from all of ibm's drivers | |
| 16:07:46 | melwitt | mriedem: we had to ask them to enable ssh validation bc otherwise their config drive stuff could not be tested | |
| 16:07:54 | mriedem | melwitt: ah that's right | |
| 16:08:18 | mriedem | the powervm driver in tree can at least do some things, but i haven't seen ci working for it in years | |
| 16:09:13 | mriedem | looks like maintenance of the out of tree driver has basically been farmed out https://github.com/openstack/nova-powervm/commits/master | |
| 16:14:21 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Replace time.sleep(10) with service forced_down in tests https://review.opendev.org/692252 | |
| 16:16:50 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: FUP for Ib62ac0b692eb92a2ed364ec9f486ded05def39ad https://review.opendev.org/693556 | |
| 16:20:50 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Use long_rpc_timeout in reserve_block_device_name https://review.opendev.org/693537 | |
| 16:22:06 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Convert nova-live-migration job to zuulv3 https://review.opendev.org/693364 | |
| 16:39:38 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove service_uuids_online_data_migration https://review.opendev.org/693421 | |
| 16:51:53 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: i filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761864 to track adding support for it at somepoint but its in our backlog and not prioritised yet. | |
| 16:51:53 | openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1761864 in openstack-nova "[RFE] Preemtable Instances" [High,New] - Assigned to smooney | |
| 16:52:12 | sean-k-mooney | actully that should not have an assignee | |
| 16:53:02 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: bcache is pretty stable | |
| 16:53:09 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: i have been using it for years | |
| 16:53:26 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: didn't say it wasn't | |
| 16:54:24 | sean-k-mooney | true | |
| 16:54:33 | sean-k-mooney | vs dm-cache i found bcache more flexible | |
| 16:54:39 | dansmith | yup | |
| 16:55:10 | sean-k-mooney | dm-cache also has a longer warmup time but when both caches are hot they perform about the same | |
| 16:55:35 | sean-k-mooney | the bcache dev has moved on to make a bcache file system. | |
| 16:56:26 | sean-k-mooney | bcache is still mainatined upstream in the kernel but they change there focus because tehy though it was feature complete | |
| 16:56:55 | sean-k-mooney | https://bcachefs.org/ | |
| 16:57:19 | sean-k-mooney | i would not really use ^ if you like your data yet | |
| 16:58:41 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: what was the context for the bcache disucssion? | |
| 16:58:59 | sean-k-mooney | is someone asking us to use it to cache remote volumes? | |
| 16:59:01 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: the spec proposed for volume caching | |
| 16:59:46 | sean-k-mooney | ah that might work for isci volumes | |
| 16:59:58 | sean-k-mooney | we mount those via the kernel right? | |
| 17:00:10 | sean-k-mooney | rather then natively in qemu | |
| 17:00:24 | dansmith | it won't, IMHO, because bcache requires the volumes to be a special format, AFAICT | |
| 17:00:30 | dansmith | which is in the backscroll and the comments on that spec | |
| 17:01:19 | sean-k-mooney | oh right so it did not requrie that orginally | |
| 17:01:43 | sean-k-mooney | but the current version i think require teh backing volume to be converted | |
| 17:01:49 | dansmith | their pre-merge docs all talk about it, so it's been that way for quite a while | |
| 17:01:53 | dansmith | but..yeah | |
| 17:02:17 | sean-k-mooney | well when i first used bcache a few years ago they allowed you to cache an existing volume | |
| 17:02:31 | sean-k-mooney | but they remove that as it lead to data curruption in some cases i think | |
| 17:03:14 | sean-k-mooney | the idea of having fast local storage cache network volumes does have merrit but ya its hard to get right | |
| 17:04:09 | sean-k-mooney | this spec right https://review.opendev.org/#/c/689070/2/specs/ussuri/approved/support-volume-local-cache.rst | |
| 17:05:00 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: doesn't work for multi-attach, or rbd, or the future where we use qemu-integrated iscsi, and can be done inside the guest with local ssd ephemeral disks | |
| 17:05:10 | dansmith | but yes, I understand caching and why it's desirable | |
| 17:05:20 | dansmith | yes, that's the spec | |
| 17:05:20 | sean-k-mooney | ya just looking at the spec now | |
| 17:05:47 | sean-k-mooney | a better way to arrpoch this woudl be to add a feature to qemu/libvirt | |
| 17:06:05 | sean-k-mooney | so that we could tell qemu to use a device as a cache for another | |
| 17:08:18 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: yep, but the spec is actually "sell moar intel SSDs through new feature for obscure brand new opensource caching project" | |
| 17:09:46 | sean-k-mooney | funnaily enough i just baught one of those ssds to use a a bcache device in front of the raid5 i use for my cinder lvm backend | |
| 17:10:25 | mriedem | hardware nerd alert | |
| 17:11:22 | sean-k-mooney | hehe it helps hide that my vms are on spinning rust and with random io but its not ssd speed by any means | |
| 17:11:44 | mriedem | you mean you haven't gone plaid yet? | |
| 17:12:27 | sean-k-mooney | plaid ? as in the shirt matail or intels 3d cross point | |
| 17:12:33 | sean-k-mooney | aka optane | |
| 17:12:33 | mriedem | as in spaceballs | |
| 17:12:38 | mriedem | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk7VWcuVOf0 | |
| 17:14:47 | sean-k-mooney | ha i should really watch that sometime | |
| 17:15:45 | mriedem | "emergency stop - never use" | |
| 17:15:46 | mriedem | classic | |
| 17:15:48 | mriedem | it's like software | |
| 17:58:03 | mriedem | gate bug fun https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1851871 | |
| 17:58:03 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1851871 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Functional tests intermittently fail with "TypeError: Can't upgrade a READER transaction to a WRITER mid-transaction" during service destroy" [Undecided,New] | |
| 21:16:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Use admin neutron client to see if instance has qos ports https://review.opendev.org/691900 | |
| 22:29:28 | efried | okay, where do I get a VM image I can actually do something with? | |
| 22:29:44 | efried | like run python | |
| 22:42:28 | efried | jroll: I'm off PoCing vTPM and am at the point where it would be nice to be able to run $test_program that uses one so I can tell if it's "working". Before I go trying to hack something together (and wind up not even knowing whether it's doing what it's supposed to) do you (or could you obtain/create) something easy? | |
| 22:42:38 | efried | The "hello world" of tpm | |
| #openstack-nova - 2019-11-09 | |||
| 15:08:08 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Convert nova-live-migration job to zuulv3 https://review.opendev.org/693364 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2019-11-10 | |||
| 14:29:29 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove TODOs around claim_resources_on_destination https://review.opendev.org/693635 | |
| 14:31:45 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove TODOs around claim_resources_on_destination https://review.opendev.org/693635 | |
| 14:43:51 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Resolve TODO in _remove_host_allocations https://review.opendev.org/693636 | |
| 15:47:46 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add flavor extra specs group https://review.opendev.org/663563 | |
| 19:29:27 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove TODOs around claim_resources_on_destination https://review.opendev.org/693635 | |
| 21:15:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix driver tests on Windows https://review.opendev.org/518525 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2019-11-11 | |||
| 05:30:19 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Update keypairs in saving an instance object https://review.opendev.org/683043 | |
| 06:58:52 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt:driver:Disallow AIO=native when 'O_DIRECT' is not available https://review.opendev.org/682772 | |
| 07:36:01 | openstackgerrit | ya.wang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for live migration no performance impact. https://review.opendev.org/693655 | |
| 07:38:48 | danil | hello folks. Please help me. Is there a way to get nova client through openstacksdk? I mean that I can not just use novaclient library due to dependencies. Thanks | |
| 09:46:28 | danil | hello folks. Please help me. Is there a way to get nova client through openstacksdk? I mean that I can not just use novaclient library due to dependencies. Thanks | |
| 12:47:00 | brinzhang | dansmith: efried: In nova PTG in Shanghai we talked about this spec https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663563/, and we reached the agreement on this feature, you can see ML/Etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-shanghai-ptg http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010643.html | |
| 12:47:22 | jroll | efried: I don't have anything, may be able to get something but not sure it'll be simple :) this might be a reasonable starting point: https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-tools/wiki/Getting-Started | |
| 12:47:44 | jroll | efried: if you don't like the looks of that, I can bug an expert here | |
| 12:48:00 | brinzhang | dansmith: efried: I was updated (re-write) this spec, please review again (there are -2 on it now) | |
| 13:38:39 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove TODO from ComputeTaskManager._live_migrate https://review.opendev.org/693696 | |
| 14:01:48 | Erdosip | Hy! | |
| 14:03:48 | Erdosip | I would like to investigate about CEPH multiple pool support in the same nova process.. AFAIK this is not supported now, since nova only able to use one RBD, but we would like to use multiple... Are there any technical problems with this, to implement? | |
| 14:04:43 | Erdosip | I would like to investigate about CEPH multiple pool support in the same nova process.. AFAIK this is not supported now, since nova only able to use one RBD pool, but we would like to use multiple... Are there any technical problems with this, to implement? | |
| 14:05:57 | Erdosip | (sorry, i thinked, i can edit my previous message...) | |
| 14:23:51 | mriedem | Erdosip: this is likely a better question for the openstack-discuss mailing list, tag the subject line with [nova] so it's filtered properly | |
| 14:24:11 | Erdosip | okay, thanks! | |
| 14:29:10 | sean-k-mooney | Erdosip: the only way to connect to multiple cephs form the same nova host today is via cinder today as far as i know | |
| 14:30:00 | sean-k-mooney | i dont know what it would take to support it with the rbd image backend but as mriedem says if you ask on the mailing list someone more familar with that may respond | |