Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-10-24
21:20:59 efried melwitt, mriedem: +A
21:21:08 efried I remember when we looked at this in April
21:21:15 efried good sleuthing, melwitt
21:24:44 mriedem now to start the backport train to train
21:32:59 melwitt efried: I was planning to ask in the meeting and then blanked and missed it, but some of my team mates were wondering what's the plan for the ptg with making decisions/moving things forward between the in-person attendees and those who are not able to attend? is there going to be an announcement or guideline on the ML?
21:34:05 efried melwitt: I don't anticipate any realtime coordination being possible. I had a vague plan to start picking pieces out of the etherpad and creating ML threads for them. But so far there's... not a lot there.
21:34:13 melwitt efried: I'm gonna try a wishlist bug, so you can kill the bp for now. I'll resurrect it if someone yells at me later
21:34:31 efried ack, iirc that's more or less what we decided last week.
21:35:22 efried melwitt: done
21:36:57 melwitt ok
21:45:56 zigo Heya over here!
21:46:18 zigo When upgrading to train, Octavia kept spawning instances that all went into error.
21:46:56 zigo It's all recovered, but now, I get a lot of instances which are all in error, and when I try to delete them I get:
21:46:56 zigo Failed to delete allocations for consumer 4a795a7d-3d1a-4b90-a5ce-54326ac7f26a. Error: Internal Server Error (HTTP 409) (Request-ID: req-feb5662b-1538-4d87-bb51-0812c8e31bbf)
21:47:06 zigo How can I tell nova to "just do it" ... :)
21:52:46 mriedem is placement up?
21:52:55 mriedem not sure why a 409 would be an internal server error
21:53:25 mriedem zigo: ^
21:54:09 zigo mriedem: I believe placement is *now* up, but wasn't, or shutdown during the build of these VMs in error, or even, that some record got lost in my galera nightmare ...
21:54:27 mriedem ok if placement is up now can you delete those servers?
21:55:19 zigo Oh, weird, now it looks like working ...
21:55:23 zigo Sorry for the noise.
21:55:50 mriedem yeah, need placement up to delete the server that failed to build because we're tracking resource allocations for that server against some compute node in placement
21:55:51 zigo Maybe *one* of my placement-api server is having difficulties...
21:55:59 mriedem if you just force it you screw up the resource tracking in plcaement
21:56:21 zigo Right.
21:56:28 zigo I'll investigate further ...
21:59:43 melwitt efried: would you expect things to go something like this, 1) efried creates ML threads for topics, 2) ppl weigh in on replies, 3) ptg in-person discussion happens, 4) ptg in-person ppl reply on ML threads, 5) further ML replies from all and work toward agreement on ML?
22:03:35 zigo Yeah, looks like my placement-api on controler #3 is always doing HTTP 500 ... :)
22:04:14 efried melwitt: yeah, something like that
22:05:07 efried where realistically based on past experience I don't expect 2 or 4 or 5 to happen, and anything discussed in 3 will get completely reversed as soon as certain people are paying attention.
22:05:21 efried which is why I haven't been super motivated to start the process.
22:05:38 efried also, efried doesn't have to be the one to initiate 1
22:05:46 efried so if you have something you want to air, I encourage you to do that.
22:09:23 melwitt efried: understood, thanks. I'll let my team know and encourage them to start ML threads if they want to kick off some discussion
22:10:43 efried Cool. I guess it wouldn't hurt for me to send a primer email to that effect as well.
22:11:08 mriedem i promise i won't certain people it up
22:11:40 mriedem my reply to all post-ptg decisions will be "lol lgtm!"
22:20:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/train: Revert "vif: Resolve a TODO and update another" https://review.opendev.org/690126
22:21:04 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/train: Add functional regression test for bug 1849409 https://review.opendev.org/690710
22:21:04 openstack bug 1849409 in OpenStack Compute (nova) train "openstack server list --deleted --limit -1 hangs" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1849409 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
22:29:02 efried melwitt: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-October/010363.html
22:29:39 efried mriedem: a naked +1 will suffice.
22:29:51 melwitt efried: cool, thank you
22:33:37 mriedem naked what now?
22:35:18 mriedem melwitt: speaking of your teammates, lee would probably be grateful if you took a look at this simple bug fix https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682622/
22:35:51 melwitt mriedem: already reviewing it brah!
22:36:35 mriedem i do respect you bro
22:36:45 melwitt I'm glad
22:37:36 mriedem that was a reference to the bro down that happened in here the other day, may have been early
22:37:39 melwitt hah, of course that was a reference
22:38:00 mriedem there was a lot of territory markings going on
22:38:21 dansmith still reeks of piss in here
22:39:15 mriedem dansmith: so i've got your cache_images notification test done, just trying to figure out how to get those samples hacked into the docs
22:39:42 dansmith mriedem: good work, mr. iedeman
22:39:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/train: Fix listing deleted servers with a marker https://review.opendev.org/690711
22:39:55 melwitt https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8dMXyJJwUA
22:40:14 dansmith melwitt: that was pasted peri-bro-down
22:40:17 dansmith you must've missed it
22:40:22 melwitt I did miss it
22:40:35 dansmith but it looked JUST like that, so you're caught yp
22:41:46 melwitt perfect
22:44:33 mriedem aha
22:52:33 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add notification sample test for aggregate.cache_images.start|end https://review.opendev.org/691129
22:52:34 mriedem dansmith: there you go ^
23:31:31 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add new policy rule for viewing host status UNKNOWN https://review.opendev.org/679181
#openstack-nova - 2019-10-25
04:11:38 VedaAnnayappa hi
04:11:52 VedaAnnayappa I need help with tempest test bed.
04:17:35 VedaAnnayappa is there any impact on nova testcases in py37?
05:36:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug 1824435 https://review.opendev.org/688205
05:36:10 openstack bug 1824435 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "fill_virtual_interface_list migration fails on second attempt" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1824435 - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt)
10:28:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Ignore volume exceptions during post_live_migration https://review.opendev.org/682622
10:33:16 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: Ignore volume exceptions during post_live_migration https://review.opendev.org/691281
10:33:40 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: libvirt: Ignore volume exceptions during post_live_migration https://review.opendev.org/691282
10:34:07 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: libvirt: Ignore volume exceptions during post_live_migration https://review.opendev.org/691283
10:34:25 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: libvirt: Ignore volume exceptions during post_live_migration https://review.opendev.org/691284
11:22:49 sean-k-mooney aspiers: are you around for a quick question about amd cpus and openstack
11:24:29 sean-k-mooney aspiers: mainly have you tried to use cpu pinning and have you turned on SMT/hyperthreading when useing openstack? if so did it all just work fine? im ignoring the slighly dumb numa topology of eypc gen 1.
11:26:35 sean-k-mooney aspiers: i have no reason to belive that nova will need any modifcation to work with amd eypc cpu for normal vms but im closing a ticket downstream saying i am happy to rely on the testing done by libvirt and qemu in this area.
13:34:16 mriedem gibi: do you think you'll be able to get to these today? https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/support-move-ops-with-qos-ports-ussuri+status:open
13:35:02 ygk_12345 hi all
13:35:23 ygk_12345 can someone point me to any resource in understanding the code for nova wsgi.py file ?
13:35:35 gibi mriedem: if I don't have to solve the rollback of the parent_ifname ugliness there then yes I can fix your comments to clean up the patches
13:36:05 mriedem yeah i'm not asking for that
13:36:26 gibi mriedem: OK, then I will go and fix those patches up
13:45:27 mriedem ygk_12345: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-October/010307.html may be helpful
13:49:15 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: [Trivial] Add missing ws between words https://review.opendev.org/689921
13:57:22 mriedem lyarwood: very weird that your stein backport fails pep8 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691282/ for an unused variable but it didn't on master or train,
13:57:28 mriedem something must have changed since train with flake8 rules
13:59:09 mriedem my guess would be something due to https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/3e65f778bdb51e2cf0693f4e9b1b4539ea5c294c#diff-b91f3d5bd63fcd17221b267e851608e8
14:01:50 lyarwood mriedem: what the flying friday
14:01:59 mriedem pycodestyle doesn't check for F841
14:02:02 mriedem https://pycodestyle.readthedocs.io/en/latest/intro.html#error-codes
14:03:51 mriedem stephenfin: ^
14:04:54 sean-k-mooney mriedem: stephenfin is currently in japan watching the rugby world cup
14:05:01 mriedem yeah i know he's not around
14:06:13 bbobrov dansmith: hi, i will be fixing amd sev code
14:10:34 mriedem lyarwood: if you're able it would be good to move forward on these rocky backports today https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/rocky+label:Code-Review=2
14:10:50 mriedem because those are also in queens https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/queens
14:13:56 lyarwood mriedem: yup stuck in calls for a while but I'll take a look once I'm out

Earlier   Later