Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-09-16
23:05:37	efried	mriedem, logan-: Howza ^
23:05:46	mriedem	"other vertical"? someone get this guy a c-suite office
23:06:00	mriedem	efried: it's dinner o'clock for me
23:06:03	efried	me too
23:06:26	sean-k-mooney	its tuesday for me so im going to sleep soon o/
23:07:35	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Try to repro bug 1823251 with mysql logs https://review.opendev.org/678051
23:07:36	openstack	bug 1823251 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Spike in TestNovaMigrationsMySQL.test_walk_versions/test_innodb_tables failures since April 1 2019 on limestone-regionone" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1823251
23:11:19	alex_xu	whatever that is worth to celebrate :)
#openstack-nova - 2019-09-17
00:16:05	alex_xu	efried: updated https://review.opendev.org/682509
00:17:02	zzzeek	logan-: not something ive seen before, https://dba.stackexchange.com/a/19139/81161 seems to have the best info
00:17:10	zzzeek	max_packet_size
00:19:22	openstackgerrit	Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Track user_id/project_id for migrations https://review.opendev.org/682511
00:20:04	openstackgerrit	Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Track user_id/project_id for migrations https://review.opendev.org/682511
00:38:15	openstackgerrit	Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Track user_id/project_id for migrations https://review.opendev.org/682511
00:45:31	openstackgerrit	Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add the maximum train flag in api version history https://review.opendev.org/682513
01:41:37	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Follow up for the bandwidth series https://review.opendev.org/682389
01:41:44	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Remove redundancies from AggregateRequestFiltersTest.setUp https://review.opendev.org/682475
01:42:11	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: doc: mark the max microversion for train https://review.opendev.org/681982
01:56:58	openstackgerrit	hutianhao27 proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "nova shared storage: rbd is always shared storage" https://review.opendev.org/682523
02:44:57	openstackgerrit	ya.wang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix typo of cpu model when check CPU compatibility https://review.opendev.org/682267
05:16:56	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Centralize volume create code during boot from volume https://review.opendev.org/682378
06:20:23	openstackgerrit	Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/nova master: Fix live migration break group policy simultaneously https://review.opendev.org/651969
07:14:00	bauzas	good morning Nova
07:18:53	gibi	good morning bauzas
07:43:22	bauzas	gibi: any change you wanna stuff me in ?
07:59:37	gibi	bauzas: nothing open at the moment I'm working on to fix mriedem's comments in the bug fix https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666857/
07:59:52	bauzas	ack, saw iy
07:59:54	bauzas	it*
08:00:01	gibi	bauzas: I will ping you if that rework is ready
08:01:00	bauzas	++
08:01:56	gibi	bauzas: do you have something I need to look at?
08:02:28	bauzas	gibi: not atm, still fixing some tests for the placement audit
08:06:43	openstackgerrit	Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up orphan instances virt driver https://review.opendev.org/648912
08:06:43	openstackgerrit	Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: clean up orphan instances https://review.opendev.org/627765
08:23:53	openstackgerrit	Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Error out interrupted builds https://review.opendev.org/666857
09:41:12	openstackgerrit	Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Remove stale BDMs on reserve_block_device_name failure https://review.opendev.org/682594
11:15:52	openstackgerrit	Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: DNM libvirt: extract _start_heterogeneous_computes https://review.opendev.org/682620
11:15:53	openstackgerrit	Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug #1843639 https://review.opendev.org/682621
11:15:54	openstack	bug 1843639 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "libvirt: post_live_migration failures to disconnect volumes result in the rollback of live migrations" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1843639
11:15:54	openstackgerrit	Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Ignore volume exceptions during post_live_migration https://review.opendev.org/682622
11:35:22	openstackgerrit	Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Error out interrupted builds https://review.opendev.org/666857
11:57:49	openstackgerrit	Ivaylo Mitev proposed openstack/nova master: VMware VMDK detach: get adapter type from instance VM https://review.opendev.org/653738
11:58:19	openstackgerrit	Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Parse the 'os' element from domainCapabilities https://review.opendev.org/673790
11:58:20	openstackgerrit	Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add methods to detect firmware auto-selection and SB https://review.opendev.org/682627
11:58:20	openstackgerrit	Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Methods to handle request for Secure Boot & non-Q35 machine types https://review.opendev.org/682628
12:01:38	gibi	mriedem, bauzas: comments fixed i https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666857
12:05:41	stephenfin	efried: Are we ever going to be able to merge a patch again? :D
12:10:46	kashyap	(And remove needless compat code; we should have much less of it, though, as we've already cleaned up a good chunk of it a few months.)
12:17:25	efried	stephenfin: appears this time it was mirror problems. But yeah, the gods really seem to hate that top pmem patch.
12:17:52	efried	stephenfin: though mriedem and I fixed a regression from the forbidden aggs series which was causing a bunch of our failures.
12:18:11	stephenfin	o rly? link?
12:18:12	efried	now if we could just kill the innodb bug
12:18:28	efried	stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682475/
12:18:57	efried	also a couple WIPs to poison multiple sched services from starting.
12:19:23	sean-k-mooney	kashyap: didnt we already bump to a minium of 3.0 earlier in the cycle
12:19:28	efried	https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682485/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682486/
12:20:00	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: We picked for Train, but we didn't pick anything for U release and gave a heads-up to the operators.
12:20:23	stephenfin	kashyap: It's not too late to do that though, right?
12:20:29	stephenfin	given that Train hasn't gone out
12:21:02	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: No, not late :-) I just wanted to write it out loud, so I feel compelled to do it :D
12:21:45	kashyap	I mean, stephenfin ^
12:22:43	sean-k-mooney	kashyap: we dont need to actully pick before we do the relaease. we can do it in early U
12:23:41	kashyap	stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: Right. But the thing is - we didn't bump the version we said we will bump for Train
12:24:14	kashyap	We gave heads-up to bump Train to these:
12:24:14	kashyap	+NEXT_MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION = (4, 0, 0)
12:24:14	kashyap	+NEXT_MIN_QEMU_VERSION = (2, 11, 0)
12:24:28	kashyap	... in Sep 2018 (commit: 489b5f762e2c828354362667cd647086dc4eed60)
12:25:01	stephenfin	kashyap: Sounds like something you might want to bring up at the team meeting
12:25:04	kashyap	stephenfin: Think we're too late to do _that_, I suppose -- as people don't like the bump at the end of the release
12:25:31	kashyap	stephenfin: Yeah, I take full accountability of not doing it in time earlier in the release :-( Just dropped through the cracks
12:26:03	shilpasd	Eric: mriedem: thanks for setUp cleanup https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682475/
12:26:30	kashyap	stephenfin: Ah, the meeting is today
12:26:52	sean-k-mooney	kashyap: i pesonally dont like that how we do the bumps in general.
12:26:56	kashyap	stephenfin: My guess: Matt(R) will (correctly) dislike it...
12:27:16	sean-k-mooney	but as i said we can bump early in U
12:27:29	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: Like how we announce up ahead what we'll bump in the next release, and actually bump in the said release?
12:27:37	kashyap	Any alternatives welcome :-)
12:27:49	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: Yes, early U is fine. We've done such a thing before
12:27:54	efried	shilpasd: yw, that would have been a tough one to spot
12:32:44	sean-k-mooney	anyway there have been several realses in the past were we did not bump
12:32:52	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: While I have you here, can I borrow you brain for a bit more on an unrelated thing...
12:32:56	sean-k-mooney	in fact i woudl say it more common not too looking at the table
12:33:16	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: Yep, indeed...
12:33:26	sean-k-mooney	sure
12:33:59	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: It's the Secure Boot-related scaffolding code - I have some sketch here (and the next patch): https://review.opendev.org/682627
12:34:02	kashyap	(No tests yet, mind you)
12:34:14	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: Just want a different pair of eyes; as I'm feeling weary
12:35:24	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: The design refresher for detecting firmware auto-selection and SB-enabled OVMF is in the above commit message
12:35:30	sean-k-mooney	no test oh easy -1 the :)
12:35:31	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: Might want to read it, when you have a block of time
12:35:34	kashyap	:D
12:35:44	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: It's Workflow -1 already
12:36:42	kashyap	Actually, I used that commit message as "documentation" (as some of that should - I will - be added in documentation)
12:36:49	sean-k-mooney	so we need to eventually talk about the inter for use get_domain_caps
12:36:57	sean-k-mooney	domain_caps = self.get_domain_capabilities()
12:36:59	sean-k-mooney	for arch in domain_caps:
12:37:01	sean-k-mooney	for machine_type in domain_caps[arch]:
12:37:07	sean-k-mooney	i have see that way to much
12:37:09	kashyap	sean-k-mooney: Also, see the "Firmware auto-detection in action" part in the message
12:37:18	kashyap	Hmm

Earlier   Later